Hearing preservation in small acoustic neuroma: observation or active therapy? Literature review and institutional experience
- 11 Downloads
Current imaging modalities enable early diagnosis of a large number of small acoustic neuromas in patients with well-preserved hearing, whose best management is still a debatable matter.
Comparing the hearing outcome of the various therapeutical approaches, including observation, radiosurgery, or resective surgery, is not easy because of the numerous classifications measuring hearing in different ways. In this review, a literature review was performed and papers selected dealing with small tumors, short- and long-term hearing, tumor control or radical resection, and effect of pre-treatment hearing and size on outcome. Two different surgical institutional series of sporadic vestibular schwannomas provided us comparative data on the outcome of observation alone.
Results and conclusions
Our experience suggests that active treatment with hearing preservation surgery, unlike observation alone, offers a better chance of hearing preservation, also enabling a more effective treatment of the tumor and an appropriate rehabilitation with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
KeywordsAcoustic neuroma Hearing preservation Observation Radiosurgery Hearing preservation surgery
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). . Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113: 179–180Google Scholar
- 2.Carlson ML, Jacob JT, Pollock BE, Neff B, Tombers N, Driscoll C, Link MJ (2013) Long-term hearing outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: patterns of hearing loss and variables influencing audiometric decline. J Neurosurg 118:579–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Di Maio S, Malebranche AD, Werstberg B, Akagami R (2011) Hearing preservation after microsurgical resection of large vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery 68:632–640Google Scholar
- 6.Golfinos J, Hill T, Rokosh R, Choudry O, Shinkeki M, Mansouri A, Friedmann D, Roland JT, Kondziolka D (2016) A matched cohort comparison of clinical outcomes following microsurgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 125:1472–1482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kirchmann M, Karnov K, Hansen S, Dethloff T, Stangerup SE, Caye-Thomasen P (2017) Ten-year follow-up on tumor growth and hearing in patients observed with intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery Jan 1(80):49–56Google Scholar
- 15.Martini A, Marioni G, Zanoletti E, Cappellesso R, Stramare R, Fasanaro E, Faccioli C, Giacomelli L, Denaro L, D'Avella D, Mazzoni A, Fassina A (2017) YAP, TAZ and AREG expression in eighth cranial nerve schwannoma. Int J Biol Markers 32(3):e319–e324Google Scholar
- 16.Mazzoni A, Calabrese V, Danesi G (2000) A modified retrosigmoid approach for direct exposure of the fundus of the internal auditory canal for hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma. Am J OtolGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mazzoni A, Zanoletti E, Denaro L, Martini A, d'Avella D (2018) Retrolabyrinthine meatotomy as part of retrosigmoid approach to expose the whole internal auditory canal: rationale, technique and outcome in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Oper Neurosurg 14(1):36–44Google Scholar