Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1439–1448 | Cite as

Interaction between chlorhexidine and fluoride in a mouthrinse solution—a 4-day and 6-week randomized clinical pilot study

  • Oscar Villa
  • Per Ramberg
  • Hidekazu Fukui
  • Claes-Göran Emilson
  • Georgios Papanikolaou
  • Lars Heijl
  • Dowen Birkhed
Original Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the present investigation was to study if there is a reduced clinical effect and fluoride retention of a mouthrinse solution containing both chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium fluoride (NaF).

Material and methods

Two clinical trials were designed as double-blind, randomized, cross-over studies. In study I, 16 healthy subjects were asked to rinse twice daily for 1 min during 4 days of no tooth brushing with four solutions: (1) 0.12% CHX + 0.2% NaF, (2) 0.2% NaF, (3) 0.12% CHX, and (4) placebo. In study II, another 16 healthy subjects rinsed with the same four solutions twice daily after tooth brushing during a 6-week period. Plaque formation, gingivitis, and microbiological samples from plaque and saliva, as well as fluoride retention, were analyzed.

Results

Both studies showed that both CHX + NaF and CHX mouthrinses had the same clinical effect with regards to plaque formation and microflora in plaque and saliva. Similarly, fluoride retention was not altered by the CHX + NaF mouthrinse compared to the NaF solution.

Conclusion

The combination of CHX and NaF in a mouthrinse showed the same clinical effect as the CHX solution. The retention of fluoride in the oral cavity was not affected by the combination of NaF and CHX.

Clinical relevance

A mouthrinse solution containing a mixture of CHX and NaF may be an interesting product for risk patients for caries and periodontal disease. However, this should be verified in further long-term clinical studies.

Keywords

Chlorhexidine Clinical trial Dental plaque Fluoride Gingivitis Microbiology Mouthwash 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Ann-Britt Lundberg for skilful technical assistance, Tommy Johnsson for statistical advice, and Anna Elmblad and Magnus Nylén at Actavis for support of the test solutions and toothpaste.

Funding information

The study was funded by the University of Gothenburg and by Actavis AB.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The mouthrinse solutions and coded bottles were kindly provided by Actavis AB (Stockholm, Sweden). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study has been approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board at the University of Gothenburg (Dnr 745-11) and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Löe H, Schiott CR (1970) The effect of mouthrinses and topical application of chlorhexidine on the development of dental plaque and gingivitis in man. J Periodontal Res 5:79–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lang NP, Brecx M (1986) Chlorhexidine digluconate—an agent for chemical plaque control and prevention of gingival inflammation. J Periodontal Res 21:74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marinho VCC, Higgins JPT, Logan S, Sheiham A (2003) Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD002284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002284
  4. 4.
    Katz S (1982) The use of fluoride and chlorhexidine for the prevention of radiation caries. J Am Dent Assoc 104:164–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keltjens HM, Schaeken MJ, van der Hoeven JS, Hendriks JC (1990) Caries control in overdenture patients: 18-month evaluation on fluoride and chlorhexidine therapies. Caries Res 24:371–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luoma H, Murtomaa H, Nuuja T, Nyman A, Nummikoski P, Ainamo J, Luoma AR (1978) A simultaneous reduction of caries and gingivitis in a group of schoolchildren receiving chlorhexidine-fluoride applications. Caries Res 12:290–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dolles OK, Gjermo P (1980) Caries increment and gingival status during 2 years' use of chlorhexidine- and fluoride-containing dentifrices. Scand J Dent Res 88:22–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spets-Happonen S, Luoma H, Forss H, Kentala J, Alaluusua S, Luoma AR, Grönroos L, Syväoja S, Tapaninen H, Happonen P (1991) Effects of a chlorhexidine-fluoride-strontium rinsing program on caries, gingivitis and some salivary bacteria among Finnish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res 99:130–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barkvoll P, Rölla G, Bellagamba S (1988) Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium monofluorophosphate in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 96:30–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Freitas CS, Diniz HF, Gomes JB, Sinisterra RD, Cortés ME (2003) Evaluation of the substantivity of chlorhexidine in association with sodium fluoride in vitro. Pesqui Odontol Bras 17:78–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorvari R, Spets-Happonen S, Luoma H (1994) Efficacy of chlorhexidine solution with fluoride varnishing in preventing enamel softening by Streptococcus mutans in an artificial mouth. Scand J Dent Res 102:206–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luoma H (1972) The effects of chlorhexidine and fluoride combinations on the potassium, sodium and phosphorus content and acid production of cariogenic streptococci. Arch Oral Biol 17:1431–1437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDermid AS, Marsh PD, Keevil CW, Ellwood DC (1985) Additive inhibitory effects of combinations of fluoride and chlorhexidine on acid production by Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis. Caries Res 19:64–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giertsen E, Scheie AA (1995) Effects of mouthrinses with chlorhexidine and zinc ions combined with fluoride on the viability and glycolytic activity of dental plaque. Eur J Oral Sci 103:306–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hussain AA, Kraal JH, Wahner H (1978) Fluoride release from sodium fluoride and chlorhexidine difluoride mouth rinses. J Dent Res 57:872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ravald N, Birkhed D, Hamp SE (1993) Root caries susceptibility in periodontally treated patients. Results after 12 years. J Clin Periodontol 20:124–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ravald N (1994) Root surface caries. Curr Opin Periodontol:78–86Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Axelsson P, Lindhe J (1974) The effect of a preventive programme on dental plaque, gingivitis and caries in schoolchildren. Results after one and two years. J Clin Periodontol 1:126–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Emilson CG (1983) Prevalence of Streptococcus mutans with different colonial morphologies in human plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res 91:26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bentley CD, Disney JA (1995) A comparison of partial and full mouth scoring of plaque and gingivitis in oral hygiene studies. J Clin Periodontol 22:131–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quigley GA, Hein JW (1962) Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Am Dent Assoc 65:26–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I (1970) Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol 41:41–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mason SC, Shirodaria S, Sufi F, Rees GD, Birkhed D (2010) Evaluation of salivary fluoride retention from a new high fluoride mouthrinse. J Dent 38(Suppl 3):S30–S36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(11)70006-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mystikos C, Yoshino T, Ramberg P, Birkhed D (2011) Effect of post-brushing mouthrinse solutions on salivary fluoride retention. Swed Dent J 35:17–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carlsson J (1965) Zooglea-forming streptococci, resembling Streptococcus sanguis, isolated from dental plaque in man. Odontol Revy 16:348–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Löe H (1967) The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 38(Suppl):610–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ramberg P, Furuichi Y, Volpe AR, Gaffar A, Lindhe J (1996) The effects of antimicrobial mouthrinses on de novo plaque formation at sites with healthy and inflamed gingivae. J Clin Periodontol 23:7–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Furuichi Y, Ramberg P, Lindhe J, Nabi N, Gaffar A (1996) Some effects of mouthrinses containing salifluor on de novo plaque formation and developing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 23:795–802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Emilson CG (1977) Susceptibility of various microorganisms to chlorhexidine. Scand J Dent Res 85:255–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dahlén G (1984) Effect of antimicrobial mouthrinses on salivary microflora in healthy subjects. Scand J Dent Res 92:38–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pinar Erdem A, Sepet E, Kulekci G, Trosola SC, Guven Y (2012) Effects of two fluoride varnishes and one fluoride/chlorhexidine varnish on Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm formation in vitro. Int J Med Sci 9:129–136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dehghani M, Abtahi M, Sadeghian H, Shafaee H, Tanbakuchi B (2015) Combined chlorhexidine-sodiumfluoride mouthrinse for orthodontic patients: clinical and microbiological study. J Clin Exp Dent 7:e569–e575.  https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51979 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marquis RE, Clock SA, Mota-Meira M (2003) Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:493–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nordström A, Mystikos C, Ramberg P, Birkhed D (2009) Effect on de novo plaque formation of rinsing with toothpaste slurries and water solutions with a high fluoride concentration (5,000 ppm). Eur J Oral Sci 117:563–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dolles OK, Bonesvoll P, Gamst ON, Gjermo P (1979) Determination of fluoride and chlorhexidine from chlorhexidine/fluoride-containing dentifrices. Scand J Dent Res 87:115–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Newcombe RG, Addy M, McKeown S (1995) Residual effect of chlorhexidine gluconate in 4-day plaque regrowth crossover trials, and its implications for study design. J Periodontal Res 30:319–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical DentistryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Satsuki Dental OfficeNaganoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  5. 5.IoanninaGreece
  6. 6.LandalatandläkarnaGothenburgSweden
  7. 7.Fersens vägMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations