Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 161, Issue 10, pp 1981–1991 | Cite as

Bypass surgery of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms—technical aspects and outcomes

  • Lars Wessels
  • Lucius Samo Fekonja
  • Peter VajkoczyEmail author
Original Article - Vascular Neurosurgery - Aneurysm
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Vascular Neurosurgery – Aneurysm

Abstract

Background

The main challenge of bypass surgery of complex MCA aneurysm is not the selection of the bypass type, but the initial decision making of how to exclude the affected vessel segment from circulation. The aim of our study was to review our experience with the treatment of complex MCA aneurysms using revascularization and parent artery sacrifice techniques. Based on this, we aimed at categorizing these aneurysms according to specific surgical aspects in order to facilitate preoperative planning for these challenging surgical pathologies.

Methods

We reviewed 50 patients with complex MCA aneurysms that were not clippable but required revascularization and parent artery sacrifice. We report the individual variations of surgical techniques, highlight the technical aspects, and categorize the aneurysms based on their location and orientation.

Results

Of the 50 aneurysms, 56% were giant, 16% large, and 28% < 10 mm, but fusiform. Fourteen percent were previously treated endovascular. Four percent presented with SAH. Ten percent were prebifurcational, 60% involved the bifurcation, and 30% were postbifurcational. Both parent artery sacrifice and bypass strategies were tailored to the individual localization and anatomical relationship of the aneurysm and inflow/outflow arteries (38% proximal inflow occlusion, 42% aneurysm trapping, 20% distal outflow occlusion; 14% STA-MCA bypass, 48% interposition graft, 36%, combined/complex revascularization with reimplantation/in situ techniques). Good outcome (mRS 0–2) rates at discharge and at follow-up were 64% and 84%. Based on our analysis of individual cases, we categorized complex MCA aneurysms into six types and provide individual recommendations for their surgical exploration and treatment by revascularization and parent artery sacrifice.

Conclusion

Complex MCA aneurysms are among the most challenging vascular lesions and afford highly individualized treatment strategies. Revascularization and parent artery sacrifice provide durable results that are superior to the natural history. Our classification provides a tool for planning and pre-surgical assessment of the intraoperative anatomy of complex MCA aneurysms, helping to assume possible pitfalls.

Keywords

Complex aneurysms Fusiform Revascularization 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Amin-Hanjani S (2011) Cerebral revascularization: extracranial-intracranial bypass. J Neurosurg Sci 55(2):107–116Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amin-Hanjani S, Alaraj A, Charbel FT (2010) Flow replacement bypass for aneurysms: decision-making using intraoperative blood flow measurements. Acta Neurochir 152(6):1021–1032 discussion 1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amin-Hanjani S, Chen PR, Chang SW, Spetzler RF (2006) Long-term follow-up of giant serpentine MCA aneurysm treated with EC-IC bypass and proximal occlusion. Acta Neurochir 148(2):227–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blackburn SL, Abdelazim AM, Cutler AB, Brookins KT, Fargen KM, Hoh BL, Kadkhodayan Y (2014) Endovascular and surgical treatment of Unruptured MCA aneurysms: meta-analysis and review of the literature. Stroke Res Treat 2014:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esposito G, Dias S, Burkhardt J-K, Bozinov O, Regli L (2018) Role of Indocyanine green Videoangiography in identification of donor and recipient arteries in cerebral bypass surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 129:85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esposito G, Regli L (2014) Selective targeted cerebral revascularization via microscope integrated Indocyanine green Videoangiography technology. In: Trends neurovascular Interv. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Galkin P, Gushcha A, Chechetkin A, Krotenkova I (2017) Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass with interposed saphenous vein graft in patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery occlusive disease and impaired cerebral hemodynamics. J Neurosurg Sci 61(1):22–32Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greving JP, Wermer MJH, Brown RD et al (2014) Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 13(1):59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hänggi D, Steiger H-J, Vajkoczy P (2014) The role of MCA-STA bypass surgery after COSS and JET: the European point of view. Trends neurovascular Interv. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 77–78Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu P, Zhang H-Q, Li X-J (2018) Double-barrel STA to proximal MCA bypass and proximal parent artery occlusion for a fusiform superior clinoidal ICA aneurysm. Acta Neurochir 160(10):1939–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Investigators TUJ (2012) The natural course of Unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 366(26):2474–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kato N, Prinz V, Finger T, Schomacher M, Onken J, Dengler J, Jakob W, Vajkoczy P (2013) Multiple reimplantation technique for treatment of complex giant aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery: technical note. Acta Neurochir 155(2):261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawashima M, Rhoton AL, Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Yasuda A, Fujii K (2005) Microsurgical anatomy of cerebral revascularization. Part I: anterior circulation. J Neurosurg 102(1):116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehdorn HM (2008) Cerebral revascularization by EC-IC bypass--present status. Acta Neurochir Suppl 103:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michaud K, Duffau H (2016) Surgery of insular and paralimbic diffuse low-grade gliomas: technical considerations. J Neuro-Oncol 130(2):289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Narducci A, Onken J, Czabanka M, Hecht N, Vajkoczy P (2018) Fluorescein videoangiography during extracranial-to-intracranial bypass surgery: preliminary results. Acta Neurochir 160(4):767–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nurminen V, Lehecka M, Chakrabarty A, Kivisaari R, Lehto H, Niemelä M, Hernesniemi J (2014) Anatomy and morphology of giant aneurysms—angiographic study of 125 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir 156(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park W, Chung J, Ahn JS, Park JC, Kwun BD (2017) Treatment of large and Giant middle cerebral artery aneurysms: risk factors for unfavorable outcomes. World Neurosurg 102:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Regli L, Esposito G (2014) Surgical decision-making for managing complex intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir Suppl 119:3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02411-0_1 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rustemi O, Amin-Hanjani S, Shakur SF, Du X, Charbel FT (2016) Donor selection in flow replacement bypass surgery for cerebral aneurysms: quantitative analysis of long-term native donor flow sufficiency. Neurosurgery 78(3):332–341 discussion 341-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spetzler RF, Riina HA, Lemole GM (2001) Giant aneurysms. Neurosurgery 49(4):902–908Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Surdell DL, Hage ZA, Eddleman CS, Gupta DK, Bendok BR, Batjer HH (2008) Revascularization for complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 24(2):E21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thines L, Proust F, Marinho P, Durand A, van der Zwan A, Regli L, Lejeune JP (2016) Giant and complex aneurysms treatment with preservation of flow via bypass technique. Neurochirurgie 62(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van der Zwan A (2014) “How I do it:” non-occlusive high flow bypass surgery. In: Trends neurovascular Interv. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yagmurlu K, Yashar M, Kalani S et al (2016) Maxillary artery to middle cerebral artery bypass: a novel technique for exposure of the maxillary artery. World Neurosurg 100(17):540–550Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhu W, Liu P, Tian Y, Gu Y, Xu B, Chen L, Zhou L, Mao Y (2013) Complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a new classification based on the angioarchitecture and surgical strategies. Acta Neurochir 155(8):1481–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB)Charité-Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations