Arachnoiditis as an outcome factor for microvascular decompression in classical trigeminal neuralgia
- 142 Downloads
Neurovascular conflict is considered a key element of classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and consequently, microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective treatment. Nevertheless, failures of MVD are described by many authors. In some patients, the arachnoid membranes surrounding the trigeminal nerve and neighbouring vessels may be thickened and adhesive. Here we analyse the impact of such focal arachnoiditis on outcome after MVD for TN.
A cohort of prospectively followed patients after their MVD was reviewed for intraoperative, imaging and clinical data if findings of arachnoiditis during MVD were described. Long-term outcome assessment was the main endpoint.
We reviewed data from 395 MVD procedures, performed for TN from 2001 to 2014. Intraoperative evidence of focal arachnoiditis, as described by the surgeon, has been noted in 51 patients (13%). In 35 (68.6%), neuralgia was typical and in the other 17 (31.4%) it was atypical.
As expected by definition, neurovascular conflict was found in 49 interventions (96%); it was predominantly arterial in 27 (52.9%). Accompanying arachnoiditis was encountered: mild in 20 interventions (39.2%), severe in 31 (60.8%).
A successful result (BNI I or II) was achieved in 29 patients (56.9%). The other 22 patients (43.1%) had persistence or recurrence of pain. Overall KM probability of being pain free at 15 years was 72%.
Intraoperative finding of arachnoiditis during MVD for classical trigeminal neuralgia is associated with poorer outcome than that of classical trigeminal neuralgia in general. This is particularly true for low grades of conflict.
KeywordsTrigeminal neuralgia Microvascular decompression Outcome Arachnoiditis Prognostic factors Neurovascular conflict
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the “Hopital Neurologique de Lyon”.
All patients signed an informed consent form with the surgeon prior to the procedure.
- 3.Cevizci R, Dilci A, Tekin AM, Bayazıt Y (2017) Recovery of tinnitus and sensorineural hearing loss due to lysis of arachnoid adhesions in the posterior cranial fossa: is there a novel etiology in neurotological disorders? J Int Adv Otol 13(2):295–297. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2017.3393 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gardner WJ (1953) The mechanism of tic douloureux. In: Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 3(78th meeting), pp 168–171 discussion, 171–173Google Scholar
- 9.Hardaway FA, Holste K, Ozturk G, Pettersson D, Pollock JM, Burchiel KJ (2019) Raslan AM sex-dependent posterior fossa anatomical differences in trigeminal neuralgia patients with and without neurovascular compression: a volumetric MRI age- and sex-matched case-control study. J Neurosurg:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.JNS181768 Epub ahead of print
- 13.Leal PRL, Hermier M, Froment JC, Souza MA, Cristino-Filho G, Sindou M (2010) Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir 152(5):817–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0588-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Leal PRL, Hermier M, Souza MA, Cristino-Filho G, Froment JC, Sindou M (2011) Visualization of vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve with high-resolution 3T MRI: a prospective study comparing preoperative imaging analysis to surgical findings in 40 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 69(1):15–25; discussion 26. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bafa CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sindou M, Howeidy T, Acevedo G (2002a) Anatomical observations during microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (with correlations between topography of pain and site of the neurovascular conflict). Prospective study in a series of 579 patients. Acta Neurochir 144(1):1–12; discussion 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010200000 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Sindou M, Leston J, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2007) Microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg 107(6):1144–1153. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS-07/12/1144 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Sindou M, Leston J, Howeidy T, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2006) Micro-vascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients. Acta Neurochir 148(12):1235–1245; discussion 1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0809-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Sindou M, Leston JM, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2008) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: the importance of a noncompressive technique—Kaplan-Meier analysis in a consecutive series of 330 patients. Neurosurgery 63(4 Suppl 2):341–350; discussion 350-351. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000327022.79171.D6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar