Advertisement

Computing

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Detection and diagnosis of myocarditis in young patients using ECG analysis based on artificial neural networks

  • Yujun Li
  • Meijun Yang
  • Zhi LiuEmail author
  • Yuefeng Zhao
  • Dongmei Jiang
  • Lizhen Cui
  • Mingyu WangEmail author
Article
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Myocarditis is a common disease of the pediatric circulatory system, and its clinical manifestations are diversified. Especially in older patients, chest tightness, shortness of breath and palpitations may occur. However, some patients may have no distinct clinical symptoms and may occasionally experience symptoms during the diagnosis and treatment of respiratory infections, such as arrhythmias in infants and young patients. Because the clinical manifestations of myocarditis are not typical, the specificity and sensitivity of serum myocardial enzyme detection are not very high, which hinders a definitive diagnosis of certain cases by clinicians. However, degeneration, necrosis and inflammatory diseases of cardiomyocytes can affect myocardial conductivity and stress. In patients with myocarditis, an electrocardiogram (ECG) signal changes abnormally; thus, the ECG remains an indispensable means of diagnosing myocarditis. Biomedical signal detection and signal processing techniques can facilitate the study of biological and physiological systems and assist physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. However, traditional manual analysis of ECG methods has some drawbacks. Due to the extensive variety of electrocardiograms, variations in various waveform patterns are subtle and complex. Clinicians often need a solid theoretical foundation and a wealth of clinical experience to make a correct assessment using an ECG. If the medical expert is engaged in a large number of ECG recognition studies for a long time, fatigue may develop and cause misdiagnosis. In addition, the manual analysis of an ECG is part of the postmortem analysis, achieving a real-time diagnosis is difficult, and the resulting delay is likely to cause critical patients to miss the best treatment opportunity. To solve this problem, we have developed a dynamic electrocardiogram medical-assisted diagnosis system to assist medical experts in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with myocarditis. Our system can process the collected ECG signals, obtain waveform parameters, and automatically perform an analysis according to an expert’s clinical experience. These parameters provide diagnostic recommendations.

Keywords

ECG signal Myocarditis Signal detection Signal processing Medical aided diagnosis system 

Mathematics Subject Classification

00-XX 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program (No. 2018YFC0831006-3 and 2017YFB1400102), the Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province (No. 2017CXGC1503 and 2018GSF118228).

References

  1. 1.
    Wu W, Pirbhulal S, Zhang H, Mukhopadhyay SC (2019) Quantitative assessment for self-tracking of acute stress based on triangulation principle in a wearable sensor system. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 23(2):703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poulakaki N, Papalois A, Papadimitriou D, Prachalias A, Stevens C, Biomed C, Papadimitriou L, John P (2001) First clinical application of a second generation HepatAssist bioartificial liver support system without charcoal associated with neurological recovery in a fulminant hepatic failure patient. Gastroenterology 120(5):A543–A543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Le M, Christine L, Freemont Anthony J, Hoyland Judith A (2006) A preliminary in vitro study into the use of IL-1Ra gene therapy for the inhibition of intervertebral disc degeneration. Int J Exp Pathol 87(1):17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nadi S, Madhuka J, Pham TT (2018) A low-complexity algorithm for detection of atrial fibrillation using an ECG. Physiol Meas 49(10):28–42Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee JW, Lee GK (2014) Applying nonlinear dynamics to ECG signal processing. Int J Control Autom Syst 3(1):137–142Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fedotov AA (2014) Baseline drift filtering for an arterial pulse signal. Meas Tech 57(1):91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felblinger J, Blondé J-P, Jovanovic S (2011) Capteur ECG intelligent pour la synchronisation des séquences en IRM et le monitorage des patients. IRBM 32(3):179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sesay M, Vignes JR, Stöckle M, Mehsen M, Boulard G, Maurette P (2003) Spectral analysis of the ECG R-R interval permits early detection of vagal responses to neurosurgical stimuli. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 22(5):421–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amonkar G, Rupani A, Shah V, Parmar H (2009) Sudden death in tuberculous myocarditis. Cardiovascular Pathology 18(4):247–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taboulet P, Smith SW, Brady WJ (2013) Diagnostic ECG du syndrome coronarien aigu. Partie 4. Les diagnostics différentiels. Annales Françaises De Médecine Durgence 3(2):240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bate MR, Bonnell IA (2015) The origin of the initial mass function and its dependence on the mean Jeans mass in molecular clouds. Mon Not R Astron Soc 356(4):1201–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt M, Krug JW, Rose G (2016) Reducing of gradient induced artifacts on the ECG signal during MRI examinations using Wilcoxon filter. Curr Direct Biomed Eng 2(1):175–178Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pezzilli R, Bellacosa L, Barakat B (2010) Abdominal pain and ECG alteration: a simple diagnosis? Adv Med Sci 55(2):333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atanassova P, Tokmakova M, Djurkova A, Naydenov V, Chalakova N, Dimitrov B (2006) Abnormal ECG patterns during the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients without previous heart disease. Cent Eur J Med 1(2):148–157Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schmidt M, Krug JW, Schumann A, Bär K-J, Rose G (2015) Estimation of a respiratory signal from a single-lead ECG using the 4th order central moments. Curr Direct Biomed Eng 1(1):61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt M, Krug JK, Rose G (2016) Real-time QRS detection using integrated variance for ECG gated cardiac MRI. Curr Direct Biomed Eng 2(1):255–258Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lv S, Wu Q, Sun E (2015) Autophagy activated by bluetongue virus infection plays a positive role in its replication. Viruses 7(8):4657–4675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu Q, Ye J, Yang J (2016) Relation between carotid intima-media thickness and diastolic augmentation index in Chinese population. In: 9th International congress on image and signal processing on biomedical engineering and informatics (CISP-BMEI). IEEE, pp 1761–1765Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Calabrese F, Carturan E, Thiene G (2010) Cardiac infections: focus on molecular diagnosis. Cardiovasc Pathol 19(3):171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baillie TJ, Scherer DJ, Wong TL, Steele PM (2015) Kounis syndrome and hypersensitivity Myocarditis-One and the same? Insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiol Cases 12(4):119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Isasti G, Manuel José, García-Pinilla Manuel F, Jiménez-Navarro Juan Robledo-Carmona, de Teresa-Galván Eduardo (2014) Elevation of circulating progenitor cells in patients with acute myocarditis. Int J Cardiol 172(3):608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cunningham MW (2004) T cell mimicry in inflammatory heart disease. Mol Immunol 40(14–15):1121–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dassen WR, Schwab J, Rogg HJ, Pauschinger M, Fessele K, Bareiter T, Bär I, Loose R (2016) Functional and morphological parameters with tissue characterization of cardiovascular magnetic imaging in clinically verified “infarct-like myocarditis”. Fortschr Röntgenstr 188(04):365–373Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mavrogeni S, Tsirogianni AK, Gialafos EJ, Manoussakis MN (2009) Detection of myocardial inflammation by contrast-enhanced MRI in a patient with Churg-Strauss syndrome. Int J Cardiol 131(2):54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dolley YL, Habib G, Lepidi H, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2012) Severe Whipple’s disease with acute myocarditis. Int J Cardiol 159(2):41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hassoun MH, Intrator N, Mckay S, Christian W (2002) Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks. Proc IEEE 84(6):906–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiao S, Liu S, Jiang F, Song M, Cheng S (2019) Nonlinear dynamic response of reciprocating compressor system with rub-impact fault caused by subsidence. J Vib Control 25(11):1737–1751MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hu YH, Tompkins WJ, Urrusti JL (1993) Applications of artificial neural networks for ECG signal detection and classification. J Electrocardiol 26(Suppl 1):66–73Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringShandong UniversityQingdaoChina
  2. 2.School of Physics and ElectronicsShandong Normal UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.School of Electronic InformationQingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
  4. 4.School of SoftwareShandong UniversityJinanChina
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory of ASIC and Systems, School of MicroelectronicsFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations