Advertisement

Purity assessment using the mass balance approach for inorganic in-house certified reference material production at Inmetro

  • Ana C. P. OsorioEmail author
  • Rodrigo C. de Sena
  • Thiago de O. Araújo
  • Marcelo D. de Almeida
Practitioner's Report
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The production of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) is one of the essential activities of the National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (Inmetro) to ensure metrological traceability of inorganic elemental measurements in Brazil. This work presents a set of procedures for purity assessment and in-house certification of high-purity salts, implemented at the Laboratory of Inorganic Analysis, from the Chemical and Thermal Metrology Division at Inmetro. We developed and validated methodologies based on inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry measurements with standard addition calibration in order to determine the mass fraction of up to 71 elements considered as possible impurities. The purity of inorganic salts was determined using the mass balance approach with expanded measurement uncertainties smaller than a mass fraction of 0.007 %. All procedures were performed according to the ISO 17034:2016 standard. The CRMs will be used for the production and certification of single-element calibration solutions at Inmetro.

Keywords

Purity assessment Certified reference material Metrological traceability Measurement uncertainty Accreditation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Olivares IRB, Souza GB, Nogueira ARA, Toledo GTK, Marcki DC (2018) Trends in developments of certified reference materials for chemical analysis–focus on food, water, soil, and sediment matrices. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 100:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO 17034 (2016) General requirements for the competence of reference material producers, 1st edn. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kipphardt H, Matschat R (2008) Purity assessment for providing primary standards for elemental determination—a snap shot of international comparability. Microchim Acta 162:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO Guide 35 (2017) Reference materials—guidance for characterization and assessment of homogeneity and stability. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vogl J (2018) Roadmap for the purity determination of pure metallic elements [Internet]. 1 Analytische Chemie; Referenzmaterialien. https://www.bipm.org/wg/CCQM/IAWG/Allowed/April_2017/CCQM-IAWG17-28.pdf.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2019
  6. 6.
    Todolí JL, Gras L, Hernandis V, Mora J (2002) Elemental matrix effects in ICP-AES. J Anal Spectrom 17:142–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Otero-Romaní J, Moreda-Piñeiro A, Bermejo-Barrera P, Martin-Esteban A (2009) Inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry/mass spectrometry for the determination of Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in seawater after ionic imprinted polymer based solid phase extraction. Talanta 79:723–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jerez Veguería SF, Godoy JM, de Campos RC, Gonçalves RA (2013) Trace element determination in seawater by ICP-MS using online, offline and bath procedures of preconcentration and matrix elimination. Microchem J 106:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krejčová A, Černohorský T, Pouzar M (2007) Determination of metal impurities in pure hydroxides and salts by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 582:208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hauswaldt A-L, Rienitz O, Jährling R, Fischer N, Schiel D, Labarraque G et al (2012) Uncertainty of standard addition experiments: a novel approach to include the uncertainty associated with the standard in the model equation. Accred Qual Assur 17:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meija J, Pagliano E, Mester Z (2014) Coordinate swapping in standard addition graphs for analytical chemistry: a simplified path for uncertainty calculation in linear and nonlinear plots. Anal Chem 86:8563–8567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 3696 (1987) Water for analytical laboratory use—specification and test methods. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO Guide 33 (2015) Reference materials—good practice in using reference materials, 3rd edn. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levenson MS, Banks DL, Eberhardt KR, Gill LM, Guthrie WF, Liu HK et al (2000) An approach to combining results from multiple methods motivated by the ISO GUM. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 105:571CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical and Thermal Metrology DivisionNational Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology – InmetroDuque de CaxiasBrazil

Personalised recommendations