Advertisement

Impact of microphysics parameterizations and horizontal resolutions on simulation of “MORA” tropical cyclone over Bay of Bengal using Numerical Weather Prediction Model

  • Lakhima Chutia
  • Binita Pathak
  • Ajay Parottil
  • P. K. Bhuyan
Original Paper
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

A numerical weather prediction model, Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF model) version 3.8 has been used to simulate a severe cyclonic storm “MORA” observed over Bay of Bengal (BoB) during 28–31 May, 2017. The initial simulation has been carried out over the region at 6-km horizontal resolution with 310 × 330 grid points in both north–south and east–west directions having 30 vertical levels. Initial conditions were used from National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Final analysis (FNL) fields available at every 6 h at a spatial resolution of 1° × 1°. The model-simulated features of this event were evaluated against Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) data over the region. Sensitivity experiments were performed using six different microphysics schemes (Lin, Kessler, WSM3, Eta, WSM6 and Thompson) among which WSM3 scheme-simulated track was close to the observed IMD track. The model with WSM3 scheme has efficiently captured many important features in simulating the occurrence of the storm accompanied with wind speed, and sea level pressure, though there are some spatial and temporal biases in the simulation. After choosing the best microphysics scheme, we looked into the model performance in simulating the storm at different horizontal resolutions, 4 km and 9 km with 480 × 510 and 210 × 210 grid points, respectively. The results clearly revealed that cyclone track as well as other parameters related to the storm are sensible to horizontal resolution and has improved after finer resolution (i.e., 4 km) simulation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

LC greatly acknowledges DST-INSPIRE, Ministry of Science and Technology fellowship program, Govt of India for providing her financial support to undertake the work. BP is a Junior Associate in the The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste. AP is grateful to Aerosol Radiative Forcing Network over India project under Indian Space Research Organization—Geosphere Biosphere Programme (ISRO-GBP ARFI) for providing him fellowship. PKB is an Emeritus Professor under University Grant Commission (UGC) of India. The authors acknowledge the support of Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) for providing the details of MORA cyclone. The authors thank the anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions towards improvement of the paper.

References

  1. Chou MD, Suarez MJ (1999) A solar radiation parameterization for atmospheric studies. NASA Tech Memo 10606:15–40Google Scholar
  2. Craig GC, Dörnbrack A (2008) Entrainment in cumulus clouds: what resolution is cloud-resolving? J Atmos Sci 65:3978–3988.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2613.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh, Damage, Loss and Needs Assessment for Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction (2008) A report prepared by the Government of Bangladesh Assisted by the International Development Community with Financial Support from the European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  4. Douluri DL, Annapurnaiah K, (2016) Impact of microphysics schemes in the simulation of cyclone Hudhud using WRF–ARW model. Intern J Oceans Oceanogr 10:49–59Google Scholar
  5. Deng A, Stauffer DR (2006) On improving 4-km mesoscale model simulations. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45:361–381.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2341.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deshpande M, Pattnaik S, Salvekar P (2010) Impact of physical parameterization schemes on numerical simulation of super cyclone Gonu. Nat Hazards 55:211–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrier BS, Jin Y, Lin Y, Black T, Rogers E DiMego G (2002) Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and precipitation scheme in the NCEP Eta model. In: 15th conference on Numerical Weather Prediction American Meteorological Society, San Antonio, TX, pp 280–283Google Scholar
  8. Gray WM (1968) Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms. Mon Weather Rev 96:669–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong SY, Dudhia J, Chen SH (2004) A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon Weather Rev 132:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hong SY, Lim JOJ (2006) The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J Korean Meteorol Soc 42:129–151Google Scholar
  11. Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Weather Rev 134:2318–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. India Meteorological Department (2017) India Meteorological Department, Severe Cyclonic Storm, ‘MORA’ over the Bay of Bengal (28–31 May 2017): a report 2017. Cyclone Warning Division, India Meteorological Department, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  13. Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain–Fritsch scheme. In: The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. Meteorological monographs of American Meteorological Society, vol 46, pp 165–170Google Scholar
  14. Kessler E (1969) On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulation. Meteorological monographs of American Meteorological Society, Providence, p 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K (2004) Evaluation of MM5 high resolution real-time forecasts over the urban area of Athens, Greece. J Appl Meteorol 43:1666–1678.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2170.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin YL, Farley RD, Orville HD (1983) Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J Clim Appl Met 22:1065–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu YB, Zhang DL, Yau MK (1997) A multiscale numerical study of Hurricane Andrew (1992). Part I: explicit simulation and verification. Mon Weather Rev 125:3073–3093.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Megan SG, Lackmann GM (2009) Sensitivity of simulated tropical cyclone structure and intensity to horizontal resolution. Am Meteorol Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2976.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahalaa BK, Mohanty PK, Nayak BK (2015) Impact of microphysics schemes in the simulation of Cyclone Phailin using WRF model. Procedia Eng 116:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandal M, Mohanty UC, Potty KVJ, Sarkar A (2003) Impact of horizontal resolution on prediction of tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal using a regional weather prediction model. Earth Planet Sci 112:79–93Google Scholar
  21. Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102:16663–16682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohanty UC, Osuri Krishna K, Routray A, Mohapatra M, Pattanayak S (2010) Simulation of Bay of Bengal Tropical Cyclones with WRF model: impact of initial and boundary condition. Mar Geod 33:294–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Niu GY, Yang ZL, Mitchell KE, Chen F, Ek MB, Barlage M, Kumar A, Manning K, Niyogi D, Rosero E, Tewari M, Xia Y (2011) The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP) 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. T Geophys Res 116:D12109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Niemelä S, Fortelius C (2005) Applicability of large-scale convection and condensation parameterization to meso-γ-scale HIRLAM: a case study of a convective event. Mon Weather Rev 133:2422–2435.  https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2981.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Osuri KK, Mohanty UC, Routra A, Kulkarni MA, Mohapatra M (2012) Customization of WRF–ARW model with physical parameterization schemes for the simulation of tropical cyclones over North Indian Ocean. Nat Hazards 63:1337–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palm’en T (1948) On the formation and structure of tropical hurricanes. Geophysica 3:26–39Google Scholar
  27. Reddy MV, Prasad SBS, Krishna UVM, Reddy KK (2014) Effect of cumulus and microphysical parameterizations on the JAL cyclone prediction. Ind J Radio Space Phys 43:103–123Google Scholar
  28. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda M, Huang XY, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-475 + STR National Centre for Atmospheric Research 125Google Scholar
  29. Srinivas CV, Bhaskar Rao DV, Yesubabu V, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2013) Tropical cyclone predictions over the Bay of Bengal using the high-resolution Advanced Research Weather Research and Forecasting (ARW) model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139(676):1810–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson G, Field PR, Rasmussen RM, Hall WD (2008) Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: implementation of a new snow parameterization. Mon Wea Rev 136:5095–5115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weisman ML, Skamarock WC, Klemp JB (2006) The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon Weather Rev 125:527–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lakhima Chutia
    • 1
  • Binita Pathak
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ajay Parottil
    • 1
  • P. K. Bhuyan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Atmospheric StudiesDibrugarh UniversityDibrugarhIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsDibrugarh UniversityDibrugarhIndia

Personalised recommendations