Advertisement

Persistent shunt dependency in children treated with CSF diversion for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)

  • Tryggve LundarEmail author
  • Bernt Johan Due-Tønnessen
Original Article - Pediatric Neurosurgery
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Pediatric Neurosurgery

Abstract

Long-term shunt dependency rates in children treated for IIH with CSF diversion have not been established. We therefore present our experience with 4 children shunted for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) during the years 1988–2000 with very long-time follow-up. Two out of these patients have experienced late or very late episodes of severe shunt failure during the second or third decade after initial shunt treatment. They were all boys and may not be representative for IIH patients as a whole. Two of them appear, however, to be permanently shunt dependent, indicating that long-term shunt dependency in children treated for IIH with CSF diversion may be more common than previously expected.

Keywords

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension Pediatric neurosurgery Shunt treatment Persistent shunt dependency 

Abbreviations

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

LP

Lumbar puncture

IIH

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the institutional and/or national research committee (REK) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Dandy WE (1937) Intracranial pressure without brain tumor. Ann Surg 106(4):492–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foley J (1955) Benign forms of intracranial hypertension; toxic and otitic hydrocephalus. Brain 78(1):1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnston I, Besser M, Morgan MK (1988) Cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the treatment of benign intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 69:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karsy M, Haussam A-A-S, Bowers CA, Schmidt RH (2018) Treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension via stereotactic placement of biventriculoperitoneal shunts. J Neurosurg Jan 1:1–9Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kidron D, Pomeranz S (1989) Malignant pseudotumor cerebri. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 71:443–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niotakis G, Grigoratos D, Chandler C, Morrison D, Lim M (2013) CSF diversion in refractory idiopatic intracranial hypertension: single-center experience and review of efficacy. Childs Nerv Syst 29:263–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paulsen AH, Due-Tønnessen BJ, Lundar T, Lindegaard K-F (2017) Persistent shunt dependency and very late shunt failure in a 3-year-old boy with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Childs Nerv Syst 33:213–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paulsen AH, Lundar T, Lindegaard K-F (2015) Pediatric hydrocephalus: 40-year outcomes in 128 hydrocephalic patients treated with shunts during childhood. Assessment of surgical outcome, work participation, and health-related quality of life. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paulsen AH, Lundar T, Lindeggard K-F (2010) Twenty-year outcome in young adults with childhood hydrocephalus: assessment of surgical outcome, work participation, and health-related quality of life. J Neurosurg Pediatrics 6:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roth J, Constantini S, Kessler A (2015) Over-drainage and persistent shunt-dependency in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension treated with shunts and bariatric surgery. Surg Neurol Int 6:S655–S660CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations