Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 164, Issue 10, pp 2451–2458 | Cite as

Altered gene expression profiles of the MDA5 signaling pathway in peripheral blood lymphocytes of chickens infected with avian reovirus

  • Liji Xie
  • Zhixun XieEmail author
  • Sheng Wang
  • Jiaoling Huang
  • Xianwen Deng
  • Zhiqin Xie
  • Sisi Luo
  • Tingting Zeng
  • Yanfang Zhang
  • Minxiu Zhang
Original Article
  • 106 Downloads

Abstract

Avian reovirus (ARV) is a member of the genus Orthoreovirus in the family Reoviridae and causes a severe syndrome including viral arthritis that leads to considerable losses in the poultry industry. Innate immunity plays a significant role in host defense against ARV. Here, we explored the interaction between ARV and the host innate immune system by measuring mRNA expression levels of several genes associated with the MDA5 signaling pathway. The results showed that expression peaks for MDA5, MAVS, TRAF3, TRAF6, IRF7, IKKɛ, TBK1 and NF-κB occurred at 3 days postinfection (dpi). Moreover, type I IFN (IFN-α, IFN-β) and IL-12 expression levels peaked at 3 dpi, while type II IFN (IFN-γ), IL-6, IL-17 and IL-18 expression reached a maximum level at 1 dpi. IL-8 changed at 5 dpi, and IL-1β and TNF-α changed at 7 dpi. Interestingly, several key IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs), including IFITM1, IFITM2, IFITM5, Mx1 and OASL, were simultaneously upregulated and reached maximum values at 3 dpi. These data indicate that the MDA5 signaling pathway and innate immune cytokines were induced after ARV infection, which would contribute to the ARV-host interaction, especially at the early infection stage.

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660715), the Guangxi Science and Technology Bureau Program (2018GXNSFAA138106 and AB16380003), the Research and Innovation Bridges Cooperation Program between China and England (2016YFE0124200), the National Ten-Thousand Talents Program of China (W02060083), and the Guangxi BaGui Scholars Program Foundation (2019-79).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in strict accordance with the recommendations included in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Guangxi Veterinary Research Institute. In addition, the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Guangxi Veterinary Research Institute approved all of the procedures involving the use of animals, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Heide L (2000) The history of avian reovirus. Avian Dis 44:638.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1593104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teng L, Xie Z, Xie L, Liu J, Pang Y, Deng X, Xie Z, Fan Q, Luo S, Feng J, Khan M (2013) Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of an avian reovirus genome. Virus Genes 48(2):381–386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-013-1029-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang L, Xie Z, Xie L, Deng X, Xie Z, Luo S, Huang J, Zeng T, Feng J (2015) A duplex real-time PCR assay for the detection and quantification of avian reovirus and Mycoplasma synoviae. Virol J 12(1):22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0255-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hüsser L, Alves MP, Ruggli N, Summerfield A (2011) Identification of the role of RIG-I, MDA-5 and TLR3 in sensing RNA viruses in porcine epithelial cells using lentivirus-driven RNA interference. Virus Res 159(1):9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barber MRW, Aldridge JR, Webster RG, Magor KE (2010) Association of RIG-I with innate immunity of ducks to influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(13):5913–5918.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001755107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kawai T, Takahashi K, Sato S, Coban C, Kumar H, Kato H, Ishii KJ, Takeuchi Q, Akira S (2005) IPS-1, an adaptor triggering RIG-I- and Mda5-mediated type I interferon induction. Nat Immunol 6(10):981–988.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbalat R, Ewald SE, Mouchess ML, Barton GM (2011) Nucleic acid recognition by the innate immune system. Ann Rev Immunol 29(1):185–214.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schoggins JW (2014) Interferon-stimulated genes: roles in viral pathogenesis. Curr Opin Virol 6:40–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2014.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brass AL, Huang IC, Benita Y, John SP, Krishnan MN, Feeley EM, Ryan BJ, Weyer JL, van der L, Fikrig E, Adams DJ, Xavier RJ, Farzan M, Elledge SJ (2009) The IFITM proteins mediate cellular resistance to influenza a H1N1 virus, west nile virus, and dengue virus. Cell 139(7):1243–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kandasamy M, Suryawanshi A, Tundup S, Perez JT, Schmolke M, Manicassamy S, Manicassamy B (2016) RIG-I signaling is critical for efficient polyfunctional T cell responses during influenza virus infection. PLoS Pathog 12(7):e1005754.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng M, Dai M, Xie T, Li Z, Shi M, Zhang X (2016) Innate immune responses in ALV-J infected chicks and chickens with hemangioma in vivo. Front Microbiol 7:786.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00786 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen S, Luo G, Yang Z, Lin S, Chen S, Wang S, Goraya MU, Chi X, Zeng X, Chen JL (2016) Avian tembusu virus infection effectively triggers host innate immune response through MDA5 and TLR3-dependent signaling pathways. Vet Res 47(1):74.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-016-0358-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reed LJ, Muench H (1938) A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints12. Am J Epidemiol 27:493–497.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He Y, Xie Z, Dai J, Cao Y, Hou J, Zheng Y, Wei T, Mo M, Wei P (2016) Responses of the toll-like receptor and melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 signaling pathways to avian infectious bronchitis virus infection in chicks. Virol Sin 31(1):57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-015-3696-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kapczynski DR, Jiang HJ, Kogut MH (2014) Characterization of cytokine expression induced by avian influenza virus infection with real-time RT-PCR. Methods Mol Biol 1161:217–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0758-8_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith SE, Gibson MS, Wash RS, Ferrara F, Wright E, Temperton N, Kellam P, Fife M (2013) Chicken interferon-inducible transmembrane protein 3 restricts influenza viruses and Lyssaviruses in vitro. J Virol 87(23):12957–12966.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01443-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hang B, Sang J, Qin A, Qian K, Shao H, Mei M, Ye J (2014) Transcription analysis of the response of chicken bursa of fabricius to avian leukosis virus subgroup J strain JS09GY3. Virus Res 188:8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abdallah F, Hassanin O (2015) Positive regulation of humoral and innate immune responses induced by inactivated Avian Influenza Virus vaccine in broiler chickens. Vet Res Commun 39(4):211–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-015-9644-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ji WT, Lee LH, Lin FL, Wang L, Liu HJ (2009) AMP-activated protein kinase facilitates avian reovirus to induce mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38 and MAPK kinase 3/6 signalling that is beneficial for virus replication. J Gen Virol 90:3002–3009.  https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.013953-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayden MS (2004) Signaling to NF-κB. Genes De. 18(18):2195–2224.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1228704 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangxi Key Laboratory of Veterinary BiotechnologyGuangxi Veterinary Research InstituteNanningPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations