Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 138, Issue 3–4, pp 1573–1590 | Cite as

The relationship between atmospheric blocking and precipitation changes in Turkey between 1977 and 2016

  • Bahtiyar EfeEmail author
  • Anthony R. Lupo
  • Ali Deniz
Original Paper
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

The relationship between blocking events and mean precipitation frequency (MPF) was investigated in this work for Turkey during 1977–2016. The overall MPF for the examined stations during blocked days (nonblocked days) fluctuated between 0.15 and 0.43 (0.12 and 0.38). The ratio of MPF during the blocked days to nonblocked days ranges between 12 and 38%. During the winter season, the country has higher MPF values during blocked days. The greatest ratio of MPF values during blocked days to nonblocked days is observed in summer due to smaller values of MPF occurring during this season overall. Higher MPF occurs when the event center was located between 0o and 30o E (mean 0.27, range 0.17–0.51). There is no relationship between blocking duration and MPF for all seasons. There is a positive relationship between blocking intensity and MPF during summer (CC = 0.35, significant at the 95% level) and fall (CC = 0.43, significant at the 95% level). The relationship between blocking longitudinal extent and MPF is significant at the 95% confidence level during the summer and fall seasons with correlation coefficients of 0.29 and 0.25, respectively. A composite of the 10 blocking events associated with the largest MPF demonstrated that there is moist advection via westerly flow into Turkey in all seasons. During winter, a greater proportion of these events is observed during the La Niña phase of El Niño Southern Oscillation, but during El Niño in spring and summer. For the blocking case study (31 October to 5 November 2009) associated with the largest MPF, the mean value across the country was 0.73. The mean total precipitation during this period was 63.4 mm.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their time and effort in making this work a stronger contribution.

Funding information

We thank the Turkish Water Foundation for supporting Bahtiyar Efe. This work is funded by the Turkish Science Foundation (TUBITAK) with grant number 1059B141700588.

References

  1. Aalijahan M, Salahi B, Rahimi YG, Asl MF (2018) A new approach in temporal-spatial reconstruction and synoptic analysis of cold waves in the northwest of Iran. Theor Appl Climatol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2601-7
  2. Antokhina OY, Antokhin PN, Martynova YV, Mordvinov VI (2016) The impact of atmospheric blocking on spatial distributions of summertime precipitation over Eurasia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 48:12035.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/48/1/012035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltacı H, Akkoyunlu BO, Tayanç M (2017) Relationship between teleconnection patterns and Turkish climatic extremes. Theor Appl Climatol 134:1365–1386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2350-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barriopedro D, García-Herrera R, Lupo AR, Hernández E (2006) A climatology of northern hemisphere blocking. J Clim 19(6):1042–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3678.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bengtsson L (1981) Numerical prediction of atmospheric blocking—a case study. Tellus 33(1):19–42.  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v33i1.10692 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bove MC, Elsner JB, Landsea CW, Niu X, O’Brien JJ (1998) Effect of El Niño on U.S. landfalling hurricanes, revisited. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:2477–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunner L, Schaller N, Anstey J, Sillmann J, Steiner AK (2018) Dependence of present and future European temperature extremes on the location of atmospheric blocking. Geophys Res Lett 45:6311–6320.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077837 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirtaş M (2018) The high-impact 2007 hot summer over Turkey: atmospheric-blocking and heat-wave episodes. Meteorol Appl 25:406–413.  https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gazete Vatan (2009) Yağış nedeniyle bazı seferler iptal!. (Turkish) http://www.gazetevatan.com/yagis-nedeniyle-bazi-seferler-iptal%2D%2D268162-yasam/. Accessed 21 Dec 2018
  10. Huang W, Yang Z, He X, Lin D, Wang B, Wright JS, Chen R, Ma W, Li F (2019) A possible mechanism for the occurrence of wintertime extreme precipitation events over South China. Clim Dyn 52:2367–2384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4262-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khodayar S, Kalthoff N, Kottmeier C (2018) Atmospheric conditions associated with heavy precipitation events in comparison to seasonal means in the western Mediterranean region. Clim Dyn 51:951–967.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3058-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kömüşcü AÜ, Çelik S (2013) Analysis of the Marmara flood in Turkey, 7–10 September 2009: an assessment from hydrometeorological perspective. Nat Hazards 66:781–808.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0521-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lejenas H, Okland H (1983) Characteristics of Northern Hemisphere blocking as determined from a long time series of observational data. Tellus A 35(5):350–362.  https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v35i5.11446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lhotka O, Kyselý J, Plavcová E (2018) Evaluation of major heat waves’ mechanisms in EURO-CORDEX RCMs over Central Europe. Clim Dyn 50:4249–4262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3873-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo D, Lupo AR, Wan H (2007a) Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part I: a simple model of North Atlantic oscillations. J Atmos Sci 64:3–28.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3818.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luo D, Gong T, Lupo AR (2007b) Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part II: mode characteristics of NAO and diagnostic study. J Atmos Sci 64:29–51.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3820.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lupo AR, Smith PJ (1995) Climatological features of blocking anticyclones in the Northern Hemisphere. Tellus A 47(4):439–456.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1995.t01-3-00004.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lupo AR, Jensen AD, Mokhov II, Akperov MG (2017) Changes in blocking characteristics during the first part of the 21st century. Proceedings 2017(1):679.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ecas2017-04154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matsueda M (2011) Predictability of Euro-Russian blocking in summer of 2010. Geophys Res Lett 38:L06801.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mokhov II, Timazhev AV, Lupo AR (2014) Changes in atmospheric blocking characteristics within Euro-Atlantic region and Northern Hemisphere as a whole in the 21st century from model simulations using RCP anthropogenic scenarios. Glob Planet Chang 122:265–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NTV (2009) Precipitation, flood, cold!. (Turkish) https://www.ntv.com.tr/galeri/turkiye/etkili-yagis-sel-soguk, 4Kdy6v3fXkagcL9Iv9BlNg/Hc1gAa7_102QpS4ONJRTHw. Accessed 21 Dec 2018
  23. Nunes MJ, Lupo AR, Lebedeva MG, Chendev YG, Solovyov AB (2017) The occurrence of extreme monthly temperatures and precipitation in two global regions. Pap Appl Geogr 3:143–156.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2017.1286253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Reilly CH, Minobe S, Kuwano-Yoshida A (2016) The influence of the gulf stream on wintertime European blocking. Clim Dyn 47:1545–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2919-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearson K (1896) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and Panmixia. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 187:253–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Retrieved https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 15 Dec 2018Google Scholar
  27. Rabinowitz JL, Lupo AR, Guinan PE (2018, 2018) Evaluating linkages between atmospheric blocking patterns and heavy rainfall events across the north-central Mississippi River valley for different ENSO phases. Adv Meteorol Article ID 1217830Google Scholar
  28. Rimbu N, Stefan S, Busuioc A, Georgescu F (2015) Links between blocking circulation and precipitation extremes over Romania in summer. Int J Climatol 36(1):369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scherrer SC, Croci-Maspoli M, Schwierz C, Appenzeller C (2006) Two-dimensional indices of atmospheric blocking and their statistical relationship with winter climate patterns in the Euro-Atlantic region. Int J Climatol 26(2):233–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shabbar A, Huang J, Higuchi K (2001) The relationship between the wintertime North Atlantic oscillation and blocking episodes in the North Atlantic. Int J Climatol 21(3):355–369.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sirdas SA, Özdemir ET, Sezen İ, Efe B, Kumar V (2017) Devastating extreme Mediterranean cyclone’s impacts in Turkey. Nat Hazards 87:255–286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2762-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sitnov SA, Mokhov II, Lupo AR (2014) Evolution of the water vapor plume over Eastern Europe during summer 2010 atmospheric blocking. Adv Meteorol 2014:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/253953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sitnov SA, Mokhov II, Lupo AR (2017) Ozone, water vapor, and temperature anomalies associated with atmospheric blocking events over Eastern Europe in spring - summer 2010. Atmos Environ 164:180–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sousa PM, Trigo RM, Barriopedro D, Soares PMM, Ramos AM, Liberato MLR (2017a) Responses of European precipitation distributions and regimes to different blocking locations. Clim Dyn 48(3):1141–1160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3132-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sousa PM, Trigo RM, Barriopedro D, Soares PMM, Santos JA (2017b) European temperature responses to blocking and ridge regional patterns. Clim Dyn 50(1–2):457–477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3620-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takvim (2009) Urfa’nın etrafı sel!. (Turkish) https://www.takvim.com.tr/yasam/2009/10/31/urfanin_etrafi_sel. Accessed 21 Dec 2018
  37. Tayanç M, Karaca M, Dalfes HN (1998) March 1987 cyclone (blizzard) over the eastern Mediterranean and Balkan region associated with blocking. Mon Weather Rev 126(11):3036–3047.  https://doi.org/10.1175/15200493(1998)126%3C3036:MCBOTE%3E2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tibaldi S, Molteni F (1990) On the operational predictability of blocking. Tellus A 42(3):343–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Treidl RA, Birch EC, Sajecki P (1981) Blocking action in the Northern Hemisphere: a climatological study. Atmosphere-Ocean 19(1):1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1981.9649096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Türkeş M, Erlat E (2005) Climatological responses of winter precipitation in Turkey to variability of the North Atlantic Oscillation during the period 1930–2001. Theor Appl Climatol 81:45–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0084-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whan K, Zwiers F, Sillmann J (2016) The influence of atmospheric blocking on extreme winter minimum temperatures in North America. J Clim 29(12):4361–4381.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0493.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York Retrieved http://ggplot2.org . Accessed 15 Dec 2018
  43. Wickham H, Francios R, Henry L, Müller K (2018) Dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. Retrieved https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr. Accessed 15 Dec 2018
  44. Wiedenmann JM, Lupo AR, Mokhov II, Tikhonova EA (2002) The climatology of blocking anticyclones for the Northern and Southern Hemispheres: block intensity as a diagnostic. J Clim 15(23):3459–3473.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3459:TCOBAF>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Department of Meteorologyİstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Atmospheric Sciences ProgramUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations