Skip to main content
Log in

Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum periimplantären Gewebezustand bei implantatgetragenen Einzelzahnversorgungen von vollkeramischen CAD/CAM-Kronen nach dem CEREC 3 Verfahren zu metallkeramischen Einzelzahnrestaurationen unter Verwendung des DNA-Tests micro-IDent®plus der Firma Hain-Lifescience

Comparing Examination of the softtissue around single tooth implants covered with CEREC 3 all ceramic crowns with metallceramics using the DNA-test, micro-IDent®plus from Hain-Lifescience

  • Master Thesis
  • Published:
Stomatologie

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Die Frage nach dem gewebefreundlicheren Kronenwerkstoff für Implantatversorgungen soll beantwortet werden: Vollkeramik (CEREC 3D Kronen) versus Metallkeramik. Die subgingivale Keimbelastung an vergleichbaren Restaurationen wird an je 15 Patienten untersucht mit dem hoch sensitiven DNA-Keimtest, micro-IDent®plus der Firma Hain-Lifescience (11 Parodontopathogene). Im Ergebnis schneidet die vollkeramische Restauration bezüglich der Keimbelastung besser ab als die metallkeramische, so dass sich die Vollkeramik als implantologische Versorgung bestens empfiehlt.

SUMMARY

The question for the most suitable crownmaterial for the softtissue around implantrestaurations should be answered: allceramics (CEREC 3D crowns) versus metalceramics. The contamination in the sulcus of equal restaurations are examined from always 15 patients with the highly sensitiv DNA-bacteriological test, micro-IDent®plus produced by the Hain-Lifescience company (11 periodontalpathogens). In the result the allceramic restauration shows a better performance with a lower range of bacterial contamination than the metalceramic, so that allceramic recommend best for implant restauration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

LITERATUR

  • Fritzsche G (2004) Treatment of a single-tooth gap with a Cerec 3D crown on an implant: a case report. Int J Comput Dent 7 (2): 199–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ (1997) Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 (5): 709

    Google Scholar 

  • Kancyper SG, Koka S (2001) The influence of intracrevicular crown margins on gingival health: preliminary findings. J Prosthet Dent 85 (5): 461–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller W, Bragger U, Mombelli A (1998) Peri-implant microflora of implants with cemented and screw retained suprastructures. Clin Oral Implants Res 9 (4): 209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohal RJ, Klaus G (2004) A zirconia implant-crown system: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24 (2): 147–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krekeler G, Kappert H, Pelz K, Graml B (1984) Affinity of plaque for various materials. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 94 (7): 647–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krekeler G, Petz K, Nelissen R (1986) Microbial colonization of periodontal pockets around artificial titanium abutments. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 41 (6): 569–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D (1993) Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 4 (3): 158–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. (1996) The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 (2): 169–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Anschrift der Verfasser: H. W. Fromme, Rumbecker Straße 7, 59821 Arnsberg, Deutschland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fromme, HW., Krekeler, G. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum periimplantären Gewebezustand bei implantatgetragenen Einzelzahnversorgungen von vollkeramischen CAD/CAM-Kronen nach dem CEREC 3 Verfahren zu metallkeramischen Einzelzahnrestaurationen unter Verwendung des DNA-Tests micro-IDent®plus der Firma Hain-Lifescience. Stomatologie 104, 69–73 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00715-007-0028-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00715-007-0028-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation