Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 539–550 | Cite as

Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival graft: a histological evaluation and split-mouth randomized clinical trial

  • Daniel Romeu Benchimol de Resende
  • Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi
  • Aline Franco Siqueira
  • César Augusto Magalhães Benfatti
  • Carla Andreotti Damante
  • Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti ZangrandoEmail author
Original Article
  • 255 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

This split-mouth controlled randomized clinical trial evaluated clinical and histological results of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADM) compared to autogenous free gingival graft (FGG) for keratinized tissue augmentation.

Material and methods

Twenty-five patients with the absence or deficiency of keratinized tissue (50 sites) were treated with FGG (control group) and ADM (test group). Clinical parameters included keratinized tissue width (KTW) (primary outcome), soft tissue thickness (TT), recession depth (RD), probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL). Esthetic perception was evaluated by patients and by a calibrated periodontist using visual analog scale (VAS). Histological analysis included biopsies of five different patients from both test and control sites for each evaluation period (n = 25). The analysis included percentage of connective tissue components, epithelial luminal to basal surface ratio, tissue maturation, and presence of elastic fibers. Data were evaluated by ANOVA complemented by Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05).

Results

After 6 months, PD and CAL demonstrated no differences between groups. ADM presented higher RD compared to FGG in all periods. Mean tissue shrinkage for control and test groups was 12.41 versus 55.7%. TT was inferior for ADM group compared to FGG. Esthetics perception by professional evaluation showed superior results for ADM. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated higher percentage of cellularity, blood vessels, and epithelial luminal to basal surface ratio for FGG group. ADM group presented higher percentage of collagen fibers and inflammatory infiltrate.

Conclusions

Both treatments resulted in improvement of clinical parameters, except for RD. ADM group presented more tissue shrinkage and delayed healing, confirmed histologically, but superior professional esthetic perception.

Clinical relevance

This study added important clinical and histological data to contribute in the decision-making process between indication of FGG or ADM.

Keywords

Gingival recession Mucogingival surgery Grafts Acellular dermal Gingiva 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by a grant (#99/09834-2) from FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation).

The work was supported by the Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics of Bauru School of Dentistry- University of São Paulo, Brazil.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

784_2018_2470_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3.1 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 3167 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Björn H (1963) Free transplantation of gingiva propria. Odont Revy 14:323Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sullivan HC, Atkins JH (1968) Free autogenous gingival grafts. I. Principles of successful grafting. Periodontics 6:121–129Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zuhr O, Bäumer D, Hürzeler M (2014) The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol 41(Suppl. 15):S123–S142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ouhayoun JP, Sawaf MH, Goffaux JC, Etienne D, Forest N (1988) Re-epithelialization of a palatal connective tissue graft transplanted in a non-keratinized alveolar mucosa: a histological and biochemical study in humans. J Periodont Res 23:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall WB, Lundergan WP (1993) Free gingival grafts. Current indications and techniques. Dent Clin N Am 37:227–242Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wei P, Laurell L, Geivelis M, Lingen MW, Maddalozzo D (2000) Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. J Periodontol 71:1297–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartolucci EG (1981) A clinical evaluation of freeze-dried homologous dura mater as a periodontal free graft material. Study in humans. J Periodontol 52:354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP (2005) Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol 76:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scarano A, Barros RR, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Novaes AB Jr (2009) Acellular dermal matrix graft for gingival augmentation: a preliminary clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation. J Periodontol 80:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jhaveri HM, Chavan MS, Tomar GB, Deshmukh VL, Wani MR, Miller PD Jr (2010) Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study. J Periodontol 81:616–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agarwal C, Tarun Kumar AB, Mehta DS (2015) Comparative evaluation of free gingival graft and AlloDerm(®) in enhancing the width of attached gingival: a clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 6:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wei P, Laurell L, Lingen MW, Geivelis M (2002) Acellular dermal matrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 2. A histological comparative study. J Periodontol 73:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gapski R, Parks CA, Wang H (2005) Acellular dermal matrix for mucogingival surgery: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol 76:1814–1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harris RJ (2001) Clinical evaluation of 3 techniques to augment keratinized tissue without root coverage. J Periodontol 72:932–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borghetti A, Gardella JP (1990) Thick gingival autograft for the coverage of gingival recession: a clinical evaluation. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 10:217–229Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Callan DP, Silverstein LH (1998) Use of acellular dermal matrix for increasing keratinized tissue around teeth and implants. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 10:731–734Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caffesse RG, Carraro JJ, Carranza FA (1972) Free gingival grafts in dogs, a clinical-histological study (Spanish). Rev Assoc Odont Argent 60:465–470Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dordick B, Coslet JG, Seibert JS (1976) Clinical evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts placed on alveolar bone. J Periodontol 47:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soehren SE, Allen AL, Cutright DE, Seibert JS (1973) Clinical and histologic studies of donor tissues utilized for free grafts of masticatory mucosa. J Periodontol 44:727–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shulman J (1996) Clinical evaluation of an acellular dermal allograft for increasing the zone of attached gingival. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 8:201–208Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silverstein LH, Duarte F (1998) Use of an acellular dermal allograft for soft-tissue augmentation. Dent Implantol Updat 9:61–64Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dorfman HS, Kennedy J, Bird WC (1982) Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. J Periodontol 53:349–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fagan F, Freeman E (1974) Clinical comparison of the free gingival graft and partial thickness apically positioned flap. J Periodontol 45:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ward VJ (1974) A clinical assessment of the use of the free gingival graft for correcting localized recession associated with frenal pull. J Periodontol 45:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Agudio G, Chambrone L, Prato GP (2017) Biologic remodeling of periodontal dimensions of areas treated with gingival augmentation procedure (GAP). A 25-year follow-up observation. J Periodontol 88:634–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chambrone L, Tatakis DN (2016) Long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 87:796–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, Heinecke A (2000) Thickness of mastigatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol 27:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oliver RC, Karring HL (1968) Microscopic evaluation of the healing and revascularization of free gingival grafts. J Periodontol 3:84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karring T, Lang NP, Löe H (1975) The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiation. J Periodontol Res 10:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karring T, Östergaard E, Löe H (1971) Conservation of tissue specificity after heterotopic transplantation of gingival and alveolar mucosa. J Periodontol Res 6:282–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Esposito P, D'Archivio D, Lisanti L, Di Luccio A et al (2002) Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative 1 year clinical study. J Periodontol 73:1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harris JR (1998) Root coverage with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft and an acellular dermal matrix graft: a clinical and histological evaluation of a case report. J Periodontol 69:1305–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Romeu Benchimol de Resende
    • 1
  • Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi
    • 2
  • Aline Franco Siqueira
    • 1
  • César Augusto Magalhães Benfatti
    • 3
  • Carla Andreotti Damante
    • 2
  • Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti Zangrando
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.BauruBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of DentistryUniversity of Sao PauloBauruBrazil
  3. 3.Department of DentistryFederal University of Santa Catarina, UFSCFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations