Advertisement

On the simulation of sensible heat flux over the Tibetan Plateau using different thermal roughness length parameterization schemes

  • Shuzhou Wang
  • Yaoming Ma
Original Paper

Abstract

The surface sensible heat flux is a major component of the heat source over the Tibetan Plateau (TP), and it has experienced significant changes during the past three decades. The mechanism for how these changes occur remains a controversial issue. This study estimates the sensible heat flux and its trend during 1981–2010 using in situ data and the Noah-MP land surface model. Five newly implemented parameterization schemes and one Noah-MP-based scheme for the thermal roughness length (z0h) were evaluated against in situ measurements to show how these schemes influence the simulation of the sensible heat flux. The results show that the sensible heat flux is very sensitive to the z0h parameterization scheme. Although z0h is different from the momentum roughness length (z0m), a simple scheme that neglects the difference between them can result in reasonable daily variations of the sensible heat flux. The scheme proposed by Zeng and Dickinson (1998) (hereafter, Z98) performed well in terms of simulating the annual mean sensible heat flux. We analyzed the climatic features of the sensible heat fluxes that were simulated using the Z98 scheme. The results indicated that the inter-annual variations of the sensible heat flux in the western and central TP were larger than those in the eastern TP. The sensible heat flux over the TP exhibited a significant decreasing trend during 1981–2010. The weakening trends over the western and central TP were higher than those in the eastern TP, and the TP-averaged weakening trend was ~ 2.7 Wm−2 per decade. Different schemes show some uncertainties in annual mean sensible heat flux, but all the schemes result in a decreasing trend.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The forcing dataset used in this study was developed by the Data Assimilation and Modeling Center for Tibetan Multi-spheres, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Thanks are due to members of the center.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41405099, 41661144043), Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Arid Regions, CAS (Lpcc201206), Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Changes and Land Surface Processes, CAS (TEL201303), and the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-DQC019).

References

  1. Brutsaert WH (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere: theory, history, and applications. Reidel Publishing Co, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen LX, Reiter ER, Feng ZQ (1985) The atmospheric heat source over the Tibetan Plateau: May-August 1979. Mon Wea Rev 113: 1771–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen F, Janjic Z, Mitchell K (1997) Impact of atmospheric surface layer parameterization in the new land-surface scheme of the NCEP mesoscale Eta numerical model. Bound-Layer Meteorol 185:391–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen F, Zhang Y (2009) On the coupling strength between the land surface and the atmosphere: from viewpoint of surface exchange coefficients. Geophys Res Letters 36:L10404.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen LT, Wu RG (2000) Interannual and decadal variations of snow cover over Qinghai-Xizang Plateau and their relationships to summer monsoon rainfall in China. Adv Atmos Sci 17:18–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-000-0040-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen YY, Yang K, Zhou DG (2010) Improving the Noah land surface model in arid regions with an appropriate parameterization of the thermal roughness length. J Hydrometeorol 11:995–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1185.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen YY, Yang K, He J (2011) Improving land surface temperature modeling for dry land of China. J Geophys Res 116:D20104.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen XL, Su ZB, Ma YM (2013) An improvement of roughness height parameterization of the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) over the Tibetan Plateau. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 52:607–622.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-12-056.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duan AM, Wu GX (2005) Role of the Tibetan Plateau thermal forcing in the summer climate patterns over subtropical Asia. Clim Dyn 24:793–807.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-004-0488-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duan AM, Wu GX (2008) Weakening trend in the atmospheric heat source over the Tibetan Plateau during recent decades. Part I: observations. J Climate 21: 3149–3164, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1912.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duan AM, Liu YM, Wu GX (2003) Heating status of the Tibetan Plateau from April to June and rainfall and atmospheric circulation anomaly over East Asia in midsummer. Sci China Ser D 48:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan AM, Wu GX, Liang XY (2008) Influence of the Tibetan Plateau on the summer climate patterns over Asia in the IAP/LASG SAMIL model. Adv Atmos Sci 25:518–528.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-008-0518-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duan AM, Wang MR, Lei YH, Cui Y (2013) Trends in summer rainfall over China associated with the Tibetan Plateau sensible heat source during 1980–2008. J Clim 26:261–275.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00669.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dyer AJ (1974) A review of flux-profile relationships. Bound-Layer Meteor 7:363–372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo X, Yang K, Chen Y (2011) Weakening sensible heat source over the Tibetan Plateau revisited: effects of the land-atmosphere thermal coupling. Theor Appl Climatol 104:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-010-0328-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Bound-Layer Meteor 78:215–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopwood WP (1995) Surface transfer of heat and momentum over an inhomogeneous vegetated land. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 121:1549–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanda M, Kanega M, Kawai T (2007) Roughness lengths for momentum and heat derived from outdoor urban scale models. J Appl Meteor Climatol 46:1067–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2500.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li MS, Babel W, Chen XL, Zhang L, Sun F, Wang B, Ma Y, Hu Z, Foken T (2015) A 3-year dataset of sensible and latent heat fluxes from the Tibetan Plateau, derived using eddy covariance measurements. Theor Appl Climatol 122:457–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1302-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu SM, Lu L, Mao D, Jia L (2007) Evaluating parameterizations of aerodynamic resistance to heat transfer using field measurements. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:769–783.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-769-2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma YM, Wang JM, Huang RH (2003) Remote sensing parameterization of land surface heat fluxes over arid and semi-arid areas. Adv Atmos Sci 20:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma YM, Menenti M, Feddes R (2008a) Analysis of the land surface heterogeneity and its impact on atmospheric variables and the aerodynamic and thermodynamic roughness lengths. J Geophys Res 113:D08113.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma YM, Kang SC, Zhu LP et al (2008b) Tibetan observation and research platform atmosphere–land interaction over a heterogeneous landscape. Bull Am Meteor Soc 89:1487–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mauder M, Foken T (2011) Documentation and instruction manual of the eddy covariance software package TK3. Work Report University of, BayreuthGoogle Scholar
  25. Niu GY, Yang ZL (2006) Effects of frozen soil on snowmelt runoff and soil water storage at a continental scale. J Hydrometeorol 7:937–952.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM538.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niu GY, Yang ZL, Mitchell KE et al (2011) The community Noah land surface mode l with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J Geophys Res 16:D12109.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paulson CA (1970) The mathematical representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. J Appl Meteorol 9:857–861.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1970)009<0857:TMROWS>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun J, Mahrt L (1995) Determination of surface fluxes from the surface radiative temperature. J Atmos Sci 52:1096–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1096:DOSFFT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang SZ, Ma YM (2011) Characteristics of land-atmosphere interaction parameters over the Tibetan Plateau. J Hydrometeorol 12:702–708.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1275.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu GX, Zhang YS (1998) Tibetan Plateau forcing and the timing of the monsoon onset over South Asia and the South China Sea. Mon Wea Rev 126:913–927.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0913:TPFATT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu GX, Liu YM, He B (2012) Thermal controls on the Asian summer monsoon. Sci Rep 2.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00404
  32. Wu TW, Qian ZA (2003) The relation between the Tibetan Plateau winter snow and the Asian summer monsoon and rainfall: an observational investigation. J Clim 16:2038–2051.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2038:TRBTTW>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang K, Koike T, Fujii H, Tamagawa K, Hirose N (2002) Improvement of surface flux parameterizations with a turbulence-related length. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 128:2073–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang K, Koike T, Ishikawa H, Kim J, Li X, Liu H, Liu S, Ma Y, Wang J (2008) Turbulent flux transfer over bare-soil surfaces: characteristics and parameterization. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:276–290.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1547.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang K, Qin J, Guo XF (2009) Method development for estimating sensible heat flux over the Tibetan Plateau from CMA data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:2474–2486.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2167.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang K, He J, Tang WJ, Qin J, Cheng CCK (2010) On downward shortwave and longwave radiations over high altitude regions: observation and modeling in the Tibetan Plateau. Agric Forest Meteor 150:38–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang K, Guo XF, Wu BY (2011a) Recent trends in surface sensible heat flux on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci China Ser D 54:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang K, Wu H, Qin J (2014) Recent climate changes over the Tibetan Plateau and their impacts on energy and water cycle: a review. Glob Planet Chang 112:79–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang ZL, Niu GY, Mitchell KE et al (2011b) The community Noah land surface model with multiple parameterization options (Noah-MP): 2. Evaluation over global river basins. J Geophys Res 116:D12110.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng XB, Dickinson RE (1998) Effect of surface sublayer on surface skin temperature and fluxes. J Clim 11:537–550.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0537:EOSSOS>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao P, Chen LX (2000) Study on climatic features of surface turbulent heat exchange coefficients and surface thermal sources over the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) Plateau. J Meteor Res 14:13–29Google Scholar
  42. Zhao P, Chen LX (2001) Climate features of atmospheric heat source/sink over the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau in 35 years and its relation to rainfall in China. Sci China Ser D 4:858–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zilitinkevich SS (1995) Non-local turbulent transport: pollution dispersion aspects of coherent structure of convective flows, in Air Pollution III, vol. I, Air Pollution Theory and Simulations, Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston, pp. 53–60Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters of Ministry of Education/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological DisastersNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Arid RegionsChinese Academy of ScienceLanzhouChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land Surface ProcessesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations