Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 230, Issue 6, pp 2111–2123 | Cite as

Effect of interface wettability on the flow characteristics of liquid in smooth microchannels

  • Xiaolong Li
  • Xiaoqian ChenEmail author
  • Yiyong Huang
  • Xiang Zhang
Original Paper

Abstract

Rapid advances in microfluidic devices have induced interest in the study of the microscale flow mechanism. However, the experimental results of microscale flow often deviate from the classical theory, and we attribute this deviation to the changing liquid viscosity in the microchannels. Because of the effect of the solid–liquid intermolecular force, the viscosity of the liquid near the walls is different from the bulk viscosity. Based on molecular theory and wetting theory, we propose a modified apparent viscosity model. The apparent viscosity of the liquid in microchannels increases with the increase in wettability and decreases with the increase in distance from the wall and the increase in drive pressure. The apparent viscosity near the hydrophilic wall is higher than the bulk viscosity, which increases the flow friction in the microchannels. To validate this model, we experimentally investigate the frictional characteristic of a deionized water flow in smooth parallel-plate microchannels with different wettabilities and heights of approximately 20 and 50 \(\upmu \hbox {m}\). The results indicate that the friction factor is higher than that predicted by the classical theory. Such a difference increases with increasing wettability and decreases with increasing hydraulic diameter and pressure drop, which is consistent with the results of theoretical analysis. The apparent viscosity calculated by the apparent viscosity model notably fit the experimental results, with a relative difference of less than ± 2.1%.

List of symbols

\(A_{\mathrm{ch}}\)

Cross-sectional area of the channel (\(\hbox {m}^{2}\))

\(A_{\mathrm{p}}\)

Cross-sectional area of the plenum (\(\hbox {m}^{2}\))

\(D_{\mathrm{h}}\)

Hydraulic diameter (\(\upmu \hbox {m}\))

\(F_{\mathrm{LL}}\)

Liquid–liquid intermolecular forces (\(\hbox {N}\))

\(F_{\mathrm{LS}}\)

Solid–liquid intermolecular forces (\(\hbox {N}\))

f

Darcy’s friction factor

H

Height of the microchannel (\(\upmu \hbox {m}\))

\(K_{90}\)

Bend loss coefficient

\(K_{\mathrm{c}}\)

Contraction loss coefficient

\(K_{\mathrm{e}}\)

Expansion loss coefficient

k

Coefficient in Eq. (3)

L

Length of the microchannel (\(\hbox {mm}\))

n

Coefficient in Eq. (3)

\(\Delta P\)

Frictional pressure drop (Pa)

\(\Delta P_{\mathrm{H1}}\)

Inlet hydrostatic pressure losses (Pa)

\(\Delta P_{\mathrm{H2}}\)

Outlet hydrostatic pressure losses (Pa)

\(P_{\mathrm{in}}\)

Inlet pressure (Pa)

\(P_{\mathrm{out}}\)

Outlet pressure (Pa)

u

Velocity in the x-direction (\(\hbox {m}/\hbox {s}\))

\(u_{\mathrm{m}}\)

Mean velocity (\(\hbox {m}/\hbox {s}\))

Re

Reynolds number

W

width of the microchannel (\(\hbox {mm}\))

xy

Cartesian coordinates (\(\hbox {m}\))

\(\delta \)

Mean distance between two adjacent molecules (\(\hbox {nm}\))

\(\mu _0\)

Bulk viscosity [\({\hbox {kg}}/({{\hbox {m}\,\hbox {s}}})\)]

\(\mu _{\mathrm{a}}\)

Apparent viscosity [\({\hbox {kg}}/({\hbox {m}\,\hbox {s}})\)]

\(\bar{{\mu }}_{\mathrm{a}}\)

Average apparent viscosity [\(\hbox {kg}/(\hbox {m}\,\hbox {s})\)]

\(\theta \)

Contact angle (\(^{\circ }\))

\(\rho \)

Density (\({\hbox {kg}}/{\hbox {m}^{3}}\))

\(\sigma _{\mathrm{L}}\)

Surface tension of the liquid (N/m)

\(\sigma _{\mathrm{L}}^0\)

Internal surface force of the liquid (N/m)

\(\sigma _{\mathrm{LS}}\)

Interfacial tension of the liquid (N/m)

\(\sigma _{\mathrm{LS}}^0\)

External surface force of the liquid (N/m)

\(\xi \)

Parameter in Eq. (2)

Subscripts

\(\exp \)

Experimental value

th

Theoretical value

1

Value of the top wall

2

Value of the bottom wall

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11702320) and the Training Program of the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91741107).

References

  1. 1.
    Ho, C.M., Tai, Y.C.: Micro-electro-mechanical-systems (MEMS) and fluid flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 579–612 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stone, H.A., Stroock, A., Ajdari, A.: Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 381–411 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peng, X.F., Peterson, G.P., Wang, B.X.: Heat transfer characteristics of water flowing through microchannels. Exp. Heat Transf. 7, 265–283 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qu, W.L., Mala, G.M., Li, D.Q.: Pressure-driven water flows in trapezoidal silicon microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 43, 353–364 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhigang, L., Ning, G., Chengwu, Z., Xiaobao, Z.: Experimental study on flow and heat transfer in a 19.6-\(\upmu \)m microtube. Exp. Heat Transf. 22, 178–197 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, Z.X., Du, D.X., Guo, Z.Y.: Experimental study on flow characteristics of liquid in circular microtubes. Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 7, 253–265 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peng, X.F., Peterson, G.P., Wang, B.X.: Frictional flow characteristics of water flowing through microchannels. Exp. Heat Transf. 7, 249–264 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mala, G.M., Li, D.Q.: Flow characteristics of water in microtubes. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 20, 142–148 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, Y.P., Xu, G.Q., Sun, J.N., Li, H.W.: Investigation of the roughness effect on flow behavior and heat transfer characteristics in microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 83, 11–20 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kandlikar, S.G., Joshi, S., Tian, S.: Effect of surface roughness on heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics at low Reynolds numbers in small diameter tubes. Heat Transf. Eng. 24, 4–16 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi, C.H., Westin, K.J.A., Breuer, K.S.: Apparent slip in hydrophilic and hydrophobic microchannels. Phys. Fluids 15, 2897–2902 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nagayama, G., Matsumoto, T., Fukushima, K., Tsuruta, T.: Scale effect of slip boundary condition at solid–liquid interface. Sci. Rep. 7, 43125 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, F., Yue, X.A., Xu, S.L., Zhang, L.J., Zhao, R.B., Hou, J.R.: Influence of wettability on flow characteristics of water through microtubes and cores. Chin. Sci. Bull. 54, 2256–2262 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagayama, G., Cheng, P.: Effects of interface wettability on microscale flow by molecular dynamics simulation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 47, 501–513 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mala, G.M., Li, D.Q., Werner, C., Jacobasch, H.J., Ning, Y.B.: Flow characteristics of water through a microchannel between two parallel plates with electrokinetic effects. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 18, 489–496 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ren, L.Q., Qu, W.L., Li, D.Q.: Interfacial electrokinetic effects on liquid flow in microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 44, 3125–3134 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, S.L., Yue, X.A., Hou, J.R.: Experimental investigation on flow characteristics of deionized water in microtubes. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52, 849–854 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    You, X.Y., Zheng, J.R., Jing, Q.: Effects of boundary slip and apparent viscosity on the stability of microchannel flow. Forsch. Ing. Wes. 71, 99–106 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mala, G.M., Li, D.Q., Dale, J.D.: Heat transfer and fluid flow in microchannels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 40, 3079–3088 (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Israelachvili, J.N.: Measurement of the viscosity of liquids in very thin films. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 110, 263–271 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gee, M.L., Mcguiggan, P.M., Israelachvili, J.N., Homola, A.M.: Liquid to solidlike transitions of molecularly thin films under shear. J. Chem. Phys. 93, 1895–1906 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lv, P., Yang, Z.H., Hua, Z., Li, M.Y., Lin, M.Q., Dong, Z.X.: Viscosity of water and hydrocarbon changes with micro-crevice thickness. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 504, 287–297 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas, J.A., Mcgaughey, A.J.H.: Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8, 2788–2793 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suk, M.E., Aluru, N.R.: Molecular and continuum hydrodynamics in graphene nanopores. RSC Adv. 3, 9365–9372 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghorbanian, J., Beskok, A.: Scale effects in nano-channel liquid flows. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20, 121 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blake, T.D., Coninck, J.D.: The influence of solid–liquid interactions on dynamic wetting. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 96, 21–36 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, F.T.: Interface layer model of physical interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 244, 271–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tretheway, D.C., Meinhart, C.D.: Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls. Phys. Fluids 14, 9–12 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kandlikar, S.G., Garimella, S., Li, D.Q., Colin, S., King, M.R.: Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Minichannels and Microchannels. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dey, R., Das, T., Chakraborty, S.: Frictional and heat transfer characteristics of single-phase microchannel liquid flows. Heat Transf. Eng. 33, 425–446 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu, Z.M., Pang, Y.: Effect of the size and pressure on the modified viscosity of water in microchannels. Acta Mech. Sin. 31, 45–52 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Aerospace Science and EngineeringNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations