Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 161, Issue 12, pp 2521–2526 | Cite as

Affected health domains in patients with brainstem cavernous malformations

  • Shivram Kumar
  • Giuseppe Lanzino
  • Kelly D. FlemmingEmail author
Original Article - Vascular Neurosurgery - Arteriovenous malformation
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Vascular Neurosurgery – Arteriovenous malformation

Abstract

Background

Brainstem cavernous malformations (CM) carry high risks of hemorrhage and neurologic morbidity. While much is published on physical effects of brainstem CM, very little is known about these patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to assess the quality of life PROMIS-29 health domains of brainstem CM patients and identify quality of life predictors.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of adult patients with at least one brainstem CM identified by advertising on the Angioma Alliance website and from our institutional CM registry. A web-based questionnaire was administered and included self-reported information about the patient, cavernous malformation, residual clinical symptoms, and treatment. In addition, patients filled out the PROMIS-29 (version 1.0). The PROMIS-29 has 7 health domains and is standardized against the general population. We defined impaired quality of life as at least one out of 7 abnormal domains and used a 1 standard deviation cutoff for abnormal. We verified clinical and radiographic data to self-reported data in 28.8% of patients.

Results

A total of 104 patients (mean age of 46.5 ± 11.5 years; 77.9% females) were recruited. Most (82.7%) reported at least one symptomatic hemorrhagic event and 36.5% reported at least 1 surgical procedure. At least one abnormal PROMIS domain was present in 64.4% of patients with fatigue (34.6%), anxiety (35.6%), social (28.2%), and physical (27.9%) domains being the most common. Among patients with a Rankin Score of 0–2, 55% had at least one abnormal domain. Gait difficulty, but not age, sex, or surgery predicted impaired quality of life.

Conclusion

More than half of patients with brainstem CM have impaired quality of life. Fatigue, anxiety, and social function, in addition to physical dysfunction, are common; practitioners should be aware of these concerns. PROMIS-29 provides additional information than modified Rankin Score and should be considered in clinical trials and when assessing treatment outcomes until a disease-specific outcome tool is available.

Keywords

Cavernous malformation Cavernous angioma Quality of life PROMIS-29 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Angioma Alliance and Connie Lee, PsyD, for allowing our study to advertise on their website. We would like to thank and acknowledge the patients that participated for sharing their stories and personal details of their journey.

Funding information

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) Grant Number UL1 TR002377 provided support in the form of funding for statistical services used in preparation of this manuscript. NCATS had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Bicalho VC, Bergmann A, Domingues F et al (2017) Cerebral cavernous malformations: patient-reported outcome validates conservative management. Cerebrovasc Dis 44:313–319.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000480125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornelius JF, Kurten K, Fischer I et al (2016) Quality of life after surgery for cerebral cavernoma: brainstem versus nonbrainstem location. World Neurosurg 95:315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dukatz T, Sarnthein J, Sitter H et al (2011) Quality of life after brainstem cavernoma surgery in 71 patients. Neurosurgery 69:689–695.  https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821d31b7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flemming KD (2017) Clinical management of cavernous malformations. Curr Cardiol Rep 19:122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-017-0931-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gruber-Baldini AL, Velozo C, Romero S et al (2017) Validation of the PROMIS((R)) measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions. Qual Life Res 26:1915–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katzan IL, Lapin B (2018) PROMIS GH (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system global health) scale in stroke: a validation study. Stroke 49:147–154.  https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.117.018766 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katzan IL, Thompson N, Uchino K (2016) Innovations in stroke: the use of PROMIS and NeuroQoL scales in clinical stroke trials. Stroke 47:e27–e30.  https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.115.011377 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Uchino K et al (2018) The most affected health domains after ischemic stroke. Neurology 90:e1364–e1371.  https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000005327 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nathal E, Patino-Rodriguez HM, Arauz A et al (2018) Risk factors for unfavorable outcomes in surgically treated brainstem cavernous malformations. World Neurosurg 111:e478–e484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Northwestern University (2019) PROMIS: patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. http://www.healthmeasures.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=147&Itemid=806. Accessed 3 May 2019
  11. 11.
    Prummer CM, Kerezoudis P, Tombers NM et al (2019) Influence of selection bias in survey studies derived from a patient-focused organization: a comparison of response data from a single tertiary care center and the acoustic neuroma association. Otol Neurotol.  https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000002151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sangha RS, Caprio FZ, Askew R et al (2015) Quality of life in patients with TIA and minor ischemic stroke. Neurology 85:1957–1963.  https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002164 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xie MG, Xiao XR, Guo FZ et al (2018) Surgical management and functional outcomes of cavernous malformations involving the medulla oblongata. World Neurosurg 119:e643–e652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.229 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations