Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of cone beam computed tomography to predetermine root canal lengths in molar teeth: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) root canal length measurements in molar teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods

Root canal lengths of twenty molar teeth were measured with two different CBCT approaches. After adjusting the CBCT images, 2D measurements were performed within the sagittal plane between the apical foramen and the coronal reference (cusp). The 3D approach measured centrically in axial planes. A linear mixed model with random intercepts was fitted to compare differences between methods (2D and 3D). The correlation between CBCT measurements and the actual root canal length was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

Differences between 3D measurements and the actual root canal lengths were significantly smaller compared to the 2D approach (p < 0.001). Mean differences were 0.32 and 0.58 mm, respectively. A high correlation was found between the actual root canal length and 3D measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.97). Compared to the actual root canal length, 80 % of the 3D measurements were within the limits of ±0.5 mm.

Conclusions

3D measurements of root canals in molar teeth are more accurate than simple 2D measurements and show a high correlation to the actual lengths.

Clinical relevance

In cases where a CBCT is already available, root canal lengths in molar teeth can be accurately predetermined using a standardized 3D approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tamse A, Kaffe I, Fishel D (1980) Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 50:563–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H (2007) Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kovisto T, Ahmad M, Bowles WR (2011) Proximity of the mandibular canal to the tooth apex. J Endod 37:311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F (2010) Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 36:1187–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AAE, AOMR (2011) Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111:234–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T (2008) Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 34:557–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D (2008) Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 34:87–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR (2009) Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod 35:719–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Ariji E, Nakamura H (2009) Evaluation of correspondence of dental computed tomography imaging to anatomic observation of external root resorption. J Endod 35:1594–1597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim S (2012) Endodontic application of cone-beam computed tomography in South Korea. J Endod 38:153–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Price JB, Thaw KL, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Padilla RJ (2012) Incidental findings from cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region: a descriptive retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1261–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cağlayan F, Tozoğlu U (2012) Incidental findings in the maxillofacial region detected by cone beam CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:159–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH (2010) Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Panzarella FK, Junqueira JL, Oliveira LB, de Araújo NS, Costa C (2011) Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40:369–378

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung MS, Lee SP, Kim GT, Choi SC, Park JH, Kim JW (2012) Three-dimensional analysis of deciduous maxillary anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Anat 25:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Janner SF, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM (2011) Precision of endodontic working length measurements: a pilot investigation comparing cone-beam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod 37:1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jeger FB, Janner SF, Bornstein MM, Lussi A (2012) Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a prospective, controlled clinical study. J Endod 38:884–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding J, Gutmann JL, Fan B, Lu Y, Chen H (2010) Investigation of apex locators and related morphological factors. J Endod 36:1399–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miletic V, Beljic-Ivanovic K, Ivanovic V (2011) Clinical reproducibility of three electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 44:769–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gomes S, Oliver R, Macouzet C, Mercadé M, Roig M, Duran-Sindreu F (2012) In vivo evaluation of the Raypex 5 by using different irrigants. J Endod 38:1075–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stoll R, Urban-Klein B, Roggendorf MJ, Jablonski-Momeni A, Strauch K, Frankenberger R (2010) Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen. Int Endod J 43:808–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualini D (2011) Effect of canal length and curvature on working length alteration with WaveOne reciprocating files. J Endod 37:1687–1690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leeb J (1983) Canal orifice enlargement as related to biomechanical preparation. J Endod 9:463–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schroeder KP, Walton RE, Rivera EM (2002) Straight line access and coronal flaring: effect on canal length. J Endod 28:474–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Camargo EJ, Zapata RO, Medeiros PL, Bramante CM, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, de Moraes IG, Duarte MA (2009) Influence of preflaring on the accuracy of length determination with four electronic apex locators. J Endod 35:1300–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morfis A, Sylaras SN, Georgopoulou M, Kernani M, Prountzos F (1994) Study of the apices of human permanent teeth with the use of a scanning electron microscope. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol 77:172–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ponce EH, Vilar Fernández JA (2003) The cemento-dentino-canal junction, the apical foramen, and the apical constriction: evaluation by optical microscopy. J Endod 29:214–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jervøe-Storm PM, Hagner M, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zöller JE, Jepsen S, Frentzen M (2010) Comparison of cone-beam computerized tomography and intraoral radiographs for determination of the periodontal ligament in a variable phantom. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Brochhagen HG, Keeve E, Zöller JE (2007) Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG (2008) Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:573–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Lith A (2011) Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40:244–250

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E (2011) Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40:265–273

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hassan B, Couto Souza P, Jacobs R, de Azambuja BS, van der Stelt P (2010) Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 14:303–310

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany

    J. P. Tchorz, P. J. Poxleitner, E. Hellwig & M. J. Altenburger

  2. Department of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany

    S. Stampf

  3. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany

    S. B. M. Patzelt

  4. Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

    S. B. M. Patzelt

  5. Private Practice, Dental Diagnostic Centre, Freiburg, Germany

    D. Rottke

  6. Abteilung für Zahnerhaltungskunde und Parodontologie, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany

    J. P. Tchorz

Authors
  1. J. P. Tchorz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. J. Poxleitner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Stampf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. B. M. Patzelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Rottke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. E. Hellwig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. J. Altenburger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Tchorz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tchorz, J.P., Poxleitner, P.J., Stampf, S. et al. The use of cone beam computed tomography to predetermine root canal lengths in molar teeth: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1129–1133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1064-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1064-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation