Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 112, Supplement 2, pp 555–567 | Cite as

Characterisation of primary and secondary carbonates in hypabyssal kimberlites: an integrated compositional and Sr-isotopic approach

  • Montgarri Castillo-OliverEmail author
  • Andrea Giuliani
  • William L. Griffin
  • Suzanne Y. O’Reilly
Original Paper


Carbonates in fresh hypabyssal kimberlites worldwide have been studied to understand their origin [i.e. primary magmatic (high T) versus deuteric (‘low T’) versus hydrothermal/alteration (‘low T’)] and identify optimal strategies for petrogenetic studies of kimberlitic carbonates. The approach presented here integrates detailed textural characterisation, cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging, in situ major- and trace-element analysis, as well as in situ Sr-isotope analysis. The results reveal a wide textural diversity. Calcite occurs as fine-grained groundmass, larger laths, segregations, veins or as a late crystallising phase, replacing olivine or early carbonates. Different generations of carbonates commonly coexist in the same kimberlite, each one defined by a characteristic texture, CL response and composition (e.g., variable Sr and Ba concentrations). In situ Sr isotope analysis revealed a magmatic signature for most of the carbonates, based on comparable 87Sr/86Sr values between these carbonates and the coexisting perovskite, a robust magmatic phase. However, this study also shows that in situ Sr isotope analysis not always allow distinction between primary (i.e., magmatic) and texturally secondary carbonates within the same sample. Carbonates with a clear secondary origin (e.g., late-stage veins) occasionally show the same moderately depleted 87Sr/86Sr ratios of primary carbonates and coexisting perovskite (e.g., calcite laths-shaped crystals with 87Sr/86Sr values identical within uncertainty to those of vein calcite in the De Beers kimberlite). This complexity emphasises the necessity of integrating detailed petrography, geochemical and in situ Sr isotopic analyses for an accurate interpretation of carbonate petrogenesis in kimberlites. Therefore, the complex petrogenesis of carbonates demonstrated here not only highlights the compositional variability of kimberlites, but also raises concerns about the use of bulk-carbonate C-O isotope studies to characterise the parental melt compositions. Conversely, our integrated textural and in situ study successfully identifies the most appropriate (i.e. primary) carbonates for providing constraints on the isotopic parameters of parental kimberlite magmas.


Carbonate in kimberlites Kimberlite petrography In situ Sr isotope analysis Cathodoluminescence 



We gratefully acknowledge provision of samples from the Ekati mine by BHP Billiton, and permission obtained from Dominion Diamond Mines ULC to publish our results. We also acknowledge Petra Diamonds for access to samples from Cullinan and Wesselton. We thank Jock Robey for his invaluable help during field work in the Kimberley area, and the De Beers Group for granting access to the Benfontein farm. Stuart Graham and Simon Shee are thanked for providing the Melita sample, and Steve Sparks for his collection of Wesselton Water Tunnel Sill kimberlites. The De Beers and Jagersfontein samples were sourced from the John J. Gurney Upper Mantle Room Collection at the University of Cape Town; kimberlites from Finland were generously provided by Hugh O’Brien. We would also like to thank Ashton Soltys for his help in sample selection and preparation; Manal Bebbington for her help with the preparation of the thin sections at Macquarie University; as well as Juan Diego Martín for his guidance in the use of the CL system at the University of Barcelona (UB). The authors also wish to acknowledge Xavier Llovet and Eva Prats for their assistance with EMPA and SEM analysis at the Serveis Científico-Tècnics (UB); as well as Yoann Gréau, Sarah Gain, Rosanna Murphy, Yi-Jen Lai and Hadrien Henry, for their help with the SEM, LA-ICP-MS and LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis at Macquarie University GeoAnalytical (MQGA). Constructive comments from the editor Bruce Kjarsgaard, and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved this work. This research was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) through a Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DECRA) to AG (grant DE-150100009); as well as funds from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (CE110001017). This study used instrumentation funded by ARC Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities (LIEF) and.

Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) Systemic Infrastructure Grants, Macquarie University, National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Scheme (NCRIS) AuScope and Industry. This is contribution 1184 from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems (CCFS) and 1240 in the ARC National Key Centre for Geochemical Evolution and Metallogeny of Continents (GEMOC).

Supplementary material

710_2018_626_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 10 kb)
710_2018_626_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (83 kb)
ESM 2 (XLSX 83 kb)
710_2018_626_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (32 kb)
ESM 3 (XLSX 32 kb)
710_2018_626_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (52 kb)
ESM 4 (XLSX 51 kb)
710_2018_626_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (90 kb)
ESM 5 (XLSX 90 kb)
710_2018_626_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (408 kb)
ESM 6 (PDF 408 kb)


  1. Allsopp H, Barrett DR (1975) Rb-Sr age determinations on South African kimberlite pipes. Phys Chem Earth 9:605–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong JP, Wilson M, Barnett RL, Nowicki T, Kjarsgaard BA (2004) Mineralogy of primary carbonate-bearing hypabyssal kimberlite, Lac de Gras, Slave Province, Northwest Territories, Canada. Lithos 76:415–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett DR, Berg GW (1975) Complementary petrographic and strontium-isotope ratio studies of South African kimberlite. Phys Chem Earth 9:619–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batumike JM, Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY (2009) Lithospheric mantle structure and the diamond potential of kimberlites in southern D.R. Congo. Lithos 112:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brett RC, Russell JK, Moss S (2009) Origin of olivine in kimberlite: Phenocryst or impostor? Lithos 112:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campeny M, Kamenetsky VS, Melgarejo JC, Mangas J, Manuel J, Kamenetsky MB, Bambi ACJM, Gonçalves AO (2015) Carbonatitic lavas in Catanda (Kwanza Sul, Angola): mineralogical and geochemical constraints on the parental melt. Lithos 232:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castillo-Oliver M, Galí S, Melgarejo JC, Griffin WL, Belousova E, Pearson NJ, Watangua M, O'Reilly SY (2016) Trace-element geochemistry and U–Pb dating of perovskite in kimberlites of the Lunda Norte province (NE Angola): petrogenetic and tectonic implications. Chem Geol 426:118–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakhmouradian AR, Mitchell RH (1999) Niobian ilmenite, hydroxylapatite and sulfatian alternative hosts for incompatible in calcite elements. Can Mineral 37:1177–1189Google Scholar
  9. Chakhmouradian AR, Reguir EP, Zaitsev AN, Chakhmouradian AR (2016) Calcite and dolomite in intrusive carbonatites. I. Textural variations. Mineral Petrol 110:333–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen W, Simonetti A (2015) Isotopic (Pb, Sr, Nd, C, O ) evidence for plume-related sampling of an ancient, depleted mantle reservoir. Lithos 216–217:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creaser RA, Gütter H, Carlson J, Crawford B (2004) Macrocrystal phlogopite Rb-Sr dates for the Ekati property kimberlites, Slave Province, Canada: evidence for multiple intrusive episodes in the Paleocene and Eocene. Lithos 76:399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson JB, Hawthorne JB (1973) Magmatic sedimentation and carbonatitic differentiation in kimberlite sills at Benfontein, South Africa. J Geol Soc Lond 12:61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deines P, Gold DP (1973) The isotopic composition of carbonatite and kimberlite carbonates and their bearing on the isotopic composition of deep-seated carbon. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 37:1709–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donnelly CL, Griffin WL, Yang J-H, O'Reilly SY, Li Q-L, Pearson NJ, Li X-H (2012) In situ U-Pb dating and Sr-Nd isotopic analysis of perovskite: constraints on the age and petrogenesis of the Kuruman Kimberlite province, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa. J Petrol 53:2497–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowall DP (2004) Elemental and isotopic geochemistry of kimberlites from the Lac De Gras field, Northwest territories, Canada. PhD Thesis. Durham University, p 412Google Scholar
  16. Exley RA, Jones AP (1983) 87Sr/86Sr in kimberlitic carbonates by ion microprobe: hydrothermal alteration, crustal contamination and relation to carbonatite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 83:288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gies H (1975) Activation possibilities and geochemical correlations of photoluminescing carbonates, particularly calcites. Mineral Deposita 10:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giuliani A, Phillips D, Kamenetsky VS, Fiorentini ML, Farquhar J, Kendrick MA (2014) Stable isotope (C, O, S) compositions of volatile-rich minerals in kimberlites: a review. Chem Geol 374–375:61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giuliani A, Phillips D, Kamenetsky VS, Goemann K (2016) Constraints on kimberlite ascent mechanisms revealed by phlogopite compositions in kimberlites and mantle xenoliths. Lithos 240–243:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giuliani A, Soltys A, Phillips D, Kamenetsky VS, Maas R, Goemann K, Woodhead JD, Drysdale RN, Griffin WL (2017) The final stages of kimberlite petrogenesis: petrography, mineral chemistry, melt inclusions and Sr-C-O isotope geochemistry of the Bultfontein kimberlite (Kimberley, South Africa). Chem Geol 455:342–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham S, Lambert D, Shee S (2004) The petrogenesis of carbonatite, melnoite and kimberlite from the Eastern Goldfields Province, Yilgarn Craton. Lithos 76:519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffin WL, Powell WJ, Pearson N., O’Reilly SY (2008) GLITTER: data reduction software for laser ablation ICP-MS. In: Sylvester P (ed) Laser Ablation–ICP–MS in the Earth Sciences. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, pp 204–207Google Scholar
  23. Griffin WL, Batumike JM, Gréau Y, Pearson NJ, Shee SR, O’Reilly SY (2014) Emplacement ages and sources of kimberlites and related rocks in southern Africa: U-Pb ages and Sr-Nd isotopes of groundmass perovskite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 168:1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heaman LM (1989) The nature of subcontinental mantle from Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic studies on kimberlitic perovskite. Earth Planet Sci Lett 92:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hiatt EE, Pufahl PK (2014) Cathodoluminescence petrography of carbonate rocks: a review of applications for understanding diagenesis, reservoir quality and pore system evolution. In: Coulson I (ed) Cathodoluminescence and its Application to geoscience. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, pp 75–96Google Scholar
  26. Kamenetsky VS, Grütter H, Kamenetsky MB, Gömann K (2013) Parental carbonatitic melt of the Koala kimberlite (Canada): constraints from melt inclusions in olivine and Cr-spinel, and groundmass carbonate. Chem Geol 353:96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamenetsky VS, Golovin AV, Maas R, Giuliani A, Kamenetsky MB, Weiss Y (2014) Towards a new model for kimberlite petrogenesis: evidence from unaltered kimberlites and mantle minerals. Earth-Sci Rev 139:145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkley MB, Smith HB, Gurney JJ (1989) Kimberlite carbonates—a carbon and oxygen stable isotope study. In: Ross J et al. (eds) Kimberlites and related rocks. Geol Soc Aust Spec Publ 14(1):264–281Google Scholar
  29. Kjarsgaard BA, Pearson DG, Tappe S, Nowell GM, Dowall DP (2009) Geochemistry of hypabyssal kimberlites from Lac de Gras, Canada: Comparisons to a global database and applications to the parent magma problem. Lithos 112:236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kramers JD (1983) A feasibility study of U− Pb and Pb− Pb dating of kimberlites using groundmass mineral fractions and whole-rock samples. Chem Geol 41:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lane SJ, Dalton JA (1994) Electron microprobe analysis of geological carbonates. Am Mineral 79:745–749Google Scholar
  32. Le Roex AP, Bell DR, Davis P (2003) Petrogenesis of Group I Kimberlites from Kimberley, South Africa: evidence from bulk-rock geochemistry. J Petrol 44:2261–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Machel HG (1985) Cathodoluminescence in calcite and dolomite and its chemical interpretation. Geosci Can 12:139–147Google Scholar
  34. Machel HG, Burton EA (1991) Factors governing cathodoluminescence in calcite and dolomite, and their implications for studies of carbonate diagenesis. In: Barker CE, Kopp OC (eds) Luminescence microscopy and spectroscopy: qualitative and quantitative applications. Society for Sedimentary Geology, pp 37–58Google Scholar
  35. Malarkey J, Pearson DG, Kjarsgaard BA, Davidson JP, Nowell GM, Ottley CJ, Stammer J (2010) From source to crust: Tracing magmatic evolution in a kimberlite and a melilitite using microsample geochemistry. Earth Planet Sci Lett 299:80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mariano AN, Mariano AJ (2014) Cathodoluminescence as a tool in mineral exploration. In: Coulson IM (ed) Cathodoluminescence and its application to geoscience. Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, pp 97–126Google Scholar
  37. Mason RA (1987) Ion microprobe analysis of trace elements in calcite with an application to the cathodoluminescence zonation of limestone cements from the Lower Carboniferous of South Wales, UK. Chem Geol 64:209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonough WF, Sun S-S (1995) The composition of the Earth. Chem Geol 120:223–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitchell RH (1984) Mineralogy and origin of carbonate-rich segregations in a composite kimberlite sill. Neues Jb Mineral Abh 150:185–197Google Scholar
  40. Mitchell RH (2008) Petrology of hypabyssal kimberlites: Relevance to primary magma compositions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 174:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mitchell RH, Crocket JH (1971) The isotopic composition of strontium in some South African Kimberlites. Contrib Mineral Petrol 30:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neumann E-R, Griffin WL, Pearson NJ, O’Reilly SY (2004) The evolution of the upper mantle beneath the Canary Islands: information from trace elements and Sr isotope ratios in minerals in mantle xenoliths. J Petrol 45:2573–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nowell GM, Pearson DG, Bell DR, Carlson RW, Smith CB, Kempton PD, Noble SR (2004) Hf Isotope systematics of kimberlites and their megacrysts: new constraints on their source regions. J Petrol 45:1583–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Brien H (2015) Kimberlite-hosted diamonds in Finland. Elsevier IncGoogle Scholar
  45. Paton C, Hergt JM, Phillips D, Woodhead JD, Shee SR (2007) New insights into the genesis of Indian kimberlites from the Dharwar Craton via in situ Sr isotope analysis of groundmass perovskite. Geology 35:1011–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pouchou JL, Pichoir F (1984) A new model for quantitative X-ray microanalysis. Part 1. Applications to the analysis of homogeneous samples. Rech Aerospatiale 3:11–38Google Scholar
  47. Russell JK, Porritt LA, Lavallée Y, Dingwell DB (2012) Kimberlite ascent by assimilation-fuelled buoyancy. Nature 481:352–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarkar C, Storey CD, Hawkesworth CJ, Sparks RSJ (2011) Degassing in kimberlite: oxygen isotope ratios in perovskites from explosive and hypabyssal kimberlites. Earth Planet Sci Lett 312:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarkar C, Heaman LM, Pearson DG (2015) Duration and periodicity of kimberlite volcanic activity in the Lac de Gras kimberlite field, Canada and some recommendations for kimberlite geochronology. Lithos 218–219:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schulman JH, Evans LW, Ginther RJ, Murata KJ (1947) The sensitized luminescence of manganese-activated calcite. Appl Phys 18:732–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith CB, Allsop HL, Kramers JD, Hutchinson G, Roddick JC (1985) Emplacement ages of Jurassic-Cretaceous South African kimberlites by the Rb-Sr method on phlogopite and whole-rock samples. Trans Geol Soc S Afr 88:249–266Google Scholar
  52. Sobolev NV, Schertl H, Neuser RD, Tomilenko AA, Kuzmin DV (2017) Formation and evolution of hypabyssal kimberlites from the Siberian craton: part 1 – new insights from cathodoluminescence of the carbonates. J Asian Earth Sci 145B:670–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sparks RSJ, Brooker RA, Field M, Kavanagh J, Schumacher JC, Walter MJ, White J (2009) The nature of erupting kimberlite melts. Lithos 112:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tappe S, Simonetti A (2012) Combined U-Pb geochronology and Sr-Nd isotope analysis of the Ice River perovskite standard, with implications for kimberlite and alkaline rock petrogenesis. Chem Geol 304–305:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thirlwall MF (1991) Long-term reproducibility of multicollector Sr and Nd isotope ratio analysis. Chem Geol Isot Geosci Sect 94:85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Achterbergh, E, Ryan CG, Jackson SE, Griffin WL (2001) Data reduction software for LA-ICP-MS: appendix. In Sylvester PJ (ed) Laser ablation –ICP-mass spectrometry in the earth sciences: principles and applications. The Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Series, vol 29. Miner Assoc Can, St Johns, pp 239–243Google Scholar
  57. Wilson MR, Kjarsgaard BA, Taylor B (2007) Stable isotope composition of magmatic and deuteric carbonate phases in hypabyssal kimberlite, Lac de Gras field, Northwest Territories, Canada. Chem Geol 242:438–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodhead J, Swearer S, Maas R (2005) In situ Sr-isotope analysis of carbonates by LA-MC-ICP-MS: interference corrections , high spatial resolution and an example from otolith studies. J Anal At Spectrom 20:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Woodhead J, Hergt J, Phillips D, Paton C (2009) African kimberlites revisited: In situ Sr-isotope analysis of groundmass perovskite. Lithos 112:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu FY, Yang YH, Mitchell RH, Li QL, Yang JH, Zhang YB (2010) In situ U–Pb age determination and Nd isotopic analysis of perovskites from kimberlites in southern Africa and Somerset Island, Canada. Lithos 115:205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu FY, Mitchell RH, Li QL, Sun J, Liu CZ, Yang YH (2013) In situ UPb age determination and SrNd isotopic analysis of perovskite from the Premier (Cullinan) kimberlite, South Africa. Chem Geol 353:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang Y-H, Wu F-Y, Wilde SA, Liu XM, Zhang Y-B, Xie L-W, Yang J-H (2009) In situ perovskite Sr–Nd isotopic constraints on the petrogenesis of the Ordovician Mengyin kimberlites in the North China Craton. Chem Geol 264:24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yaxley GM, Kamenetsky VS, Nichols GT, Maas R, Belousova E, Rosenthal A, Norman M (2013) The discovery of kimberlites in Antarctica extends the vast Gondwanan Cretaceous province. Nat Commun 4:2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zurevinski SE, Mitchell RH (2011) Highly evolved hypabyssal kimberlite sills from Wemindji, Quebec, Canada: insights into the process of flow differentiation in kimberlite magmas. Contrib Mineral Petrol 161:765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Research Council (ARC) National Key Centre for Geochemical Evolution and Metallogeny of Continents (GEMOC) and Core to Crust Fluid Systems (CCFS), Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.KiDs (Kimberlites and Diamonds), School of Earth SciencesThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations