Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 230, Issue 3, pp 1159–1179 | Cite as

Three-dimensional analytical model for the dynamic interaction of twin tunnels in a homogeneous half-space

  • Chao He
  • Shunhua ZhouEmail author
  • Peijun Guo
  • Quanmei Gong
Original Paper
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Ground vibration and noise induced by underground railways have become a major environmental issue. Significant research has been carried out to investigate vibrations generated by a single tunnel, with less attention been paid to the dynamic interaction of twin tunnels. This paper presents a three-dimensional analytical model for the dynamic interaction of twin tunnels in a homogeneous half-space. The two tunnels are modeled using the cylindrical thin-shell theory. The soil, a homogenous half-space with two cylindrical cavities, is simulated using the elastic continuum theory. The translation between two cylindrical waves and the transformation between plane waves and cylindrical waves are introduced to satisfy the boundary conditions on the ground surface and the twin tunnel–soil interfaces. The accuracy of the proposed model is verified by comparison with numerical models. A numerical example is presented to investigate the influence of the dynamic interaction between twin tunnels on the ground vibrations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Forrest, J.A., Hunt, H.E.M.: A three-dimensional tunnel model for calculation of train-induced ground vibration. J. Sound Vib. 294(4–5), 678–705 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forrest, J.A., Hunt, H.E.M.: Ground vibration generated by trains in underground tunnels. J. Sound Vib. 294(4–5), 706–736 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hussein, M.F.M., François, S., Schevenels, M., Hunt, H.E.M., Talbot, J.P., Degrande, G.: The fictitious force method for efficient calculation of vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space. J. Sound Vib. 333, 6996–7018 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    He, C., Zhou, S.H., Di, H.G., Guo, P.J., Xiao, J.H.: Analytical method for calculation of ground vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space. Comput. Geotech. 99, 149–164 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu, J.F., Ding, J.J., Fan, Z., Li, M.H.: Response of a circular tunnel embedded in saturated soil to a series of equidistant moving loads. Acta Mech. 228, 3675–3693 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di, H.G., Zhou, S.H., He, C., Zhang, X.H., Luo, Z.: Three-dimensional multilayer cylindrical tunnel model for calculating train-induced dynamic stress in saturated soils. Comput. Geotech. 80, 333–345 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, S.H., He, C., Di, H.G., Guo, P.J., Zhang, X.H.: An efficient method for predicting train-induced vibrations from a tunnel in a poroelastic half-space. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 85, 43–56 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di, H.G., Zhou, S.H., Luo, Z., He, C., Xiao, J.H., Li, X.: A vehicle-track-tunnel-soil model for evaluating the dynamic response of a double-line metro tunnel in a poroelastic half-space. Comput. Geotech. 101, 245–263 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang, Y.B., Huang, H.H.: A 2.5 D finite/infinite element approach for modelling viseo-elastic bodies subjected to moving loads. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 51(11), 1317–1336 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, Y.B., Hung, H.H.: Analysis of ground vibrations due to underground trains by 2.5D finite infinite element approach. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 9(3), 327–335 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bian, X.C., Jin, W.F., Jiang, H.G.: Ground-borne vibrations due to dynamic loadings from moving trains in subway tunnels. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 13(11), 870–876 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andersen, L., Jones, C.J.C.: Coupled boundary and finite element analysis of vibration from railway tunnels—a comparison of two and three-dimensional models. J. Sound Vib. 293(3–5), 611–625 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sheng, X., Jones, C.J.C., Thompson, D.J.: Modelling ground vibrations from railways using wavenumber finite- and boundary-element methods. Proc. R. Soc. 461, 2043–2070 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheng, X., Jones, C.J.C., Thompson, D.J.: Prediction of ground vibration from trains using the wavenumber finite and boundary element methods. J. Sound Vib. 293(3–5), 575–586 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    François, S., Schevenels, M., Galvín, P., Lombaert, G., Degrande, G.: A 2.5D coupled FE–BE methodology for the dynamic interaction between longitudinally invariant structures and a layered halfspace. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199, 1536–1548 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou, S.H., He, C., Di, H.G.: Dynamic 2.5-D Green’s function for a poroelastic half-space. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 67, 96–107 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    He, C., Zhou, S.H., Di, H.G., Shan, Y.: A 2.5-D coupled FE–BE model for the dynamic interaction between saturated soil and longitudinally invariant structures. Comput. Geotech. 82, 211–222 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    He, C., Zhou, S.H., Guo, P.J., Di, H.G., Zhang, X.H.: Modelling of ground vibration from tunnels in a poroelastic half-space using a 2.5-D FE–BE formulation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 82, 211–221 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clouteau, D., Arnst, M., Al-Hussaini, T.M., Degrande, G.: Freefield vibrations due to dynamic loading on a tunnel embedded in a stratified medium. J. Sound Vib. 283(1–2), 173–199 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gupta, S., Degrande, G., Lombaert, G.: Experimental validation of a numerical model for subway induced vibrations. J. Sound Vib. 321, 786–812 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, V.W., Karl, J.: Diffraction of SV waves by underground, circular, cylindrical cavities. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 11, 445–456 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, V.W., Chen, S., Hsu, I.R.: Antiplane diffraction from canyon above subsurface unlined tunnel. J. Eng. Mech. 125(6), 668–675 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stamos, A.A., Beskos, D.E.: 3-D seismic response analysis of long lined tunnels in half-space. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 15, 111–118 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lu, J.F., Jeng, D.S., Lee, T.L.: Dynamic response of a piecewise circular tunnel embedded in a poroelastic medium. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 27, 875–891 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones, S., Hunt, H.: Voids at the tunnel–soil interface for calculation of ground vibration from underground railways. J. Sound Vib. 330(2), 245–270 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coulier, P., Lombaert, G., Degrande, G.: The influence of source–receiver interaction on the numerical prediction of railway induced vibrations. J. Sound Vib. 333, 2520–2538 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lopes, P., Costa, P.A., Ferraz, M., Calcada, R., Cardoso, A.: Numerical modelling of vibrations induced by railway traffic in tunnels: from the source to the nearby buildings. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 61–62, 269–285 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guan, F., Moore, I.D.: Three dimensional dynamic response of twin cavities due to travelling loads. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 120, 637–653 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moore, I.D., Guan, F.: Three-dimensional dynamic response of lined tunnels due to incident seismic waves. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25, 357–369 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuo, K.A., Hussein, M.F.M., Hunt, H.E.M.: The effect of a twin tunnel on the propagation of ground-borne vibration from an underground railway. J. Sound Vib. 330, 6203–6222 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hamad, W.I., Hunt, H.E.M., Talbot, J.P., Hussein, M.F.M, Thompson, D.J.: The dynamic interaction of twin tunnels embedded in a homogeneous half-space. In: Proceedings of the 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete Island, Greece, May (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    He, C., Zhou, S.H., Guo, P.J., Di, H.G., Zhang, X.H.: Analytical model for vibration prediction of two parallel tunnels in a full-space. J. Sound Vib. 423, 306–321 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sneddon, I.: Fourier Transforms. McGraw-Hill, New York (1951)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Graff, K.F.: Wave Motion in Elastic Solids. Oxford University Press, London (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Boström, A., Kristensson, G., Ström, S.: Transformation properties of plane, spherical and cylindrical scalar and vector wave functions. In: Varadan, V.V., Lakhtakia, A., Varadan, V.K. (eds.) Field Representations and Introduction to Scattering, pp. 165–210. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1991)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bose, S.K., Mal, A.K.: Longitudinal shear waves in a fiber-reinforced composite. Int. J. Solids Struct. 9, 1075–1085 (1973)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Luco, J.E., Contesse, L.: Dynamic structure–soil structure interaction. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 63(4), 1289–1303 (1973)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Varadan, V.K., Varadan, V.V., Pao, Y.H.: Multiple scattering of elastic waves by cylinders of arbitrary cross section. I. SH waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63(5), 1310–1319 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leissa, A.: Vibration of Shells. Acoustical Society of America, New York (1973). reissued 1993zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of EducationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations