Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
- 15 Downloads
The current use of external cervical orthoses (ECO) after cervical discectomy is still based on a common practice than a solid scientific literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of ECO on radiological and functional outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
We compared two cohorts of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with and without ECO after surgery. Thirty-six patients operated from January 2015 to June 2016 received an ECO whereas 36 patients, operated from July 2016 to December 2017, did not. Each patient underwent radiological and functional evaluation using plain x-ray at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, respectively.
In the ECO group, 5 patients (13.9%) presented an incomplete fusion and 31 patients (86.1%) presented a complete fusion (CI 0.705–0.953). In the non-ECO group, 8 patients (22.2%) presented an incomplete fusion and 28 patients (77.8% [CI 0.608–0.899]) had a complete fusion, with no statistically significant differences between two groups. No statistically significant differences were also observed regarding the NDI neither at 2 weeks nor at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. At multivariate analysis, patients who underwent two-level ACDF showed a five-fold increased risk of worse NDI at 3-, 6-, 12-month (p = 0.003, CI 1.770–14.584) follow-up.
We advise against the routine use of ECO after single- or two-level ACDF as we did not find out any significant statistical differences between the two groups.
KeywordsAnterior cervical discectomy Cervical disc herniation Cervical external orthoses Cervical myelopathy Neck disability index
The authors wish to thank the statisticians Giorgia Valpiani (ACQUARI, University Hospital of Ferrara) and Elisa Maietti (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna; Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara) for their precious help with interpretation of statistical analyses.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of Ferrara University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by Ethical Committee of Ferrara University Hospital (Ethics CE-AVEC number 55/2019/Oss/AOUFe).
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Abbott A, Halvorsen M, Dedering Å (2013) (2013) Is there a need for cervical collar usage post anterior cervical decompression and fusion using interbody cages? A randomized controlled pilot trial. Physiother Theory Pract 29(4):290–300. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2012.731627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Elliott RE, Tanweer O, Boah A, et al. (2013) Is external cervical orthotic bracing necessary after posterior atlantoaxial fusion with modern instrumentation: meta-analysis and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 79(2):369–374.e12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.022
- 7.Jagannathan J, Shaffrey CI, Oskouian RJ et al (2008) Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar. J Neurosurg Spine 8(5):420–428. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Krock N (1997) Immobilizing the cervical spine using a collar. Complications Nurs Manag Axone 18(3):52–55Google Scholar
- 9.Lunsford TR, Davidson M, Lunsford BR. (1994) The effectiveness of four contemporary cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot 1994;6(4)Google Scholar
- 12.Penolazzi L, Lambertini E, Bergamin LS, et al. (2018) MicroRNA-221 silencing attenuates the degenerated phenotype of intervertebral disc cells. Aging (Albany NY). 10(8):2001–2015. doi: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101525