Clinical investigation of gustatory and neurosensory alterations following mandibular third molar surgery: an observational prospective study
- 40 Downloads
This study aimed to prospectively observe gustatory and neurosensory alterations following surgical removal of mandibular third molars.
Material and methods
A prospective clinical study was conducted with patients who required mandibular third molar extraction, recruited from the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the Federal University of Ceará (Brazil). Age, sex, and radiographic signs were recorded. The outcome variables were the presence or absence of gustatory and neurosensory alterations. The patients were observed preoperatively and at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively by using gustatory and neurosensory tests.
The response to sweet (p = 0.509) and sour (p = 0.078) stimulus did not alter significantly over time. The salty threshold significantly increased from the preoperative to 7- and 30-day postoperative periods, returning to baseline values at 90 days postoperatively (p = 0.038). The bitter threshold increased significantly from the preoperative to 7-day postoperative period, returning to baseline values at 30 days after surgery (p < 0.001). Regarding neurosensory evaluation, there was an altered response to stimulus at 7 days postoperatively in specific studied areas, returning to baseline values 30 days after surgery (p < 0.05).
The present study shows that mandibular third molar removal was associated with slight sensory disturbances related to mechanical, tactile, and gustatory perception. Regarding the recovery period, all patients returned to normal function without intervention, over a period ranging from 30 to 90 days.
This study highlighted the importance of a sensory evaluation following removal of third molars, notably regarding mechanical perception and gustatory threshold assessment.
KeywordsNeurosensory testing Peripheral nerve injuries Third molars Wisdom tooth
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Walter Cantídio University Hospital (WCUH) No. 983. 983.130130 and was held in accordance with the Helsinki statements.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Blondeau F, Daniel NG (2007) Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc 73(4):325Google Scholar
- 11.Westermark A, Englesson L, Bongenhielm U (1999) Neurosensory function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: a comparison between subjective evaluation and objective assessment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 14(4):268–275Google Scholar
- 12.Harvey WS, Phillips CL, Essick GK (2001) Neurosensory impairment and patient perception of recovery following orthognathic surgery [abstract]. J Dent Res 80(1_suppl):178Google Scholar
- 16.de Melo Albert DG, Gomes AC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, de Oliveira e Silva ED, Holanda GZ (2006) Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(7):1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Dal Pont G (1961) Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 19:42–47Google Scholar
- 22.Pell GJ, Gregory BT (1933) Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest 39:330–338Google Scholar
- 23.Winter GB (1926) Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted mandibular third molar; a complete treatise on the operative technic with clinical diagnoses and radiographic interpretations. American Medical Book Company, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
- 24.Costa FWG, Fontenele EHL, Bezerra TP, Ribeiro TR, Carneiro BGDS, Soares ECS (2013) Correlation between radiographic signs of third molar proximity with inferior alveolar nerve and postoperative occurrence of neurosensory disorders: a prospective, double-blind study. Acta Cir Bras 28:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Monnazzi MS, Real-Gabrielli MF, Passeri LA, Gabrielli MA (2012) Cutaneous sensibility impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: a prospective clinical study of the spontaneous recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(3):696–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Bartoshuk L (1989) Clinical evaluation of the sense of taste. Ear Nose Throat J 68(4):331–337Google Scholar
- 31.Costa FW, Soares EC, Esses DF, Silva PG, Bezerra TP, Scarparo HC, Ribeiro TR, Fonteles CS (2015) A split-mouth, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study to analyze the pre-emptive effect of etoricoxib 120 mg on inflammatory events following removal of unerupted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(9):1166–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Albuquerque AFM, Fonteles CSR, do Val DR, Chaves HV, Bezerra MM, Pereira KMA, de Barros Silva PG, de Lima BB, Soares ECS, Ribeiro TR, Costa FWG (2017) Effect of pre-emptive analgesia on clinical parameters and tissue levels of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta in third molar surgery: a triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(12):1615–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Anand R, Shankar DP, Manodh P, Devadoss P, Aparna M, Neelakandan RS (2018) Short-term evaluation of gustatory changes after surgical removal of mandibular third molar-a prospective randomized control trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76(2):258–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar