Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis
- 235 Downloads
Microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (mTSS) is a well-established method to address adenomas of the pituitary gland. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (eTSS) has become a viable alternative, however. Advocates suggest that the greater illumination, panoramic visualization, and angled endoscopic views afforded by eTSS may allow for higher rates of gross total tumor resection (GTR). The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the rate of GTR using mTSS and eTSS.
A meta-analysis of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through July 2017 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
Seventy case series that reported GTR rate in 8257 pituitary adenoma patients were identified. For all pituitary adenomas, eTSS (GTR=74.0%; I2 = 92.1%) was associated with higher GTR as compared to mTSS (GTR=66.4%; I2 = 84.0%) in a fixed-effect model (P-interaction < 0.01). For functioning pituitary adenomas (FPAs) (n = 1170 patients), there was no significant difference in GTR rate between eTSS (GTR=75.8%; I2 = 63.9%) and mTSS (GTR=75.5%; I2 = 79.0%); (P-interaction = 0.92). For nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) (n = 2655 patients), eTSS (GTR=71.0%; I2 = 86.4%) was associated with higher GTR as compared to mTSS (GTR=60.7%; I2 = 87.5%) in a fixed-effect model (P-interaction < 0.01). None of the associations were significant in a random-effect model (all P-interaction > 0.05). No significant publication bias was identified for any of the outcomes.
Among patients who were not randomly allocated to either approach, eTSS resulted in a higher rate of GTR as compared to mTSS for all patients and for NFPA patients alone, but only in a fixed-effect model. For FPA, however, eTSS did not seem to offer a significantly higher rate of GTR. These conclusions should be interpreted with caution because of the nature of the included non-comparative studies.
KeywordsEndoscopic transsphenoidal surgery Gross total resection Meta-analysis Microscopic transsphenoidal surgery Pituitary adenoma Transsphenoidal surgery
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 11.Chone CT, Sampaio MH, Sakano E, Paschoal JR, Garnes HM, Queiroz L, Vargas AA, Fernandes YB, Honorato DC, Fabbro MD, Guizoni H, Tedeschi H (2014) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas: preliminary evaluation of consecutive cases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:146–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Constantino ER, Leal R, Ferreira CC, Acioly MA, Landeiro JA (2016) Surgical outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience with special attention to approach-related complications. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 74:388–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Cushing H (1912) The pituitary body and its disorders: clinical status produced by disorders of the hypophysis Cerebri. JB Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Dallapiazza R, Bond AE, Grober Y, Louis RG, Payne SC, Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr (2014) Retrospective analysis of a concurrent series of microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries for Knosp grades 0-2 nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas at a single institution. J Neurosurg 121:511–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Hardy J (1967 (Fr)) [Surgery of the pituitary gland, using the trans-sphenoidal approach. Comparative study of 2 technical methods.]. Union Med Canada 96Google Scholar
- 48.Juraschka K, Khan OH, Godoy BL, Monsalves E, Kilian A, Krischek B, Ghare A, Vescan A, Gentili F, Zadeh G (2014) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection—clinical article. J Neurosurg 121:75–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 63.McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol C, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374:1105–1112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 75.Qureshi T, Chaus F, Fogg L, Dasgupta M, Straus D, Byrne RW (2016) Learning curve for the transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach to pituitary tumors. Br J Neurosurg:1–6Google Scholar
- 77.Schloffer H (1907) Erfolgreiche Operation eines Hypophysentumors auf nasalem wege. Wien Klin Wochenschr 20:621–624Google Scholar
- 79.Singh H, Essayed WI, Cohen-Gadol A, Zada G, Schwartz TH (2016) Resection of pituitary tumors: endoscopic versus microscopic. Journal of neuro-oncologyGoogle Scholar
- 85.Wolf A, Coros A, Bierer J, Goncalves S, Cooper P, Van Uum S, Lee DH, Proulx A, Nicolle D, Fraser JA, Rotenberg BW, Duggal N (2016) Quantitative evaluation of vision-related and health-related quality of life after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg:1–8Google Scholar
- 86.Wongsirisuwan M, Karnchanapandh K (2014) Comparative outcomes of keyhole supraorbital approach (KSA) and endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (EETA) in pituitary surgery. J Med Assoc Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet 97:386–392Google Scholar
- 88.Yildirim AE, Sahinoglu M, Ekici I, Cagil E, Karaoglu D, Celik H, Nacar OA, Belen AD (2016) Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas are really clinically nonfunctioning? Clinical and endocrinological symptoms and outcomes with endoscopic endonasal treatment. World Neurosurg 85:185–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 89.Zaidi HA, Awad AW, Bohl MA, Chapple K, Knecht L, Jahnke H, White WL, Little AS (2016) Comparison of outcomes between a less experienced surgeon using a fully endoscopic technique and a very experienced surgeon using a microscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 124:596–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar