Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 112, Supplement 2, pp 569–581 | Cite as

Ilmenite as a recorder of kimberlite history from mantle to surface: examples from Indian kimberlites

  • Jingyao XuEmail author
  • Joan Carles Melgarejo
  • Montgarri Castillo-Oliver
Original Paper


Five compositional-textural types of ilmenite can be distinguished in nine kimberlites from the Eastern Dharwar craton of southern India. These ilmenite generations record different processes in kimberlite history, from mantle to surface. A first generation of Mg-rich ilmenite (type 1) was produced by metasomatic processes in the mantle before the emplacement of the kimberlite. It is found as xenolithic polycrystalline ilmenite aggregates as well as megacrysts and macrocrysts. All of these ilmenite forms may disaggregate within the kimberlite. Due to the interaction with low-viscosity kimberlitic magma replacement of pre-existing type 1 ilmenite by a succeeding generation of geikielite (type 2) along grain boundaries and cracks occurs. Another generation of Mg-rich ilmenite maybe produced by exsolution processes (type 3 ilmenite). Although the identity of the host mineral is unclear due to extensive alteration and possibility includes enstatite. Type 4 Mn-rich ilmenite is produced before the crystallization of groundmass perovskite and ulvöspinel. It usually mantles ilmenite and other Ti-rich minerals. Type 5 Mn-rich ilmenite is produced after the crystallization of the groundmass minerals and replaces them. The contents of Cr and Nb in type 2, 4 and 5 ilmenites are highly dependent on the composition of the replaced minerals, they may not be a good argument in exploration. The highest Mg contents are recorded in metasomatic ilmenite that is produced during kimberlite emplacement, and cannot be associated with diamond formation. The higher Mn contents are linked to magmatic processes and also late processes clearly produced after the crystallization of the kimberlite groundmass, and therefore ilmenite with high Mn contents cannot be considered as a reliable diamond indicator mineral (DIM) and kimberlite indicator mineral (KIM).


Magnesian ilmenite Manganoan ilmenite Geikielite Kimberlite India 



Authors acknowledge the Scientific and Technical Centres of the University of Barcelona (CCiTUB) for assistance with SEM-EDS (Javier García Veigas, Eva Prats Miralles and David Artiaga Torres) and EMPA (Xavier Llovet). We also thank Bruce Wyatt and Adrian Van Rythoven for their detailed reviews. The authors appreciate the careful editorial work of Casey Michael Hetman. This research was supported by the CGL2006-12973 and CGL2009-13758 projects of the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain, the AGAUR 2014SGR01661 and 2017SGR707 (Generalitat de Catalunya), and a FI grant to Jingyao Xu (coded FI_B 00904, Departament d’Educació i Universitats, Generalitat de Catalunya).


  1. Afanasyev AA, Melnik O, Porritt L, Schumacher JC, Sparks RSJ (2014) Hydrothermal alteration of kimberlite by convective flows of external water. Contrib Mineral Petrol 168:1038–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong KA, Nowicki TE, Read GH (2004) Kimberlite AT-56: a mantle sample from the north central Superior craton, Canada. Lithos 77:695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashchepkov IV, Alymova NV, Logvinova AM, Vladykin NV, Kuligin SS, Mityukhin SI, Downes H, Stegnitsky YB, Prokopiev SA, Salikhov RF, Palessky VS, Khmel’nikova OS (2014) Picroilmenites in Yakutian kimberlites: variations and genetic models. Solid Earth 5:915–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chalapathi Rao NV, Wu FY, Mitchell RH, Li QL, Lehmann B (2013) Mesoproterozoic U–Pb ages, trace element and Sr–Nd isotopic composition of perovskite from kimberlites of the eastern Dharwar craton, southern India: distinct mantle sources and a widespread 1.1 Ga tectonomagmatic event. Chem Geol 353:48–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawson JB, Smith JV (1977) The MARID (mica–amphibole–rutile–ilmenite–diopside) suite of xenoliths in kimberlite. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 41:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dongre AN, Jacob DE, Stern RA (2015) Subduction-related origin of eclogite xenoliths from theWajrakarur kimberlite field, eastern Dharwar craton, southern India: constraints from petrology and geochemistry. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 166:165–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fareeduddin, Mitchell RH (2012) Diamonds and their source rocks in India. Geol Soc India, Bangalore, 434 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Giuliani A, Kamenetsky VS, Kendrick MA, Phillips D, Wyatt BA, Maas R (2013) Oxide, sulphide and carbonate minerals in a mantle polymict breccia: Metasomatism by proto-kimberlite magmas, and relationship to the kimberlite megacrystic suite. Chem Geol 353:4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giuliani A, Soltys A, Phillips D, Kamenetsky VS, Maas R, Goemann K, Woodhead JD, Drysdale RN, Griffin WL (2017) The final stages of kimberlite petrogenesis: petrography, mineral chemistry, melt inclusions and Sr-C-O isotope geochemistry of the Bultfontein kimberlite (Kimberley, South Africa). Chem Geol 455:342–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Golubkova AB, Nosovab AA, Larionovab YO (2013) Mg-ilmenite Megacrysts from the Arkhangelsk kimberlites, Russia: genesis and interaction with kimberlite melt and postkimberlite fluid. Geochem Int 51:353–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grégoire M, Bell D, Le Roex A (2002) Trace element geochemistry of phlogopite-rich mafic mantle xenoliths: their classification and their relationship to phlogopite-bearing peridotites and kimberlites revisited. Contrib Mineral Petrol 142:603–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gurney JJ, Zweistra P (1995) The interpretation of the major element compositions of mantle minerals in diamond exploration. J Geochem Explor 53:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurney JJ, Helmstaedt H, Moore RO (1993) A review of the use and application of mantle mineral geochemistry in diamond exploration. Pure Appl Chem 65:2423–2442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haggerty SE, Hardie RB, McMahon BM (1979) The mineral chemistry of ilmenite nodule associations from the Monastery Daitreme. In: Boyd FR, Meyer HOA (eds) The mantle sample: inclusions in kimberlites and other volcanics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Kimberlite Conference, vol 2. Amer Geophys Union, Washington, pp 249–256Google Scholar
  15. Hearn BC Jr (2004) The Homestead kimberlite, central Montana, USA: mineralogy, xenocrysts, and upper-mantle xenoliths. Lithos 77:473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaminsky FV, Belousova EA (2009) Manganoan ilmenite as kimberlite/diamond indicator mineral. Russ Geol Geophys 50:1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaminsky FV, Sablukov SM, Sablukova LI, Shchukin VS, Canil D (2002) Kimberlites from the Wawa area, Ontario. Can J Earth Sci 39:1819–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kostrovitsky SI, Malkovets VG, Verichev EM, Garanin VK, Suvorova LV (2004) Megacrysts from the Grib kimberlite pipe (Arkhangelsk Province, Russia). Lithos 77:511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kostrovitsky SI, Alymova NV, Yakovlev DA, Serov IV, Ivanov AS, Serov VP (2006) Specific features of “picroilmenite” composition in various diamondiferous fields of the Yakutian province. Dokl Earth Sci 406:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell RH (2013) Paragenesis and oxygen isotopic studies of serpentine in kimberlites. In: Pearson D. G. et al (Ed.) (2013): Proceedings of the 10th International Kimberlite Conference, vol 1. J Geol Soc India special issue, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  21. Moore AE (1987) A model for the origin of ilmenite in kimberlite and diamond: implications for the genesis of the discrete nodule (megacryst) suite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 95:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore A, Belousova E (2005) Crystallization of Cr-poor and Cr-rich megacryst suites from the host kimberlite magma: implications for mantle structure and the generation of kimberlite magmas. Contrib Mineral Petrol 149:462–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nayak SS, Kudari SAD (1999) Discovery of diamond-bearing kimberlites in Kalyandurg area, Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh. Curr Sci India 76:1077–1079Google Scholar
  24. Persikov ES, Bukhtiyarov PG, Sokol AG (2015) Change in the viscosity of kimberlite and basaltic magmas during their origin and evolution (prediction). Russ Geol Geophys 56:885–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pouchou JL, Pichoir F (1991) Quantitative analysis of homogeneous or stratified microvolumes applying the model “PAP”. In: Heirinch KFJ, Newbury DE (eds) Electron probe quantitation. Plenum Press, New York, pp 223–249Google Scholar
  26. Robles-Cruz SE, Watangua M, Isidoro L, Melgarejo JC, Galí A, Gonçalves AO (2009) Contrasting compositions and textures of ilmenite in the Catoca kimberlite, Angola, and implications in exploration for diamond. Lithos 112:966–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulze DJ, Anderson PFN, Hearn BC, Hetman CM (1995) Origin and significance of ilmenite megacrysts and macrocrysts from kimberlite. Int Geol Rev 37:780–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott Smith BH, Nowicki TE, Russell JK, Webb KJ, Mitchell RH, Hetman CM, Robey JV (2018) A glossary of kimberlite and related terms. Scott-Smith Petrology Inc., North Vancouver, BC, Canada. Part 1, 144 pp; part 2, 59 pp; part 3, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Sobolev NV, Kaminsky FV, Griffin WL, Yefimova ES, Win TT, Ryan CG, Botkunov AI (1997) Mineral inclusions in diamonds from the Sputnik kimberlite pipe, Yakutia. Lithos 39:135–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sparks RSJ (2013) Kimberlite volcanism. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 41:497–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sparks RSJ, Baker L, Brown RJ, Field M, Schumacher J, Stripp G, Walters A (2006) Dynamical constraints on kimberlite volcanism. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 155:18–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sparks RSJ, Brooker RA, Field M, Kavanagh J, Schumacher JC, Walter MJ, White J (2009) The nature of erupting kimberlite melts. Lithos 1125:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sridhar M, Chowdhary VS, Nayak SS, Augustine PF (2004) Discovery of kimberlite pipes in Gadwal area, Mahuhbubnagar district, Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 63:95–99Google Scholar
  34. Sturt BA (1970) Exsolution during metamorphism with particular reference to feldspar solid solutions. Mineral Mag 37:815–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Talukdar D, Chalapathi Rao NV (2015) Diamond Prospectivity of Mesoproterozoic kimberlites from the Wajrakarur field, southern India: perovskite oxybarometry and bulk-rock transition element geochemistry constraints. J Ind Geophys Union 19:175–181Google Scholar
  36. Van Straaten BI, Kopylova MG, Russell JK, Webb KJ, Scott Smith BH (2008) Discrimination of diamond resource and non-resource domains in the Victor North pyroclastic Kimberlite, Canada. J Volcanol Geoth Res 17:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wyatt BA, Lawless PJ (1982) Ilmenite in polymict xenoliths from Bultfontein and de Beers mines, South Africa. In: Kornprobst J (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Kimberlite Conference, vol 2. Elsevier, pp 43–56Google Scholar
  38. Wyatt BA, Mike B, Anckar E, Grütter H (2004) Compositional classification of “kimberlitic” and “non-kimberlitic” ilmenite. Lithos 77:819–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang H-F, Menzies MA, Mattey DP, Hinton RW, Gurney JJ (2001) Petrology, mineralogy and geochemistry of oxide minerals in polymict xenoliths from the Bultfontein kimberlites, South Africa: implication for low bulk-rock oxygen isotopic ratios. Contrib Mineral Petrol 141:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia Aplicada, Facultat de Ciències de la TerraUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems and GEMOC, Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia

Personalised recommendations