Advertisement

Seasonal forecasts for the Limpopo Province in estimating deviations from grazing capacity

  • Phumzile Maluleke
  • Willem A. Landman
  • Johan Malherbe
  • Emma Archer
Original Paper

Abstract

Application of seasonal forecasts in agriculture has significant potential and realized utility. Other sectors that may also benefit from using seasonal forecasts include (but are not limited to) health, hydrology, water, and energy. This paper shows that seasonal forecast model data, satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre (SPOT), dry matter productivity (DMP) data (proxy of grass biomass) along with other sets of data are effectively used to estimate grazing capacity (GC) over a 12-year test period (1998/1999–2009/2010) in Limpopo Province. GC comprises a vital consideration in agricultural activities, particularly for a province in South Africa like Limpopo, due to its varying climate. The Limpopo Province capitalizes on subsistence farming, including livestock and crop production. Grazing should thus be regulated in order to conserve grass, shrubs, and trees, thereby ensuring sustainability of rangelands. In a statistical downscaling model, the predictor is the 850 geopotential height fields of a coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation (CGCM) over Southern Africa to predict seasonal DMP values. This model shows that the mid-summer rainfall totals are important predictors for the November through April (NDJFMA) DMP (as well as grazing capacity) growing season. Forecast verification is conducted using the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and reliability diagrams. The CGCM model shows skill in discriminating high and low DMP (GC) seasons in the Limpopo Province, as well as reliability in the probabilistic forecasts. This paper demonstrates the development of a tailored forecast, an avenue that should be explored in enhancing relevance of forecasts in agricultural production.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors have made use of CGCM data from the IRI and would like to thank IRI for the access to their website (http://iridl.Ideo.Columbia.edu//).

Funding information

This study is based upon work fully supported financially by the Agricultural Research Council.

References

  1. Archer ERM (2004) Beyond the “climate versus grazing” impasse: using remote sensing to investigate the effects of grazing system choice on vegetation cover in the eastern Karoo. J Arid Environ 57:381–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnston AG, Li S, Mason SJ, Dewitt DG, Goddard L, Gong X (2010) Verification of the first 11 years or IRI’s seasonal climate forecasts. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:493–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartalev SA, Belward AS, Erchov DV, Isaev AS (2003) A new SPOT4-VEGETATION derived land cover map of Northern Eurasia. Int J Remote Sens 24:1977–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker-reshef I, Vermote E, Justice C (2010) A generalized regression-based model for forecasting winter wheat yields in Kansas and Ukraine using MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ 114:1312–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvao T, Palmeirim JM (2004) Mapping Mediterranean scrub with satellite imagery: biomass estimation and spectral behavior. Int J Remote Sens 25:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IRI (2014) Climate predictability tool (CPT). International Research Institute for Climate and Society. New York, United States of America. http://iri.columbia.edu/. Accessed 10 March 2014
  7. De Leeuw PN, Tothill JC (1990) The concept of rangeland carrying capacity in sub-Saharan Africa—myth or reality. Pastoral Development Network 29b:1–18Google Scholar
  8. Hexagon Geospatial (2014) Earth Resources Data Analysis System–IMAGINE (ERDAS version 14.00) software. Hexagon Geospatial Division. Alabama, United States of America. http://www.hexagongeospatial.com/. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  9. Fraser RH, Li Z, Landry R (2000) SPOT VEGETATION for characterizing boreal forest fires. Int J Remote Sens 21:3525–3532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodchild MF (1994) Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling: methodological issues. J Veg Sci 5:615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grazing Capacity Potential Map (1993) The Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act 43 of 1983. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamill TM (1997) Reliability diagrams for multicategory probabilistic forecasts. Weather Forecast 12:736–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayward MW, O’brien J, Kerley GIH (2007) Carrying capacity of large African predators: predictions and tests. Biol Conserv 139:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunt ER, Everitt JH, Ritchie JC, Moran MS, Booth DT, Anderson GL, Clark PE, Seyfried MS (2003) Applications and research using remote sensing for rangeland management. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:675–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joshi C, De Leeuw J, Van duren IC (2004) Remote sensing and GIS applications for mapping and spatial modelling of invasive species. Proc ISPRS 35:B7Google Scholar
  16. Kurtz DB, Schellberg J, Braun M (2010) Ground and satellite based assessment of rangeland management in sub-tropical Argentina. Appl Geogr 30:210–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Landman WA, Beraki A (2012) Multi-model forecast skill for mid-summer rainfall over southern Africa. Int J Climatol 32:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landman WA, Dewitt D, Lee D, Beraki A, Lötter D (2012) Seasonal rainfall prediction skill over South Africa: one-versus two-tiered forecasting systems. Am Meteorol Soc 27:489–501Google Scholar
  19. Landman WA, Beraki A, DeWitt D, Lötter D (2014) SST prediction methodologies and verification considerations for dynamical mid-summer rainfall forecasts for South Africa. Water SA 40(4):615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malherbe J, Landman WA, Olievier C, Sakuma H, Luo J-J (2014) Seasonal forecasts of the SINTEX-F coupled model applied to maize yield and streamflow estimates over north-eastern South Africa. Meterol Appl 21:733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mason SJ, Graham NE (2002) Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 128:2145–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason SJ, Tippett MK (2016) Climate Predictability Tool version 15.3.9. Columbia University Academic Commons.  https://doi.org/10.7916/D8NS0TQ6
  23. NASA (2015) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Washington D.C., United States of America. http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/dataproducts. Accessed 23 March 2015
  24. Moeletsi ME, Walker S (2012) Rainy season characteristics of the Free State Province of South Africa with reference to rain-fed maize production. Water SA 38(5):775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morgenthal TL (2015) Personal communication: discussions on reasons for high (positive) grazing capacity values in the Limpopo Province. Department of Agriculture, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgenthal TL, Newby T, Smith HJC, Pretorius DJ (2004) Development and refinement of a grazing capacity map for South Africa using NOAA (AVHHR) satellite derived data. Final report no. GW/A/2004/66. Department of Agriculture, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  27. Nutini F, Stroppiana D, Boschetti M, Brivio PA, Bartholomé E, Beye G (2011) Evaluation of remotely sensed DMP product using multi-year field measurements of biomass in West Africa. Proc. SPIE. 8174, Remote Sens. for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XIII. 81740VGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer AR, Bennett JE (2013) Degradation of communal rangelands in South Africa: towards an improved understanding to inform policy. Afr J Range For Sci 30:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickup G, Bastin GN, Chewings VH (1994) Remote-sensing-based condition assessment for nonequilibrium rangelands under large scale commercial grazing. Ecol Appl 4:497–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pickup G, Bastin GN, Chewings VH (1998) Identifying trends in land degradation in non-equilibrium rangelands. J Appl Ecol 35:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prasad AK, Chai L, Singh RP, Kafatos M (2006) Crop yield estimation model for Iowa using remote sensing and surface parameters. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 8:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roe EM (1997) Viewpoint: on rangeland carrying capacity. J Range Manag 50:467–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schulze BR (1965) Climate of South Africa. Part 8. General survey. WB 28. Weather Bureau, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  34. Sivakumar MVK (2006) Climate prediction and agriculture: current status and future challenges. Clim Res 33:3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ESA (2014) SPOT VEGETATION DMP. European Space Agency. Boeretang, Belgium. http://proba-v.vgt.vito.be/. Accessed 24 Jan 2014
  36. Stroebel A, Swanepoel FJC, NthakhenI ND, Nesamvuni AE, Taylor G (2008) Benefits obtained from cattle by smallholder farmers: a case study of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Aust J Exp Agric 48:825–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Troccoli A, Harrison M, Anderson DLT, Mason SJ (2008) Seasonal climate: forecasting and managing risk 82: NATO Science Series on Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Unganai LS, Kogan FN (1998) Drought monitoring and corn yield estimation in Southern Africa from AVHRR data. Remote Sens Environ 63:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vanderpost C, Ringrose S, Matheson W, Arntzen J (2011) Satellite based long term assessment of rangeland condition in semi-arid areas: an example from Botswana. J Arid Environ 75:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SANBI (2014) Vegetation Map of 2009. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Cape Town, South Africa. http://bgis.sanbi.org/vegmap/map.asp. Accessed 16 Sept 2014
  41. Vogel C, Koch I, Van Zyl K (2010) “A persistent truth”—reflections on drought Management in Southern Africa. Weather Clim Soc 2:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wessels KJ, Prince SD, Carroll M, Malherbe J (2007a) Relevance of rangeland degradation in semiarid northeastern South Africa to the nonequilibrium theory. Ecol Appl 17:815–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wessels KJ, Prince SD, Malherbe J, Small J, Frost PE, Van Zyl D (2007b) Can human-induced land degradation be distinguished from the effects of rainfall variability? A case study in South Africa. J Arid Environ 68:271–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilks DS (2006) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Amsterdam, p 676Google Scholar
  46. Xia YQ, Shao MA (2008) Soil water carrying capacity for vegetation: a hydrological and biogeochemical process model solution. Ecol Model 124:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xiao X, Boles S, Liu J, Zhuang D, Liu M (2002) Characterization of forest types in Northeastern China, using multi-temporal SPOT-4 VEGETATION sensor data. Remote Sens Environ 82:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xie Y, Zongyao S, Yu M (2008) Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. J Plant Ecol 1:9–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Soil, Climate and WaterPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and MeteorologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Natural Resources & the EnvironmentPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Natural Resources & the EnvironmentJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations