Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 230, Issue 11, pp 4077–4107 | Cite as

Geometrically exact shell theory from a hierarchical perspective

  • Robert WinklerEmail author
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

A hierarchic approach for the derivation of an infinite series of nonlinear \(\ell \)th-order shell theories from three-dimensional continuum mechanics based on a polynomial series expansion of the displacement field is recapitulated. Imposing the static constraints that second- and higher-order moments vanish, a ‘first-order’ shell theory is obtained without employing any kinematic constraints or geometric approximations. In particular, it is shown in full generality that, within the same theoretical framework, this static assumption, on the one hand, and a common Reissner–Mindlin-type kinematic assumption, on the other hand, lead to the same theory, for which the attribute geometrically exact is adopted from the literature. This coincidence can be interpreted as a theoretical justification for the heuristic Reissner–Mindlin assumption. Further, the unexpected but unavoidable appearance of transverse moment components (residual drill moments) is addressed and analysed. Feasible assumptions are formulated which allow to separate these drill components from the remaining balance equations without affecting the equilibrium of the standard static variables. This leads to a favourable structure of the component representation of balance equations in the sense that they formally coincide with the ones of linear shear-deformable shell theory. Finally, it is shown that this result affects the interpretation of applied boundary moments.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by University of Innsbruck and Medical University of Innsbruck.

References

  1. 1.
    Basar, Y., Krätzig, W.B.: Mechanik der Flächentragwerke. Springer, Wiesbaden (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basar, Y., Krätzig, W.B.: A consistent shell theory for finite deformations. Acta Mech. 76, 73–87 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapelle, D., Bathe, K.J.: The Finite Element Analysis of Shells: Fundamentals. Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chróścielewski, J., Makowski, J., Stumpf, H.: Genuinely resultant shell finite elements accounting for geometric and material non-linearity. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 35, 63–94 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chróścielewski, J., Witkowski, W.: Four-node semi-EAS element in six-field nonlinear theory of shells. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 68, 1137–1179 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciarlet, P.C.: Mathematical Elasticity. Vol. 3: Theory of Shells. Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciarlet, P.G.: Mathematical Elasticity. Vol. 2: Theory of Plates. Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciarlet, P.G.: An Introduction to Differential Geometry with Applications to Elasticity. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eliseev, V.V., Vetyukov, Y.M.: Finite deformation of thin shells in the context of analytical mechanics of material surfaces. Acta Mech. 209, 43–57 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fox, D.D., Simo, J.C.: A drill rotation formulation for geometrically exact shells. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 98, 329–343 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frostig, Y., Kardomateas, G.A., Rodcheuy, N.: Non-linear response of curved sandwich panels-extended high-order approach. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 81, 177–196 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Green, A.E., Zerna, W.: Theoretical Elasticity, 1st edn. University Press, Oxford (1954)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gruttmann, F., Stein, E., Wriggers, P.: Theory and numerics of thin shells with finite rotations. Ingenieur Arch. 59, 54–67 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haupt, P.: Continuum Mechanics and Theory of Materials, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibrahimbegović, A.: Stress resultant geometrically nonlinear shell theory with drilling rotations—Part I. A consistent formulation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 118, 265–284 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibrahimbegović, A.: Stress resultant geometrically nonlinear shell theory with drilling rotations—Part II. Computational aspects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 118, 285–308 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kienzler, R.: On consistent plate theories. Arch. Appl. Mech. 72, 229–247 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kienzler, R., Schneider, P.: Second-order linear plate theories: partial differential equations, stress resultants and displacements. Int. J. Solids Struct. 115, 14–26 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Libai, A., Simmonds, J.G.: Nonlinear elastic shell theory. In: Hutchinson, J.W., Wu, T.Y. (eds.) Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 23, pp. 272–371. Academic Press, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mindlin, R.: Influence of rotary inertia and shear on flexural motion of isotropic elastic plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 18, 31–38 (1951)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Naghdi, P.M.: The theory of shells and plates. In: Flügge, S., Truesdell, C. (eds.) Handbuch der Physik VIa/2, pp. 425–640. Springer, Berlin (1972)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neff, P., Hong, K.I., Jeong, J.: The Reissner-Mindlin plate is the \(\Gamma \)-limit of Cosserat elasticity. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20, 1553–1590 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reddy, J.N.: A general non-linear third-order theory of plates with moderate thickness. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 25, 677–686 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reissner, E.: The effect of transverse shear deformation on the bending of elastic plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 12, A69–A77 (1945)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reissner, E.: On consistent first approximations in the general linear theory of thin elastic shells. Ingenieur Arch. 40, 402–419 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ricci-Curbastro, G., Levi-Civita, T.: Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leurs applications. Math. Ann. 54, 125–201 (1901)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rössle, A., Bischoff, M., Wendland, W., Ramm, E.: On the mathematical foundation of the 1–1–2 plate model. Int. J. Solids Struct. 36, 2143–2168 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schneider, P., Kienzler, R.: Comparison of various linear plate theories in the light of a consistent second-order approximation. Math. Mech. Solids 20, 871–882 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schnell, W., Eschenauer, H.: Elastizitätstheorie II: Schalen. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1984)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simmonds, J.G.: A Brief on Tensor Analysis. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simo, J.C., Fox, D.D.: On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part I: Formulation and optimal parametrization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 72, 276–304 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simo, J.C., Fox, D.D., Rifai, M.S.: On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part III: Computational aspects of the nonlinear theory. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 79, 21–70 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simo, J.C., Rifai, M.S., Fox, D.: On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part IV: Variable thickness shells with through-the-thickness stretching. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 81, 91–126 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Steigmann, D.J.: Two-dimensional models for the combined bending and stretching of plates and shells based on three-dimensional linear elasticity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 46, 654–676 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vekua, I.N.: Shell Theory: General Methods of Construction (translated from the Russian by T. Gabeskiria). Vol. 25 of Monographs, Advanced Texts, and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston (1985)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vetyukov, Y., Kuzin, A., Krommer, M.: Asymptotic splitting in the three-dimensional problem of elasticity for non-homogeneous piezoelectric plates. Int. J. Solids Struct. 48, 12–23 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wagner, W., Gruttmann, F.: A robust non-linear mixed hybrid quadrilateral shell element. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 64, 635–666 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wempner, G., Talaslidis, D.: Mechanics of Solids and Shells. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wiśniewski, K.: A shell theory with independent rotations for relaxed Biot stress and right stretch strain. Comput. Mech. 21, 101–122 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wiśniewski, K.: Finite Rotation Shells: Basic Equations and Finite Elements for Reissner Kinematics. Lecture Notes on Numerical Methods in Engineering and Sciences. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wiśniewski, K., Turska, E.: Four-node mixed Hu–Washizu shell element with drilling rotation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 90, 506–536 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MechatronicsUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations