Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:597 | Cite as

A nanosized magnetic metal-organic framework of type MIL-53(Fe) as an efficient sorbent for coextraction of phenols and anilines prior to their quantitation by HPLC

  • Niloofar Jalilian
  • Homeira EbrahimzadehEmail author
  • Ali Akbar Asgharinezhad
Original Paper
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

The authors describe the synthesis of a magnetic metal-organic framework (MOF) of type MIL-53(Fe) for coextraction of phenols and anilines from various environmental samples. A quick method for dispersive micro-solid phase extraction (D-μ-SPE) was developed for coextraction of the analytes 4-nitrophenol (4-NP), 4-chlorophenol (4-CP), 4-chloroaniline (4-CA), 1-amino-2-naphtol (1-A2N) and 2, 4-dichloroaniline (2, 4-DCA). The MOF was characterized by SEM, TEM, FT-IR, EDS, thermogravimetry, VSM and XRD. The method was optimized by response surface methodology combined with desirability function approach, specifically with respect to pH value of the sample, amount of sorbent, sorption time, salt concentration, sample volume, type and volume of the eluent, and elution time. Following elution with acetonitrile, the analytes were quantified by HPLC with photodiode array detection. Responses are linear in 0.1–2000 μg·L−1 concentration ranges. The limits of detection and relative standard deviations (for n = 5) are in the range of 0.03–0.2 μg·L−1 and 3.5–12.6%, respectively. Enrichment factors are 113, 61, 87, 144 and 114 for 4-NP, 4-CP, 4-CA, 1-A2N and 2,4-DCA, respectively. Recoveries from spiked samples ranged from 39.5 to 93.3%. The magnetic sorbent was successfully applied to the coextraction and determination of the analytes in river, rain and hookah water samples.

Graphical abstract

Schematic presentation for the synthesis of (a) Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) and (b) Fe3O4@MIL-53(Fe). Fe3O4@MIL-53(Fe) was employed as a new nanosorbent in dispersive micro-solid phase extraction of phenols and anilines. The limits of detection are in the range of 0.03–0.2 μg·L−1.

Keywords

Magnetic sorbent Dispersive micro-solid phase extraction Pollutants Desirability function Water samples 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3698_MOESM1_ESM.docx (998 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 997 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Young A, Lai G, Hung B, Yuen A, He Y (2011) Determination of trace Chloroanilines in environmental water samples using hollow Fiber-based liquid phase microextraction. Chromatographia 74:83–88.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2022-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang Q, Chen X, Jiang X (2013) Liquid–liquid microextraction of Nitrophenols using supramolecular solvent and their determination by HPLC with UV detection. Chromatographia 76:1641–1647.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2554-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pan YL, Chen F, Zhang MY, Wang TQ, Xu ZC, Zhang W, Chu QC, Ye JN (2013) Sensitive determination of chloroanilines in water samples by hollow fiber-based liquid-phase microextraction prior to capillary electrophoresis with amperometric detection. Electrophoresis 34:1241–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201200320 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jalilian N, Ebrahimzadeh H, Asgharinezhad AA (2017) Dispersive micro-solid phase extraction of aromatic amines based on an efficient sorbent made from poly(1,8-diaminonaphtalen) and magnetic multiwalled carbon nanotubes composite. J Chromatogr A 1499:38–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.03.087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babaee S, Daneshfar A (2016) Extraction of phenolic compounds from water samples by dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction. J Sep Sci 39:2508–2516.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201500977 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun XM, Sun Y, Wu LW, Jiang CZ, Yu X, Gao Y, Wang LY, Song DQ (2012) Development of a vortex-assisted ionic liquid microextraction method for the determination of aromatic amines in environmental water samples. Anal Methods 4:2074–2080.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2AY25056J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baciocchi R, Attina M, Lombardi G, Boni MR (2001) Fast determination of phenols in contaminated soils. J Chromatogr A 911:135–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)01249-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wennrich L, Popp P, Molder M (2000) Determination of chlorophenols in soils using accelerated solvent extraction combined with solid-phase microextraction. Anal Chem 72:546–551.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990463r CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang WB, Xiao XM, An TC, Song ZG, Fu JM, Sheng GY, Cui MC (2003) Kinetics, degradation pathway and reaction mechanism of advanced oxidation of 4-nitrophenol in water by a UV/H2O2 process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:788–794.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chung KT, Fulk GF, Egan M (1978) Reduction of azo dyes by intestinal anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol 35:558–562PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asgharinezhad AA, Ebrahimzadeh H (2016) A simple and fast method based on mixed hemimicelles coated magnetite nanoparticles for simultaneous extraction of acidic and basic pollutants. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:473–486.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9114-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jauregui O, Galceran MT (1997) Determination of phenols in water by on-line solid-phase disk extraction and liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Anal Chim Acta 340:191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(96)00504-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cai MQ, Wei XQ, Du CH, Ma XM, Jin MC (2014) Novel amphiphilic polymeric ionic liquid-solid phase micro-extraction membrane for the preconcentration of aniline as degradation product of azo dye Orange G under sonication by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1349:24–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.05.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarafraz-Yazdi A, Sayyar Ardaki M, Amiri A (2013) Determination of monocyclic aromatic amines using headspace solid-phase microextraction based on sol gel technique prior to GC. J Sep Sci 36:1629–1635.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201200940 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu L, Lee HK (2001) Liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction of nitrophenols with a hollow fiber membrane prior to capillary liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 924:407–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)00906-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang D, Zhang L, Liu T (2018) A magnetic cellulose-based carbon fiber hybrid as a dispersive solid-phase extraction material for the simultaneous detection of six bisphenol analogs from environmental samples. Analyst 143:3100–3106.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AN00544C CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jalilian N, Ebrahimzadeh H, Asgharinezhad AA (2018) Determination of acidic, basic and amphoteric drugs in biological fluids and wastewater after their simultaneous dispersive micro-solid phase extraction using multiwalled carbon nanotubes/magnetite nanoparticles@poly(2-aminopyrimidine) composite. Microchem J 143:337–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chisvert A, Cardenas S, Lucena R (2019) Dispersive micro-solid phase extraction. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 112:226–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asgharinezhad AA, Jalilian N, Ebrahimzadeh H, Panjali Z (2015) A simple and fast method based on new magnetic ion imprinted polymer nanoparticles for the selective extraction of Ni(II) ions in different food samples. RSC Adv 5:45510–45519.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA05639J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jalilian N, Ebrahimzadeh H, Asgharinezhad AA, Molaei K (2017) Extraction and determination of trace amounts of gold(III), palladium(II), platinum(II) and silver(I) with the aid of a magnetic nanosorbent made from Fe3O4-decorated and silica-coated graphene oxide modified with a polypyrrole-polythiophene copolymer. Microchim Acta 184:2191–2200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2170-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang H, Yuan Y, Sun Y, Niu C, Qiao F, Yan H (2018) An ionic liquid-magnetic graphene composite for magnet dispersive solid-phase extraction of triazine herbicides in surface water followed by high performance liquid chromatography. Analyst 143:175–181.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7AN01290J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang Z, Xu X, Liang X, Lei C, Wei Y, He P, Lv B, Ma H, Lei Z (2016) MIL-53(Fe)-graphene nanocomposites: efficient visible-light photocatalysts for the selective oxidation of alcohols. Appl Catal B 198:112–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hashemi B, Zohrabi P, Raza N, Kim KH (2017) Metal-organic frameworks as advanced sorbents for the extraction and determination of pollutants from environmental, biological, and food media. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 97:65–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rocio-Bautista P, Gonzalez-Hernandez P, Pino V, Pasan J, Afonso AM (2017) Metal-organic frameworks as novel sorbents in dispersive-based microextraction approaches. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 90:114–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghorbani-Kalhor E (2016) A metal-organic framework nanocomposite made from functionalized magnetite nanoparticles and HKUST-1 (MOF-199) for preconcentration of Cd(II), Pb(II), and Ni(II). Microchim Acta 183:2639–2647.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-1896-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Azizi Vahed T, Naimi-Jamal MR, Panahi L (2018) (Fe)MIL−100-met@alginate: a hybrid polymer–MOF for enhancement of metformin's bioavailability and pH-controlled release. New J Chem 42:11137–11146.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ01946K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Araya T, Jia M, Yang J, Zhao P, Cai K, Ma W, Huang Y (2017) Resin modified MIL-53(Fe) MOF for improvement of photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B 203:768–777.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rezvani M, Asgharinezhad AA, Ebrahimzadeh H, Shekari N (2014) A polyaniline-magnetite nanocomposite as an anion exchange sorbent for solid-phase extraction of chromium(VI) ions. Microchim Acta 181:1887–1895.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-014-1262-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Banerjee A, Gokhale R, Bhatnagar S, Jog J, Bhardwaj M, Lefez B, Hannoyerc B, Ogale S (2012) MOF derived porous carbon–Fe3O4 nanocomposite as a high performance, recyclable environmental superadsorbent. J Mater Chem 22:19694–19699.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM33798C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Madrakian T, Afkhami A, Zadpour B, Ahmadi M (2015) New synthetic mercaptoethylamino homopolymer-modified maghemite nanoparticles for effective removal of some heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. J Ind Eng Chem 21:1160–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.05.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Asgharinezhad AA, Ebrahimzadeh H (2015) Coextraction of acidic, basic and amphiprotic pollutants using multiwalled carbon nanotubes/magnetite nanoparticles@polypyrrole composite. J Chromatogr A 1412:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Asiabi H, Yamini Y, Rezaei F, Seidi S (2016) Nanostructured polypyrrole for automated and electrochemically controlled in-tube solid-phase microextraction of cationic nitrogen compounds. Microchim Acta 183:1449–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-015-1534-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Chemistry and Petroleum SciencesShahid Beheshti University, G.C., EvinTehranIran
  2. 2.Chemistry and Process DepartmentNiroo Research InstituteTehranIran

Personalised recommendations