Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 133, Issue 3–4, pp 1035–1050 | Cite as

On the inherent predictability of precipitation across the United States

  • C. T. Dhanya
  • Gabriele Villarini
Original Paper

Abstract

Predictability of climate variables is known to be limited to few days up to few weeks due to the inherent chaotic nature and resulting sensitivity to initial conditions. However, such generalization of limited predictability is cautioned because of the highly nonlinear nature and the known influence of localized causal factors on many climate variables. Additionally, even though an improvement in predictability is expected with coarsening in spatial and temporal resolutions, the extent and rate of this expected improvement is still unexplored. This study investigates the spatial distribution of predictability of daily precipitation across the USA. The emphasis is on determining the rate of increase in predictability with spatio-temporal averaging, by defining three predictability statistics (maximum predictability, predictive error, and predictive instability) based on the nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent. From our analyses, we find that predictability increases monotonically with temporal averaging, while spatial averaging has minimal influence, pointing to the possible spatially invariant nature of precipitation dynamics. Modeling the precipitation dynamics at relatively coarser scales of 1° × 1° and higher temporal scales of 5–10 days could markedly improve the predictability statistics. Significant changes in the predictability characteristics of daily precipitation across large areas of the USA and associated non-stationarity are also identified over the 1948–2006 period. This is consistent with sudden changes in the overall nature of precipitation over time, which include a reduction in non-rainy days, an increase in signal-to-noise ratio, an increase in average precipitation events, and an increase in extremes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

G. Villarini acknowledges financial support from NOAA’s Climate Program Office’s Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections Program, Grant #NA15OAR4310073, from the Broad Agency Announcement Program and the Engineer Research and Development Center–Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory under Contract W913E5-16-C-0002 and from Grant/Cooperative Agreement Number G11 AP20079 from the United States Geological Survey. The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NOAA, USACE, or USGS. The computations were performed on Helium and Neon clusters of High Performance Computing (HPC) at the University of Iowa. We thank Dr. Kaustubh Salvi for his help with some of the figures. The comments by three anonymous reviewers and the editors are gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

704_2017_2231_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17.9 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18322 kb)

References

  1. Aurell E, Boffetta G, Crisanti A, Paladin G, Vulpiani A (1997) Predictability in the large: an extension of the concept of Lyapunov exponent. J Phys A: Math Gen 30:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer P, Thorpe A, Brunet G (2015) The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature 525:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brankovic C, Palmer TN (1997) Atmospheric seasonal predictability and estimates of ensemble size. Mon Weather Rev 125:859–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanaugh NR, Gershunov A, Panorska AR, Kozubowski TJ (2015) The probability distribution of intense daily precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 42:1560–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen BH, Li JP, Ding RQ (2006) Nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent and atmospheric predictability research. Sci China D 49:1111–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  7. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597. doi: 10.1002/qj.828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhanya CT, Nagesh Kumar D (2010) Nonlinear ensemble prediction of a chaotic daily rainfall. Adv Water Resour 33(3):327–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhanya CT, Nagesh Kumar D (2011a) Multivariate nonlinear ensemble prediction of daily chaotic rainfall with climate inputs. J Hydrol 403(3–4):292–306 Google Scholar
  10. Dhanya CT, Nagesh Kumar D (2011b) Predictive uncertainty of chaotic daily stream flow using ensemble wavelet networks approach. Water Resour Res 47:1–28Google Scholar
  11. Ding R, Li J (2007) Nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent and predictability. Phys Lett A 364:396–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ding R, Li J, Ha K-J (2008) Trends and interdecadal changes of weather predictability during 1950s–1990s. J Geophys Res 113:D24112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eckmann JP, Ruelle D (1985) Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev Mod Phys 57:617–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards PN (2011) History of climate modeling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2:128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Ent RJ, Tuinenburg OA (2017) The residence time of water in the atmosphere revisited. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:779–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer JD, Sidorowich JJ (1987) Predicting chaotic time series. Phys Rev Lett 59:845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. George SE, Sutton RT (2006) Predictability and skill of boreal winter forecasts made with the ECMWF Seasonal Forecasting System II. Q J R Meteorol Soc 132:2031–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gershunov A, Cayan DR (2003) Heavy daily precipitation frequency over the contiguous United States: sources of climatic variability and seasonal predictability, J Clim 16:2752–2765Google Scholar
  19. Gianotti DJ, Anderson BT, Salvucci GD (2014) The potential predictability of precipitation occurrence, intensity, and seasonal totals over the continental United States. J Clim 27:6904–6918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goswami BN (2004) Interdecadal change in potential predictability of the Indian summer monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 31:L16208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1984) Dimensions and entropies of strange attractors from a fluctuating dynamics approach. Physica D 3:34–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groisman PY, Knight RW (2008) Prolonged dry episodes over the conterminous United States: new tendencies emerging during the last 40 years. J Clim 21:1850–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groisman PY et al (1999) Changes in the probability of heavy precipitation: important indicators of climatic change. Clim Chang 42:243–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Groisman PY, Knight RW, Easterling DR, Karl TR, Hegerl GC, Razuvaev VN (2005) Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record. J Clim 18:1326–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haller G (2001) Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows. Physica D 149:248–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Higgins RW, Kousky V (2013) Changes in observed daily precipitation over the United States between 1950–79 and 1980–2009. J Hydrometeorol 14:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higgins RW, Silva VBS, Shi W, Larson J (2007) Relationships between climate variability and fluctuations in daily precipitation over the United States. J Clim 20:3561–3579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jayawardena AW, Lai F (1994) Analysis and prediction of chaos in rainfall and streamflow time series. J Hydrol 153(1–4):23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jung T et al (2012) High-resolution global climate simulations with the ECMWF model in Project Athena: experimental design, model climate, and seasonal forecast skill. J Clim 25:3155–3172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kang I-S, Shukla J (2006) Dynamical seasonal prediction and predictability of the monsoon. The Asian monsoon, B. Wang, Ed. 585–612Google Scholar
  31. Kang I-S, Jin EK, An K-H (2006) Secular increase of seasonal predictability for the 20th century. Geophys Res Lett 33:L02703Google Scholar
  32. Karl TR, Knight RW (1998) Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kunkel KE, Easterling DR, Redmond K, Hubbard K (2003) Temporal variations of extreme precipitation events in the United States: 1895–2000. Geophys Res Lett 30:1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lavers DA, Ralph FM, Waliser DE, Gershunov A, Dettinger MD (2015) Climate change intensification of horizontal water vapor transport in CMIP5. Geophys Res Lett 42:5617–5625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leith C (1978) Predictability of climate. Nature 276:352–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li J, Ding R (2011) Temporal–spatial distribution of atmospheric predictability limit by local dynamical analogs. Mon Weather Rev 139:3265–3283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lorenz EN (1965) A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus 17:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorenz EN (1972) Predictability: does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?. AAAS Section on Environmental Sciences New Approaches to Global Weather: GARP, 139th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, California, December 1972Google Scholar
  39. Lorenz EN (1982) Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus 34:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luo L, Wood EF (2006) Assessing the idealized predictability of precipitation and temperature in the NCEP Climate Forecast System. Geophys Res Lett 33:L04708Google Scholar
  41. Lynch P (2008) The origins of computer weather prediction and climate modeling. J Comput Phys 227:3431–3444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mallakpour I, Villarini G (2016) Analysis of changes in the magnitude, frequency, and seasonality of heavy precipitation over the contiguous United States. Theor Appl Climatol. doi: 10.1007/s00704-016-1881-z
  43. Mani NJ, Suhas E, Goswami BN (2009) Can global warming make Indian monsoon weather less predictable? Geophys Res Lett 36:L08811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Misra V (2004) An evaluation of the predictability of austral summer season precipitation over South America. J Clim 17:1161–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Msadek R, Vecchi GA, Winton M, Gudgel RG (2014) Importance of initial conditions in seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice extent. Geophys Res Lett 41:5208–5215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nese JM (1989) Quantifying local predictability in phase space. Physica D:35, 237–250Google Scholar
  47. Pal I, Anderson BT, Salvucci GD, Gianotti DJ (2013) Shifting seasonality and increasing frequency of precipitation in wet and dry seasons across the U.S. Geophys Res Lett 40:4030–4035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peng P, Kumar A (2005) A large ensemble analysis of the influence of tropical SSTs on seasonal atmospheric variability. J Clim 18:1068–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng P, Kumar A, Wang W (2011) An analysis of seasonal predictability in coupled model forecasts. Climate Dyn 36:637–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Polade SD, Pierce DW, Cayan DR, Gershunov A, Dettinger MD (2014) The key role of dry days in changing regional climate and precipitation regimes. Nat Sci Rep 4:4364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pryor SC, Schoof JT (2008) Changes in the seasonality of precipitation over the contiguous USA. J Geophys Res 113:D21108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rayner S, Denise L, Helen I (2005) Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Chang 69:197–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Regonda SK, Rajagopalan B, Clark M, Pitlick J (2005) Seasonal cycle shifts in hydroclimatology over the Western United States. J Clim 18:372–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reichler T, Roads JO (2004) Time–space distribution of long-range atmospheric predictability. J Atmos Sci 61:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenstein MT, James JC, Carlo JD (1993) A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D 65:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Salas JD, Kim HS, Eykholt R, Burlando P, Green T (2005) Aggregation and sampling in deterministic chaos: implications for chaos identification in hydrological processes. Nonlinear Process Geophys 12:557–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sano M, Sawada Y (1985) Measurement of the Lyapunov spectrum from a chaotic time series. Phys Rev Lett 55:1082–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sivakumar B (2004) Chaos theory in hydrology: important issues and interpretations. J Hydrol 227(1–4):1–20Google Scholar
  59. Stephens GL, Hu Y (2010) Are climate-related changes to the character of global-mean precipitation predictable? Environ Res Lett 5(2):025209Google Scholar
  60. Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand DA, Young LS (eds) Lectures notes in mathematics 898. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 366–381Google Scholar
  61. Trenberth KE (2010) More knowledge, less certainty. Natl Rep Clim Chang 4:20–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trenberth KE, Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Parsons DB (2003) The changing character of precipitation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84:1205–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Westra S, Alexander LV, Zwiers FW (2013) Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. J Clim 26:3904–3918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolf A, Swift JB, Swinney HL, Vastano JA (1985) Determining Lyapunov exponent from a time series. Physica D 16:285–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu R, Kirtman BP (2006) Changes in spread and predictability associated with ENSO in an ensemble coupled GCM. J Clim 19:4378–4396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zeng X, Eykholt R, Pielke RA (1991) Estimating the Lyapunov time series from the short time series of low precision. Phys Rev Lett 66:3229–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ziehmann C, Smith LA, Kurths J (2000) Localized Lyapunov exponents and the prediction of predictability. Phys Lett A 271:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.IIHR-Hydroscience & EngineeringThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations