Spinal cord stimulation modulates descending pain inhibition and temporal summation of pricking pain in patients with neuropathic pain
- 73 Downloads
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment option for patients with refractory chronic pain conditions. While effects of SCS on dorsal horn neuronal circuitries are intensively studied, current knowledge on the impact of SCS on descending pain pathways is scarce and relies on preclinical data. We aimed to address this topic and hypothesized a significant effect of SCS on descending pain modulation. In light of current efforts to determine the sensitivity of “static” versus “dynamic” somatosensory parameters to characterize pathophysiological pain conditions, all SCS patients were carefully investigated using both classes of somatosensory outcome parameters.
Descending pain pathways were investigated by using a “Cold Pressor Test.” This test enables to evaluate the efficacy of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) at the individual level. CPM efficacy was assessed in eight neuropathic pain patients (age 55.5 ± 10.6) during the two conditions stimulator “ON” and “OFF.” The impact of SCS on “static” and “dynamic” somatosensory parameters was explored by using a quantitative sensory testing (QST) battery.
CPM efficacy on pressure pain sensitivity was nearly absent during “OFF” (− 1.2 ± 5.6% facilitation), but increased significantly to 16.3 ± 3.4% inhibition during “ON” (p = 0.03). While most “static” nociceptive QST parameters, represented by mechanical/thermal pain thresholds, exhibited only small effects of SCS (p > 0.05), the wind-up ratio was strongly reduced to within the normal range during “ON” (p = 0.04; Cohen’s d = 1.0). Dynamic mechanical allodynia was abolished in six of seven patients.
Our study provides first human evidence for an impact of SCS on descending pain pathways in the dorsolateral funiculus and emphasizes the significance of “dynamic” pain measures like “CPM”-efficacy and “temporal summation” to evaluate SCS treatment effects. Future prospective studies may use these measures of nociceptive processing to predict SCS therapy response.
KeywordsSpinal cord stimulation Descending pain modulation Quantitative sensory testing Cold pressor test Neuropathic pain
Cold detection threshold
Conditioned pain modulation
Cold pain threshold
Dynamic mechanical allodynia
Heat pain threshold
Mechanical detection threshold
Mechanical pain threshold
Mechanical pain sensitivity
Paradoxical heat sensations
Pressure pain threshold
Pain tolerance time
Quantitative sensory testing
Standard error of the mean
Spinal cord stimulation
Thermal sensory limen
Vibration detection threshold
Warm detection threshold
We thank Yvonne Neu for her excellent technical support.
This work was supported by the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (DFG), SFB 1158 (From nociception to chronic pain: Structure-function properties of neural pathways and their reorganization).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Broggi G, Franzini A, Parati E, Parenty M, Flauto C, Servello D (1985) Neurochemical and structural modifications related to pain control induced by spinal cord stimulation. In: Neurostimulation: An Overview. Futura Publishing, New York, pp 87–95Google Scholar
- 11.Dworkin RH, O’Connor AB, Kent J, Mackey SC, Raja SN, Stacey BR, Levy RM, Backonja M, Baron R, Harke H, Loeser JD, Treede R-D, Turk DC, Wells CD (2013) Interventional management of neuropathic pain: NeuPSIG recommendations. Pain 154:2249–2261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Eisenberg E, Burstein Y, Suzan E, Treister R, Aviram J (2015) Spinal cord stimulation attenuates temporal summation in patients with neuropathic pain. Pain 156:381–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460342.69718.a2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gierthmuhlen J, Maier C, Baron R, Tolle T, Treede RD, Birbaumer N, Huge V, Koroschetz J, Krumova EK, Lauchart M, Maihofner C, Richter H, Westermann A (2012) Sensory signs in complex regional pain syndrome and peripheral nerve injury. Pain 153:765–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Guan Y, Wacnik PW, Yang F, Carteret AF, Chung CY, Meyer RA, Raja SN (2010) Spinal cord stimulation-induced analgesia: electrical stimulation of dorsal column and dorsal roots attenuates dorsal horn neuronal excitability in neuropathic rats. Anesthesiology 113:1392–1405. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fcd95c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, Thomson S, O'Callaghan J, Eisenberg E, Milbouw G, Buchser E, Fortini G, Richardson J, North RB (2008) The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 63:762–770. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mackey IG, Dixon EA, Johnson K, Kong JT (2017) Dynamic quantitative sensory testing to characterize central pain processing. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/54452
- 27.Maier C, Baron R, Tölle TR, Binder A, Birbaumer N, Birklein F, Gierthmühlen J, Flor H, Geber C, Huge V, Krumova EK, Landwehrmeyer GB, Magerl W, Maihöfner C, Richter H, Rolke R, Scherens A, Schwarz A, Sommer C, Tronnier V, Üçeyler N, Valet M, Wasner G, Treede RD (2010) Quantitative sensory testing in the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS): somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes. Pain 150:439–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, Tolle TR, Treede RD, Beyer A, Binder A, Birbaumer N, Birklein F, Botefur IC, Braune S, Flor H, Huge V, Klug R, Landwehrmeyer GB, Magerl W, Maihofner C, Rolko C, Schaub C, Scherens A, Sprenger T, Valet M, Wasserka B (2006) Quantitative sensory testing in the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 123:231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Saadé NE, Barchini J, Tchachaghian S, Chamaa F, Jabbur SJ, Song Z, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B (2015) The role of the dorsolateral funiculi in the pain relieving effect of spinal cord stimulation: a study in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Exp Brain Res 233:1041–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4180-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Smits H, Ultenius C, Deumens R, Koopmans GC, Honig WM, van Kleef M, Linderoth B, Joosten EA (2006) Effect of spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain relates to degree of tactile "allodynia". Neuroscience 143:541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Song Z, Ansah OB, Meyerson BA, Pertovaara A, Linderoth B (2013) The rostroventromedial medulla is engaged in the effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rodent model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 247:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.05.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Tazawa T, Kamiya Y, Kobayashi A, Saeki K, Takiguchi M, Nakahashi Y, Shinbori H, Funakoshi K, Goto T (2015) Spinal cord stimulation modulates supraspinal centers of the descending antinociceptive system in rats with unilateral spinal nerve injury. Mol Pain 11:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12990-015-0039-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 44.van Eijs F, Geurts JW, Van Zundert J, Faber CG, Kessels AG, Joosten EA, van Kleef M (2012) Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type I of less than 12-month duration. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 15:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00424.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.van Eijs F, Smits H, Geurts JW, Kessels AG, Kemler MA, van Kleef M, Joosten EA, Faber CG (2010) Brush-evoked allodynia predicts outcome of spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Eur J Pain 14:164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.10.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.Williams KA, Gonzalez-Fernandez M, Hamzehzadeh S, Wilkinson I, Erdek MA, Plunkett A, Griffith S, Crooks M, Larkin T, Cohen SP (2011) A multi-center analysis evaluating factors associated with spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic pain patients. Pain Med 12:1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01184.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Yarnitsky D, Bouhassira D, Drewes AM, Fillingim RB, Granot M, Hansson P, Landau R, Marchand S, Matre D, Nilsen KB, Stubhaug A, Treede RD, Wilder-Smith OHG (2015) Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. Eur J Pain 19:805–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.605 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar