Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:679 | Cite as

A monolithic graphitic carbon nitride/polyethersulfone nanocomposite: an application of a mixed matrix membrane as a solid-phase microextraction fiber

  • Elnaz Marzi Khosrowshahi
  • Amir Abbas MatinEmail author
Original Paper
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

A monolithic solid phase microextraction (M-SPME) fiber based on mixed matrix membrane (MMM) is described for the microextraction of phenol, 2-chlorophenol (2CP), 4-nitrophenol (4NP) and 4-methylphenol (4MP) from refinery wastewaters. The sorbent consists of polyethersulfone (PES) and graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), and the phenols were quantified by HPLC with UV detection. This fiber offers good capacity, stability, and ease of preparation and use. The fiber composition, pH value, extraction time, desorption solvent and desorption time were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the detection limits for the phenolic compounds were in the lower μg L−1 range, and responses were linear in the range from 2 to 2500 μg L−1. Fiber-to-fiber and single-fiber repeatabilities were between 5.2 and 10.4%, and between 4.9 and 8.9%, respectively. The method was applied to the determination of phenolic compounds in wastewater samples and gave recoveries between 72 and 108%.

Graphical abstract

Schematic epresentation of a monolithic polyethersulfone/graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposite: a novel application of mixed matrix membrane as a solid-phase microextraction fiber.

Keywords

Monolithic fiber Graphitic carbon nitride HPLC Phenol 2-chlorophenol 4-nitrophenol 4-methylphenol Polyethersulfone SPME 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University for their supporting. Also, The authors acknowledge the petroleum refinery company (Tabriz, Iran) for their assistance in sample collection and the Research Institute of polymer Industry (Tehran, Iran) for kindly cooporation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3786_MOESM1_ESM.docx (620 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 620 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pawliszyn J (1999) Application of solid-phase microextraction. Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumazawa T, Lee X-P, Sato K, Suzuki O (2003) Solid-phase microextraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry in drug analysis. Anal Chim Acta 492:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aranda R, Kruus P, Burk RC (2000) Assessment of polycrystalline graphites as sorbents for solid-phase microextraction of nonionic surfactants. J Chromatogr A 888:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagheri H, Es-haghi A, Rouini M-R (2005) Sol–gel-based solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determination of dextromethorphan and dextrorphan in human plasma. J Chromatogr B 818:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagheri H, Mir A, Babanezhad E (2005) An electropolymerized aniline-based fiber coating for solid phase microextraction of phenols from water. Anal Chim Acta 532:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kusworo T, Ismail A, Mustafa A, Matsuura T (2008) Dependence of membrane morphology and performance on preparation conditions: the shear rate effect in membrane casting. Sep Purif Technol 61:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Şen D, Kalıpçılar H, Yilmaz L (2007) Development of polycarbonate based zeolite 4A filled mixed matrix gas separation membranes. J Membr Sci 303:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang LY, Chung TS, Kulprathipanja S (2006) An investigation to revitalize the separation performance of hollow fibers with a thin mixed matrix composite skin for gas separation. J Membr Sci 276:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clarizia G, Algieri C, Regina A, Drioli E (2008) Zeolite-based composite PEEK-WC membranes: gas transport and surface properties. Micropor Mesopor Mater 115:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu C-C, Liu T-C, Lee K-R, Ruaan R-C, Lai J-Y (2006) Zeolite-filled PMMA composite membranes: influence of coupling agent addition on gas separation properties. Desalination 193:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Funk CV, Lloyd DR (2008) Zeolite-filled microporous mixed matrix (ZeoTIPS) membranes: prediction of gas separation performance. J Membr Sci 313:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang F, Zheng J, Qiu J, Liu S, Chen G, Tong Y, Zhu F, Ouyang G (2017) In situ hydrothermally grown TiO2@ C Core–Shell nanowire coating for highly sensitive solid phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:1840–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang Y, Song H, Su Y, Lv Y (2013) Turn-on persistent luminescence probe based on graphitic carbon nitride for imaging detection of biothiols in biological fluids. Anal Chem 85:11876–11884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee EZ, Jun YS, Hong WH, Thomas A, Jin MM (2010) Cubic mesoporous graphitic carbon (IV) nitride: an all-in-one chemosensor for selective optical sensing of metal ions. Angew 49:9706–9710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee EZ, Lee SU, Heo NS, Stucky GD, Jun Y-S, Hong WH (2012) A fluorescent sensor for selective detection of cyanide using mesoporous graphitic carbon (IV) nitride. Chem Commun 48:3942–3944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang J, Si L, Cui S, Bi W (2015) Synthesis of a graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposite with magnetite as a sorbent for solid phase extraction of phenolic acids. Microchim Acta 182:737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang M, Yang X, Bi W (2015) Application of magnetic graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposites for the solid-phase extraction of phthalate esters in water samples. J Sep Sci 38:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang M, Cui S, Yang X, Bi W (2015) Synthesis of g-C3N4/Fe3O4 nanocomposites and application as a new sorbent for solid phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples. Talanta 132:922–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu N, Wang Y, Rong M, Ye Z, Deng Z, Chen X (2014) Facile preparation and applications of graphitic carbon nitride coating in solid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1364:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun Y, Chen J, Qi H, Shi Y (2015) Graphitic carbon nitrides modified hollow fiber solid phase microextraction for extraction and determination of uric acid in urine and serum coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 1004:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ohlenbusch G, Kumke MU, Frimmel FH (2000) Sorption of phenols to dissolved organic matter investigated by solid phase microextraction. Sci Total Environ 253:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Neilson AH, Allard AS, Hynning PÅ, Remberger M (1991) Distribution, fate and persistence of organochlorine compounds formed during production of bleached pulp. Toxicol Environ Chem 30:3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martinez D, Pocurull E, Marce R, Borrull F, Calull M (1996) Separation of eleven priority phenols by capillary zone electrophoresis with ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr A 734:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y, Hong J, Zhang W, Xu R (2013) Carbon nitride nanosheets for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution: remarkably enhanced activity by dye sensitization. Catal Sci Technol 3:1703–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chung T-S, Jiang LY, Li Y, Kulprathipanja S (2007) Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 32:483–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu X, Ji Y, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Liu M (2007) Oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a novel solid-phase microextraction fiber for determination of phenols in aqueous samples. J Chromatogr A 1165:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kueseng P, Pawliszyn J (2013) Carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polydimethylsiloxane, a new coating for 96-blade solid-phase microextraction for determination of phenolic compounds in water. J Chromatogr A 1317:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Q-L, Huang F, Wang X-L, Wang X, Zhao R (2017) Multiple-helix cobalt (II)-based metal-organic nanotubes on stainless steel fibers for solid-phase microextraction of chlorophenol and nitrophenols from water samples. Microchim Acta 184:1817–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic SciencesAzarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations