Advertisement

Archives of Women's Mental Health

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 631–635 | Cite as

Type of delivery is not associated with maternal depression

  • Alexandre Faisal-CuryEmail author
  • Paulo Rossi Menezes
Short Communication

Abstract

Although many women experience depressive symptoms during the first year after childbirth, the relationship between type of delivery and maternal depression is not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate relationship between type of delivery and maternal depression, between 6 to 16 months after childbirth. We performed a prospective cohort study of 558 low–socioeconomic status pregnant women without depression. All participants were recruited from primary care clinics of the public sector in three administrative districts in the Western area of the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20). Type of delivery was classified as uncomplicated spontaneous vaginal delivery (UVD) (no episiotomy and no more than a first-degree perineal laceration), complicated vaginal delivery (CVD) (episiotomy or more than a second-degree perineal laceration), and cesarean delivery (CD). Data about type of delivery were extracted from medical charts. Crude and adjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Poisson regression with robust variance estimates to examine the association between type of delivery with maternal depression. Among 482 women reassessed during 6 to 16 months after delivery, 18% had symptoms of depression. According to the type of delivery, 250 (51.8%), 85 (21.7%), and 147 (30.5%) were UVD, CVD, and CD, respectively. There was no association between type of delivery and maternal depression. In comparison with women submitted to uncomplicated vaginal, women who had a cesarean or perineal trauma/episiotomy did not show greater risk of maternal depression, in the medium to long term after delivery.

Keywords

Maternal depression Pregnancy Postpartum Mental disorder Mode of delivery Type of delivery 

Notes

Financial support

The study was funded by FAPESP (2003/08553-7). Paulo Rossi Menezes was partially funded by the CNPq-Brazil. Alexandre Faisal-Cury received postdoctoral fellowships from the CNPq-Brazil and FAPESP (2005/04572-2).

Compliance with ethical standards

The Ethics Committee of the University of São Paulo, School of Medicine, approved the research project (Number 206/2004—approval date 07/2004).

Conflict of interest

The authors delcare that they no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adams SS, Eberhard-Gran M, Sandvik Å, Eskild A (2012) Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: a cohort study of 55,814 women. BJOG 119:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan PA, Hammen C, Andersen MJ, Bor W, Najman JM, Williams GM (2000) Chronicity, severity, and timing of maternal depressive symptoms: relationships with child outcomes at age 5. Dev Psychol 36:759–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000081.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000081
  4. Carter FA, Frampton CM, Mulder RT (2006) Cesarean section and postpartum depression: a review of the evidence examining the link. Psychosom Med 68:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coutinho LM, Scazufca M, Menezes PR (2008) Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies. Rev Saude Publica 42:992–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ducarme G, Hamel JF, Brun S, Madar H, Merlot B, Sentilhes L (2017) Sexual function and postpartum depression 6 months after attempted operative vaginal delivery according to fetal head station: a prospective population-based cohort study. PLoS One 12:e0178915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunn AB, Paul S, Ware LZ, Corwin EJ (2015) Perineal injury during childbirth increases risk of postpartum depressive symptoms and inflammatory markers. J Midwifery Womens Health 60:428–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faisal-Cury A, Menezes PR (2012) Antenatal depression strongly predicts postnatal depression in primary health care. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 34:446–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher J, Cabral de Mello M, Patel V, Rahman A, Tran T, Holton S, Holmes W (2012) Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 90:139G–149GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanlon C, Medhin G, Alem A, Araya M, Abdulahi A, Hughes M, Tesfaye M, Wondimagegn D, Patel V, Prince M (2008) Detecting perinatal common mental disorders in Ethiopia: validation of the self-reporting questionnaire and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. J Affect Disord 108:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mari JJ, Williams P (1986) A validity study of a psychiatric screening questionnaire (SRQ-20) in primary care in the city of Sao Paulo. Br J Psychiatry 148:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matijasevich A, Murray J, Cooper PJ, Anselmi L, Barros AJ, Barros FC et al (2015) Trajectories of maternal depression and offspring psychopathology at 6 years: 2004 Pelotas cohort study. J Affect Disord 174:424–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. O'Hara MW, McCabe JE (2013) Postpartum depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 9:379–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Patel RR, Murphy DJ, Peters TJ (2005) Operative delivery and postnatal depression: a cohort study. BMJ 330:879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pollock JI, Manaseki-Holland S, Patel V (2006) Detection of depression in women of child-bearing age in non-Western cultures: a comparison of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 in Mongolia. J Affect Disord 92:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stuart-Parrigon K, Stuart S (2014) Perinatal depression: an update and overview. Curr Psychiatry Rep 16:468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang SN, Shen LJ, Ping T, Wang YC, Chien CW (2011) The delivery mode and seasonal variation are associated with the development of postpartum depression. J Affect Disord 132:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Preventive Medicine DepartmentUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations