Advertisement

Archives of Women's Mental Health

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 759–770 | Cite as

The current status of gender-sensitive mental health services for women—findings from a global survey of experts

  • Prabha S. ChandraEmail author
  • Gayatri Saraf
  • Aakash Bajaj
  • Veena A. Satyanarayana
Original Article

Abstract

Integrating gender in all aspects of health services is important and mental health is no exception. Despite several recommendations regarding the need for gender-sensitive mental health services, the actual availability of these is not clear, both in high and low-income countries. We sought to understand what aspects of gender-sensitive mental health care were considered a priority by global experts in women’s mental health and how satisfied they were with the current availability of these services in their own place of work. A survey with 43 items under 7 domains of gender-sensitive mental health care for women was sent to 150 experts in women’s mental health across the world, of whom 73 responded. Rating on each item was from 0 to 5. While majority of the experts rated most of the items as being very important (median score of 4 and above), some areas that were considered most important included training of mental health professionals in gender sensitivity, having private spaces for examination, using a life course approach to service planning and delivery, and assisting women who find it difficult to navigate the system and mother-baby units. However, satisfaction rates with available services were quite low overall and much lower among experts in low-income countries compared with those from high-income countries. Even in high-income countries, only 6 of the top 20 items were scored as satisfactory by at least 50% of experts. This expert survey method to arrive at consensus on top priorities for improving delivery of gender-sensitive mental health care indicates that at least 72% of the items provided in the survey were considered extremely important. Poor satisfaction of experts in both high- and low-income countries with availability of gender-sensitive services indicates the need for local and global strategic action and multilevel stakeholder engagement.

Keywords

Gender sensitive Women Sex Mental health Services Psychiatry 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Institutional Ethics Committee, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, India, Ref no.: NIMHANS/EC/BEH SC/13/2018) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abel KM, Newbigging K (2018) Addressing unmet needs in women’s mental health. Tavistock square, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel K, Rees S (2010) Reproductive and sexual health of women service users: what’s the fuss? Adv Psychiatr Treat 16:279–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkham M, Mellor-Clark J (2003) Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clin Psychol Psychother 10:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes M, Davis A, Guru S, et al (2002) Women-only and women sensitive mental health services: a summary report. University of Birmingam Google Scholar
  5. Brady TM, Ashley OS (2005) Women in substance abuse treatment: results from the alcohol and drug services study (ADSS). Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  6. Brienza RS, Stein MD (2002) Alcohol use disorders in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 17:387–397PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter AJ, Bourgeois S, O’Brien N et al (2013) Women-specific HIV/AIDS services: identifying and defining the components of holistic service delivery for women living with HIV/AIDS. J Int AIDS Soc 16:17433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobanoglu C, Moreo PJ, Warde B (2001) A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods. Int J Mark Res 43:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 60:821–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, Samuel S, Ghali WA, Sykes LL, Jetté N (2015) Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:32Google Scholar
  11. deKleijn M, Lagro-Janssen ALM, Canelo I, Yano EM (2015) Creating a roadmap for delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive care for women veterans: results of a national expert panel. Med Care 53:S156–S164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Health (2002) Women’s mental health: into the mainstream. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott DE, Bjelajac P, Fallot RD, Markoff LS, Reed BG (2005) Trauma-informed or trauma-denied: principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. J Community Psychol 33:461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fillmore K, Golding J, Leino E, Motoyoshi M (1997) Patterns and trends in women’s and men’s drinking. In: R. W. Wilsnack & S. C. Wilsnack (eds) Gender and alcohol: Individual and social perspectives. Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, Piscataway, NJ, pp 21-48Google Scholar
  15. Fisher J, de Mello MC, Takashi I (2009) Mental health aspects of pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. In: Chandra PS, Herrman H, Fisher J et al (eds) Contemporary topics in women’s mental health: global perspectives in a changing society. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, UK, pp 197–213Google Scholar
  16. Fisher J, Cabral de Mello M, Patel V, Rahman A, Tran T, Holton S, Holmes W (2012) Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 90:139–149HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green CA (2006) Gender and use of substance abuse treatment services. Alcohol Res Health 29:55–62Google Scholar
  18. Howard LM, Ehrlich AM, Gamlen F, Oram S (2017) Gender-neutral mental health research is sex and gender biased. Lancet Psychiatry 4:9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Judd F, Armstrong S, Kulkarni J (2009) Gender-sensitive mental health care. Australas Psychiatry 17:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimerling R, Pavao J, Greene L, Karpenko J, Rodriguez A, Saweikis M, Washington DL (2015) Access to mental health care among women veterans. Med Care 53:S97–S104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirmayer LJ, Young A (1998) Culture and somatization: clinical, epidemiological, and ethnographic perspectives. Psychosom Med 60:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kissin WB, Tang Z, Arieira CR, Claus RE, Orwin RG (2015) Women’s employment outcomes following gender-sensitive substance abuse treatment. J Drug Issues 45:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrow M, Columbia B (2002) Violence and trauma in the lives of women with serious mental illness current practices in service provision in British Columbia.Vancouver, BC: BC Centre of Excellence for Women’s HealthGoogle Scholar
  24. Newbigging K, Abel K (2006) Supporting women into the mainstream : commissioning women-only community day services. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Nichter M (1981) Idioms of distress: alternatives in the expression of psychosocial distress: a case study from South India. Cult Med Psychiatry 5:379–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oertelt-Prigione S, Dalibert L, Verdonk P, Stutz EZ, Klinge I (2017) Implementation strategies for gender-sensitive public health practice: a European workshop. J Women's Health 26:1255–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramsay R, Welch S, Youard E (2001) Needs of women patients with mental illness. Adv Psychiatr Treat 7:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruijne RE, Kamperman AM, Trevillion K, Garofalo C, Jongejan FE, Bogaerts S, Howard LM, Mulder NL (2019) Mental health professionals’ knowledge, skills and attitudes on domestic violence and abuse in the Netherlands: cross-sectional study. BJPsych Open 5:e29Google Scholar
  29. Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, Chey T, Jackson JW, Patel V, Silove D (2014) The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980-2013. Int J Epidemiol 43:476–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stewart DE (2007) Social determinants of women’s mental health. J Psychosom Res 63:223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stewart DE, Chandra PS (2017) WPA international competency-based curriculum for mental health providers on intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women. World Psychiatry 16:223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sweeney A, Filson B, Kennedy A, Collinson L, Gillard S (2018) A paradigm shift: relationships in trauma-informed mental health services. BJPsych Adv 24:319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Women’s Health Council (2007) A guide to creating gender-sensitive health services. Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  34. Thom B (1987) Sex differences in help-seeking for alcohol problems--2. Entry into treatment. Br J Addict 82:989–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trevillion K, Corker E, Capron LE, Oram S (2016) Improving mental health service responses to domestic violence and abuse. Int Rev Psychiatry 28:423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Victorian Women and Mental Health Network (2009) Increasing safety and gender sensitivity in mixed sex psychiatric units. Elsternwick, VICGoogle Scholar
  37. Watts C, Zimmerman C (2002) Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet 359:1232–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wechsberg WM, Craddock SG, Hubbard RL (1998) How are women who enter substance abuse treatment different than men?: a gender comparison from the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Drugs Soc 13:97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wesseloo R, Kamperman AM, Munk-Olsen T, Pop VJM, Kushner SA, Bergink V (2016) Risk of postpartum relapse in bipolar disorder and postpartum psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 173:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Women’s Centre for Health Matters (2009) WCHM position paper on gender sensitive mental health service delivery. Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
  41. World Health Organization (2002) Gender and mental health. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  42. World Health Organization (2007) Gender disparities in mental health. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  43. World Health Organization (2013) Increasing access to health care services in Afghanistan with gender-sensitive health service delivery. WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)BengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of BiostatisticsNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)BengaluruIndia
  4. 4.Department of Clinical PsychologyNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)BengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations