The evaluation of MTA and Biodentine as a pulpotomy materials for carious exposures in primary teeth
- 373 Downloads
This study examined the effects of MTA and Biodentine on the clinical and radiographic success rates of pulpotomies performed on primary teeth with carious pulp exposures.
Materials and methods
This study was conducted with 44 mandibular primary molars requiring vital pulpotomy. Carious dentin surrounding the exposure site was used as the inclusion criteria for all teeth, which were randomly divided into two groups according to pulpotomy material [MTA group (n = 24), Biodentine group (n = 20)]. Treatment was followed up clinically and radiologically for 24 months. Pulp canal obliteration was not regarded as a failure.
Clinical and radiographic success rates at the end of 24 months were 100% for the MTA group and 89.4% for the Biodentine group. Success rates did not vary significantly between the groups (p = 0.646). Pulp canal obliteration was observed in two teeth (8.3%) in the MTA group at 6 months, but the teeth were found to be stabilized by 24 months.
The long-term clinical and radiographic success rates obtained in this study indicate that both MTA and Biodentine are appropriate options for pulpotomy treatment of primary teeth with carious exposure in patients whose teeth should be retained for long periods of time.
The etiology of exposure determines pulpal response, making it crucial to distinguish between mechanical and carious exposures. The carious exposure is presumed to be accompanied by severe inflammation, which makes the prognosis of treatment unpredictable. Biomaterials can be used especially in cases with carious pulp exposures.
KeywordsCarious exposure Primary teeth Vital pulpotomy Mineral trioxide aggregate Biodentine
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their parents included in the study.
- 3.American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Reference Manual 15/16. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. http://www.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/g_pulp.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2016
- 4.Starkey P (1968) The management of deep caries and pulpally involved teeth in children. In: Goldman HM Current therapy in dentistry, vol.: 3, St Louis: Mosby. Chapter 41. p.:896–941Google Scholar
- 7.Camp JH (2008) Diagnosis dilemmas in vital pulp therapy: treatment for the toothache is changing, especially in young, immature teeth. Review. Pediatr Dent 30:197–205Google Scholar
- 13.Sönmez D, Durutürk L (2010) Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns. Br Dent J 208: E18, E18; discussion 409Google Scholar
- 17.Niranjani K, Prasad MG, Vasa AA, Divya G, Thakur MS, Saujanya K (2015) Clinical evaluation of success of primary teeth pulpotomy using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (®), Laser and Biodentine(TM)—an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res 9:35–37Google Scholar
- 21.Fuks AB (2008) Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. Pediatr Dent 30:211–219Google Scholar
- 26.Akçay M, Sari S (2014) The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 36:316–321Google Scholar
- 31.Shayegan A, Jurysta C, Atash R, Petein M, Abbeele AV (2012) Biodentine used as a pulp-capping agent in primary pig teeth. Pediatr Dent 34:e202–e208Google Scholar
- 33.Agamy HA, Bakry NS, Mounir MM, Avery DR (2004) Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 26:302–309Google Scholar
- 35.Doyle TL, Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, Judd PL (2010) Mineral trioxide aggregate produces superior outcomes in vital primary molar pulpotomy. Pediatr Dent 32:41–47Google Scholar
- 37.Liu H, Zhou Q, Qin M (2011) Mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary molars. Chin J Dent Res 14:121–125Google Scholar
- 41.Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB (2001) Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 23:15–18Google Scholar
- 43.Maroto M, Barbería E, Vera V, García-Godoy F (2007) Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp dressing agent in pulpotomy treatment of primary molars: 42-month clinical study. Am J Dent 20:283–286Google Scholar