Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 164, Issue 7, pp 1873–1876 | Cite as

Molecular characterization and detection of two carlaviruses infecting cactus

  • L. Peng
  • S. Grinstead
  • G. Kinard
  • L.-P. WuEmail author
  • R. LiEmail author
Brief Report

Abstract

Two large contigs with sequence similarities to different carlaviruses were identified by high-throughput sequencing in samples from a cactus plant. The complete genomes of the two viruses, tentatively named “cactus carlavirus 1” (CCV-1) and “cactus carlavirus 2” (CCV-2), were determined to be 8,441 and 8,396 nucleotides long, respectively, excluding the poly(A) tail. These viruses have the typical genomic organization of members of the genus Carlavirus. CCV-1 appears to be a cactus isolate of the carlavirus HSO-2016a, with 90.1% nucleotide sequence identity between the two virus genomes, whereas CCV-2 may be classified as a member of a new species. The sequences of CCV-2 and other carlaviruses are 48.9-60.0% identical at the whole-genome level.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31860525) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, under research project 1215-22000-302-00D, “Characterizing and Detecting Pathogens to Ensure Safe Exchange of Plant Germplasm”. The authors thank Mathew Buhl and Meya Ngundam for their technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any research involving humans or animals.

Supplementary material

705_2019_4279_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
705_2019_4279_MOESM2_ESM.txt (17 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (TXT 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Adams MJ, Lefkowitz EJ, King AMQ, Harrach B, Harrison RL, Knowles NJ, Kropinski AM, Krupovic M, Kuhn JH, Mushegian AR, Nibert M, Sabanadzovic S, Sanfacon H, Siddell SG, Simmonds P, Varsani A, Zerbini FM, Gorbalenya AE, Davison AJ (2017) Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Arch Virol 162:2505–2538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martelli GP, Adams MJ, Kreuze JF, Dolja VV (2007) Family Flexiviridae: a case study in virion and genome plasticity. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45:73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kreuze J, Hammond J, Pearson MN, Martelli GP, Adams MJ, Saldarelli P, Ryu KH, Namba S, Candresse T, Yoshikawa N (2012) Betaflexiviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ (eds) Virus taxonomy, ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp 920–941Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevens PF (2001) Angiosperm phylogeny website version 14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erwin J (2009) Cacti: studies on introducing a new group of ornamental plants. Acta Hortic 813:359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nazareno MA, Nefzaoui A, Inglese P, Liguori G (2013) New insights about medicinal uses and health-beneficial properties of cactus products. Acta Hortic 995:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morris SJ (1977) Viruses of Opuntia spp. Zeitschrift fuer pflanzenkrankheiten und pflanzenschutz 84:468–472Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koenig R, Pleij CWA, Burgermeister W, Aust H, Schiemann J (2004) Molecular characterisation of potexviruses isolated from three different genera in the family Cactaceae. Arch Virol 149:903–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eicholtz M, Grinstead S, Wu LP, Kinard G, Li R (2017) First report of Beet western yellows virus infecting Epiphyllum spp. in USA. Plant Dis 102:464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park CH, Song EG, Ryu KH (2018) Detection of co-infection of Notocactus leningausii f. Cristatus with six virus species in South Korea. Plant Pathol J 34:65–70Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martelli GP, Adams MJ, Kreuze JF, Dolja VV (2007) Family Flexiviridae: a case study in virion and genome plasticity. Annu Rev Phytopahol 45:73–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morozov SY, Solovyev AG (2003) Triple gene block: modular design of a multifunctional machine for plant virus movement. J Gen Virol 84:1351–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gramstat A, Courtpozanis A, Rohde W (1990) The 12 kDa protein of potato virus M displays properties of a nucleic acid- binding regulatory protein. FEBS Lett 276:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng XG, Peng XJ, Zhu F, Chen YJ, Zhu T, Qin SB, Xi DH, Lin HH (2015) A critical domain of Sweet potato chlorotic fleck virus nucleotide-binding protein (NaBp) for RNA silencing suppression, nuclear localization n and viral pathogenesis. Mol Plant Pathol 16:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li RH, Mock R, Haung Q, Abad J, Hartung SJ, Kinard G (2008) A reliable and inexpensive method of nucleic acid extraction for the PCR-based detection of diverse plant pathogens. J Virol Methods 154:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource, School of Life ScienceNanchang UniversityNanchangChina
  2. 2.USDA-ARS, National Germplasm Resources LaboratoryBeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations