Advertisement

Comparative evaluation of sultry indices in the mid-south of Iran

  • Peyman MahmoudiEmail author
  • Taghi Tavousi
  • Sylwester Wereski
  • Mahdiye Miri Kamak
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The sultry phenomenon is considered one of the climactic events of south shorelines of Iran which are associated with humidity and high air temperature. The importance and necessity of this phenomenon on the subject of applied studies especially bioclimatology will be regarded if increasing of its severity leads to human discomfort as well as asthma and hard breathing. The main objective of this study was to conduct a comparative investigation into the estimation indices for sultry conditions in the southern half of Iran. To achieve research objectives, the hourly data for partial vapor pressure, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed were collected from 12 synoptic stations over a 15-year period (1995–2009). The following five indices were used to differentiate between sultry and non-sultry days: the actual vapor pressure more than or equal to 18.8 hPa (Scharlau criterion), equivalent temperature index (more than 56 °C), physiological deficit index (less than 45 hPa), the approximated heat stress index, and the sultry severity index (Castens-Lancaster criterion). To compare these indices, two quantitative and qualitative criteria were considered. The results obtained from quantitative analysis of these indices showed that the Scharlau and Castens-Lancaster criteria were the most coordinated indices in determining sultry conditions. Suitable coordination was obtained only in half the studied stations for the physiological deficit index of less than 45 hPa. The lowest coordination was between the approximated heat stress index and the equivalent temperature index of more than 56 °C. The results obtained from the qualitative evaluation of the sultry estimation indices showed that the Scharlau criterion was more capable of estimating sultry conditions since it exhibited such characteristics as robustness, tractability, transparency, sophistication, extendability, and dimensionality. In general, the conducted quantitative and qualitative analyses showed that the Scharlau criterion was the most appropriate, homogeneous, and concrete index for monitoring sultry conditions in southern Iran.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors of the present article know their duty to thank Iran’s Meteorology Organization for its cooperation and providing of the daily data of various variables from synoptic stations in the southern half of Iran for a 15-year time span. Also, we would like to express our utmost gratitude to the respected reviewers who judged the article and provided us with suggestions to elevate the quality of the article.

References

  1. Berke T, Castens G (1929) Zur Kenntnis der Temperatur und Feuchtigkeit der Schiffsluft. In: Ann. d. Hydrogr. U. Mar. Met., 57, 169ff. (In German)Google Scholar
  2. Blazejczyk K, Kunert A (2011) Bioclimatic principles of recreation and tourism in Poland. Monographies 13, Warsaw, 366 pp. (In Polish)Google Scholar
  3. Blazejczyk K, Matzarakis A (2007) Assessment of bioclimatic differentiation of Poland based on the human heat balance. Geogr Pol 80(1):63–82Google Scholar
  4. Castens G (1925) Über Tropenklimatologie, Tropenhygiene und den Lettow-Feldzug. Ann Hydrogr Marit Meteorol 5:177–187 (In German)Google Scholar
  5. Dieterichs H (1957) Dauer and Haufigkeit schuler stunden in San Salvador. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioklimatol Ser B 8(3–4):369–377 (In German)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dufton AF (1929) The eupatheostat. J Sci Instrum 6:51–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Endler C, Matzarakis A (2011) Climate and tourism in the Black Forest during the warm season. Int J Biometeorol 55(2):173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falarz M (2005) Days with sultry weather in Poland. Geogr Rev 77(3):311–323 (In Polish)Google Scholar
  9. Freedman DA (2005) Statistical models: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelman A (2005) Analysis of variance? Why it is more important than ever. Ann Stat 33:1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelman A (2008) Variance, analysis of. The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalkstein LS, Valimont KM (1986) An evaluation of summer discomfort in the United States using a relative climatological index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 67(7):842–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kamoutsis A, Matsoukis A, Chronopoulos K, Manoli E (2010) A comparative study of human thermal comfort conditions in two mountainous regions in Greece during summer. Global NEST J 12:401–408Google Scholar
  14. Kaviyani MR (1981) Climatic study of sultry phenomenon in the coastal and southern regions of the country. J Iran Geogr 1(3):36–59 (In Persian)Google Scholar
  15. Khoshakhlagh F, Hosseinpur Z, Hosseinpur M (2011) Statistical analysis of sultry phenomenon in Khuzestan province. In: 11th Geographers Congress of Iran, 15–16 September, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  16. Kozlowska-Szczesna T, Blazejczyk K, Krawczyk B (1997) Human Bioclimatology. Methods and applications. Monographies 1, Warsaw, 200 pp. (In Polish)Google Scholar
  17. Lancaster A (1898) De la manière d’utiliser les observations hygrométriques. V Congr Int d’Hydrologie, Climatologie. Liège, 261–271. (In German)Google Scholar
  18. Mahmoudi P, Tavousi T, Daneshmand H, Shabab Moghadam A (2014) Spatial classification of the sultry days in the southern half of Iran. J Spat anal Environ Hazards 1(2):47–63 (In Persian)Google Scholar
  19. Mahmoudi P, Tavousi T, Shabab Moghadam A (2017a) Investigating temporal-spatial behavior of sultry days in southern half of Iran. J Geogr (Reg Plan) 7(4):89–101 (In Persian)Google Scholar
  20. Mahmoudi P, Tavousi T, Shabab Moghadam A (2017b) Investigating trend of number of days changes of sultry days in southern half of Iran. J Zon Plan 7(26):55–68 (In Persian)Google Scholar
  21. Masoodian SA (2012) Climate of Iran. Sharia -E- Tous Press, Mashhad 217 pp. (In Persian)Google Scholar
  22. Matzarakis A, Mayer H (1997) Heat stress in Greece. Int J Biometeorol 41(1):34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niedźwiedź T (ed) (2003) Meteorological glossary. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw (in Polish)Google Scholar
  24. Pearson K (1895) Notes on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc R Soc Lond 58:240–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Redmond K (1991) Climate monitoring and indices. In: Wilhite DA, Wood DA, Kay PA (eds) Drought management and planning: international drought information center, department of agricultural meteorology, vol 9(1). University of Nebraska-Lincoln, IDIC Technical Report Series, pp 29–33Google Scholar
  26. Saaroni H, Ziv B (2003) The impact of a small lake on heat stress in a Mediterranean Urban Park: the case of Tel Aviv, Israel. Int J Biometeorol 47(3):156–165Google Scholar
  27. Scharlau K (1943) Die Schwüle als meßbare Größe. In: Bioklimat Beibl 10, S.19–23. (In German)Google Scholar
  28. Schoen C (2005) A new empirical model of the temperature-humidity index. J Appl Meteorol 44:1413–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steadman RG (1979) The assessment of sultriness. Part I: a temperature-humidity index based on human physiology and clothing science. J Appl Meteorol 18:861–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stigler S (1989) Francis Galton’s account of the invention of correlation. Stat Sci 4(2):73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watts D, Kalkstein S (2004) The development of a warm – weather relative stress index for environmental application. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 43(3):503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wereski S, Wereski S (2012) The methods of determining sultriness based on meteorological data from Lesko during the period 1981–2010. Rev Geophys 57(2):69–78 (In Polish)Google Scholar
  33. Zarnowiecki G (2003) Sultry weather characteristics in KIELCE. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Urban Climate, 1–5 September, Lodz, PolandGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao SL, Che SJ (2001) High temperature and muggy weather in Shijiazhuang City. Meteorol Mon 9:23–25 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peyman Mahmoudi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Taghi Tavousi
    • 1
  • Sylwester Wereski
    • 2
  • Mahdiye Miri Kamak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geography and Environmental PlanningUniversity of Sistan and BaluchestanZahedanIran
  2. 2.Department of Hydrology and Climatology, Faculty of Earth Science and Spatial ManagementMaria Curie-Skłodowska UniversityLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations