Advertisement

Techniques and challenges of the expanded endoscopic endonasal access to the ventrolateral skull base during the “far-medial” and “extreme medial” approaches

  • Giuliano Silveira-BertazzoEmail author
  • Sunil Manjila
  • Nyall R. LondonJr
  • Daniel M. PrevedelloEmail author
How I Do it - Neurosurgical Anatomy
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Neurosurgical anatomy

Abstract

Background

Expanding the ventrolateral skull base corridor from the midline of lower clivus to the petroclival fissure is a challenging endonasal surgical task. Resection of lytic lesions like chondrosarcoma can cause cranial nerve morbidities and injury of ICA, necessitating accurate knowledge of correlative endoscopic anatomy with stereotactic landmarks.

Methods

We describe an extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for a right petroclival chondrosarcoma with the demonstration of ipsilateral surgical landmarks with contralateral normal correlates, using a stepwise comparative image-guided cadaveric dissection study.

Conclusion

EEA for lytic lesions like chondrosarcomas needs to address brain shift and displacement of ICA, posing a chance for cranial nerve morbidities and ICA injury. Meticulous utilization of intraoperative stereotactic landmarks can help avoid and mitigate surgical complications.

Keywords

Far-medial Extreme medial Expanded endonasal Transclival approach Lower clivus Skull base Sublacerum corridor Endoscopic landmarks 

Abbreviations

EEa

Expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches

eFMA

Endoscopic far-medial approach

CCJ

Craniocervical junction

SCG

Supracondylar groove

LPT

Lateral pharyngeal tubercle

AOJ

Atlanto-occipital joint

AOM

Atlanto-occipital membrane

IGS

Image guidance system

HC

Hypoglossal canal

e-ICG

Endoscope-integrated indocyanine green fluorescence

ICA

Internal carotid artery

EEA

Expanded endonasal approach

SSEP

Somato-sensory evoked potential

JF

Jugular foramen

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Ricardo L. Carrau, MD, for his invaluable guidance and intellectual contribution during this project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

This study was performed at ALT-VISION at The Ohio State University. This laboratory receives educational support from the following companies: Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Intuitive Surgical Corp., KLS Martin Corp., Karl Storz Endoscopy, Leica Microsystems, Medtronic Corp., Stryker Corp., and Vycor Medical. Dr. Prevedello is a consultant for Stryker Corp., Medtronic Corp., and Integra; he has received an honorarium from Mizuho and royalties from KLS- Martin. N. London holds stock in Navigen Pharmaceuticals currently of no value and was a consultant for Cooltech Inc., both of which are unrelated to this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

701_2019_4204_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (217.9 mb)
Video 1 A 27-year-old woman presented with diplopia during pregnancy. The neurological exam revealed no cranial nerve dysfunction. Preoperative and postoperative MRI is presented in Fig. 1a and b. There were no postoperative complications, and the patient improved her referred diplopia after the procedure. Postop MRI shows a gross total resection of the petroclival lesion. (Fig. 1e and f) (MP4 223092 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Benet A, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Rincon-Torroella J, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prats-Galino A, Kassam AB (2014) Comparative analysis of the transcranial “far lateral” and endoscopic endonasal “far medial” approaches: surgical anatomy and clinical illustration. World Neurosurg 81(2):385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakravarthi S, Monroy-Sosa A, Gonen L et al (2018) Reanalyzing the “far medial” (transcondylar-transtubercular) approach based on three anatomical vectors: the ventral posterolateral corridor. J Neurosurg Sci 62(3):347–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Little RE, Taylor RJ, Miller JD, Ambrose EC, Matthew DMS, Adam GE (2014) Endoscopic endonasal transclival approaches : case series and outcomes for different clival regionsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morera VA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prevedello DM, Madhok R, Barges-Coll J, Gardner P, Carrau R, Snyderman CH, Rhoton AL, Kassam AB (2010) “Far-medial” expanded Endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus. Oper Neurosurg 66(June):ons211–ons220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moussazadeh N, Kulwin C, Anand VK, Ting JY, Gamss C, Iorgulescu JB, Tsiouris AJ, Cohen-gadol AA, Schwartz TH (2015) Endoscopic endonasal resection of skull base chondrosarcomas: technique and early results. 122(April):735–742Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peris-Celda M, Pinheiro-Neto CD, Funaki T, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Rhoton AL (2013) The extended nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction of the clival region: an anatomical and radiological study. J Neurol Surgery, Part B Skull Base 74(6):369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ruiz-valdepeñas EC (2018) How I do it : endoscopic endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus. 741–745Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaz-Guimaraes Filho F, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2013) Endoscopic endonasal “far-medial” transclival approach: surgical anatomy and technique. Oper Tech Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg 24(4):222–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaz-Guimaraes F, Nakassa ACI, Gardner PA, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2017) Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral jugular foramen: anatomical basis, technical considerations, and clinical series. Oper Neurosurg 13(4):482–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zwagerman NT, Wang EW, Shin SS, Chang Y-F, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA (2018) Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg:1–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurological SurgeryThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurological SurgeryMcLaren HospitalBay CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryThe Ohio State University, Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNIHBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations