Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 161, Issue 10, pp 2223–2228 | Cite as

Early decompressive surgery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury improves neurological outcome

  • Mette HaldrupEmail author
  • Ole Søndergaard Schwartz
  • Helge Kasch
  • Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen
Original Article - Spine trauma
  • 78 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Spine trauma

Abstract

Background

The role and timing of a decompressive surgical intervention in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) remain controversial. Given the impact of SCI on the individual and society, decompressive surgery to reduce the extent of tissue destruction and improving neurological outcome after initial spinal cord trauma are needed.

Objective

To evaluate any possible correlation between the time of a decompressive procedure after traumatic SCI and end-neurologic outcome for traumatic SCI patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study on patients with traumatic SCI in Western Denmark from 2010 to 2017. Data on date and time of injury and time of surgery and data on neurologic status at admission and one-year post-trauma were found in the Electronic Patients Journal (EPJ) and in paper journals. Patients were divided into 4 groups (< 6 h, < 12 h, < 24 h, and > 24 h) based on the time between injury and surgery. Further, patients were separated into two groups depending on whether they did or did not achieve neurological improvement one-year post-trauma. We used Fisher’s exact test to compare the abovementioned groups to examine an eventual correlation between time from injury to operation and change in neurological outcome one-year post-trauma.

Results

Patients undergoing surgery < 24 h after trauma obtained a significantly better neurological outcome as compared with patients who underwent surgery > 24 h after trauma (p < 0.001). This result did not change for subgroups of incomplete SCI patients (p = 0.002). However, complete SCI patients operated < 24 h as compared with > 24 h did not obtain better outcome (p = 0.14). We did not find a statistically significant correlation when time from trauma to surgery was reduced further to < 6 or < 12 h post-trauma. Furthermore, stratification on patients undergoing surgery before and after 24 h was made regarding gender, completeness, and years of age. The groups did not differ concerning gender and SCI completeness, but significant difference in age was found (44 and 58 years of age, respectively, p < 0.001). The chance of improved outcome was significantly higher for patients < 50 years of age (42% versus 24%, p = 0.05). Patients under the age of 50 seemed to benefit from early intervention (50% improvement versus 23%); however, difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). In patients aged above 50, the trend was similar, but significant correlation was found (40% versus 16%, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

The present study reports a beneficial effect of early decompression surgery, especially for incomplete SCI patients; however, surgical decision-making is complex, and all cases of acute spinal cord injury should be cautiously interpreted and handled on an individual basis.

Keywords

Traumatic spinal cord injury Decompressive surgery Early versus late 

Notes

Author Contributions

  

1. Conceived and/or designed the work that led to the submission, acquired data, and/or played an important role in interpreting the results

2. Drafted or revised the manuscript

3. Approved the final version

4. Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved

1

Mette Haldrup

X

X

X

X

2

Ole Søndergaard Schwartz

X

X

X

X

3

Helge Kasch

X

X

X

X

4

Mikkel Mylius Rasmussen

X

X

X

X

Compliance with ethical standards

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Burns S, Biering-Sørensen F, Donovan W, Graves D, Jha A et al (2012) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil.  https://doi.org/10.1179/204577211X13207446293695
  2. 2.
    Carlson GD, Gorden CD, Oliff HS, Pillai JJ, Lamanna JC (2003) Sustained spinal cord compression. Part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A(1):86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chacko AT, Ramirez MA, Ramappa AJ, Richardson LC, Appleton PT, Rodriguez EK (2011) Does late night hip surgery affect outcome? J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182231ad7
  4. 4.
    Duh MS, Shepard MJ, Wilberger JE, Bracken MB (1994) The effectiveness of surgery on the treatment of acute spinal cord injury and its relation to pharmacological treatment. Neurosurgery 35(2):240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH et al (2007) Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord 45(3):190–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR et al (2012) Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One 7(2):e32037.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furlan JC, Noonan V, Cadotte DW, Fehlings MG (2009) Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Neurotrauma.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009.1147
  8. 8.
    Hicken BL, Putzke JD, Richards JS (2001) Bladder management and quality of life after spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80(12):916–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kivisild A, Sabre L, Tomberg T, Ruus T, Kõrv J et al (2014) Health-related quality of life in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury in Estonia. Spinal Cord 52(7):570–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krogh K, Nielsen J, Djurhuus JC, Mosdal C, Sabroe S, Laurberg S (1997) Colorectal function in patients with spinal cord lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10):1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    La Rosa G, Conti A, Cardali S, Cacciola F, Tomasello F (2004) Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2009
  12. 12.
    McKinley W, Meade MA, Kirshblum S, Barnard B (2004) Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(11):1818–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papadopoulos SM, Selden NR, Quint DJ, Patel N, Gillespie B, Grube S (2002) Immediate spinal cord decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: feasibility and outcome. J Trauma 52(2):323–332Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phatak UR, Chan WM, Lew DF, Escamilla RJ, Ko TC et al (2014) Is nighttime the right time? Risk of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at night. J Am Coll Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.05.009
  15. 15.
    Pointillart V, Petitjean M, Wiart L, Vital J, Lassié P et al (2000) Pharmacological therapy of spinal cord injury during the acute phase. Spinal Cord 38(2):71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saadoun S, Chen S, Papadopoulos MC (2017) Intraspinal pressure and spinal cord perfusion pressure predict neurological outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-314600
  17. 17.
    Saadoun S, Chen S, MC P (2016) Intraspinal pressure and spinal cord perfusion pressure predict neurological outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 88(5).  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-314600
  18. 18.
    Summers RL, Baker SD, Sterling SA, Porter JM, Jones AE (2013) Characterization of the spectrum of hemodynamic profiles in trauma patients with acute neurogenic shock. J Crit Care 28(4).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.02.002
  19. 19.
    Wilson JR, Singh A, Craven C, Verrier MC, Drew B et al (2012) Early versus late surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury: the results of a prospective Canadian cohort study. Spinal Cord.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.59
  20. 20.
    Young W, Huang PKK 1995 Cellular, ionic, and biomolecular mechanisms of the injury process. In AANS  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.028
  21. 21.
    Zafar SN, Libuit L, Hashmi ZG, Hughes K, Greene WR et al (2015) The sleepy surgeon: does night-time surgery for trauma affect mortality outcomes? Am J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CENSE-Spine, Department of NeurosurgeryAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.DANDRITE-Danish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine & Department of BiomedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  4. 4.Spinal Cord Injury Centre of Western DenmarkViborg Regional HospitalViborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations