Ilmenite as a recorder of kimberlite history from mantle to surface: examples from Indian kimberlites
- 123 Downloads
Five compositional-textural types of ilmenite can be distinguished in nine kimberlites from the Eastern Dharwar craton of southern India. These ilmenite generations record different processes in kimberlite history, from mantle to surface. A first generation of Mg-rich ilmenite (type 1) was produced by metasomatic processes in the mantle before the emplacement of the kimberlite. It is found as xenolithic polycrystalline ilmenite aggregates as well as megacrysts and macrocrysts. All of these ilmenite forms may disaggregate within the kimberlite. Due to the interaction with low-viscosity kimberlitic magma replacement of pre-existing type 1 ilmenite by a succeeding generation of geikielite (type 2) along grain boundaries and cracks occurs. Another generation of Mg-rich ilmenite maybe produced by exsolution processes (type 3 ilmenite). Although the identity of the host mineral is unclear due to extensive alteration and possibility includes enstatite. Type 4 Mn-rich ilmenite is produced before the crystallization of groundmass perovskite and ulvöspinel. It usually mantles ilmenite and other Ti-rich minerals. Type 5 Mn-rich ilmenite is produced after the crystallization of the groundmass minerals and replaces them. The contents of Cr and Nb in type 2, 4 and 5 ilmenites are highly dependent on the composition of the replaced minerals, they may not be a good argument in exploration. The highest Mg contents are recorded in metasomatic ilmenite that is produced during kimberlite emplacement, and cannot be associated with diamond formation. The higher Mn contents are linked to magmatic processes and also late processes clearly produced after the crystallization of the kimberlite groundmass, and therefore ilmenite with high Mn contents cannot be considered as a reliable diamond indicator mineral (DIM) and kimberlite indicator mineral (KIM).
KeywordsMagnesian ilmenite Manganoan ilmenite Geikielite Kimberlite India
Authors acknowledge the Scientific and Technical Centres of the University of Barcelona (CCiTUB) for assistance with SEM-EDS (Javier García Veigas, Eva Prats Miralles and David Artiaga Torres) and EMPA (Xavier Llovet). We also thank Bruce Wyatt and Adrian Van Rythoven for their detailed reviews. The authors appreciate the careful editorial work of Casey Michael Hetman. This research was supported by the CGL2006-12973 and CGL2009-13758 projects of the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain, the AGAUR 2014SGR01661 and 2017SGR707 (Generalitat de Catalunya), and a FI grant to Jingyao Xu (coded FI_B 00904, Departament d’Educació i Universitats, Generalitat de Catalunya).
- Chalapathi Rao NV, Wu FY, Mitchell RH, Li QL, Lehmann B (2013) Mesoproterozoic U–Pb ages, trace element and Sr–Nd isotopic composition of perovskite from kimberlites of the eastern Dharwar craton, southern India: distinct mantle sources and a widespread 1.1 Ga tectonomagmatic event. Chem Geol 353:48–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fareeduddin, Mitchell RH (2012) Diamonds and their source rocks in India. Geol Soc India, Bangalore, 434 ppGoogle Scholar
- Giuliani A, Soltys A, Phillips D, Kamenetsky VS, Maas R, Goemann K, Woodhead JD, Drysdale RN, Griffin WL (2017) The final stages of kimberlite petrogenesis: petrography, mineral chemistry, melt inclusions and Sr-C-O isotope geochemistry of the Bultfontein kimberlite (Kimberley, South Africa). Chem Geol 455:342–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haggerty SE, Hardie RB, McMahon BM (1979) The mineral chemistry of ilmenite nodule associations from the Monastery Daitreme. In: Boyd FR, Meyer HOA (eds) The mantle sample: inclusions in kimberlites and other volcanics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Kimberlite Conference, vol 2. Amer Geophys Union, Washington, pp 249–256Google Scholar
- Mitchell RH (2013) Paragenesis and oxygen isotopic studies of serpentine in kimberlites. In: Pearson D. G. et al (Ed.) (2013): Proceedings of the 10th International Kimberlite Conference, vol 1. J Geol Soc India special issue, pp 1–12Google Scholar
- Nayak SS, Kudari SAD (1999) Discovery of diamond-bearing kimberlites in Kalyandurg area, Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh. Curr Sci India 76:1077–1079Google Scholar
- Pouchou JL, Pichoir F (1991) Quantitative analysis of homogeneous or stratified microvolumes applying the model “PAP”. In: Heirinch KFJ, Newbury DE (eds) Electron probe quantitation. Plenum Press, New York, pp 223–249Google Scholar
- Scott Smith BH, Nowicki TE, Russell JK, Webb KJ, Mitchell RH, Hetman CM, Robey JV (2018) A glossary of kimberlite and related terms. Scott-Smith Petrology Inc., North Vancouver, BC, Canada. Part 1, 144 pp; part 2, 59 pp; part 3, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
- Sridhar M, Chowdhary VS, Nayak SS, Augustine PF (2004) Discovery of kimberlite pipes in Gadwal area, Mahuhbubnagar district, Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 63:95–99Google Scholar
- Talukdar D, Chalapathi Rao NV (2015) Diamond Prospectivity of Mesoproterozoic kimberlites from the Wajrakarur field, southern India: perovskite oxybarometry and bulk-rock transition element geochemistry constraints. J Ind Geophys Union 19:175–181Google Scholar
- Wyatt BA, Lawless PJ (1982) Ilmenite in polymict xenoliths from Bultfontein and de Beers mines, South Africa. In: Kornprobst J (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Kimberlite Conference, vol 2. Elsevier, pp 43–56Google Scholar