Advertisement

Simulation of atmospheric dispersion of airborne effluent releases at a tropical coastal site under sea-breeze circulation and internal boundary layer development

  • K. B. R. R. Hari Prasad
  • B. Revanth Reddy
  • C. V. SrinivasEmail author
  • P. T. Rakesh
  • R. Baskaran
  • B. Venkatraman
Original Paper
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

In this study the impact of land–sea breeze circulation and internal boundary layer (IBL) on the atmospheric dispersion of airborne effluent releases at the tropical coastal site Kalpakkam is simulated using mesoscale model WRF and Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART. Simulations with WRF are conducted for typical days in different seasons, i.e., 3 May 2011 (summer), 20 Sep 2010 and 20 Jun 2011 (southwest monsoon). Two K-based non-local turbulence closures (YSU, ACM) and two TKE-based local closures (MYNN, MYJ) in WRF are tested for simulating the sea breeze and IBL. Observations from a 50-m meteorological tower, GPS Sonde, and a Doppler SODAR are used for validation. Simulations indicate that the synoptic flow largely influences the characteristics of the sea breeze at the site. Results show that the sea breeze is more predominant with early onset and it is characterized by deep inland penetration, strong horizontal and vertical winds and is associated with formation of a deep IBL relative to monsoon with opposing large-scale flow. The YSU non-local diffusion scheme and the higher order local TKE closure (MYNN) simulated the sea breeze and IBL characteristics in good agreement with observations. Dispersion simulations with a hypothetical tracer release using FLEXPART showed relatively high ground-level concentrations during IBL formation in the daytime and during stable off-shore flow condition in the morning time. The coupled mesoscale dispersion model could simulate the plume trajectory and buildup of concentrations during sea-breeze time by realistically simulating the winds and mixed-layer characteristics at the coastal site.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Director of IGCAR for support and encouragement in carrying out the study. Authors acknowledge NCEP/NOAA for the public access of GFS analysis/forecasts used in the study. Observations used in study are obtained from RRE project funded by BRNS, DAE. Authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their technical comments which greatly helped to improve the content of the paper.

References

  1. Angevine WM, Brioude J, McKeen S, Holloway JS, Lerner BM, Goldstein AH, Guha A, Andrews A, Nowak JB, Evan S, Fischer ML, Gilman JB, Bon D (2013) Pollutant transport among California regions. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:6750–6763.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastin S, Drobinski P, Dabas A, Delville P, Reitebuch O, Werner C (2005) Impact of the Rhone and Durance valleys on sea-breeze circulation in the Marseille area. Atmos Res 74:303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg LK, Zhong S (2005) Sensitivity of MM5-simulated boundary layer characteristics to turbulence parameterizations. J Appl Meteorol 44(9):1467–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouchlaghem K, Ben Mansour FB, Elouragini S (2007) Impact of a sea breeze event on air pollution at the Eastern Tunisian Coast. Atmos Res 86:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Challa VS, Indracanti J, Rabarison MK, Patrick C, Baham JM, Young J, Hughes R, Hardy MG, Swanier SJ, Yerramilli A (2009) A simulation study of mesoscale coastal circulations in Mississippi Gulf coast. Atmos Res 91:9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen F, Pielke R Sr, Mitchell K (2001) Development and application of landsurface models for mesoscale atmospheric models. In: Lakshmi V, Alberston J, Schaaake (eds) Problems and promises. Observation and modeling of the land surface hydrological processes. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 107–135Google Scholar
  7. Ding A, Wang T, Zhao M, Wang T, Li Z (2004) Simulation of sea-land breezes and a discussion of their implications on the transport of air pollution during a multi-day ozone episode in the Pearl River Delta of China. Atmos Environ 38:6737–6750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doran JC, Fast JD, Barnard JC, Laskin A, Desyaterik Y, Gilles MK, Hopkins RJ (2008) Applications of Lagrangian dispersion modeling to the analysis of changes in the specific absorption of elemental carbon. Atmos Chem Phys 8:1377–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan S, Wang B, Tesche M, Engelmann R, Althausen A, Liu J, Zhu W, Fan Q, Li M, Ta N, Song L, Leong K (2008) Meteorological conditions and structures of atmospheric boundary layer in October 2004 over Pearl River Delta area. Atmos Environ 42:6174–6186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fast JD, Easter RC (2006) A Lagrangian particle dispersion model compatible with WRF. In: 7th WRF users’ workshop, NCAR, June 19–22. Boulder, p 6.2Google Scholar
  11. Federico S, Pasqualoni L, Leo LD, Bellecci C (2010) A study of the breeze circulation during summer and fall 2008 in Calabria, Italy. Atmos Res 97:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golder D (1972) Relations among stability parameters in the surface layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 3:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hari Prasad KBRR, Srinivas CV, Naidu CV, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2016) Assessment of surface layer parameterizations in ARW using micro-meteorological observations from a tropical station. Meteorol Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hernandez-Ceballos MA, Adame JA, Bolivar JP, De la Morena BA (2013) A mesoscale simulation of coastal circulation in the Guadalquivir valley (southwestern Iberian Peninsula) using the WRF-ARW model. Atmos Res 124:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holtzworth GC (1967) Mixing depths, wind speeds and air pollution potential for selected locations in the United States. J Appl Meteorol 6(6):1039–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janjic ZI (1996) The surface layer in the NCEP Eta model. In: Eleventh conference on numerical weather prediction, Norfolk, VA. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 354–355Google Scholar
  18. Janjic ZI (2002) Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model. NCEP Office Note No. 437Google Scholar
  19. Kain JS (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol 43:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lasry F, Coll I, Buisson E (2005) An insight into the formation of severe ozone episodes: modeling the 21/03/01 event in the ESCOMPTE region. Atmos Res 74:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee H, Lee H (2004) Analysis of meteorological characteristics of sea/land breeze in western coastal region. J Korean Soc Urb Environ 4:63–71Google Scholar
  22. Levy I, Mahrer Y, Dayan U (2009) Coastal and synoptic recirculation affecting air pollutants dispersion: a numerical study. Atmos Environ 43:1991–1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu HP, Chan JCL (2002) Boundary layer dynamics associated with a severe air-pollution episode in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 36:2013–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu H, Chan JCL, Cheng AYS (2001) Internal boundary layer structure under sea-breeze conditions in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ 35:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luhar AK, Hurley PJ (2003) Application of a prognostic model TAPM to sea-breeze flows, surface concentrations, and fumigating plumes. Environ Model Softw 19:591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller STK, Keim BD, Talbot RW, Mao H (2003) Sea breeze: structure, forecasting, and impacts. Rev Geophys 41(3):1011.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003RG000124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakanishi M, Niino H (2004) An improved Mellor-Yamada level-3 model with condensation physics: its design and verification. Bound Layer Meteorol 112:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pleim JE (2007) A combined local and non-local closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part 1: model description and testing. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:1383–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pokhrel R, Lee H (2011) Estimation of the effective zone of sea/land breeze in a coastal area. Atmos Pollut Res 2:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prabha TV, Venkatesan R, Mursch-Radlgruber E, Rengarajan G, Jayanthi N (2002) Thermal internal boundary layer characteristics at a tropical coastal site as observed by a mini-SODAR under varying synoptic conditions. J Earth Syst Sci 111(1):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rani SI, Ramachandran R, Subrahamanyam DB, Alappattu DP, Kunhikrishnan PK (2010) Characterization of sea/land breeze circulation along the west coast of Indian sub-continent during pre-monsoon season. Atmos Res 95:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reche C, Viana M, Moreno T, Querol X, Alastuey A, Pey J, Pandolfi M, Prévôt A, Mohr C, Richard A, Artiñano B, Gomez-Moreno FJ, Cots N (2011) Peculiarities in atmospheric particle number and size-resolved speciation in an urban area in the western Mediterranean: results from the DAURE campaign. Atmos Environ 45:5282–5293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A Description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR technical note, NCAR/TN-475+STR. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  34. Soler MR, Arasa R, Merino M, Olid M, Ortega S (2011) Modelling local sea-breeze flow and associated dispersion patterns over a coastal area in North-East Spain: a case study. Bound Layer Meteorol 140(1):37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Srinivas CV, Venkatesan R, Somayaji KM, Bagavath Singh A (2006) A numerical study of sea breeze circulation observed at a tropical site Kalpakkam on the east coast of India, under different synoptic flow situations. J Earth Syst Sci 115(5):557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Srinivas CV, Venkatesan R, Bagavath Singh A (2007) Sensitivity of mesoscale simulations of land–sea breeze to boundary layer turbulence parameterization. Atmos Environ 41:2534–2548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srinivas CV, Bagavath Singh A, Venkatesan R, Baskaran R (2011) Creation of benchmark meteorological observations for RRE on atmospheric flowfield simulation at kalpakkam. IGC Report – 213. Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, Tamilnadu, India.Google Scholar
  38. Stohl A, Sodemann H (2010) Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Antarctic troposphere. J Geophys Res.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stohl A, Forster C, Frank A, Seibert P, Wotawa G (2005) Technical note: the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos Chem Phys 5:4739–4799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suresh R (2007) Observation of sea breeze front and its induced convection over Chennai in southern peninsular India using Doppler Weather Radar. Pure Appl Geophys 164:1511–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xie B, Fung JCH, Chan A, Lau A (2012) Evaluation of nonlocal and local planetary boundary layer schemes in the WRF model. J Geophys Res 117:D12103Google Scholar
  42. Zhang DL, Anthes RA (1982) A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data. J Appl Meteorol 21:1594–1609.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021%3c1594:ahrmot%3e2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. B. R. R. Hari Prasad
    • 1
  • B. Revanth Reddy
    • 1
  • C. V. Srinivas
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. T. Rakesh
    • 1
  • R. Baskaran
    • 1
  • B. Venkatraman
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiological Safety and Environment GroupIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia

Personalised recommendations