Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1243–1252 | Cite as

Doxycycline-loaded nanotube-modified adhesives inhibit MMP in a dose-dependent fashion

  • Jadesada Palasuk
  • L. Jack Windsor
  • Jeffrey A. Platt
  • Yuri Lvov
  • Saulo Geraldeli
  • Marco C. Bottino
Original Article
  • 174 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

This article evaluated the drug loading, release kinetics, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibition of doxycycline (DOX) released from DOX-loaded nanotube-modified adhesives. DOX was chosen as the model drug, since it is the only MMP inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Materials and methods

Drug loading into the nanotubes was accomplished using DOX solution at distinct concentrations. Increased concentrations of DOX significantly improved the amount of loaded DOX. The modified adhesives were fabricated by incorporating DOX-loaded nanotubes into the adhesive resin of a commercial product. The degree of conversion (DC), Knoop microhardness, DOX release kinetics, antimicrobial, cytocompatibility, and anti-MMP activity of the modified adhesives were investigated.

Results

Incorporation of DOX-loaded nanotubes did not compromise DC, Knoop microhardness, or cell compatibility. Higher concentrations of DOX led to an increase in DOX release in a concentration-dependent manner from the modified adhesives. DOX released from the modified adhesives did not inhibit the growth of caries-related bacteria, but more importantly, it did inhibit MMP-1 activity.

Conclusions

The loading of DOX into the nanotube-modified adhesives did not compromise the physicochemical properties of the adhesives and the released levels of DOX were able to inhibit MMP activity without cytotoxicity.

Clinical significance

Doxycycline released from the nanotube-modified adhesives inhibited MMP activity in a concentration-dependent fashion. Therefore, the proposed nanotube-modified adhesive may hold clinical potential as a strategy to preserve resin/dentin bond stability.

Keywords

Dental adhesive Matrix metalloproteinase Halloysite® Doxycycline Nanotubes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Bruce Cooper (Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University) for the assistance in HPLC and mass spectrometry analyses, Dr. Richard L. Gregory (IUSD) for the access to his microbiology facilities, and Caroline Miller (Indiana University, School of Medicine) for the TEM study. This manuscript is based on a dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty, Indiana University Purdue University (IUPUI), in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Dental Sciences.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferracane JL (2011) Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 27:29–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2011) Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 90:953–968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mjor IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE (2000) Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 50:361–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84:118–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mazzoni A, Tjaderhane L, Checchi V, Di Lenarda R, Salo T, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Breschi L (2015) Role of dentin MMPs in caries progression and bond stability. J Dent Res 94(2):241–51Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breschi L, Martin P, Mazzoni A, Nato F, Carrilho M, Tjaderhane L, Visintini E, Cadenaro M, Tay FR, De Stefano DE, Pashley DH (2010) Use of a specific MMP-inhibitor (galardin) for preservation of hybrid layer. Dent Mater 26:571–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Almahdy A, Koller G, Sauro S, Bartsch JW, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Banerjee A (2012) Effects of MMP inhibitors incorporated within dental adhesives. J Dent Res 91:605–611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjaderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley D (2007) In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res 86:529–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sartori N, Stolf SC, Silva SB, Lopes GC, Carrilho M (2013) Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up. J Dent 41:1188–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dutra-Correa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS (2013) Effect of chlorhexidine on the 18-month clinical performance of two adhesives. J Adhes Dent 15:287–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lvov Y, Wang W, Zhang L, Fakhrullin R (2016) Halloysite clay nanotubes for loading and sustained release of functional compounds. Adv Mater 28:1227–1250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bottino MC, Batarseh G, Palasuk J, Alkatheeri MS, Windsor LJ, Platt JA (2013) Nanotube-modified dentin adhesive—physicochemical and dentin bonding characterizations. Dent Mater 29:1158–1165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feitosa SA, Palasuk J, Kamocki K, Geraldeli S, Gregory RL, Platt JA, Windsor LJ, Bottino MC (2014) Doxycycline-encapsulated nanotube-modified dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 93:1270–1276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alkatheeri MS, Palasuk J, Eckert GJ, Platt JA, Bottino MC (2015) Halloysite nanotube incorporation into adhesive systems-effect on bond strength to human dentin. Clin Oral Investig 19:1905–1912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feitosa SA, Munchow EA, Al-Zain AO, Kamocki K, Platt JA, Bottino MC (2015) Synthesis and characterization of novel halloysite-incorporated adhesive resins. J Dent 43:1316–1322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patel BK, Parikh RH, Aboti PS (2013) Development of oral sustained release rifampicin loaded chitosan nanoparticles by design of experiment. J Drug Deliv 2013:370938CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith K, Leyden JJ (2005) Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review. Clin Ther 27:1329–1342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Palasuk J, Kamocki K, Hippenmeyer L, Platt JA, Spolnik KJ, Gregory RL, Bottino MC (2014) Bimix antimicrobial scaffolds for regenerative endodontics. J Endod 40:1879–1884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Organization for Standardization ISO 10993–5: biological evaluation of medical devices Part 5: tests for cytotoxicity—in vitro methods (1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang K, Cheng L, Imazato S, Antonucci JM, Lin NJ, Lin-Gibson S, Bai Y, Xu HH (2013) Effects of dual antibacterial agents MDPB and nano-silver in primer on microcosm biofilm, cytotoxicity and dentine bond properties. J Dent 41:464–474CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Birkedal-Hansen H, Yamada S, Windsor J, Poulsen AH, Lyons G, Stetler-Stevenson W, Birkedal-Hansen B (2003) Matrix metalloproteinases. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 17:10.8.1–10.8.23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Windsor LJ, Steele DL, LeBlanc SB, Taylor KB (1997) Catalytic domain comparisons of human fibroblast-type collagenase, stromelysin-1, and matrilysin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1334:261–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun J, Song F, Zhang W, Sexton BE, Windsor LJ (2012) Effects of alendronate on human osteoblast-like MG63 cells and matrix metalloproteinases. Arch Oral Biol 57:728–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tay FR, Moulding KM, Pashley DH (1999) Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid-conditioned dentin. J Adhes Dent 1:103–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Montagner AF, Sarkis-Onofre R, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS (2014) MMP inhibitors on dentin stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 93:733–743CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qi R, Guo R, Shen M, Cao X, Zhang L, Xu J, Yu J, Shi X (2010) Electrospun poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/halloysite nanotube composite nanofibers for drug encapsulation and sustained release. J Mater Chem 20:10622–10629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seleem MN, Jain N, Pothayee N, Ranjan A, Riffle JS, Sriranganathan N (2009) Targeting Brucella melitensis with polymeric nanoparticles containing streptomycin and doxycycline. FEMS Microbiol Lett 294:24–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wei W, Abdullayev E, Hollister A, Mills D, Lvov YM (2012) Clay nanotube/poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement composites with sustained antibiotic release. Macromol Mater Eng 297:645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferracane JL (1985) Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1:11–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Centlivre M, Zhou X, Pouw SM, Weijer K, Kleibeuker W, Das AT, Blom B, Seppen J, Berkhout B, Legrand N (2010) Autoregulatory lentiviral vectors allow multiple cycles of doxycycline-inducible gene expression in human hematopoietic cells in vivo. Gene Ther 17:14–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strickman D, Sheer T, Salata K, Hershey J, Dasch G, Kelly D, Kuschner R (1995) In vitro effectiveness of azithromycin against doxycycline-resistant and -susceptible strains of Rickettsia tsutsugamushi, etiologic agent of scrub typhus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:2406–2410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Al-Ahmad A, Ameen H, Pelz K, Karygianni L, Wittmer A, Anderson AC, Spitzmuller B, Hellwig E (2014) Antibiotic resistance and capacity for biofilm formation of different bacteria isolated from endodontic infections associated with root-filled teeth. J Endod 40:223–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang DY, Zhang L, Fan J, Li F, Ma KQ, Wang P, Chen JH (2012) Matrix metalloproteinases in human sclerotic dentine of attrited molars. Arch Oral Biol 57:1307–1312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van Strijp AJ, Jansen DC, DeGroot J, ten Cate JM, Everts V (2003) Host-derived proteinases and degradation of dentine collagen in situ. Caries Res 37:58–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sulkala M, Tervahartiala T, Sorsa T, Larmas M, Salo T, Tjaderhane L (2007) Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) is the major collagenase in human dentin. Arch Oral Biol 52:121–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toledano M, Yamauti M, Osorio E, Osorio R (2012) Zinc-inhibited MMP-mediated collagen degradation after different dentine demineralization procedures. Caries Res 46:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smith GN Jr, Mickler EA, Hasty KA, Brandt KD (1999) Specificity of inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity by doxycycline: relationship to structure of the enzyme. Arthritis Rheum 42:1140–1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Beekman B, Verzijl N, de Roos JA, Koopman JL, TeKoppele JM (1997) Doxyclycline inhibits collagen synthesis by bovine chondrocytes cultured in alginate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237:107–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jadesada Palasuk
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. Jack Windsor
    • 2
  • Jeffrey A. Platt
    • 2
  • Yuri Lvov
    • 3
  • Saulo Geraldeli
    • 4
  • Marco C. Bottino
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of DentistryNaresuan UniversityPhitsanulokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical and Applied SciencesIndiana University School of DentistryIndianapolisUSA
  3. 3.Institute for MicromanufacturingLouisiana Tech UniversityRustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Operative Division, College of DentistryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  5. 5.Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and EndodonticsUniversity of Michigan School of DentistryAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations