Telemetric home monitoring of intracranial pressure—where are we now

  • Joachim M. K. OertelEmail author
  • Matthias J. M. Huelser
Editorial (by Invitation) - CSF Circulation
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. CSF Circulation

Monitoring of brain pressure is considered to be of major importance for the optimum treatment of various neurosurgical diseases. Quite recently, several devices for telemetric brain pressure monitoring became available for clinical application.

The advantage of telemetric ICP monitoring in comparison with conventional ICP monitoring, besides a lower infection rate due to the closed system used, is the possibility to record the ICP within greater time intervals, at any time and for longer periods [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12].

Most commonly, telemetric long-term measurement is used for monitoring and controlling patients with acute neurosurgical conditions such as severe head trauma, after neuroendoscopic procedures or implantation of cerebral shunts, verifying subtle shunt dysfunction especially under- or overdrainage and for optimization of shunt valve settings [1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11].

Tschan et al. described a new technique for long-term home telemetric ICP monitoring by receiving the home telemonitoring data from the patients online as well as using Internet consultations. Since the introduction of the Raumedic Helmbrecht p-Tel device in 2009, there were several descriptions of domestic use [1, 3]. This study, however, presents for the first time a detailed description of a bigger cohort, namely 20 patients using home telemetric ICP monitoring. Additionally, the authors established a method for real home telemonitoring. With enabling the patients to send their encoded ICP records via the Internet, they could overcome the limited storage capacity of the datalogger (72 h). An accompanying online consultation was included in the home telemonitoring service. That was how the authors achieved to avoid unnecessary outpatient visits, especially advantageous for patients living further away from a specialized neurosurgical center.

However, obviously, this technique also has limitations. If neurosurgical intervention of any kind (including a simple valve adjustment) is necessary, this can only be done in a clinical setting since online valve adjustment is not possible yet, even though techniques using online programmable valves may be available in the future. Another more profane disadvantage is the limited availability of a sufficient quantity of datalogger systems for providing long-term home telemonitoring over weeks since this system was not designed for home monitoring. Due to the high expenses of these devices, they cannot be given to the patients on a regular basis.

At first glance, home telemetric measurements could exploit the advantage of telemetric ICP monitoring at the most. Especially for the detection and consecutive therapy of overdrainage, this method seems to be effective because it allows recording and evaluation of the ICP in orthostasis under daily circumstances in an environment which the patient is used to as the patients’ activity at home is usually much higher compared with that during a hospital stay. Furthermore, in a home setting, the effect of valve adjustment if it was needed can be observed much more adequately.

However, since the introduction of the Sensor Reservoir by Miethke Company in 2015, there is another telemetric ICP system available for verification of subtle drainage-related shunt failure and controlling and optimizing valve setting adjustment [4, 7]. Opposite to the p-Tel probe which has to be explanted after 3 months, the shunt sensor does not have to be explanted. It is integrated into the shunt system and is permitted for an unlimited implantation time [4]. Despite data which shows the p-Tel probe provided reliable measurements beyond the approved implantation time of 90 days [9, 11], the advantage of the longer duration of the shunt sensor is obvious.

The decision of which device to use should be based upon the clinical situation: For long-duration monitoring sessions, the Raumedic P-tel is needed; for continuously repeated ambulatory follow-up sessions, the Miethke Shunt sensor is more suitable [11]. The Raumedic system demonstrated to be very useful for confirming the diagnosis of NPH, chronic occlusive hydrocephalus, and IIH [1, 3, 13] and for predicting and controlling the outcome after ETV in chronic occlusive hydrocephalus [2, 8]. However, this could be easily achieved in 24- to 48-h measurement sessions during a hospital stay.

The Miethke system provides the possibility for verifying subtle drainage-related shunt failure and controlling the valve setting adjustment in sequential outpatient presentations over the years [4, 7, 12].

However, all data acquired have to be interpreted very carefully. We are just at the beginning of a process to understand the data which become available to us now. So in conclusion, for the future optimizing, the technical devices and the cost-effectiveness will be essential for further refinement of telemetric brain pressure monitoring.



  1. 1.
    Antes S, Tschan CA, Kunze G et al (2014) Clinical and radiological findings in long-term intracranial pressure monitoring. Acta Neurochir 156:1009–1019 discussion 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antes S, Tschan CA, Oertel JM (2014) An operative technique combining endoscopic third ventriculostomy and long-term ICP monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst 30:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antes S, Tschan CA, Heckelmann M, Breuskin D, Oertel J (2016) Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring with the Raumedic Neurovent P-tel. World Neurosurg 91:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antes S, Stadie A, Muller S, Linsler S, Breuskin D, Oertel J (2018) Intracranial pressure-guided shunt valve adjustments with the Miethke sensor reservoir. World Neurosurg 109:e642–ee50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beer R, Lackner P, Pfausler B, Schmutzhard E (2008) Nosocomial ventriculitis and meningitis in neurocritical care patients. J Neurol 255:1617–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dasic D, Hanna SJ, Bojanic S, Kerr RS (2006) External ventricular drain infection: the effect of a strict protocol on infection rates and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 20:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freimann FB, Schulz M, Haberl H, Thomale UW (2014) Feasibility of telemetric ICP-guided valve adjustments for complex shunt therapy. Childs Nerv Syst 30:689–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huelser M, Antes S, Teping F, Oertel J Long-term ICP monitoring after endoscopic third ventriculostomy. In: ProcessGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiefer M, Antes S, Schmitt M, Krause I, Eymann R (2011) Long-term performance of a CE-approved telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:2246–2249Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lilja-Cyron A, Kelsen J, Andresen M, Fugleholm K, Juhler M (2018) Feasibility of telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in the neuro intensive care unit. J Neurotrauma 35:1578–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norager NH, Lilja-Cyron A, Bjarkam CR, Duus S, Juhler M (2018) Telemetry in intracranial pressure monitoring: sensor survival and drift. Acta Neurochir 160:2137–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norager NH, Lilja-Cyron A, Hansen TS, Juhler M (2019) Deciding on the appropriate telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring system. World NeurosurgGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmitt M, Kiefer M, Antes S, Eymann R (2012) Detection of hidden pseudotumour cerebri behind Chiari 1 malformation: value of telemetric ICP monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1811–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim M. K. Oertel
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Matthias J. M. Huelser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgerySaarland University Medical CenterHomburgGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineSaarland UniversitySaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations