Advertisement

Analysis of new grapevine Pinot gris virus (GPGV) isolates from Northeast Italy provides clues to track the evolution of a newly emerging clade

  • Giulia Tarquini
  • Francesca De Amicis
  • Marta Martini
  • Paolo Ermacora
  • Nazia Loi
  • Rita Musetti
  • Gian Luca Bianchi
  • Giuseppe FirraoEmail author
Brief Report
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Grapevine Pinot gris disease (GPGD) has been associated with a trichovirus, namely grapevine Pinot gris virus (GPGV), although the virus has been reported in both symptomatic and asymptomatic plants. Despite the puzzling aetiology of the disease and potentially important role of GPGV, the number of fully sequenced isolates is still rather limited. With the aim of increasing the knowledge on intraspecific diversity and evolution, nine GPGV isolates were collected from different vineyards in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (Northeast Italy), cloned, sequenced, and subjected to robust phylogenetic and other analyses. The results provided hints on the evolutionary history of the virus, the occurrence of recombination, and the presence of clade-specific SNPs in sites of putative protein modifications with potential impact on the interaction with the host.

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Regione Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy; CUP: F22I15000110002).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

705_2019_4241_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (644 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 644 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bianchi GL, De Amicis F, De Sabbata L et al (2015) Occurrence of Grapevine Pinot gris virus in Friuli Venezia Giulia (Italy): field monitoring and virus quantification by real-time RT-PCR. EPPO Bull 45:22–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giampetruzzi A, Roumi V, Roberto R et al (2012) A new grapevine virus discovered by deep sequencing of virus- and viroid-derived small RNAs in Cv. Pinot gris. Virus Res 163:262–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tarquini G, Ermacora P, Bianchi GL et al (2018) Localization and subcellular association of Grapevine Pinot Gris Virus in grapevine leaf tissues. Protoplasma 255:923–935.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1198-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martelli GP (2014) Directory of virus and virus-like diseases of the grapevine and their agents. J Plant Pathol 96:1–136.  https://doi.org/10.4454/JPP.V96I1SUP Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saldarelli P, Giampetruzzi A, Morelli M et al (2015) Genetic variability of grapevine pinot gris virus and Its association with grapevine leaf mottling and deformation. Phytopathology 105:555–563.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-14-0241-R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reynard J-S, Schumacher S, Menzel W et al (2016) First report of grapevine pinot gris virus in German Vineyards. Plant Dis 100:2545.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-16-0966-PDN CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al Rwahnih M, Golino D, Rowhani A (2016) First report of grapevine Pinot gris virus infecting grapevine in the United States. Plant Dis 100:1030.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1235-PDN CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poojari S, Lowery T, Rott M et al (2016) First report of grapevine Pinot gris virus in British Columbia, Canada. Plant Dis 100:1513.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0178-PDN CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertazzon N, Filippin L, Forte V, Angelini E (2016) Grapevine Pinot gris virus seems to have recently been introduced to vineyards in Veneto, Italy. Arch Virol 161:711–714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-015-2718-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bertazzon N, Angelini E, Borgo M (2002) Detection of grapevine leafroll-associated virus-2 (GLRaV-2) by ELISA and RT-PCR. J Plant Pathol 84:175Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bianchi GL, Bertazzon N, De Amicis F et al (2010) Multiplex real time RT-PCR for the detection of the most important viruses of grapevine. Petria 20:180–181Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bertazzon N, Forte V, Filippin L et al (2017) Association between genetic variability and titre of grapevine Pinot gris virus with disease symptoms. Plant Pathol 66:949–959.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sabanadzovic S, Abou-Ghanem N, Castellano MA et al (2000) Grapevine fleck virus-like viruses in Vitis. Arch Virol 145:553–565.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s007050050046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MacKenzie DJ, McLean MA, Mukerji S, Green M (1997) Improved RNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Plant Dis 81:222–226.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.2.222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huson DH, Bryant D (2005) Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23:254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bryant D, Moulton V (2002) NeighborNet: an agglomerative method for the construction of planar phylogenetic networks. International workshop on algorithms in bioinformatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruths D, Nakhleh L (2005) Recombination and phylogeny: effects and detection. Int J Bioinform Res Appl 1:202–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL, Posada D, Gravenor MB et al (2006) GARD: a genetic algorithm for recombination detection. Bioinformatics 22:3096–3098.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M et al (2015) RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vev003 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holland BR, Huber KT, Moulton V, Lockhart PJ (2004) Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol 21:1459–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C et al (2003) ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3784–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jakubiec A, Jupin I (2007) Regulation of positive-strand RNA virus replication: the emerging role of phosphorylation. Virus Res 129:73–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2007.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang L, Sineva EV, Hargittai MR et al (2004) Purification and characterization of hepatitis C virus non-structural protein 5A expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 37:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2004.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pietschmann T, Lohmann V, Rutter G et al (2001) Characterization of cell lines carrying self-replicating hepatitis C virus RNAs. J Virol 75:1252–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.3.1252-1264.2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee J-Y, Lucas WJ (2001) Phosphorylation of viral movement proteins—regulation of cell-to-cell trafficking. Trends Microbiol 9:5–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01901-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shapka N, Stork J, Nagy PD (2005) Phosphorylation of the p33 replication protein of Cucumber necrosis tombusvirus adjacent to the RNA binding site affects viral RNA replication. Virology 343:65–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2005.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ann Haley, Tony Hunter, Paula Kiberstis, David Zimmern (2002) Multiple serine phosphorylation sites on the 30 kDa TMV cell-to-cell movement protein synthesized in tobacco protoplasts. Plant J 8:715–724.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08050715.x Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kawakami S, Padgett HS, Hosokawa D et al (1999) Phosphorylation and/or presence of serine 37 in the movement protein of tomato mosaic tobamovirus is essential for intracellular localization and stability in vivo. J Virol 73(8):6831–6840Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matsushita Y, Hanazawa K, Yoshioka K et al (2000) In vitro phosphorylation of the movement protein of tomato mosaic tobamovirus by a cellular kinase. J Gen Virol 81(8):2095–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sokolova M, Prüfer D, Tacke E, Rohde W (1997) The potato leafroll virus 17K movement protein is phosphorylated by a membrane-associated protein kinase from potato with biochemical features of protein kinase C. FEBS Lett 400:201–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01380-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    SéRon K, Bernasconi L, Allet B, Haenni A-L (1996) Expression of the 69K movement protein of turnip yellow mosaic virus in insect cells. Virology 219:274–278.  https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matsushita Y, Yoshioka K, Shigyo T et al (2002) Phosphorylation of the movement protein of cucumber mosaic virus in transgenic tobacco plants. Virus Genes 24:231–234.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015324415110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal SciencesUniversity of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.ERSA, Plant Protection ServicePozzuolo del FriuliItaly

Personalised recommendations