Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:529 | Cite as

Absolute quantification of particle number concentration using a digital single particle counting system

  • Li Zhang
  • Yu-Jun Yang
  • Jun-Yi Xiong
  • Zhen Wu
  • Zhi-Xiong Xie
  • Dai-Wen Pang
  • Zhi-Ling ZhangEmail author
Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The accurate determination of the molar concentration or the number concentration of particles in a defined volume is important but challenging. Since particle diversity and heterogeneity cannot be ignored in particle quantification, single particle counting has become quite important. However, most methods require standard samples (calibrators) which are usually difficult to obtain. The authors describe a method for single particle counting that is based on the combination of digital counting and formation of microdroplets in a microchip. By compartmentalizing particles into picoliter droplets, positive droplets encapsulating particles were counted and particle concentrations were calculated by Poisson statistics. The concentration of particles over a wide range (from 5.0 × 103 to 1.8 × 107 particles per mL) were accurately determined without the need for using a calibrator. A microdroplet chip including a T-junction channel achieved a 9-fold increase of signal-to-background ratio compared to the traditional flow-focusing chip. This makes the digital counting system a widely applicable tool for quantification of fluorescent particles. Various particles including differently sized fluorescent microspheres and bacteria with large heterogeneity in shape such as Escherichia coli DH5α-pDsRed were accurately quantified by this method.

Graphical abstract

Schematic representation of the digital single particle counting system for absolute quantification of particles. Particles compartmentalized in picoliter droplets were counted and the number concentration of particles was determined using digital analysis.

Keywords

Digital analysis Number concentration determination Poisson statistics Droplet microfluidics Picoliter droplet 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21775111), and the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX10301405).

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3692_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19.6 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 20108 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Li J, Fu C, Yang CF (2013) Recent advances in micro/nano-particles for clinical detection of cancer biomarkers. Anal Methods 5:5862–5874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen G, Roy I, Yang C, Prasad PN (2016) Nanochemistry and nanomedicine for nanoparticle-based diagnostics and therapy. Chem Rev 116:2826–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang S, Luo X (2014) Mesoporous nano/micro noble metal particles: synthesis and applications. Nanoscale 6:4438–4457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shang J, Gao X (2014) Nanoparticle counting: towards accurate determination of the molar concentration. Chem Soc Rev 43:7267–7278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khandare J, Minko T (2006) Polymer-drug conjugates: Progress in polymeric prodrugs. Prog Polym Sci 31:359–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu WW, Qu L, Guo W, Peng X (2003) Experimental determination of the extinction coefficient of CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals. Chem Mater 15:2854–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai Q, Wang Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Pellegrino DJ, Zhao M, Zou B, Seo JT, Wang Y, Yu WW (2009) Size-dependent composition and molar extinction coefficient of PbSe semiconductor nanocrystals. ACS Nano 3:1518–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu X, Su D, Du Z, Huang X, Dong C, Ren J (2016) A single particle method for direct determination of molar concentrations of gold nanoparticles, and its application to the determination of the activity of caspase 3 and drug-induced cell apoptosis. Microchim Acta 183:2457–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang S, Li L, Jin S, Li W, Hang W, Yan X (2017) Rapid and quantitative measurement of single quantum dots in a sheath flow cuvette. Anal Chem 89:9857–9863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang C, Johnson LW (2008) Simple and accurate quantification of quantum dots via single-particle counting. J Am Chem Soc 130:3750–3751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boika A, Bard AJ (2015) Time of first arrival in electrochemical collision experiments as a measure of ultralow concentrations of analytes in solution. Anal Chem 87:4341–4346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiao X, Fan FRF, Zhou J, Bard AJ (2008) Current transients in single nanoparticle collision events. J Am Chem Soc 130:16669–16677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laborda F, Jiménez-Lamana J, Bolea E, Castillo JR (2013) Critical considerations for the determination of nanoparticle number concentrations, size and number size distributions by single particle ICP-MS. J Anal At Spectrom 28:1220–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pace HE, Rogers NJ, Jarolimek C, Coleman VA, Higgins CP, Ranville JF (2011) Determining transport efficiency for the purpose of counting and sizing nanoparticles via single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 83:9361–9369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han G, Xing Z, Dong Y, Zhang S, Zhang X (2011) One-step homogeneous DNA assay with single-nanoparticle detection. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:3462–3465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carr B, Wright M (2013) Nanoparticle tracking analysis a review of applications and usage 2010–2012, NanoSight Ltd, pp 5–16, pp 161–175Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vives-Rego J, Lebaron P, Caron GN (2000) Current and future applications of flow cytometry in aquatic microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:429–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Coulter WH (1956) High speed automatic blood cell counter and cell size analyzer. Proc Natl Electron Conf 12:1034–1040Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wen CY, Tang M, Hu J, Wu LL, Pang DW, Zeng JB, Li XY (2016) Determination of the absolute number concentration of nanoparticles and the active affinity sites on their surfaces. Anal Chem 88:10134–10142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wo X, Li Z, Jiang Y, Li M, Su Y, Wang W, Tao N (2016) Determining the absolute concentration of nanoparticles without calibration factor by visualizing the dynamic processes of interfacial adsorption. Anal Chem 88:2380–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Najah M, Griffiths AD, Ryckelynck M (2012) Teaching single-cell digital analysis using droplet-based microfluidics. Anal Chem 84:1202–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Witters D, Sun B, Begolo S, Rodriguez-Manzano J, Robles W, Ismagilov RF (2014) Digital biology and chemistry. Lab Chip 14:3225–3232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang Y, Hiroyuki N (2017) Digital bioassays: theory, applications, and perspectives. Anal Chem 89:92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hümmer D, Kurth F, Naredi-Rainer N, Dittrich PS (2016) Single cells in confined volumes: microchambers and microdroplets. Lab Chip 16:447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Al-Hetlani E, Amin MO (2019) Continuous magnetic droplets and microfluidics: generation, manipulation, synthesis and detection. Microchim Acta 186:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fan YQ, Wang M, Gao F, Zhuang J, Tang G, Zhang YJ (2016) Recent development of droplet microfluidics in digital polymerase chain reaction. Chin J Anal Chem 44:1300–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Basova EY, Foret F (2015) Droplet microfluidics in (bio) chemical analysis. Analyst 140:22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rissin DM, Kan CW, Campbell TG, Howes SC, Fournier DR, Song L, Piech T, Patel PP, Chang L, Rivnak AJ, Ferrell EP, Randall JD, Provuncher GK, Walt DR, Duffy DC (2010) Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat Biotechnol 28:595–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ge S, Liu W, Schlappi T, Ismagilov RF (2014) Digital, ultrasensitive, end-point protein measurements with large dynamic range via Brownian trapping with drift. J Am Chem Soc 136:14662–14665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paunescu D, Mora CA, Querci L, Heckel R, Puddu M, Hattendorf B, Günther D, Grass RN (2015) Detecting and number counting of single engineered nanoparticles by digital particle polymerase chain reaction. ACS Nano 9:9564–9572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang YJ, Feng X, Xu N, Pang DW, Zhang ZL (2013) Generation of sub-femtoliter droplet by T-junction splitting on microfluidic chips. Appl Phys Lett 102:123502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kreutz JE, Munson T, Huynh T, Shen F, Du WB, Ismagilov RF (2011) Theoretical design and analysis of multivolume digital assays with wide dynamic range validated experimentally with microfluidic digital PCR. Anal Chem 83:8158–8168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guo M, Wang H, Xie N, Xie Z (2015) Positive effect of carbon sources on natural transformation in Escherichia coli: role of low-level cyclic AMP (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein in the derepression of rpoS. J Bacteriol 197:3317–3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Biology and Medicine (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of VirologyWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Life SciencesWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations