Photosynthesis-dependent formation of convoluted plasma membrane domains in Chara internodal cells is independent of chloroplast position
- 1.2k Downloads
The characean green alga Chara australis forms complex plasma membrane convolutions called charasomes when exposed to light. Charasomes are involved in local acidification of the surrounding medium which facilitates carbon uptake required for photosynthesis. They have hitherto been only described in the internodal cells and in close contact with the stationary chloroplasts. Here, we show that charasomes are not only present in the internodal cells of the main axis, side branches, and branchlets but that the plasma membranes of chloroplast-containing nodal cells, protonemata, and rhizoids are also able to invaginate into complex domains. Removal of chloroplasts by local irradiation with intense light revealed that charasomes can develop at chloroplast-free “windows” and that the resulting pH banding pattern is independent of chloroplast or window position. Charasomes were not detected along cell walls containing functional plasmodesmata. However, charasomes formed next to a smooth wound wall which was deposited onto the plasmodesmata-containing wall when the neighboring cell was damaged. In contrast, charasomes were rarely found at uneven, bulged wound walls which protrude into the streaming endoplasm and which were induced by ligation or puncturing. The results of this study show that charasome formation, although dependent on photosynthesis, does not require intimate contact with chloroplasts. Our data suggest further that the presence of plasmodesmata inhibits charasome formation and/or that exposure to the outer medium is a prerequisite for charasome formation. Finally, we hypothesize that the absence of charasomes at bulged wound walls is due to the disturbance of uniform laminar mass streaming.
KeywordsCharasome Chara australis pH banding Plant Nodal cell Wound
The plasma membrane of plant and other cells is laterally compartmented into a wide range of different types of domains. Among these domains, lipid rafts are considered to be small (10–200 nm in diameter) and highly dynamic (Lingwood and Simons 2009; Mongrand et al. 2011), whereas micro- and macrodomains are larger (up to several micrometers) and more stable (Boutte and Moreau 2014; Jarsch et al. 2014; Malinsky et al. 2013). Membrane domains have been shown to be involved in signal transduction, cell to cell interactions, transport, stress, and polarized growth. They are enriched or depleted in membrane components but structurally similar to the “normal” plasma membrane. Visually more conspicuous are highly convoluted plasma membrane areas which serve to provide space for the accommodation of various transporters, e. g., the microvilli of animal intestinal cells (Lange 2011) or the convoluted plasma membrane domains of plant transfer cells (Offler et al. 2003). Convoluted membrane domains are also characteristic for submerged leaves of aquatic angiosperms where the plasma membrane along the outer epidermal cells is invaginated along distinct wall ingrowths in order to provide space for the accommodation of H+-ATPases (Elzenga and Prins 1989a, b; Ligrone et al. 2011; Prins and Elzenga 1989; Prins et al. 1982). The H+-ATPases acidify the environment which helps to convert membrane-impermeable hydrogen carbonate (bicarbonate) into CO2 which is freely diffusible and easily taken up for photosynthesis. Plasma membrane domains with a similar structure and a similar function are present in the highly evolved characean alga, Chara australis, as described below.
The internodal cells of the characean algae may become up to 20 cm long. They have been a widely used model system in plant biology and are useful for studying various aspects of cellular dynamics and the cytoskeleton (Foissner and Wasteneys 2012; Shimmen and Yokota 2004). They are also well suited for the study of transmembrane transport and plasma membrane domains (Beilby and Bisson 2012; Beilby and Casanova 2014; Foissner and Wasteneys 2014; Volkov 2006). The cytoplasm of the internodal cells consists of a stationary cortex, which includes files of helically arranged chloroplasts (Fig. 1b, c), a motile endoplasm, and a huge central vacuole. Cytoplasmic rotational streaming is generated by interaction of myosin-coated organelles with subcortical actin bundles attached to the inner surface of chloroplasts. Up- and down-streaming regions are separated from each other by the chloroplast-free neutral line (Fig. 1b, c). The plasma membrane along the longitudinal cell walls is smooth in the internodal cells of the genera Nitella and Nitellopsis as investigated so far. In the internodal cells of the genus Chara, however, smooth plasma membrane domains alternate with highly complex convoluted membrane areas in light-exposed thalli (Chau et al. 1994; Franceschi and Lucas 1980; Schmoelzer et al. 2011 and references therein). The function of these “charasomes” is similar to that of the membrane invaginations found in leaves of submerged water plants (see above). Several studies indicate that they are involved in the photosynthesis-dependent acidification of the environment required for efficient uptake of CO2 (e.g., Chau et al. 1994; Price and Badger 1985; Price et al. 1985; Price and Whitecross 1983). A recent study confirmed the abundance of H+-ATPases in charasomes and their involvement in the generation of the pH banding pattern at the cell surface under steady state conditions (Schmoelzer et al. 2011). However, it has also been shown that a pH banding pattern can be generated in the absence of charasomes, and that photosynthetic utilization of exogenous hydrogen carbonate can occur in the absence of charasomes (e.g. Lucas et al. 1989). Unlike the convoluted plasma membrane areas in cells of higher plants (McCurdy et al. 2008), charasomes are not supported by cell wall ingrowths but by a proteoglucan coat (Franceschi and Lucas 1981). This allows easy degradation and, eventually, reformation at other cell regions in response to changing light conditions (Schmoelzer et al. 2011). So far, charasomes have been described only in the internodal cells of the main axis, the branches and the branchlets, and in close proximity to the chloroplasts. They have been reported to be absent from the chloroplast-free neutral lines and from the chloroplast-free cross walls (Franceschi and Lucas 1980; Schmoelzer et al. 2011). On the basis of these data, it was concluded that the induction of a (charasome-free) alkaline zone at regions ligated with the aid of cotton or silk thread was due to the removal of the chloroplasts (Shimmen and Yamamoto 2002).
During the course of this study, we wanted to verify or discard the hypothesis that the formation of charasomes requires intimate contact of chloroplasts with the plasma membrane, and that the local experimental removal of chloroplasts from the cell cortex results in degradation of charasomes and, consequently, the formation of an alkaline zone. Our data show that charasomes can develop at chloroplast-free windows produced by local irradiation with intense light and that the pH banding pattern is independent of these chloroplast-free areas. Our study revealed also that the presence of functional plasmodesmata excludes the presence of charasomes, and that charasomes are rarely formed at wound walls which protrude into the streaming endoplasm. We show further that charasomes are not only formed in the internodal cells of the main axis and the branches, but that the plasma membrane of the nodal cells, protonemata, and rhizoids is also able to invaginate into these complex membrane domains.
Material and methods
Algal material and culture conditions
The thalli of Chara australis were grown in a substrate of soil, peat, and sand in 10–50 l aquaria filled with distilled water. The temperature was about 20 °C and fluorescent lamps provided a 16/8 h light/dark cycle. The light intensity was low (about 5 μEinstein m−2 s−1) in order to prevent the calcification and excessive growth of epiphytes. After several weeks of growth, fragments of thalli were isolated from the main axis with a small pair of scissors and left in artificial fresh water (AFW) (10−3 M NaCl, 10−4 M KCl, 10−4 M CaCl2) until use.
For growth of protonemata, shoots were cut into short segments containing at least two nodes and one internodal cell as described (Braun 2002). The segments were embedded in a 1-cm-high layer of sand which covered the bottom of a glass container measuring about 6 cm in diameter and about 6 cm in height. The containers were filled with slightly modified Forsberg medium (Forsberg 1965), supplemented with 1 % soil (w/v), and kept in complete darkness. After 3 to 4 weeks, the single-celled, pale protonema initials had a length of up to 2 cm. These protonema initials started cell divisions when exposed to light, and the basal cell became green after a few days (Fig. 1a).
In vivo staining, formation of chloroplast-free windows and confocal laser scanning microscopy
The pH banding pattern of the internodal cells was documented using phenol red (phenolsulfonphthalein, Sigma) at a concentration of 10 mM dissolved in AFW. Phenol red changes color from yellow to pink depending on the pH of the medium (visual transition interval is between pH 6.8 and pH 8.2; Spear et al. 1969). Photographs were taken after 15 min exposure to intense light of fluorescent lamps (80 μEinstein m−2 s−1).
For in vivo staining of charasomes, internodal cells were pulse labeled for 5 min with 10 μM FM1-43FX (N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(4-(dibutylamino)styryl)pyridinium dibromide, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), a plasma membrane dye and endocytic marker, diluted from a 500 μM stock solution in AFW. Mitochondria were fluorescently labeled by 1 µM MitoTracker® Orange CMTMRos (Invitrogen) diluted from a 1 mM stock solution in DMSO.
The chloroplast-free windows in the internodal cells of the main axis and the branchlets were created by 3–7 min irradiation of cells with the blue light (450–490 nm) of a halide lamp (maximum intensity) attached to a fluorescence microscope and using a 40× objective (Kamitsubo 1972). This treatment was sufficient to cause rounding up of chloroplasts and to temporarily impede streaming in the irradiated zone. Longer irradiation times which lead to the deposition of a wound wall (Foissner and Wasteneys 2012) were not applied. For recovery and for charasome formation, cells were placed into Petri dishes containing AFW or a mixture of AFW and modified Forsberg medium and exposed to light provided by fluorescent lamps with an intensity of about 5 μEinstein m−2 s−1. The bleached chloroplasts were detached from the cortex within 2 hours and were carried away with the streaming endoplasm. The pH banding pattern and charasome distribution were documented at various time intervals as described above.
The confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) used in this study was a Leica (Mannheim, Germany) TCS SP5 coupled to a DMI 6000B inverted microscope. Live internodal cells and nodal complexes were mounted in AFW ± dye. All images presented in this study are single optical sections unless otherwise stated. Images produced by the LSM software were further processed with Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc.).
Chemical fixation was as described in Foissner (1991). Briefly, cells were fixed for 30 min at room temperature in 1 % glutaraldehyde dissolved in phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. Following several washes in buffer, cells were postfixed overnight at 4° in 2 % OsO4 dissolved in buffer. After dehydration in an ethanol series at 4 °C, cells were embedded in Agar low viscosity resin (Agar Scientific, Essex, Great Britain). Micrographs at elastic bright-field mode were taken with a Zeiss LEO 912 transmission electron microscope (EM) equipped with in-column energy filter.
Charasomes in the internodal cells of the main axis, branches, branchlets, protonemata and rhizoids
Fluorescent plasma membrane dyes like FM1-43 accumulate in the membranous tubules of charasomes and can therefore be used for visualization of charasomes in living cells (Schmoelzer et al. 2011). The FM-dyes also stain membrane- and callose-containing amorphous wound walls deposited after injury or in senescent cells (Foissner and Wasteneys 2012; see below). In order to exclude the possibility that small wound walls were mistaken for charasomes, we used electron microscopy and/or co-labeling with sirofluor, a callose-specific fluorescent stain which labels the wound walls only (see Klima and Foissner 2008). Experiments with pH buffers and with inhibitors of H+-ATPase activity like vanadate indicate that FM1-43 staining of charasomes is neither dependent on the pH nor on their functional status (Suppl. Fig. 1; see also Schmoelzer et al. 2011).
The possibility to stain charasomes in living cells, with the aid of fluorescent plasma membrane and endocytic markers (Klima and Foissner 2008; Schmoelzer et al. 2011), confirmed the earlier electron microscopical studies about the presence of charasomes in the internodal cells of the main axis, the branches, and the branchlets (Fig. 1a; Bisson et al. 1991; Chau et al. 1994; Franceschi and Lucas 1980 and references therein). Under steady state conditions, charasome size and abundance correlated with the pH banding pattern as revealed by the pH indicating dye phenol red (Fig. 1b). Charasomes were large (up to few micrometer in diameter) and numerous at the acid regions (Fig. 1c, d), and they were smaller, less abundant, or even absent at the alkaline zones (not shown) as described in detail in Schmoelzer et al. (2011). Mean charasome area fractions (percentage of cortical area occupied by charasomes) in cells investigated during the course of this study were 18.7 (±1.9 SD, n = 6) at the acid regions and 2.2 (±0.2 SD, n = 5) at the alkaline zones, and differences were highly significant (P ≤0.001, t test). Transitions from acid to alkaline pH were smooth or abrupt (Bulychev et al. 2003) and correlated with smooth or abrupt changes in charasome size and abundance (Schmoelzer et al. 2011). Consistent with earlier findings (Franceschi and Lucas 1980), charasomes were found to be absent from the chloroplast-free neutral line (Fig. 1b, c) and from the chloroplast-free cross walls (Fig. 1e). In this study, we additionally investigated the more delicate basal (proximal) internodal cells of the secondary protonemata (Fig. 1a, f) and the upper (proximal) internodal cells of the rhizoids (Fig. 1a, h). Their cytoplasmic architecture is similar to that of the internodes of the main axis and the branchlets consisting of a stationary cortex, a streaming endoplasm which contains up to several thousand nuclei and a large central vacuole. In the upward-growing green protonema, the internodal cell charasomes were detected by CLSM of FM1-43 stained cells (Fig. 1g) and by the electron microscopy (data not shown). Freshly collected rhizoid internodal cells never contained charasomes. However, when these pale rhizoids were pulled out of the sediment and exposed to light for about 2 weeks, numerous charasomes could be identified by CLSM (Fig. 1i, j) and EM (Fig. 1k). In protonemata and rhizoids, charasomes often formed in considerable distance to the small and widely spaced chloroplasts (Fig. 1g, j). The abundance of charasomes in the internodal cells of protonemata and rhizoids was not uniform suggesting uneven acidification of the cell surface. A pH banding pattern, however, could not be detected using phenol red. Most probably, the differences in acid and alkaline pH were too small to be detected by pH-indicating dyes. Neither chloroplasts nor charasomes were detected in the tip-growing cells of protonemata or in tip-growing rhizoids.
Charasomes in nodal cells
Nodal cell of Chara australis with motile chloroplasts (autofluorescent red) and minute FM1-43 fluorescent charasomes (green; arrows). Time interval is2580 ms; 5 frames per second. (AVI 842 kb)
In freshly isolated nodes, the charasomes in peripheral nodal, stipulode or bract cells were exclusively located along their outer cell walls, i. e., at those facing the environment (Figs. 2c–e and 5). No charasomes could be detected at the plasmodesmata-containing cell walls, i. e., at regions with close contact to another cell (an internode or a cell of the nodal complex). The central flat nodal cells (Fig. 2b and schematic Fig. 5), which were completely surrounded by the peripheral nodal cells and by the upper and lower internodes, were therefore completely free of charasomes (Figs. 2g, h and 5). In the nodal cells, chloroplasts were seen not only at the plasmodesmata-free but also at the plasmodesmata-pervaded cell walls (Figs. 2a, b, g and 5), which is in contrast to the internodal cells where neither charasomes nor chloroplasts could be detected at the plasmodesmata-containing cross walls (Figs. 1e and 5).
However, charasomes formed beneath the plasmodesmata-containing cell walls when nodal complexes were isolated from the thallus as shown in Fig. 2b and were exposed to light (16/8 h light/dark cycle, 5 μEinstein m−2 s−1) for at least 2 weeks. Following staining with FM1-43, numerous tubular structures became visible in those cell walls, which previously connected the nodal cells with their adjacent internodes (Fig. 2i). These tubules corresponded to the channels containing the damaged plasmodesmata. Their brighter FM1-43 fluorescence, as compared with that of the living plasmodesmata, suggests that FM1-43 stained not only the residual plasma membrane but also other components of plugged plasmodesmata (compare Figs. 2g with 2i). The cytoplasm beneath these cell walls contained FM1-43-stained, immobile punctate structures in the interstices between the cortical chloroplasts (Fig. 2i). Electron microscopy revealed that these charasomes were not located immediately beneath the original, perforated cell wall but beneath a channel-free, smooth wound wall deposited in response to the severing of plasmodesmata (Figs. 2j, k and 5).
Charasomes and pH banding in chloroplast-free windows
We produced windows at the alkaline or at the acid regions previously identified by incubation in phenol red. Local irradiation with intense blue light caused local, transient alkalinization of the medium as reported from microperforated internodes (Bulychev and Komarova 2014b) even if windows were created at the acidic zones (not shown). After window formation, the pH banding patterns were documented in 1 week intervals over a period of up to 5 weeks. As illustrated in Fig. 3b, c, the pattern of acid and alkaline regions changed within days similar to that of control cells without windows. Some alkaline regions, especially those at the tip of the distal internodal cells of the branchlets were rather stable, others disappeared or slightly changed their position and/or size, and still others seemed to form de novo at the previously acid bands. No correlation was found between the positions of windows and the positions of alkaline or acid bands, irrespective whether windows were created at the acid or at the alkaline zones, and irrespective whether charasomes were present or not. Over a period of 5 weeks, 22 out of 34 windows became permanently acidic, 10 windows became transiently alkaline, and 2 windows became permanently alkaline.
Just as the pH banding pattern, the distribution of charasomes, documented between 1 and 2 weeks after local removal of chloroplasts, was independent of the position of windows. No or very few charasomes were found at alkaline windows even if the windows were created at acid (charasome-rich) zones (not shown). Charasomes were larger and more abundant in windows with an acidic pH. When the window was located within a larger acid region, charasome size and abundance within the window were similar as in the chloroplast-containing neighbor area, but charasome distribution was different (Fig. 3d–g). Outside the window, charasomes were preferentially located in the clefts between chloroplasts (Fig. 3g), but they were evenly distributed in the chloroplast-free areas (Fig. 3f). When the border between an acid and alkaline zone was located across a window, transitions in charasome size and abundance were either continuous or abrupt as reported for control cells (Schmoelzer et al. 2011). Abrupt transitions yielded the most spectacular images. In these windows, the extremely dense pattern of large, punctate, or branched charasomes in the acid region sharply contrasted with the complete absence of charasomes at the adjacent alkaline zone (Fig. 3h–k).
Under steady state conditions, the pH banding pattern correlated not only with spatiotemporal differences in charasome size and abundance but also with spatiotemporal differences in size and abundance of cortical mitochondria, which were larger and more numerous at the acid regions as compared with the alkaline bands (Foissner 2004; Schmoelzer et al. 2011). Within windows, however, cortical mitochondria were rarely observed, even if they had an acidic pH and a dense population of charasomes (Fig. 3f, g). Inside the windows, mitochondria performed wiggling motions and often became detached and were carried away with the streaming endoplasm. On the other hand, endoplasmic mitochondria were observed to suddenly establish contact with the cortex and to remain attached for several seconds or minutes. The mitochondria in windows were often streaming aligned, i. e., parallel to the direction of cytoplasmic streaming (not shown). Streaming-aligned orientation of charasomes was never observed.
Charasomes and pH banding at wound walls
It has been reported that alkaline bands form at wounds induced, e.g., by ligation of the internodal cells, and it had been suggested that this local alkalinization was due to the removal of chloroplasts (Shimmen and Yamamoto 2002). In this study, we were able to demonstrate that the mere absence of chloroplasts did not automatically lead to a permanent alkalinization of the cell surface even when the chloroplast-free area occupied the whole cell diameter (Suppl Fig. 2D). Ligation of the internodal cells is a serious damage, which is always followed by the deposition of a wound wall (Foissner and Wasteneys 2012). As described above, wound walls had also been deposited beneath the plasmodesmata-containing cell walls following destruction of the neighbor cell. The surface of these wound walls was smooth, and charasomes were abundant along their surface (Figs. 2i–k and 5). We therefore argued that the morphology of the wound wall could be decisive for the reported alkalinization and for the presence or absence of charasomes. In the following, we describe pH patterns and charasomes at wound walls with uneven surfaces that protrude deep into the streaming endoplasm. The results were similar in the internodal cells of the main axis and in the internodal cells of the branchlets and whether internodal cells were wounded at acid or at alkaline regions.
The internodal cells may become several months and even several years old (own unpublished observations). Older cells often contained distinct local thickenings of the cell wall which were probably induced by epiphytes, e. g., by fungal hyphae trying to penetrate the cell wall. The wall ingrowths displaced the cortical chloroplasts and protruded deep into the streaming endoplasm (Fig. 4l–n) just as the wound wall beneath the puncture wounds. Only few, if any, charasomes were present at the plasma membrane along these wall ingrowths even if they were abundant between the chloroplasts of the adjacent regions.
Photosynthesis-dependent formation of charasomes is not restricted to the internodal cells
The convoluted plasma membrane areas of characean algae have hitherto been only described from the internodal cells of the main axis and of the branches and from the internodal cells of the branchlets (see introduction). During the course of this study, we also detected charasomes in the internodal cells of protonemata and in the internodal cells of rhizoids when they developed chloroplasts following light exposure. Even more interestingly, charasomes were found in chloroplast-containing nodal cells, irrespective whether chloroplasts were anchored in the cortex or participated in cytoplasmic streaming (Fig. 5). Charasomes were never detected in pale cells lacking well-developed chloroplasts consistent with the observation that photosynthesis is required for charasome development (Bisson et al. 1991; Chau et al. 1994; Schmoelzer et al. 2011). Apart from this prerequisite, every cell of the vegetative part of the thallus of Chara australis seems to have the capacity for charasome formation, although to different extent.
Charasome formation is not dependent on close contact with chloroplasts or mitochondria
In the internodal cells, charasomes usually develop in close proximity to the stationary chloroplasts, and they are absent from the chloroplast-free neutral line and the chloroplast-free cross walls as confirmed in this study. Therefore, it had been suggested that charasome formation is dependent on close contact with chloroplasts, and that the removal of chloroplasts induced the formation of (charasome-free) alkaline band in mechanically wounded cells (Shimmen and Yamamoto 2002). We tested this hypothesis by analyzing the chloroplast-free regions, “windows”, experimentally induced by irradiation with intense blue light. The results of this study showed that the pH banding pattern was completely independent of the position of chloroplasts or windows, respectively. The fact that the pH at windows could be either acidic or alkaline indicates that anchored chloroplasts are neither required for extrusion of OH− (or proton influx, Shimmen and Yamamoto 2002) nor for the acidification of the surrounding medium. Corresponding to the pH banding pattern, charasome distribution was found to be independent of the position of cortical chloroplasts. Even more interestingly, we found that charasome density could be higher in the chloroplast-free windows than that in the adjacent chloroplast-containing regions of the cell suggesting that the presence of chloroplasts anchored to or near the cell membrane restricted charasome growth due to space constraints at least under the conditions used in this study, i. e., after 2 weeks of growth of charasomes at rather low light intensity. We have to note, however, that after longer treatment or under higher light intensities, charasomes form not only between chloroplasts but also beneath them (Franceschi and Lucas 1980; Schmoelzer et al. 2011).
Our data indicate that charasome formation—although dependent on photosynthesis—does not require intimate contact of chloroplasts with the plasma membrane. Obviously, long-distance signaling from chloroplasts to the plasma membrane is sufficient to induce its invagination into complex domains. A possible candidate is H2O2 which has recently been shown to be transported from illuminated to non-illuminated regions of the internodal cells by cytoplasmic mass streaming (Eremin et al. 2013; Bulychev and Komarova 2014a). The shift in cytoplasmic redox poise and light-induced elevation of cytoplasmic pH appeared to be involved in the generation of the pH banding pattern by the opening of H+/OH− permeable channels in the plasma membrane at the downstream region of the irradiated zone (Eremin et al. 2013). We speculate that the pH banding pattern, which precedes charasome formation (Chau et al. 1994), affects the properties of the plasma membrane and the cortical cytoplasm. It is feasible that endocytosis becomes locally inhibited at acidic zones so that surplus membrane area delivered by exocytosis of vesicles becomes convoluted into charasomes. This in turn would lead to a stronger acidification because of the highly concentrated H+-ATPases. Research is now in progress how local differences in external and internal pH affect charasome formation.
In spite of the slowly changing pH banding pattern, charasome size and abundance largely correlated with the positions of acid and alkaline zones investigated during the course of this study. Hence, charasomes became degraded and were newly formed in untreated cells or cell regions as long as their cell walls were not calcified. This is consistent with our observations that charasomes were often found in windows which were produced at the previously charasome-free alkaline regions and, on the other hand, charasomes were often found to be absent from windows produced at the previously charasome-rich acidic zones. More rapidly changing pH banding patterns (within few hours) have been described elsewhere, and it is unlikely that they correspond to the distribution of charasomes because of their slow growth (e.g., Bisson et al. 1991).
In the cortex of the unwounded control internodal cells, charasome size and density were shown to correlate with the size and density of mitochondria (Franceschi and Lucas 1980; Schmoelzer et al. 2011). At the acid regions, charasomes and also mitochondria were abundant, squeezed between the chloroplasts and in close contact to each other (Schmoelzer et al. 2011). In the cortical cytoplasm of windows, mitochondria were less frequently observed than in the adjacent chloroplast-containing regions where they were shielded from endoplasmic flow. Mitochondria occasionally adhered to the cortex but mostly detached after several seconds or minutes and were carried away with the streaming endoplasm. In the cortex of untreated internodal cells, mitochondria move along actin filaments and microtubules (Foissner 2004). Preliminary results indicated, however, that their anchorage in windows was actin and microtubule independent. Irrespective of how mitochondria adhered to windows, the forces between cortex and mitochondria were obviously weaker than those exerted by the shearing forces of cytoplasmic mass streaming. It also became clear from these observations that contact with mitochondria was not required for charasome growth.
Do functional plasmodesmata inhibit charasome formation?
Our study confirmed that charasomes were absent from the chloroplast-free transverse end walls of the internodal cells (Franceschi and Lucas 1980). These cell walls were pervaded by plasmodesmata which connected the cytoplasm of the internode with that of the adjacent nodal cells (Brecknock et al. 2011; Cook et al. 1997). Charasomes were also absent from the plasmodesmata-containing cell walls between different nodal cells. When plasmodesmata became severed due to the destruction of the neighboring internodal cell, a continuous, smooth, and channel-free cell wall was deposited onto the old plasmodesmata-containing cell wall. The plasma membrane along this newly formed “wound wall”, which had a smooth surface, was able to invaginate into charasomes (Fig. 5). These findings suggest that the presence of functional plasmodesmata, a highly complex membrane macrodomain (Boutte and Moreau 2014), excludes the presence of another complex membrane domain, the charasome. Although we cannot exclude that the absence of charasomes is due to sterical restrictions, it is feasible that the presence of plasmodesmata-associated proteins prevents charasome formation. That Chara plasmodesmata, like those of higher plants, contain a specific set of proteins, has been documented (Faulkner et al. 2005). However, it is also possible that charasomes can only be formed when the cell wall is directly exposed to the environment. Studies are now in progress to investigate which of these two possibilities, or both, are responsible for charasome development.
In nodal cells, the presence of functional plasmodesmata does not prevent the anchoring of chloroplasts. The absence of chloroplasts at the end walls of the internodal cell is therefore due to other constraints. A likely candidate is the actin cytoskeleton which, in co-operation with myosin, drives cytoplasmic mass streaming. Actin filaments are usually polymerized from the plasma membrane. The subcortical actin filament bundles in the internodal cells are aligned along the chloroplast files, far apart from the plasma membrane. If chloroplasts are not tightly packed, the subcortical actin bundles may extend into the cortex. Otherwise, close contact of actin filament bundles with the plasma membrane is possible only at the end walls, and it is feasible that these regions are free of chloroplasts (and charasomes) in order to accommodate protein complexes involved in actin polymerization and anchorage (e. g., Martiniere et al. 2011; Thomas 2012). The presence of chloroplasts at the plasmodesmata-containing cell walls of nodal cells with a streaming endoplasm can be explained by the fact that chloroplasts of the nodal cells are smaller and wider spaced so that there is ample space for anchoring or nucleation of actin filaments between chloroplasts.
pH banding pattern and charasome formation at wound walls
We confirmed that alkaline bands form at ligated regions of the internodal cells (Shimmen and Yamamoto 2002) and showed that the plasma membrane beneath the ligated zone was free of charasomes as expected. However, this study also revealed that the local removal of chloroplasts did not lead to local, permanent alkalinization of the cell surface and, furthermore, ligation was not always associated with the detachment of chloroplasts. This excludes the possibility that the absence of chloroplasts is responsible for the local and permanent rise in pH. During the course of this study, we observed that alkaline (charasome-free) zones were created after the deposition of extended wound walls with an uneven surface, irrespective whether they were induced by ligation or by multiple puncturing. We also found that charasomes were absent beneath wounds induced by single puncturing or by epiphytes. Both wound types were characterized by uneven wound walls which protruded deep into the endoplasm and both were (nearly) devoid of charasomes (Fig. 5). We therefore hypothesize that the absence of charasomes along bulged wound walls is due to hydrodynamic turbulences in the streaming endoplasm (Uijttewaal 2014). Such turbulences do not occur along smooth surfaces, and this would explain why numerous charasomes were observed along the flat, smooth wound walls deposited beneath plugged plasmodesmata.
This research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, Project No. P 22957-B20 to IF). We are grateful to Marion Hoepflinger for the discussion and proofreading.
Conflicts of interest
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.
- Beilby M, Bisson M (2012) pH banding in charophyte algae. In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant Electrophysiology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 247–271Google Scholar
- Foissner I, Wasteneys GO (2014) Characean internodal cells as a model system for the study of cell organization. In: Kwang WJ (ed) Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, vol 311. Academic Press, pp 307–364Google Scholar
- Wood RD, Imahori K (1965) Monograph of the characeae. Cramer, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.