Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:662 | Cite as

Click DNA cycling in combination with gold nanoparticles loaded with quadruplex DNA motifs enable sensitive electrochemical quantitation of the tuberculosis-associated biomarker CFP-10 in sputum

  • Jinlong LiEmail author
  • Kai Hu
  • Zhaoli Zhang
  • Xiaoyan Teng
  • Xia ZhangEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

An electrochemical aptamer-based assay is described for the determination of CFP-10 which is an early secretary biomarker of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. CFP-10 is specifically captured by its aptamer and then induces a DNA cross-linking click reaction, the release of CFP-10, and an amplification cycle of repeated CFP-10 release. This mechanism (with dual amplification via DNA click and target release cycle) causes more and more CFP-10 Apt strands on the electrode surface to expose their 5′ overhang and to hybridize with the DNA complexes linked to the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Consequently, large amounts of AuNPs, each loaded with a number of quadruplex DNA motifs, can be bound on the electrode surface and remarkably enhance the signal. Under optimal conditions, the method has a detection limit as low as 10 pg.mL−1 of CFP-10. The method was successfully applied to the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in sputum.

Graphical abstract

Schematic representation of an electrochemical CFP-10 (10-kDa culture filtrate protein) assay using click DNA cycling in combination with gold nanoparticles loaded with quadruplex DNA motifs. Click chemistry reaction between Dibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO)-DNA and azido-DNA can liberate the CFP-10 antigen for the next cycle, which can be viewed as the first amplification step. G-quadruplex-based DNAzyme is formed due to the guanine-rich sequences of DNA S1, which can be viewed as the second amplification step.

Keywords

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Electrochemical method Aptasensor Dual amplification strategy DNA click ligation G-quadruplex-hemin complex AuNPs H2O2 Hydroquinone Azido group 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81703088, and 81870695), the Medical Research Project of Jiangsu Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission, China (Grant No. H2018113), the Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation of Department of Health of Nanjing (YKK16107), and the Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Department of Health of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. Z2018034).

Compliance with ethical standards

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3780_MOESM1_ESM.docx (208 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 207 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dheda K, Gumbo T, Gandhi NR, Murray M, Theron G, Udwadia Z, Migliori GB, Warren R (2014) Global control of tuberculosis: from extensively drug-resistant to untreatable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med 2(4):321–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sypabekova M, Bekmurzayeva A, Wang R, Li Y, Nogues C, Kanayeva D (2017) Selection, characterization, and application of DNA aptamers for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis secreted protein MPT64. Tuberculosis 104:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goletti D, Lee M-R, Wang J-Y, Walter N, Ottenhoff THM (2018) Update on tuberculosis biomarkers: from correlates of risk, to correlates of active disease and of cure from disease. Respirology 23(5):455–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13272 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Floyd K, Glaziou P, Zumla A, Raviglione M (2018) The global tuberculosis epidemic and progress in care, prevention, and research: an overview in year 3 of the end TB era. Lancet Respir Med 6(4):299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lei L, Liu Z, Zhang H, Yue W, Li CW, Yi C (2018) A point-of-need enzyme linked aptamer assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection using a smartphone. Sensors Actuators B Chem 254:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu W, Zou D, He X, Ao D, Su Y, Yang Z, Huang S, Zhao Q, Tang Y, Ma W (2018) Development and application of a rapidMycobacterium tuberculosisdetection technique using polymerase spiral reaction. Sci Rep 8(1):3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen H, Liu F, Kwangnak L, Jaebeom Y, Zonghuang (2013) Sensitive detection of tuberculosis using nanoparticle-enhanced surface;plasmon resonance. Microchim Acta 180(5–6):431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsamadony H, Althani A, Tageldin MA, Azzazy HME (2017) Nanodiagnostics for tuberculosis detection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 17(5):427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim J, Lee J, Lee KI, Park TJ, Kim HJ, Lee J (2013) Rapid monitoring of CFP-10 during culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using a magnetophoretic immunoassay. Sensors Actuators B Chem 177(1):327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Troiano Araujo LDC, Wibrantz M, Rodriguez-Fernandez DE, Karp SG, Talevi AC, de Souza EM, Soccol CR, Thomaz-Soccol V (2019) Process parameters optimization to produce the recombinant protein CFP10 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Protein Expr Purif 154:118–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2018.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hong SC, Lee J, Shin HC, Kim CM, Park JY, Koh K, Kim HJ, Chang CL, Lee J (2011) Clinical immunosensing of tuberculosis CFP-10 in patient urine by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy. Sensors Actuators B Chem 160(1):1434–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Makinen, J, Marjamaki, M, Marttila H, Soini H (2006) Evaluation of a novel strip test, GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS, for species identification of mycobacterial cultures. Clin Microbiol Infect 12(5):481–483Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bai Y, Xue Y, Gao H, Wang L, Ding T, Bai W, Fan A, Zhang J, An Q, Xu Z (2008) Expression and purification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6 and MPT64 fusion protein and its immunoprophylactic potential in mouse model. Protein Expr Purif 59(2):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lambert L, Rajbhandary S, Qualls N, Budnick L, Catanzaro A, Cook S, Danielscuevas L, Reves EGR (2003) Costs of implementing and maintaining a tuberculin skin test program in hospitals and health departments. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24(11):814–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauzullo I, Massetti AP, Mengoni F, Rossi R, Lichtner M, Ajassa C, Vullo V, Mastroianni CM (2011) Influence of previous tuberculin skin test on serial IFN-Î3 release assays. Tuberculosis 91(4):322–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee HJ, Choi HJ, Kim DR, Lee H, Jin JE, Kim YR, Lee MS, Cho SN, Kang YA (2016) Safety and efficacy of tuberculin skin testing with microneedle MicronJet600™ in healthy adults. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 20(4):500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun J-R, Lee S-Y, Perng C-L, Lu J-J (2009) Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Bactec MGIT 960 cultures by Inhouse IS6110-based PCR assay in routine clinical practice. J Formos Med Assoc 108(2):119–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60042-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azmi UZM, Yusof NA, Kusnin N, Abdullah J, Suraiya S, Ong PS, Raston NHA, Abd Rahman SF, Fathil MFM (2018) Sandwich electrochemical Immunosensor for early detection of tuberculosis based on graphene/polyaniline-modified screen-printed gold electrode. Sensors 18(11).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113926
  19. 19.
    He F, Xiong Y, Liu J, Tong F, Yan D (2016) Construction of au-IDE/CFP10-ESAT6 aptamer/DNA-AuNPs MSPQC for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biosens Bioelectron 77:799–804.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thakur H, Kaur N, Sareen D, Prabhakar N (2017) Electrochemical determination of M. tuberculosis antigen based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and functionalized carbon nanotubes hybrid platform. Talanta 171:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torati SR, Reddy V, Yoon SS, Kim C (2016) Electrochemical biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection based on gold nanotubes array electrode platform. Biosens Bioelectron 78:483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li J, Wang B, Gu S, Yang Y, Wang Z, Xiang Y (2017) Amperometric low potential aptasensor for the fucosylated Golgi protein 73, a marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Microchim Acta 184(9):3131–3136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2334-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feng C, Wang Z, Chen T, Chen X, Mao D, Zhao J, Li G (2018) A dual-enzyme-assisted three-dimensional DNA walking machine using T4 polynucleotide kinase as activators and application in polynucleotide kinase assays. Anal Chem 90(4):2810–2815.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04924 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Li J, Gao T, Gu S, Zhi J, Yang J, Li G (2017) An electrochemical biosensor for the assay of alpha-fetoprotein-L3 with practical applications. Biosens Bioelectron 87:352–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.08.071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li C, Hu X, Lu J, Mao X, Xiang Y, Shu Y, Li G (2018) Design of DNA nanostructure-based interfacial probes for the electrochemical detection of nucleic acids directly in whole blood. Chem Sci 9(4):979–984.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04663d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhanzhong MA, Yujiong W, Lianhua QIN, Yuansheng D, Qin XIE, Zhongyi HU (2008) Screening of aptamers to CFP-10 protein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Pathogen Biology 3(2):86–89Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang X-L, Zhou Y-X, Wu S-M, Pan Q, Xia B, Zhang X-L (2014) CFP10 and ESAT6 aptamers as effective mycobacterial antigen diagnostic reagents. J Infect 69(6):569–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang J, Liu Y, Lv J, Li G (2014) A colorimetric method for α-glucosidase activity assay and its inhibitor screening based on aggregation of gold nanoparticles induced by specific recognition between phenylenediboronic acid and 4-aminophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside. Nano Res 8(3):920–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li J, He G, Wang B, Shi L, Gao T, Li G (2018) Fabrication of reusable electrochemical biosensor and its application for the assay of alpha-glucosidase activity. Anal Chim Acta 1026:140–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.04.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li J, He G, Mu C, Wang K, Xiang Y (2017) Assay of DNA methyltransferase 1 activity based on uracil-specific excision reagent digestion induced G-quadruplex formation. Anal Chim Acta 986:131–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang D, Ning L, Gao T, Ye Z, Li G (2015) Enzyme-free dual amplification strategy for protein assay by coupling toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement reaction with hybridization chain reaction. Electrochem Commun 58:33–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2015.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bakhori NM, Yusof NA, Abdullah J, Wasoh H, Noor SSM, Raston NHA, Mohammad F (2018) Immuno Nanosensor for the ultrasensitive naked eye detection of tuberculosis. Sensors 18(6).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061932
  33. 33.
    Hong SC, Chen H, Lee J, Park H-K, Kim YS, Shin H-C, Kim C-M, Park TJ, Lee SJ, Koh K, Kim H-J, Chang CL, Lee J (2011) Ultrasensitive immunosensing of tuberculosis CFP-10 based on SPR spectroscopy. Sensors Actuators B Chem 156(1):271–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second Hospital of NanjingNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of ophthalmology, the Nanjing Drum Tower HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Tuberculosis, the Second Hospital of NanjingNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Center for Global Health, School of Public HealthNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations