Adjustment of Thornthwaite equation for estimating evapotranspiration in Vojvodina
Evapotranspiration is one of the crucial components of hydrological cycle. The Penman-Monteith method (PM) is recommended as the sole standard method for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET0). The usage of the PM method is limited in many regions due to the lack of required weather data. In such circumstances, simple Thornthwaite equation is often used to estimate ET0. The main objectives of the present study are (i) to estimate reference evapotranspiration using different Thornthwaite approaches, (ii) to develop optimal adjusted equation, and (iii) to consider the spatial variability of the empirical coefficient(s) of adjusted equation for the study area. In this study, six Thornthwaite approaches were compared to the full set PM equation using weather data from Vojvodina region, Serbia. The original Thornthwaite equation was very poor in estimating ET0 and greatly underestimated PM values at all locations. It can be concluded that an adjustment of the Thornthwaite equation is necessary. The obtained results indicate that ET0 could be estimated from the new Th65 approach (effective temperature, k = 0.65), which reproduced statistical characteristics better compared to other Thornthwaite approaches. The spatial variability of the empirical k coefficient showed that k values varied from 0.62 to 0.69 across the study area with deviations of − 5% to 6% compared to a unique k value of 0.65. These results suggested that single regional k value can be successfully used for estimating ET0.
The paper is a part of the research done within the bilateral project “Project changes of hydrological hazards (extreme precipitation and drought) in Hungary and Serbia” financed by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (TR37003) and Hungarian Ministry of Science.
- Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Bautista F, Bautista D, Delgado-Carranza C (2009) Calibration of the equations of Hargreaves and Thornthwaite to estimate the potential evapotranspiration in semi–arid and subhumid tropical climates for regional applications. Atmosfera 22(4):331–348Google Scholar
- Camargo AP, Marin FR, Sentelhas PC, Picini AG (1999) Adjust of the Thornthwaite’s method to estimate the potential evapotranspiration for arid and superhumid climates, based on daily temperature amplitude. Rev Bras Agrometeorol 7(2):251–257 (in Portuguese with English summary)Google Scholar
- Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice no. 70. ASCE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. US weather bureau technical paper, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Quej VH, Almorox J, Arnaldo AJ, Moratiel M (2019) Evaluation of temperature-based methods for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration in the Yucatán peninsula, Mexico. J Hydrol Eng 24(2):05018029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsakiris G, Vangelis H (2005) Establishing a drought index incorporating evapotranspiration. Eur Water 9(10):3–11Google Scholar