Evaluation of occlusal caries detection and assessment by visual inspection, digital bitewing radiography and near-infrared light transillumination
- 360 Downloads
This study compared the diagnostic outcomes of visual inspection (VI), digital bitewing radiography (BWR), and near-infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT, DIAGNOcam, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) for occlusal caries detection and assessment of posterior teeth.
Participants and methods
This study included 203 patients (mean age 23.0 years). All individuals received a meticulous VI. Additionally, BWR and NIR-LT images were collected. All BWR and NIR-LT images were blindly evaluated for the presence of enamel caries lesions (ECLs) and dentin caries lesions (DCLs). The descriptive statistical analyses included calculation of frequencies, cross tabulations, and pairwise comparisons using Pearson chi-square tests.
The majority of ECLs/DCLs were detected by VI in this low-risk adult population. The additional diagnostic outcomes in terms of ECLs/DCLs amounted to 5.0% (BWR) and 6.8% (NIR-LT). The combined usage of VI/NIR-LT or VI/BWR identified 95.7 and 94.4% of all ECLs/DCLs on occlusal surfaces, respectively.
This comparative diagnostic study showed that VI detected the majority of occlusal caries lesions. Both additional methods showed limited benefits. Due to the valuable features of NIR-LT, i.e., X-ray freeness and clinical practicability, this method might be preferred over X-ray-based methods. Nevertheless, BWRs should be prescribed in clinical situations where insufficient fillings or multiple (deep) caries lesions are diagnosed or where there is a need to assess the caries extension in relation to the pulp.
VI has to be understood as caries detection method of choice on occlusal surfaces in low-risk adult population which may help to avoid multiple diagnostic testing, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment.
KeywordsOcclusal caries Dentin caries Caries detection Caries diagnostics Near-infrared light transillumination DIAGNOcam
The study team would like to thank all the participants for their support.
There was no grant support or funding for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich (project number 013-12).
Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2012) Dental radiographic examinations: recommendations for patient selection and limiting radiation exposure. http://www.ada.org/en/member-center/oral-health-topics/x-raysGoogle Scholar
- 6.European Commission. Radiation protection 136. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004Google Scholar
- 11.Chung S, Fried D, Staninec M, Darling CL (2011) Near infrared imaging of teeth at wavelengths between 1200 and 1600 nm. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 7884 pii: 78840XGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hall A, Girkin JM (2004) A review of potential new diagnostic modalities for caries lesions. J Dent Res 83 (Spec Issue No C):C89-C94Google Scholar
- 18.Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP et al for the STARD Group (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 326:41–44Google Scholar
- 19.WHO (1997) Oral health surveys. Basic methods. 4th edition. Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pitts NB (2009) Detection, assessment, diagnosis and monitoring of caries. Monographs in Oral Science, Vol. 21. Basel: S. Karger AGGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kühnisch J, Goddon I, Berger S, Senkel H, Bücher K, Oehme T, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R (2009) Development, methodology and potential of the new universal visual scoring system (UniViSS) for caries detection and diagnosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:2500–2509CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.R Development Core Team (2008) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
- 26.Heinrich-Weltzien R, Kühnisch J, Weerheijm K, Stößer L (2001) Diagnostik der versteckten Okklusalkaries mit Bissflügel-Aufnahmen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:476–480Google Scholar
- 31.Jordan R, Micheelis W (2016) Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie (DMS V) Köln: Deutscher Zahnärzte VerlagGoogle Scholar