Advertisement

Spatiotemporal assessment of the PERSIANN family of satellite precipitation data over Fars Province, Iran

  • Narjes Salmani-Dehaghi
  • Nozar SamaniEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

High resolution and global coverage of the satellite-based precipitation data have been found useful in many climate and hydrological studies, particularly in limited and nongauged areas. Due to systematic and nonsystematic factors, there are always deviations between ground-based and satellite-based precipitation. Among many satellite-based precipitation products, the PERSIANN (Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks) family products attracted more attention. In this paper, we evaluated the PERSIANN family of monthly, seasonal, and annual precipitation data over Fars Province, Iran, at four different spatial scales, namely point (station), pixel, regional, and provincial during the period of 2003–2015 using 132 rain gauge data as baseline. The performance of the products was first evaluated by calculating some statistical metrics. The result shows that in all spatial and temporal scales, the three products mirror the precipitation pattern and underestimate the precipitation in the province. The PERSIANN-CDR outperforms the other two products and is the superior product. The performance of PERSIANNN products is the best at the provincial scale followed by regional, pixel, and point scales. The performance of PERSIANN family products is also evaluated by the quantile–quantile plot from which a set of equations is proposed to accurately predict precipitation in Fars Province from the PERSIANN-CDR precipitation data. The proposed equations are verified by 2-year precipitation data that were not used in the assessment of the products. These equations provide highly accurate precipitation data from PERSIANN-CDR data particularly in nongauged sites at various spatiotemporal scales for application such as in statistical hydrology and hydroclimate-related projects.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Constructive comments by the editor and anonymous reviewers are appreciated.

Funding information

Financial support provided by the Office of Vice Chancellor for Research, Shiraz University (grant no. 91GCU4M1206) is acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. AghaKouchak A, Behrangi A, Sorooshian S, Hsu K, Amitai E, (2011). Evaluation of satellite-retrieved extreme precipitation rates across the central United States. J Geophys Res-Atmos, 116(D2)Google Scholar
  2. AghaKouchak A, Mehran A, Norouzi H, Behrangi A, (2012). Systematic and random error components in satellite precipitation data sets. Geophys Res Lett, 39(9)Google Scholar
  3. Alijanian M, Rakhshandehroo GR, Mishra AK, Dehghani M (2017) Evaluation of satellite rainfall climatology using CMORPH, PERSIANN-CDR, PERSIANN, TRMM, MSWEP over Iran. Int J Climatol 37(14):4896–4914Google Scholar
  4. Artan G, Gadain H, Smith JL, Asante K, Bandaragoda CJ, Verdin JP (2007) Adequacy of satellite derived rainfall data for stream flow modeling. Nat Hazards 43(2):167–185Google Scholar
  5. Ashouri H, Hsu KL, Sorooshian S, Braithwaite DK, Knapp KR, Cecil LD, Nelson BR, Prat OP (2015) PERSIANN-CDR: daily precipitation climate data record from multisatellite observations for hydrological and climate studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96(1):69–83Google Scholar
  6. Basalirwa C (1995) Delineation of Uganda into climatological rainfall zones using the method of principal component analysis. Int J Climatol 15(10):1161–1177Google Scholar
  7. Beck HE, van Dijk AIJM, Levizzani V, Schellekens J, Miralles DG, Martens B, de Roo A (2017) MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25 global gridded precipitation (1979-2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(1):589–615Google Scholar
  8. Bethere L, Sennikovs J, Bethers U (2017) Climate indices for the Baltic states from principal component analysis. Earth System Dynamics 8(4):951–962Google Scholar
  9. Beyglou M, Khoshakhlagh F, Ovji R (2009) The seasonal location and frequency of cyclone tracks of wet periods in middle-western Iran. Natl Geogr Res 68:71–84Google Scholar
  10. Casse C, Gosset M (2015) Analysis of hydrological changes and flood increase in Niamey based on the PERSIANN-CDR satellite rainfall estimate and hydrological simulations over the 1983–2013 period. Proc Int Assoc Hydrol Sci 370:117–123Google Scholar
  11. Chaplot V (2015) Evaluation of six high-resolution satellite and ground-based precipitation products over Malaysia. Remote Sens 7(2):1504–1528Google Scholar
  12. Derin Y, Yilmaz KK (2014) Evaluation of multiple satellite-based precipitation products over complex topography. J Hydrometeorol 15(4):1498–1516Google Scholar
  13. Duan Z, Liu J, Tuo Y, Chiogna G, Disse M (2016) Evaluation of eight high spatial resolution gridded precipitation products in Adige Basin (Italy) at multiple temporal and spatial scales. Sci Total Environ 573:1536–1553Google Scholar
  14. Ebert EE, Janowiak JE, Kidd C (2007) Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:47–64Google Scholar
  15. Feidas H, Kokolatos G, Negri A, Manyin M, Chrysoulakis N, Kamarianakis Y (2009) Validation of an infrared-based satellite algorithm to estimate accumulated rainfall over the Mediterranean basin. Theor Appl Climatol 95(1–2):91–109Google Scholar
  16. Guo H et al (2015) Inter-comparison of high-resolution satellite precipitation products over Central Asia. Remote Sens 7(6):7181–7211Google Scholar
  17. Hao Z, AghaKouchak A, Nakhjiri N, Farahmand A (2014) Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system. Scientific Data 1:140001Google Scholar
  18. Hong Y, Hsu K-L, Sorooshian S, Gao X (2004) Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed imagery using an artificial neural network cloud classification system. J Appl Meteorol 43(12):1834–1853Google Scholar
  19. Hong Y, Adler R, Huffman G (2006) Evaluation of the potential of NASA multi-satellite precipitation analysis in global landslide hazard assessment. Geophys Res Lett 33(22):L22402Google Scholar
  20. Hong Y, Adler RF, Negri A, Huffman GJ (2007) Flood and landslide applications of near real-time satellite rainfall products. Nat Hazards 43(2):285–294Google Scholar
  21. Hsu KL, Gao X, Sorooshian S, Gupta HV (1997) Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed information using artificial neural networks. J Appl Meteorol 36(9):1176–1190Google Scholar
  22. Hsu, KL., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., & Sorooshian, S (1999) Estimation of physical variables from multichannel remotely sensed imagery using a neural network: Application to rainfall estimation. Water Resources Research, 35(5): 1605–1618.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900032
  23. Hsu, KL., Hong, Y., & Sorooshian, S (2007) Rainfall Estimation Using a Cloud Patch Classification Map. In Measuring Precipitation From Space (pp. 329–342). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5835-6_26
  24. Hu Q, Yang D, Li Z, Mishra AK, Wang Y, Yang H (2014) Multi-scale evaluation of six high-resolution satellite monthly rainfall estimates over a humid region in China with dense rain gauges. Int J Remote Sens 35(4):1272–1294Google Scholar
  25. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ, Wolff DB, Adler RF, Gu G, Hong Y, Bowman KP, Stocker EF (2007) The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol 8(1):38–55Google Scholar
  26. Jamli, JB (2015) Validation of Satellite-Based PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates Using Surface-Based APHRODITE Data over Iran. Earth Sciences, 4(5): 150.  https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11
  27. Joyce RJ, Janowiak JE, Arkin PA, Xie P (2004) CMORPH: a method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. J Hydrometeorol 5(3):487–503Google Scholar
  28. Karbalaee N, Hsu K, Sorooshian S, Braithwaite D (2017) Bias adjustment of infrared-based rainfall estimation using passive microwave satellite rainfall data. J Geophys Res 122(7):3859–3876.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026037 Google Scholar
  29. Katiraie-Boroujerdy P-S, Nasrollahi N, Hsu KL, Sorooshian S (2013) Evaluation of satellite-based precipitation estimation over Iran. J Arid Environ 97:205–219Google Scholar
  30. Katiraie-Boroujerdy P-S, Nasrollahi N, Hsu KL, Sorooshian S (2016) Quantifying the reliability of four global datasets for drought monitoring over a semiarid region. Theor Appl Climatol 123(1–2):387–398Google Scholar
  31. Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319(1–4):357–382Google Scholar
  32. Kleiber W, Katz RW, Rajagopalan B, (2012). Daily spatiotemporal precipitation simulation using latent and transformed Gaussian processes. Water Resour Res, 48(1)Google Scholar
  33. Koutsouris AJ, Chen D, Lyon SW (2016) Comparing global precipitation data sets in eastern Africa: a case study of Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. Int J Climatol 36(4):2000–2014Google Scholar
  34. Kratz M, Resnick SI (1996) The QQ-estimator and heavy tails. Stoch Model 12(4):699–724Google Scholar
  35. Kubota T, Shige S, Hashizume H, Aonashi K, Takahashi N, Seto S, Hirose M, Takayabu YN, Ushio T, Nakagawa K, Iwanami K, Kachi M, Okamoto K' (2007) Global precipitation map using satellite-borne microwave radiometers by the GSMaP project: production and validation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45(7):2259–2275Google Scholar
  36. Kummerow C, Barnes W, Kozu T, Shiue J, Simpson J (1998) The tropical rainfall measuring mission (TRMM) sensor package. J Atmos Ocean Technol 15(3):809–817Google Scholar
  37. Li J, Ruan H, Li J, Huang S (2010) Application of TRMM precipitation data in meteorological drought monitoring. Journal of China Hydrology 30(4):43–46Google Scholar
  38. Li X, Zhang Q, Ye X (2013a) Dry/wet conditions monitoring based on TRMM rainfall data and its reliability validation over Poyang Lake Basin, China. Water 5(4):1848–1864Google Scholar
  39. Li Z, Yang D, Hong Y (2013b) Multi-scale evaluation of high-resolution multi-sensor blended global precipitation products over the Yangtze River. J Hydrol 500:157–169Google Scholar
  40. Liu X, Yang T, Hsu K, Liu C, Sorooshian S (2017) Evaluating the streamflow simulation capability of PERSIANN-CDR daily rainfall products in two river basins on the Tibetan Plateau. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(1):169–181Google Scholar
  41. Mahsin M (2011) Modeling rainfall in Dhaka division of Bangladesh using time series analysis. J Math Model Appl 1(5):67–73Google Scholar
  42. Malmgren BA, Winter A (1999) Climate zonation in Puerto Rico based on principal components analysis and an artificial neural network. J Clim 12(4):977–985Google Scholar
  43. Mashingia F, Mtalo F, Bruen M (2014) Validation of remotely sensed rainfall over major climatic regions in northeast Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 67:55–63Google Scholar
  44. Massari C, Crow W, Brocca L (2017) An assessment of the performance of global rainfall estimates without ground-based observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(9):4347–4361Google Scholar
  45. McMillan H, Jackson B, Clark M, Kavetski D, Woods R (2011) Rainfall uncertainty in hydrological modelling: an evaluation of multiplicative error models. J Hydrol 400(1–2):83–94Google Scholar
  46. Miao C, Ashouri H, Hsu K-L, Sorooshian S, Duan Q (2015) Evaluation of the PERSIANN-CDR daily rainfall estimates in capturing the behavior of extreme precipitation events over China. J Hydrometeorol 16(3):1387–1396Google Scholar
  47. Moazami S (2013) Comparison of PERSIANN and V7 TRMM multi-satellite precipitation analysis (TMPA) products with rain gauge data over Iran. Int J Remote Sens 34(22):8156–8171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.833360 Google Scholar
  48. Modarres R, Sarhadi A (2009) Rainfall trends analysis of Iran in the last half of the twentieth century. J Geophys Res-Atmos 114(D3):D03101Google Scholar
  49. Nadarajah S, Choi D (2007) Maximum daily rainfall in South Korea. J Earth Syst Sci 116(4):311–320Google Scholar
  50. Naderi M, Raeisi E (2015) Climate change in a region with altitude differences and with precipitation from various sources, south-central Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 124:529–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1433-y Google Scholar
  51. Nguyen P, Ombadi M, Sorooshian S, Hsu K, AghaKouchak A, Braithwaite D, Ashouri H, Thorstensen AR (2018) The PERSIANN family of global satellite precipitation data: a review and evaluation of products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:5801–5816.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5801-2018 Google Scholar
  52. Olsson J (1998) Evaluation of a scaling cascade model for temporal rain-fall disaggregation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 2(1):19–30Google Scholar
  53. Onyutha C (2012) Statistical modelling of FDC and return periods to characterise QDF and design threshold of hydrological extremes. J Urban Environ Eng 6(2):132–148Google Scholar
  54. Pereira F et al (2010) Satellite rainfall estimates over South America—possible applicability to the water management of large watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46(2):344–360Google Scholar
  55. Ramseyer CA, Mote TL (2017) Analysing regional climate forcing on historical precipitation variability in northeast Puerto Rico. Int J Climatol 38:e224–e236.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5364 Google Scholar
  56. Rashid MM, Beecham S, Chowdhury RK (2015) Statistical characteristics of rainfall in the Onkaparinga catchment in South Australia. J Water Clim Change 6(2):352–373Google Scholar
  57. Ringard J, Becker M, Seyler F, Linguet L (2015) Temporal and spatial assessment of four satellite rainfall estimates over French Guiana and North Brazil. Remote Sens 7(12):16441–16459Google Scholar
  58. Roca RM et al (2010) Comparing satellite and surface rainfall products over West Africa at meteorologically relevant scales during the AMMA campaign using error estimates. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49(4):715–731Google Scholar
  59. Roshani A, Parak F, Hejazizade Z, Ghaemi H (2013) Studying the moisture flux over south and southwest of Iran: a case study from December 10 to 13, 1995 rain storm. Earth Sci Res J 2(2):34–39Google Scholar
  60. Sahoo AK, Sheffield J, Pan M, Wood EF (2015) Evaluation of the tropical rainfall measuring mission multi-satellite precipitation analysis (TMPA) for assessment of large-scale meteorological drought. Remote Sens Environ 159:181–193Google Scholar
  61. Samani N, and Jamshidi Z, (2017) Climate change trend in Fars Province, Iran and its effect on groundwater crisis. Proceedings of the international conference of recent trends in environmental science and engineering (RTESE'17) Toronto, Canada – August 23–25, doi:  https://doi.org/10.11159/rtese17.133
  62. Sorooshian S, Hsu KL, Gao X, Gupta HV, Imam B, Braithwaite D (2000) Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite-based estimates of tropical rainfall. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81(9):2035–2046Google Scholar
  63. Sorooshian, S., Gao, X., Hsu, KL., Maddox, R. A., Hong, Y., & Gupta, HV (2002) Diurnal Variability of Tropical Rainfall Retrieved from Combined GOES and TRMM Satellite Information. Retrieved from Sorooshian, S., Gao, X., Hsu, KL., Maddox, R. A., Hong, Y., & Gupta, HV (2002) Diurnal Variability of Tropical Rainfall Retrieved from Combined GOES and TRMM Satellite Information. Retrieved from http://hydis.hwr.arizona.edu/precip/
  64. Sun QH, Miao CY, Duan QY, Ashouri H, Sorooshian S, Hsu KL (2018) A review of global precipitation data sets: data sources, estimation, and inter-comparisons. Rev Geophys 56:79–107Google Scholar
  65. Tan ML, Ibrahim AL, Duan Z, Cracknell AP, Chaplot V (2015) Evaluation of six high-resolution satellite and ground-based precipitation products over Malaysia. Remote Sens 7(2):1504–1528Google Scholar
  66. Thiemig V, Rojas R, Zambrano-Bigiarini M, Levizzani V, De Roo A (2012) Validation of satellite-based precipitation products over sparsely gauged African river basins. J Hydrometeorol 13(6):1760–1783Google Scholar
  67. Thyer M, Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Franks SW, Srikanthan S (2009) Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: a case study using Bayesian total error analysis. Water Resour Res 45(12):22Google Scholar
  68. Tian Y, Peters-Lidard CD, Choudhury BJ, Garcia M (2007) Multitemporal analysis of TRMM-based satellite precipitation products for land data assimilation applications. J Hydrometeorol 8(6):1165–1183Google Scholar
  69. Willems P (2000) Compound intensity/duration/frequency-relationships of extreme precipitation for two seasons and two storm types. J Hydrol 233(1–4):189–205Google Scholar
  70. Yan N, Wu B, Chang S, Bao X, (2014). Evaluation of TRMM precipitation product for meteorological drought monitoring in Hai Basin, IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. IOP Publishing, pp. 012093Google Scholar
  71. Yang H, Adler RF (2008) Predicting global landslide spatiotemporal distribution: integrating landslide susceptibility zoning techniques and real-time satellite rainfall estimates. Int J Sediment Res 23(3):249–257Google Scholar
  72. Yilmaz KK, Hogue TS, Hsu KL, Sorooshian S, Gupta HV, Wagener T (2005) Intercomparison of rain gauge, radar, and satellite-based precipitation estimates with emphasis on hydrologic forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 6(4):497–517Google Scholar
  73. Zeng H, Li L, Li J (2012) The evaluation of TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA) in drought monitoring in the Lancang River Basin. J Geogr Sci 22(2):273–282Google Scholar
  74. Zhou T, Yu R, Chen H, Dai A, Pan Y (2008) Summer precipitation frequency, intensity, and diurnal cycle over China: a comparison of satellite data with rain gauge observations. J Clim 21(16):3997–4010Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations