Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

On the inherent predictability of precipitation across the United States

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predictability of climate variables is known to be limited to few days up to few weeks due to the inherent chaotic nature and resulting sensitivity to initial conditions. However, such generalization of limited predictability is cautioned because of the highly nonlinear nature and the known influence of localized causal factors on many climate variables. Additionally, even though an improvement in predictability is expected with coarsening in spatial and temporal resolutions, the extent and rate of this expected improvement is still unexplored. This study investigates the spatial distribution of predictability of daily precipitation across the USA. The emphasis is on determining the rate of increase in predictability with spatio-temporal averaging, by defining three predictability statistics (maximum predictability, predictive error, and predictive instability) based on the nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent. From our analyses, we find that predictability increases monotonically with temporal averaging, while spatial averaging has minimal influence, pointing to the possible spatially invariant nature of precipitation dynamics. Modeling the precipitation dynamics at relatively coarser scales of 1° × 1° and higher temporal scales of 5–10 days could markedly improve the predictability statistics. Significant changes in the predictability characteristics of daily precipitation across large areas of the USA and associated non-stationarity are also identified over the 1948–2006 period. This is consistent with sudden changes in the overall nature of precipitation over time, which include a reduction in non-rainy days, an increase in signal-to-noise ratio, an increase in average precipitation events, and an increase in extremes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aurell E, Boffetta G, Crisanti A, Paladin G, Vulpiani A (1997) Predictability in the large: an extension of the concept of Lyapunov exponent. J Phys A: Math Gen 30:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer P, Thorpe A, Brunet G (2015) The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature 525:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brankovic C, Palmer TN (1997) Atmospheric seasonal predictability and estimates of ensemble size. Mon Weather Rev 125:859–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh NR, Gershunov A, Panorska AR, Kozubowski TJ (2015) The probability distribution of intense daily precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 42:1560–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BH, Li JP, Ding RQ (2006) Nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent and atmospheric predictability research. Sci China D 49:1111–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597. doi:10.1002/qj.828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanya CT, Nagesh Kumar D (2010) Nonlinear ensemble prediction of a chaotic daily rainfall. Adv Water Resour 33(3):327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanya CT, Nagesh Kumar D (2011a) Multivariate nonlinear ensemble prediction of daily chaotic rainfall with climate inputs. J Hydrol 403(3–4):292–306

  • Dhanya CT, Nagesh Kumar D (2011b) Predictive uncertainty of chaotic daily stream flow using ensemble wavelet networks approach. Water Resour Res 47:1–28

  • Ding R, Li J (2007) Nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent and predictability. Phys Lett A 364:396–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding R, Li J, Ha K-J (2008) Trends and interdecadal changes of weather predictability during 1950s–1990s. J Geophys Res 113:D24112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckmann JP, Ruelle D (1985) Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev Mod Phys 57:617–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards PN (2011) History of climate modeling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ent RJ, Tuinenburg OA (2017) The residence time of water in the atmosphere revisited. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer JD, Sidorowich JJ (1987) Predicting chaotic time series. Phys Rev Lett 59:845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George SE, Sutton RT (2006) Predictability and skill of boreal winter forecasts made with the ECMWF Seasonal Forecasting System II. Q J R Meteorol Soc 132:2031–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershunov A, Cayan DR (2003) Heavy daily precipitation frequency over the contiguous United States: sources of climatic variability and seasonal predictability, J Clim 16:2752–2765

  • Gianotti DJ, Anderson BT, Salvucci GD (2014) The potential predictability of precipitation occurrence, intensity, and seasonal totals over the continental United States. J Clim 27:6904–6918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami BN (2004) Interdecadal change in potential predictability of the Indian summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 31:L16208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1984) Dimensions and entropies of strange attractors from a fluctuating dynamics approach. Physica D 3:34–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groisman PY, Knight RW (2008) Prolonged dry episodes over the conterminous United States: new tendencies emerging during the last 40 years. J Clim 21:1850–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groisman PY et al (1999) Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: important indicators of climatic change. Clim Chang 42:243–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groisman PY, Knight RW, Easterling DR, Karl TR, Hegerl GC, Razuvaev VN (2005) Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record. J Clim 18:1326–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller G (2001) Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows. Physica D 149:248–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins RW, Kousky V (2013) Changes in observed daily precipitation over the United States between 1950–79 and 1980–2009. J Hydrometeorol 14:105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins RW, Silva VBS, Shi W, Larson J (2007) Relationships between climate variability and fluctuations in daily precipitation over the United States. J Clim 20:3561–3579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, Lai F (1994) Analysis and prediction of chaos in rainfall and streamflow time series. J Hydrol 153(1–4):23–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung T et al (2012) High-resolution global climate simulations with the ECMWF model in Project Athena: experimental design, model climate, and seasonal forecast skill. J Clim 25:3155–3172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang I-S, Shukla J (2006) Dynamical seasonal prediction and predictability of the monsoon. The Asian monsoon, B. Wang, Ed. 585–612

  • Kang I-S, Jin EK, An K-H (2006) Secular increase of seasonal predictability for the 20th century. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02703

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Knight RW (1998) Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel KE, Easterling DR, Redmond K, Hubbard K (2003) Temporal variations of extreme precipitation events in the United States: 1895–2000. Geophys Res Lett 30:1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavers DA, Ralph FM, Waliser DE, Gershunov A, Dettinger MD (2015) Climate change intensification of horizontal water vapor transport in CMIP5. Geophys Res Lett 42:5617–5625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leith C (1978) Predictability of climate. Nature 276:352–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Ding R (2011) Temporal–spatial distribution of atmospheric predictability limit by local dynamical analogs. Mon Weather Rev 139:3265–3283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1965) A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus 17:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1972) Predictability: does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?. AAAS Section on Environmental Sciences New Approaches to Global Weather: GARP, 139th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, California, December 1972

  • Lorenz EN (1982) Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus 34:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Wood EF (2006) Assessing the idealized predictability of precipitation and temperature in the NCEP Climate Forecast System. Geophys Res Lett 33:L04708

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch P (2008) The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. J Comput Phys 227:3431–3444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallakpour I, Villarini G (2016) Analysis of changes in the magnitude, frequency, and seasonality of heavy precipitation over the contiguous United States. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-016-1881-z

  • Mani NJ, Suhas E, Goswami BN (2009) Can global warming make Indian monsoon weather less predictable? Geophys Res Lett 36:L08811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra V (2004) An evaluation of the predictability of austral summer season precipitation over South America. J Clim 17:1161–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Msadek R, Vecchi GA, Winton M, Gudgel RG (2014) Importance of initial conditions in seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice extent. Geophys Res Lett 41:5208–5215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nese JM (1989) Quantifying local predictability in phase space. Physica D:35, 237–250

  • Pal I, Anderson BT, Salvucci GD, Gianotti DJ (2013) Shifting seasonality and increasing frequency of precipitation in wet and dry seasons across the U.S. Geophys Res Lett 40:4030–4035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng P, Kumar A (2005) A large ensemble analysis of the influence of tropical SSTs on seasonal atmospheric variability. J Clim 18:1068–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng P, Kumar A, Wang W (2011) An analysis of seasonal predictability in coupled model forecasts. Climate Dyn 36:637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polade SD, Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Gershunov A, Dettinger MD (2014) The key role of dry days in changing regional climate and precipitation regimes. Nat Sci Rep 4:4364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor SC, Schoof JT (2008) Changes in the seasonality of precipitation over the contiguous USA. J Geophys Res 113:D21108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner S, Denise L, Helen I (2005) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Chang 69:197–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regonda SK, Rajagopalan B, Clark M, Pitlick J (2005) Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the Western United States. J Clim 18:372–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichler T, Roads JO (2004) Time–space distribution of long-range atmospheric predictability. J Atmos Sci 61:249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein MT, James JC, Carlo JD (1993) A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D 65:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas JD, Kim HS, Eykholt R, Burlando P, Green T (2005) Aggregation and sampling in deterministic chaos: implications for chaos identification in hydrological processes. Nonlinear Process Geophys 12:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sano M, Sawada Y (1985) Measurement of the Lyapunov spectrum from a chaotic time series. Phys Rev Lett 55:1082–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B (2004) Chaos theory in hydrology: important issues and interpretations. J Hydrol 227(1–4):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens GL, Hu Y (2010) Are climate-related changes to the character of global-mean precipitation predictable? Environ Res Lett 5(2):025209

  • Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand DA, Young LS (eds) Lectures notes in mathematics 898. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 366–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE (2010) More knowledge, less certainty. Natl Rep Clim Chang 4:20–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Parsons DB (2003) The changing character of precipitation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84:1205–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westra S, Alexander LV, Zwiers FW (2013) Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. J Clim 26:3904–3918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, Swift JB, Swinney HL, Vastano JA (1985) Determining Lyapunov exponent from a time series. Physica D 16:285–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Kirtman BP (2006) Changes in spread and predictability associated with ENSO in an ensemble coupled GCM. J Clim 19:4378–4396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Eykholt R, Pielke RA (1991) Estimating the Lyapunov time series from the short time series of low precision. Phys Rev Lett 66:3229–3232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziehmann C, Smith LA, Kurths J (2000) Localized Lyapunov exponents and the prediction of predictability. Phys Lett A 271:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

G. Villarini acknowledges financial support from NOAA’s Climate Program Office’s Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections Program, Grant #NA15OAR4310073, from the Broad Agency Announcement Program and the Engineer Research and Development Center–Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory under Contract W913E5-16-C-0002 and from Grant/Cooperative Agreement Number G11 AP20079 from the United States Geological Survey. The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NOAA, USACE, or USGS. The computations were performed on Helium and Neon clusters of High Performance Computing (HPC) at the University of Iowa. We thank Dr. Kaustubh Salvi for his help with some of the figures. The comments by three anonymous reviewers and the editors are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

    C. T. Dhanya

  2. IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Gabriele Villarini

Authors
  1. C. T. Dhanya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriele Villarini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. T. Dhanya.

Additional information

Highlights

• Extent and rate of increase in predictability of daily precipitation is investigated.

• Predictability increases monotonically with temporal averaging.

• Spatial averaging has minimal influence on predictability

• Non-stationarity in predictability is coherent with the persistent changes in precipitation characteristics

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 18322 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhanya, C.T., Villarini, G. On the inherent predictability of precipitation across the United States. Theor Appl Climatol 133, 1035–1050 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2231-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2231-5

Search

Navigation