Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Evaluation and estimation of daily global solar radiation from the estimated direct and diffuse solar radiation

  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

There are various empirical models used in the estimation of global solar radiation; however, knowledge of direct and diffuse solar radiation is insufficient. Global solar radiation is the sum of direct and diffuse solar radiation, and a method that calculates global solar radiation from the estimated direct and diffuse solar radiation was further proposed in this study. The observed daily solar radiation and meteorological data from 97 stations during 1993–2016 were used for the analysis, and the results indicated that the concave-shaped relationship with relative sunshine duration was more obvious for direct solar radiation than for global solar radiation, while an inverted u-shaped relationship was found for diffuse solar radiation. Generally, the performances of empirical models in estimating direct and diffuse solar radiation were worse than the estimation of global solar radiation. However, because the bias of estimated direct and diffuse solar radiation was partially offset, the results in this study indicated that global solar radiation can be better calculated from the estimated direct and diffuse solar radiation when compared with the best performed empirical model, especially in data-scarce regions. The results of this study will aid in better estimations and understanding of the variations in global solar radiation, as well as direct and diffuse solar radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Akinoğlu BG, Ecevit A (1990) A further comparison and discussion of sunshine-based models to estimate global solar radiation. Energy 15:865–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(90)90068-D

  2. Alexandrov VA, Hoogenboom G (2000) The impact of climate variability and change on crop yield in Bulgaria. Agric For Meteorol 104:315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00166-0

  3. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome

  4. Alonso-Montesinos J, Batlles FJ, Bosch JL (2015) Beam, diffuse and global solar irradiance estimation with satellite imagery. Energy Convers Manag 105:1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.037

  5. Ampratwum DB, Dorvlo ASS (1999) Estimation of solar radiation from the number of sunshine hours. Appl Energy 63:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00025-2

  6. Angstrom A (1924) Solar and terrestrial radiation. Report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 50:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49705021008

  7. Bahel V, Bakhsh H, Srinivasan R (1987) A correlation for estimation of global solar radiation. Energy 12:131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(87)90117-4

  8. Besharat F, Dehghan AA, Faghih AR (2013) Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: a review and case study. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:798–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.043

  9. Chen J-L, He L, Yang H, Ma M, Chen Q, Wu S-J, Xiao Z-L (2019) Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: a most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 108:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.033

  10. Despotovic M, Nedic V, Despotovic D, Cvetanovic S (2015) Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.035

  11. Dinpashoh Y (2006) Study of reference crop evapotranspiration in I.R. of Iran. Agric Water Manag 84:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.02.011

  12. Dinpashoh Y, Jahanbakhsh-Asl S, Rasouli AA, Foroughi M, Singh VP (2019) Impact of climate change on potential evapotranspiration (case study: west and NW of Iran). Theor Appl Climatol 136:185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2462-0

  13. Ertekin C, Yaldiz O (2000) Comparison of some existing models for estimating global solar radiation for Antalya (Turkey). Energy Conversion and Management 41: 311-330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00127-2

  14. Fan J, Wu L, Zhang F, Cai H, Ma X, Bai H (2019) Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily and monthly mean daily diffuse horizontal solar radiation for different climatic regions of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 105:168–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.040

  15. Gueymard CA (2001) Parameterized transmittance model for direct beam and circumsolar spectral irradiance. Solar Energy 71:325–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(01)00054-8

  16. Guo D, Westra S, Maier HR (2017) Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to changes in climate variables for different Australian climatic zones. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:2107–2126. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2107-2017

  17. Jahani B, Mohammadi B (2019) A comparison between the application of empirical and ANN methods for estimation of daily global solar radiation in Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 137:1257–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2666-3

  18. Jahani B, Dinpashoh Y, Raisi Nafchi A (2017) Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:878–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.124

  19. Kumar R, Aggarwal RK, Sharma JD (2015) Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for estimation of global solar radiations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.021

  20. Leng G, Zhang X, Huang M, Asrar GR, Leung LR (2016) The role of climate covariability on crop yields in the conterminous United States. Sci Rep 6:33160. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33160

  21. Liu X, Mei X, Li Y, Wang Q, Jensen JR, Zhang Y, Porter JR (2009) Evaluation of temperature-based global solar radiation models in China. Agric For Meteorol 149:1433–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.03.012

  22. Marzo A, Trigo-Gonzalez M, Alonso-Montesinos J, Martinez-Durban M, Lopez G, Ferrada P, Fuentealba E, Cortes M, Batlles FJ (2017) Daily global solar radiation estimation in desert areas using daily extreme temperatures and extraterrestrial radiation. Renew Energy 113:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.061

  23. Mohammadi K, Shamshirband S, Anisi MH, Alam KA, Petković D (2015) Support vector regression based prediction of global solar radiation on a horizontal surface. Energy Convers Manag 91:433–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.015

  24. Oesterle H (2001) Reconstruction of daily global radiation for past years for use in agricultural models. Phys Chem Eartht B Hydrol Oceans Atmos 26:253–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00248-3

  25. Prescott JA (1940) Evaporation from water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans R Soc S Aust 64:114–118

  26. Samuel Chukwujindu N (2017) A comprehensive review of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Africa. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:955–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.101

  27. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190:214–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03128-9

  28. Trnka M, Žalud Z, Eitzinger J, Dubrovský M (2005) Global solar radiation in Central European lowlands estimated by various empirical formulae. Agric For Meteorol 131:54–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.05.002

  29. Wild M (2009) Global dimming and brightening: a review. J Geophys Res Atmos 114. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011470

  30. Wu B, Liu S, Zhu W, Yan N, Xing Q, Tan S (2017) An improved approach for estimating daily net radiation over the Heihe River Basin. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 17:86. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010086

  31. Yao WX, Zhang CX, Hao HD, Wang X, Li XL (2018) A support vector machine approach to estimate global solar radiation with the influence of fog and haze. Renew Energy 128:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.069

  32. Zhang J, Zhao L, Deng S, Xu W, Zhang Y (2017) A critical review of the models used to estimate solar radiation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:314–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.124

Download references

Acknowledgments

We cordially thank the editor, Prof. Dr. Hartmut Graßl, and an anonymous reviewer for their professional comments and constructive suggestions, which are greatly helpful for further improvement in the quality of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51909057); National Key R&D Program of China (grant numbers 2016YFC0402706 and 2016YFC0402710); and the Belt and Road Special Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (grant number 2018490711).

Author information

Correspondence to Mingzhong Xiao.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, M., Yu, Z. & Cui, Y. Evaluation and estimation of daily global solar radiation from the estimated direct and diffuse solar radiation. Theor Appl Climatol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03140-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Global solar radiation
  • Direct solar radiation
  • Diffuse solar radiation
  • Sunshine duration