Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:465 | Cite as

Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on the use of polyaniline and its nanocomposites: a review on recent advances

  • Nahid Shoaie
  • Maryam Daneshpour
  • Mostafa Azimzadeh
  • Sara Mahshid
  • Seyyed Mehdi Khoshfetrat
  • Fatemeh Jahanpeyma
  • Alieh Gholaminejad
  • Kobra OmidfarEmail author
  • Mehdi ForuzandehEmail author
Review Article
  • 174 Downloads

Abstract

Polyaniline and its composites with nanoparticles have been widely used in electrochemical sensor and biosensors due to their attractive properties and the option of tuning them by proper choice of materials. The review (with 191 references) describes the progress made in the recent years in polyaniline-based biosensors and their applications in clinical sensing, food quality control, and environmental monitoring. A first section summarizes the features of using polyaniline in biosensing systems. A subsequent section covers sensors for clinical applications (with subsections on the detection of cancer cells and bacteria, and sensing of glucose, uric acid, and cholesterol). Further sections discuss sensors for use in the food industry (such as for sulfite, phenolic compounds, acrylamide), and in environmental monitoring (mainly pesticides and heavy metal ions). A concluding section summarizes the current state, highlights some of the challenges currently compromising performance in biosensors and nanobiosensors, and discusses potential future directions.

Graphical abstract

Schematic presentation of electrochemical sensor and biosensors applications based on polyaniline/nanoparticles in various fields of human life including medicine, food industry, and environmental monitoring. The simultaneous use of suitable properties polyaniline and nanoparticles can provide the fabrication of sensing systems with high sensitivity, short response time, high signal/noise ratio, low detection limit, and wide linear range by improving conductivity and the large surface area for biomolecules immobilization.

Keywords

Sensing system Nanoparticles Clinical detection Food quality control Environmental monitoring Drugs Cancer cells Bacteria Glucose Uric acid Cholesterol Sulfite Phenolic compounds Acrylamide Pesticides Heavy metal ions 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Šefčovičová J, Tkac J (2015) Application of nanomaterials in microbial-cell biosensor constructions. Chemical Papers 69:42–53Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paniel N, Baudart J (2013) Colorimetric and electrochemical genosensors for the detection of Escherichia coli DNA without amplification in seawater. Talanta 115:133–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farka Zk, Juřík Ts, Kovář D, Trnková Le, Skládal P (2017) Nanoparticle-based immunochemical biosensors and assays: recent advances and challenges. Chem Rev 117:9973–10042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kissinger PT (2005) Biosensors—a perspective. Biosens Bioelectron 20:2512–2516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nagel B, Dellweg H, Gierasch L (1992) Glossary for chemists of terms used in biotechnology (IUPAC Recommendations 1992). Pure Appl Chem 64:143–168Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Topkaya SN, Azimzadeh M (2016) Biosensors of in vitro detection of cancer and bacterial cells. In: Nanobiosensors for Personalized and Onsite Biomedical Diagnosis. Institution of Engineering and Technology, pp 73–94Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Topkaya SN, Azimzadeh M, Ozsoz M (2016) Electrochemical biosensors for cancer biomarkers detection: Recent advances and challenges. Electroanalysis:n/a–n/aGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahshid SS, Camiré S, Ricci F, Vallée-Bélisle A (2015) A highly selective electrochemical dna-based sensor that employs steric hindrance effects to detect proteins directly in whole blood. J Am Chem Soc 137:15596–15599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omidfar K, Darzianiazizi M, Ahmadi A, Daneshpour M, Shirazi H (2015) A high sensitive electrochemical nanoimmunosensor based on Fe3O4/TMC/Au nanocomposite and PT-modified electrode for the detection of cancer biomarker epidermal growth factor receptor. Sens Actuators B 220:1311–1319Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aydemir N, Malmström J, Travas-Sejdic J (2016) Conducting polymer based electrochemical biosensors. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:8264–8277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerard M, Chaubey A, Malhotra B (2002) Application of conducting polymers to biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 17:345–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holzinger M, Le Goff A, Cosnier S (2014) Nanomaterials for biosensing applications: a review. Front Chem 2:63PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daneshpour M, moradi LS, Izadi P, Omidfar K (2016) Femtomolar level detection of RASSF1A tumor suppressor gene methylation by electrochemical nano-genosensor based on Fe3O4/TMC/Au nanocomposite and PT-modified electrode. Biosens Bioelectron 77:1095–1103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jafari S, Dehghani M, Nasirizadeh N, Azimzadeh M (2018) An azithromycin electrochemical sensor based on an aniline MIP film electropolymerized on a gold nano urchins/graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electroanal Chem 829:27–34Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park CS, Lee C, Kwon OS (2016) Conducting polymer based nanobiosensors. Polymers 8:249PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barsan MM, Ghica ME, Brett CM (2015) Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on redox polymer/carbon nanotube modified electrodes: a review. Anal Chim Acta 881:1–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arshak K, Velusamy V, Korostynska O, Oliwa-Stasiak K, Adley C (2009) Conducting polymers and their applications to biosensors: emphasizing on foodborne pathogen detection. IEEE Sensors Journal 9:1942–1951Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dhand C, Das M, Datta M, Malhotra B (2011) Recent advances in polyaniline based biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 26:2811–2821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chowdhury AD, Gangopadhyay R, De A (2014) Highly sensitive electrochemical biosensor for glucose, DNA and protein using gold-polyaniline nanocomposites as a common matrix. Sens Actuators B 190:348–356Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spain E, Keyes TE, Forster RJ (2013) Vapour phase polymerised polyaniline–gold nanoparticle composites for DNA detection. J Electroanal Chem 711:38–44Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Azimzadeh M, Nasirizadeh N, Rahaie M, Naderi-Manesh H (2017) Early detection of Alzheimer's disease using a biosensor based on electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide and gold nanowires for the quantification of serum microRNA-137. RSC Adv 7:55709–55719Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shrivastava S, Jadon N, Jain R (2016) Next-generation polymer nanocomposite-based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: A review. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 82:55–67Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shoaie N, Forouzandeh M, Omidfar K (2018) Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Biosensor Based on Polyaniline and Gold Nanoparticles for DNA Detection. IEEE Sensors Journal 18:1835–1843Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ćirić-Marjanović G (2013) Recent advances in polyaniline research: Polymerization mechanisms, structural aspects, properties and applications. Synth Met 177:1–47Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hun X, Li Y, Wang S, Li Y, Zhao J, Zhang H, Luo X (2018) Photoelectrochemical platform for cancer cell glutathione detection based on polyaniline and nanoMoS2 composites modified gold electrode. Biosens Bioelectron 112:93–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu Q, Leng J, Li H-b, Lu G-j, Wang Y, Hu X-Y (2010) The preparation of polyaniline/gold nanocomposites by self-assembly and their electrochemical applications. React Funct Polym 70:663–668Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chang H, Yuan Y, Shi N, Guan Y (2007) Electrochemical DNA biosensor based on conducting polyaniline nanotube array. Anal Chem 79:5111–5115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kang Z, Jiao K, Xu X, Peng R, Jiao S, Hu Z (2017) Graphene oxide-supported carbon nanofiber-like network derived from polyaniline: A novel composite for enhanced glucose oxidase bioelectrode performance. Biosens Bioelectron 96:367–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dhand C, Dwivedi N, Mishra S, Solanki P, Mayandi V, Beuerman R, Ramarishna S, Lakshminarayanan R, Malhotra B (2015) Polyaniline-based biosensors. Nanobiosensors in Disease Diagnosis 4:25–46Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mallick K, Witcomb MJ, Scurrell MS (2006) Gold in polyaniline: recent trends. Gold Bulletin 39:166–174Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saberi RS, Shahrokhian S, Marrazza G (2013) Amplified electrochemical DNA sensor based on polyaniline film and gold nanoparticles. Electroanalysis 25:1373–1380Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arora K, Prabhakar N, Chand S, Malhotra B (2007) Ultrasensitive DNA hybridization biosensor based on polyaniline. Biosens Bioelectron 23:613–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mickova I, Prusi A, Grčev T, Arsov L (2006) Electrochemical polymerization of aniline in presence of TiO2 nanoparticles. Maced J Chem Chem Eng 25:45–50Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tahir ZM, Alocilja EC, Grooms DL (2005) Polyaniline synthesis and its biosensor application. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1690–1695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shoaie N, Forouzandeh M, Omidfar K (2018) Voltammetric determination of the Escherichia coli DNA using a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with polyaniline and gold nanoparticles. Microchimica Acta 185:217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sen T, Mishra S, Shimpi NG (2016) Synthesis and sensing applications of polyaniline nanocomposites: a review. RSC Adv 6:42196–42222Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang J, Li Y, Li C, Zeng X, Tang W, Chen X (2017) A voltammetric study on the interaction between isoproterenol and cardiomyocyte DNA by using a glassy carbon electrode modified with carbon nanotubes, polyaniline and gold nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 184:2999–3006Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang X, Lai G, Yu A, Zhang H (2013) A glassy carbon electrode modified with a polyaniline doped with silicotungstic acid and carbon nanotubes for the sensitive amperometric determination of ascorbic acid. Microchim. Acta 180:437–443Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Syedmoradi L, Daneshpour M, Alvandipour M, Gomez FA, Hajghassem H, Omidfar K (2017) Point of care testing: The impact of nanotechnology. Biosens Bioelectron 87:373–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mahshid SS, Mahshid S, Dolati A, Ghorbani M, Yang L, Luo S, Cai Q (2011) Template-based electrodeposition of Pt/Ni nanowires and its catalytic activity towards glucose oxidation. Electrochim Acta 58:551–555Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hasanzadeh M, Shadjou N (2017) Advanced nanomaterials for use in electrochemical and optical immunoassays of carcinoembryonic antigen. A review. Microchim. Acta 184:389–414Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lai J, Yi Y, Zhu P, Shen J, Wu K, Zhang L, Liu J (2016) Polyaniline-based glucose biosensor: A review. J Electroanal Chem 782:138–153Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yazdanparast S, Benvidi A, Banaei M, Nikukar H, Tezerjani MD, Azimzadeh M (2018) Dual-aptamer based electrochemical sandwich biosensor for MCF-7 human breast cancer cells using silver nanoparticle labels and a poly(glutamic acid)/MWNT nanocomposite. Mikrochim Acta 185:405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Azimzadeh M, Rahaie M, Nasirizadeh N, Ashtari K, Naderi-Manesh H (2016) An electrochemical nanobiosensor for plasma miRNA-155, based on graphene oxide and gold nanorod, for early detection of breast cancer. Biosens Bioelectron 77:99–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mahshid S, Li C, Mahshid SS, Askari M, Dolati A, Yang L, Luo S, Cai Q (2011) Sensitive determination of dopamine in the presence of uric acid and ascorbic acid using TiO2 nanotubes modified with Pd, Pt and Au nanoparticles. Analyst 136:2322–2329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ghazizadeh E, Naseri Z, Jaafari MR, Forozandeh-Moghadam M, Hosseinkhani S (2018) A fires novel report of exosomal electrochemical sensor for sensing micro RNAs by using multi covalent attachment p19 with high sensitivity. Biosens Bioelectron 113:74–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chandra P (2015) Electrochemical nanobiosensors for cancer diagnosis. J Anal Bioanal Tech 6:1000e119Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67:7–30PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wu L, Qu X (2015) Cancer biomarker detection: recent achievements and challenges. Chem Soc Rev 44:2963–2997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Keshavarz M, Behpour M, Rafiee-pour H-A (2015) Recent trends in electrochemical microRNA biosensors for early detection of cancer. RSC Adv 5:35651–35660Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2006) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:11–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Selvolini G, Marrazza G (2017) MIP-based sensors: Promising new tools for cancer biomarker determination. Sensors 17:718Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hui W, Tian W, Yan-Xia Y, Zhang Y-X, Pei-Hui Y, Huai-Hong C, Ji-Ye C (2012) Construction of an electrochemical cytosensor based on polyaniline nanofiber/gold nanoparticle interface and application to detection of cancer cells. Chin J Anal Chem 40:184–190Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Damborska D, Bertok T, Dosekova E, Holazova A, Lorencova L, Kasak P, Tkac J (2017) Nanomaterial-based biosensors for detection of prostate specific antigen. Microchimica Acta 184:3049–3067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vural T, Yaman YT, Ozturk S, Abaci S, Denkbas EB (2018) Electrochemical immunoassay for detection of prostate specific antigen based on peptide nanotube-gold nanoparticle-polyaniline immobilized pencil graphite electrode. J Colloid Interface Sci 510:318–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tezerjani MD, Benvidi A, Rezaeinasab M, Jahanbani S, Moshtaghioun SM, Youssefi M, Zarrini K (2016) An impedimeric biosensor based on a composite of graphene nanosheets and polyaniline as a suitable platform for prostate cancer sensing. Anal Methods 8:7507–7515Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dey A, Kaushik A, Arya SK, Bhansali S (2012) Mediator free highly sensitive polyaniline–gold hybrid nanocomposite based immunosensor for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) detection. J Mater Chem 22:14763–14772Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Salahandish R, Ghaffarinejad A, Naghib SM, Majidzadeh-A K, Zargartalebi H, Sanati-Nezhad A (2018) Nano-biosensor for highly sensitive detection of HER2 positive breast cancer. Biosens Bioelectron 117:104–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Webb PM, Jordan SJ (2017) Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 41:3–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA (2017) Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med 14:9PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zheng Y, Wang H, Ma Z (2017) A nanocomposite containing Prussian Blue, platinum nanoparticles and polyaniline for multi-amplification of the signal of voltammetric immunosensors: highly sensitive detection of carcinoma antigen 125. Microchimica Acta 184:4269–4277Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wang X, Wang Q (2018) Alpha-Fetoprotein and hepatocellular carcinoma immunity. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018 Article ID 9049252:8Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Liu S, Ma Y, Cui M, Luo X (2018) Enhanced electrochemical biosensing of alpha-fetoprotein based on three-dimensional macroporous conducting polymer polyaniline. Sens Actuators B 255:2568–2574Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hui N, Sun X, Song Z, Niu S, Luo X (2016) Gold nanoparticles and polyethylene glycols functionalized conducting polyaniline nanowires for ultrasensitive and low fouling immunosensing of alpha-fetoprotein. Biosens Bioelectron 86:143–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Yu T, Zhang H, Huang Z, Luo Z, Huang N, Ding S, Feng W (2017) A Simple Electrochemical Aptamer Cytosensor for Direct Detection of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia K562 Cells. Electroanalysis 29:828–834Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Alves PU, Vinhas R, Fernandes AR, Birol SZ, Trabzon L, Bernacka-Wojcik I, Igreja R, Lopes P, Baptista PV, Águas H (2018) Multifunctional microfluidic chip for optical nanoprobe based RNA detection–application to Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Sci Rep 8:381PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wang J, Wang X, Tang H, Gao Z, He S, Li J, Han S (2018) Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of tumor cells based on multiple layer CdS quantum dots-functionalized polystyrene microspheres and graphene oxide–polyaniline composite. Biosens Bioelectron 100:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wang J, Hui N (2018) A nonfouling voltammetric immunosensor for the carcinoembryonic antigen based on the use of polyaniline nanowires wrapped with hyaluronic acid. Microchimica Acta 185:329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Fu J, Shi Z, Li M, Wang Y, Yu L (2016) Label-free detection of chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan 4 by a polyaniline/graphene nanocomposite functionalized impedimetric immunosensor. Journal of Nanomaterials 2016:2Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Singer E, Markó L, Paragas N, Barasch J, Dragun D, Müller DN, Budde K, Schmidt-Ott KM (2013) Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: pathophysiology and clinical applications. Acta physiologica 207:663–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Devarajan P (2010) Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: A troponin-like biomarker for human acute kidney injury. Nephrology 15:419–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yukird J, Wongtangprasert T, Rangkupan R, Chailapakul O, Pisitkun T, Rodthongkum N (2017) Label-free immunosensor based on graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin detection. Biosens Bioelectron 87:249–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cui J (2015) MiR-16 family as potential diagnostic biomarkers for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:1703PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Larrea E, Sole C, Manterola L, Goicoechea I, Armesto M, Arestin M, Caffarel M, Araujo A, Araiz M, Fernandez-Mercado M (2016) New concepts in cancer biomarkers: circulating miRNAs in liquid biopsies. Int J Mol Sci 17:627PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Peng Y, Yi G, Gao Z (2010) A highly sensitive microRNA biosensor based on ruthenium oxide nanoparticle-initiated polymerization of aniline. Chem Commun 46:9131–9133Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Singh R, Dhand C, Sumana G, Verma R, Sood S, Gupta RK, Malhotra BD (2010) Polyaniline/carbon nanotubes platform for sexually transmitted disease detection. J Mol Recognit 23:472–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sin ML, Mach KE, Wong PK, Liao JC (2014) Advances and challenges in biosensor-based diagnosis of infectious diseases. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 14:225–244PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lazcka O, Del Campo FJ, Munoz FX (2007) Pathogen detection: A perspective of traditional methods and biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 22:1205–1217PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zourob M, Elwary S, Turner AP (2008) Principles of bacterial detection: biosensors, recognition receptors and microsystems. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hashemi E, Forouzandeh M (2018) Designing a new biosensor “DNA ELISA” to detect Escherichia coli using genomic DNA and comparison of this method to PCR-ELISA. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 33:722–725PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Torati SR, Reddy V, Yoon SS, Kim C (2016) Electrochemical biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection based on gold nanotubes array electrode platform. Biosens Bioelectron 78:483–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hiraiwa M, Kim J-H, Lee H-B, Inoue S, Becker AL, Weigel KM, Cangelosi GA, Lee K-H, Chung J-H (2015) Amperometric immunosensor for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Micromech Microeng 25:055013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Chen Y, Li Y, Yang Y, Wu F, Cao J, Bai L (2017) A polyaniline-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a redox nanoprobe in a voltammetric DNA biosensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microchimica Acta 184:1801–1808Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Liu C, Jiang D, Xiang G, Liu L, Liu F, Pu X (2014) An electrochemical DNA biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, based on signal amplification of graphene and a gold nanoparticle–polyaniline nanocomposite. Analyst 139:5460–5465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Zhou L, He X, He D, Wang K, Qin D (2011) Biosensing technologies for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection: status and new developments. Clin Dev Immunol 2011 Article ID 193963:8Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rodovalho V, Alves L, Castro A, Madurro J, Brito-Madurro A, Santos A (2015) Biosensors Applied to Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases–An Update. Austin J Biosens & Bioelectron 1:1015Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mohd Azmi U, Yusof N, Kusnin N, Abdullah J, Suraiya S, Ong P, Ahmad Raston N, Abd Rahman S, Mohamad Fathil M (2018) Sandwich electrochemical immunosensor for early detection of tuberculosis based on graphene/polyaniline-modified screen-printed gold electrode. Sensors 18:3926Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Kumar H, Neelam R (2016) Enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors for food safety: A review. Nanobiosens Dis Diagn 5:29–39Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hailemariam M, Abebe T, Mihret A, Lambiyo T (2013) Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhea and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among symptomatic women attending gynecology outpatient department in Hawassa Referral Hospital. Ethiop J Health Sci 23:10–18PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Singh R, Verma R, Sumana G, Srivastava AK, Sood S, Gupta RK, Malhotra B (2012) Nanobiocomposite platform based on polyaniline-iron oxide-carbon nanotubes for bacterial detection. Bioelectrochemistry 86:30–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Spain E, Kojima R, Kaner RB, Wallace GG, O’Grady J, Lacey K, Barry T, Keyes TE, Forster RJ (2011) High sensitivity DNA detection using gold nanoparticle functionalised polyaniline nanofibres. Biosens Bioelectron 26:2613–2618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Ariffin EY, Lee YH, Futra D, Tan LL, Karim NHA, Ibrahim NNN, Ahmad A (2018) An ultrasensitive hollow-silica-based biosensor for pathogenic Escherichia coli DNA detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 410:2363–2375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kellner K, Ettenauer J, Zuser K, Posnicek T, Brandl M (2016) An automated, robotic biosensor for the electrochemical detection of E. coli in water. Procedia Engineering 168:594–597Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wildeboer D, Amirat L, Price RG, Abuknesha RA (2010) Rapid detection of Escherichia coli in water using a hand-held fluorescence detector. Water Res 44:2621–2628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Mo X, Wu Z, Huang J, Zhao G, Dou W (2019) A sensitive and regenerative electrochemical immunosensor for quantitative detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7 based on stable polyaniline coated screen-printed carbon electrode and rGO-NR-Au@ Pt. Anal Methods 11:1475–1482Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Magliano DJ, Bennett PH (2016) Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 12:616–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Yoo E-H, Lee S-Y (2010) Glucose biosensors: an overview of use in clinical practice. Sensors 10:4558–4576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Salek-Maghsoudi A, Vakhshiteh F, Torabi R, Hassani S, Ganjali MR, Norouzi P, Hosseini M, Abdollahi M (2018) Recent advances in biosensor technology in assessment of early diabetes biomarkers. Biosens Bioelectron 99:122–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Tracey ML, Gilmartin M, O’Neill K, Fitzgerald AP, McHugh SM, Buckley CM, Canavan RJ, Kearney PM (2016) Epidemiology of diabetes and complications among adults in the Republic of Ireland 1998-2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 16:132PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, Singh GM, Cowan MJ, Paciorek CJ, Lin JK, Farzadfar F, Khang Y-H, Stevens GA (2011) National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2· 7 million participants. The Lancet 378:31–40Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Thakur B, Amarnath CA, Sawant SN (2014) Pectin coated polyaniline nanoparticles for an amperometric glucose biosensor. RSC Adv 4:40917–40923Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Zhai D, Liu B, Shi Y, Pan L, Wang Y, Li W, Zhang R, Yu G (2013) Highly sensitive glucose sensor based on Pt nanoparticle/polyaniline hydrogel heterostructures. ACS Nano 7:3540–3546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    U. Tamer, A.İ. Seçkin, E. Temur, H. Torul, Fabrication of biosensor based on polyaniline/gold nanorod composite, International Journal of Electrochemistry, 2011 (2011) Article ID 869742, 7 pages.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Nguyen HB, Ngo TTT, Nguyen NT, Dang TTH, Do PQ, Nguyen XN, Nguyen XP, Phan HK, Phan NM (2012) Graphene patterned polyaniline-based biosensor for glucose detection. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 3:025011Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Xu M, Song Y, Ye Y, Gong C, Shen Y, Wang L, Wang L (2017) A novel flexible electrochemical glucose sensor based on gold nanoparticles/polyaniline arrays/carbon cloth electrode. Sens Actuators B 252:1187–1193Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Wu S, Su F, Dong X, Ma C, Pang L, Peng D, Wang M, He L, Zhang Z (2017) Development of glucose biosensors based on plasma polymerization-assisted nanocomposites of polyaniline, tin oxide, and three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide. Appl Surf Sci 401:262–270Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Esmaeeli A, Ghaffarinejad A, Zahedi A, Vahidi O (2018) Copper oxide-polyaniline nanofiber modified fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) electrode as non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Sens Actuators B 266:294–301Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Wang Y, Zhong J, Ding F, Zhao Q, Zhang Z, Liu X, Liu Y, Rao H, Zou P, Wang X (2018) A bifunctional NiCo 2 S 4/reduced graphene oxide@ polyaniline nanocomposite as a highly-efficient electrode for glucose and rutin detection. New J Chem 42:9398–9409Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Chauhan N, Pundir CS (2011) An amperometric uric acid biosensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotube–gold nanoparticle composite. Anal Biochem 413:97–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Rawal R, Chawla S, Chauhan N, Dahiya T, Pundir C (2012) Construction of amperometric uric acid biosensor based on uricase immobilized on PBNPs/cMWCNT/PANI/Au composite. Int J Biol Macromol 50:112–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Devi R, Pundir C (2014) Construction and application of an amperometric uric acid biosensor based on covalent immobilization of uricase on iron oxide nanoparticles/chitosan-g-polyaniline composite film electrodeposited on Pt electrode. Sens Actuators B 193:608–615Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Erden PE, Kılıç E (2013) A review of enzymatic uric acid biosensors based on amperometric detection. Talanta 107:312–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    El Kurdi R, Patra D (2018) Gold nanoparticles functionalized with Pluronic are viable optical probes for the determination of uric acid. Microchimica Acta 185:185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Bhambi M, Sumana G, Malhotra B, Pundir C (2010) An amperomertic uric acid biosensor based on immobilization of uricase onto polyaniline-multiwalled carbon nanotube composite film. Artif Cells Blood Substit Biotechnol 38:178–185Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Xu L, Zhang M, Hou Y, Huang W, Yao C, Wu Q (2015) An Au nanocomposite based biosensor for determination of cholesterol. Anal Methods 7:3480–3485Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Muhammet SM, Çete S, Arslan F, Yaşar A (2009) Amperometric cholesterol biosensors based on the electropolymerization of pyrrole and aniline in sulphuric acid for the determination of cholesterol in serum. Artif Cells Blood Substit Biotechnol 37:273–278Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Singh K, Chauhan R, Solanki PR, Basu T (2013) Development of Impedimetric Biosensor for Total Cholesterol Estimation Based on Polypyrrole and Platinum Nanoparticle Multi Layer Nanocomposite. J Org Chem 3:262Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Khan R, Solanki PR, Kaushik A, Singh S, Ahmad S, Malhotra B (2009) Cholesterol biosensor based on electrochemically prepared polyaniline conducting polymer film in presence of a nonionic surfactant. J. Polym. Res. 16:363–373Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Srivastava M, Srivastava S, Nirala N, Prakash R (2014) A chitosan-based polyaniline–Au nanocomposite biosensor for determination of cholesterol. Anal Methods 6:817–824Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Dhand C, Arya SK, Datta M, Malhotra B (2008) Polyaniline–carbon nanotube composite film for cholesterol biosensor. Anal Biochem 383:194–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Deepshikha R, Chauhan PR, Solanki TB (2012) Fabrication of bienzymatic cholesterol biosensor based on gold nanoparticles decorated graphene-nanostructured polyaniline nanocomposite. Int. J. Biomed. Nanosci. Nanotechnol 2:251–275Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    McKeating KS, Aubé A, Masson J-F (2016) Biosensors and nanobiosensors for therapeutic drug and response monitoring. Analyst 141:429–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Chawla PK, Udwadia ZF, Soman R, Mahashur AA, Amale RA, Dherai AJ, Lokhande RV, Naik PR, Ashavaid TF (2016) Importance of therapeutic drug monitoring of rifampicin. J Assoc Physicians India 64:68–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Meneghello A, Tartaggia S, Alvau MD, Polo F, Toffoli G (2018) Biosensing technologies for therapeutic drug monitoring. Curr Med Chem 25:4354–4377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Gao J, Liu ZJ, Chen T, Zhao D (2014) Pharmaceutical properties of calycosin, the major bioactive isoflavonoid in the dry root extract of Radix astragali. Pharm Biol 52:1217–1222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Cai J, Sun B, Gou X, Gou Y, Li W, Hu F (2018) A novel way for analysis of calycosin via polyaniline functionalized graphene quantum dots fabricated electrochemical sensor. J Electroanal Chem 816:123–131Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Prasad BB, Srivastava S, Tiwari K, Sharma PS (2009) Development of uracil and 5-fluorouracil sensors based on molecularly imprinted polymer-modified hanging mercury drop electrode (S & M 0769). Sensor Mater 21:291Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Zahed FM, Hatamluyi B, Lorestani F, Es’haghi Z (2018) Silver nanoparticles decorated polyaniline nanocomposite based electrochemical sensor for the determination of anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil. J Pharm Biomed Anal 161:12–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Mostafavi M, Yaftian MR, Piri F, Shayani-Jam H (2018) A new diclofenac molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor based upon a polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide nano-composite. Biosens Bioelectron 122:160–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Wong A, Marestoni LD, Sotomayor MD (2014) Monitoring of diclofenac with biomimetic sensor in batch and FIA systems. J Braz Chem Soc 25:1283–1291Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Chen L, Xu S, Li J (2011) Recent advances in molecular imprinting technology: current status, challenges and highlighted applications. Chem Soc Rev 40:2922–2942PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Adumitrăchioaie A, Tertiș M, Cernat A, Săndulescu R, Cristea C (2018) Electrochemical methods based on molecularly imprinted polymers for drug detection. A review. Int J Electrochem Sci 13:2556–2576Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Rajpurohit AS, Punde NS, Rawool CR, Srivastava AK (2018) Application of carbon paste electrode modified with carbon nanofibres/polyaniline/platinum nanoparticles as an electrochemical sensor for the determination of bezafibrate. Electroanalysis 30:571–582Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Rezazadeh F, Mohamadi M, Afzali D, Shamspur T, Mostafavi A (2015) A quercetin biosensor based on chitosan-entrapped carbon nanotube paste electrode coated with DNA. J AOAC Int 98:1375–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Jiang W, Yang S, Sun X, Lu W, Jiang D, Xu L, Xu H, Gao B, Ma M, Cao F (2018) Quercetin-coated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticle sensors based on low-field NMR for determination and removal of Pb 2+ and Cu 2+ in biological samples. Anal Methods 10:2494–2502Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Ponnaiah SK, Periakaruppan P (2018) A glassy carbon electrode modified with a copper tungstate and polyaniline nanocomposite for voltammetric determination of quercetin. Microchim Acta 185:524Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Yu Z, Li H, Zhang X, Liu N, Tan W, Zhang X, Zhang L (2016) Facile synthesis of NiCo2O4@ Polyaniline core–shell nanocomposite for sensitive determination of glucose. Biosens Bioelectron 75:161–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Dehghani M, Nasirizadeh N, Yazdanshenas ME (2019) Determination of cefixime using a novel electrochemical sensor produced with gold nanowires/graphene oxide/electropolymerized molecular imprinted polymer. Mater Sci Eng C 96:654–660Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Fatahi A, Malakooti R, Shahlaei M (2017) Electrocatalytic oxidation and determination of dexamethasone at an Fe 3 O 4/PANI–Cu II microsphere modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. RSC Adv 7:11322–11330Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Wang Q, Zhao R, Wang S, Guo H, Li J, Zhou H, Wang X, Wu X, Wang Y, Chen W (2016) A highly selective electrochemical sensor for nifedipine based on layer-by-layer assembly films from polyaniline and multiwalled carbon nanotube. J Appl Polym Sci:133Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    Yang Y, Yan Y, Chen X, Zhai W, Xu Y, Liu Y (2014) Investigation of a polyaniline-coated copper hexacyanoferrate modified glassy carbon electrode as a sulfite sensor. Electrocatalysis 5:344–353Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Rawal R, Chawla S, Dahiya T, Pundir CS (2011) Development of an amperometric sulfite biosensor based on a gold nanoparticles/chitosan/multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline-modified gold electrode. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:2599–2608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Rawal R, Chawla S, Pundir C (2011) Polyphenol biosensor based on laccase immobilized onto silver nanoparticles/multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyaniline gold electrode. Anal Biochem 419:196–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Chawla S, Rawal R, Sharma S, Pundir CS (2012) An amperometric biosensor based on laccase immobilized onto nickel nanoparticles/carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline modified gold electrode for determination of phenolic content in fruit juices. Biochem Eng J 68:76–84Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Batra B, Lata S, Sharma M, Pundir C (2013) An acrylamide biosensor based on immobilization of hemoglobin onto multiwalled carbon nanotube/copper nanoparticles/polyaniline hybrid film. Anal Biochem 433:210–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Sun X, Qiao L, Wang X (2013) A novel immunosensor based on Au nanoparticles and polyaniline/multiwall carbon nanotubes/chitosan nanocomposite film functionalized interface. Nano-Micro Letters 5:191–201Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    He L, Cui B, Liu J, Song Y, Wang M, Peng D, Zhang Z (2018) Novel electrochemical biosensor based on core-shell nanostructured composite of hollow carbon spheres and polyaniline for sensitively detecting malathion. Sens Actuators B 258:813–821Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Khan I, Pandit UJ, Wankar S, Das R, Limaye SN (2017) Fabrication of electrochemical nanosensor based on polyaniline film-coated AgNP-MWCNT-modified GCE and its application for trace analysis of fenitrothion. Ionics 23:1293–1308Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Zhang C, Govindaraju S, Giribabu K, Huh YS, Yun K (2017) AgNWs-PANI nanocomposite based electrochemical sensor for detection of 4-nitrophenol. Sens Actuators B 252:616–623Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Saadati F, Ghahramani F, Shayani-jam H, Piri F, Yaftian MR (2018) Synthesis and characterization of nanostructure molecularly imprinted polyaniline/graphene oxide composite as highly selective electrochemical sensor for detection of p-nitrophenol. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 86:213–221Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Rapini R, Cincinelli A, Marrazza G (2016) Acetamiprid multidetection by disposable electrochemical DNA aptasensor. Talanta 161:15–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Selvolini G, Băjan I, Hosu O, Cristea C, Săndulescu R, Marrazza G (2018) DNA-based sensor for the detection of an organophosphorus pesticide: Profenofos. Sensors 18:2035Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Van Chuc N, Binh NH, Thanh CT, Van Tu N, Le Huy N, Dzung NT, Minh PN, Thu VT, Dai Lam T (2016) Electrochemical immunosensor for detection of atrazine based on polyaniline/graphene. J. Mater. Sci. Technol 32:539–544Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Deep A, Saraf M, Bharadwaj SK, Sharma AL (2014) Styrene sulphonic acid doped polyaniline based immunosensor for highly sensitive impedimetric sensing of atrazine. Electrochim Acta 146:301–306Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Yang Y, Kang M, Fang S, Wang M, He L, Zhao J, Zhang H, Zhang Z (2015) Electrochemical biosensor based on three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide and polyaniline nanocomposite for selective detection of mercury ions. Sens Actuators B 214:63–69Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Tang L, Xie X, Zhou Y, Zeng G, Tang J, Wu Y, Long B, Peng B, Zhu J (2017) A reusable electrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive detection of mercury ions with an anionic intercalator supported on ordered mesoporous carbon/self-doped polyaniline nanofibers platform. Biochem Eng J 117:7–14Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    Chowdhury AN, Ferdousi S, Islam MM, Okajima T, Ohsaka T (2007) Arsenic detection by nanogold/conducting-polymer-modified glassy carbon electrodes. J Appl Polym Sci 104:1306–1311Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    de Barros A, Constantino CJL, da Cruz NC, Bortoleto JRR, Ferreira M (2017) High performance of electrochemical sensors based on LbL films of gold nanoparticles, polyaniline and sodium montmorillonite clay mineral for simultaneous detection of metal ions. Electrochim Acta 235:700–708Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Kong Y, Wu T, Wu D, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Du B, Wei Q (2018) An electrochemical sensor based on Fe 3 O 4@ PANI nanocomposites for sensitive detection of Pb 2+ and Cd 2+. Anal Methods 10:4784–4792Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Deshmukh MA, Patil HK, Bodkhe GA, Yasuzawa M, Koinkar P, Ramanaviciene A, Shirsat MD, Ramanavicius A (2018) EDTA-modified PANI/SWNTs nanocomposite for differential pulse voltammetry based determination of Cu (II) ions. Sens Actuators B 260:331–338Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Mehennaoui S, Poorahong S, Jimenez GC, Siaj M (2019) Selection of high affinity aptamer-ligand for dexamethasone and its electrochemical biosensor. Sci Rep 9:6600PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Mantas A, Mihranyan A (2019) Immediate-release nifedipine binary dry powder mixtures with nanocellulose featuring enhanced solubility and dissolution rate. Pharmaceutics 11:37PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Fakhri A, Shahidi S, Agarwal S, Gupta VK (2016) Electrocatalytic oxidation behavior of cefixime antibiotic at bimetallic Pt-W nanoparticle-decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified glassy Carbon electrode and its determination. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 11:1530–1540Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Pundir CS, Rawal R (2013) Determination of sulfite with emphasis on biosensing methods: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:3049–3062PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Bahmani B, Moztarzadeh F, Hossini M, Rabiee M, Tahriri M, Rezvannia M, Alizadeh M (2009) A sulfite biosensor fabricated by immobilization of sulfite oxidase on aluminum electrode modified with electropolymerized conducting film (polyaniline). Asian J. Chem 21:923Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    Ozcan T, Akpinar-Bayizit A, Yilmaz-Ersan L, Delikanli B (2014) Phenolics in human health. International Journal of chemical Engineering and applications 5:393Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Nguyen H, Lee S, Lee U, Fermin C, Kim M (2019) Immobilized enzymes in biosensor applications. Materials 12:121PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Hasan A, Nurunnabi M, Morshed M, Paul A, Polini A, Kuila T, Al Hariri M, Lee Y-K, Jaffa AA (2014) Recent advances in application of biosensors in tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int 2014 Article ID 307519:18Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    Huang S, Lu S, Huang C, Sheng J, Zhang L, Su W, Xiao Q (2016) An electrochemical biosensor based on single-stranded DNA modified gold electrode for acrylamide determination. Sens Actuators B 224:22–30Google Scholar
  170. 170.
    Hu Q, Xu X, Fu Y, Li Y (2015) Rapid methods for detecting acrylamide in thermally processed foods: A review. Food Control 56:135–146Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Stobiecka A, Radecka H, Radecki J (2007) Novel voltammetric biosensor for determining acrylamide in food samples. Biosens Bioelectron 22:2165–2170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Batra B, Lata S, Pundir C (2013) Construction of an improved amperometric acrylamide biosensor based on hemoglobin immobilized onto carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes/iron oxide nanoparticles/chitosan composite film. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:1591–1599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Dhull V, Gahlaut A, Dilbaghi N, Hooda V (2013) Acetylcholinesterase biosensors for electrochemical detection of organophosphorus compounds: A review. Biochem Res Int 2013) Article ID 731501:18Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    Cesarino I, Moraes FC, Lanza MR, Machado SA (2012) Electrochemical detection of carbamate pesticides in fruit and vegetables with a biosensor based on acetylcholinesterase immobilised on a composite of polyaniline–carbon nanotubes. Food Chem 135:873–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Bolat G, Abaci S (2018) Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Sensing of Malathion Pesticide in Tomato and Apple Samples Based on Gold Nanoparticles-Chitosan-Ionic Liquid Hybrid Nanocomposite. Sensors 18:773Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Bala R, Swami A, Tabujew I, Peneva K, Wangoo N, Sharma RK (2018) Ultra-sensitive detection of malathion using quantum dots-polymer based fluorescence aptasensor. Biosens Bioelectron 104:45–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Guler M, Turkoglu V, Kivrak A (2016) Electrochemical detection of malathion pesticide using acetylcholinesterase biosensor based on glassy carbon electrode modified with conducting polymer film. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:12343–12351Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    Tefera M, Admassie S, Tessema M, Mehretie S (2015) Electrochemical Sensor for Determination of Fenitrothion at Multi-wall Carbon Nanotubes Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Anal Bioanal Chem Res 2:139–150Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    Rao H, Guo W, Hou H, Wang H, Yin B, Xue Z, Zhao G (2017) Electroanalytical investigation of p-nitrophenol with dual electroactive groups on a reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:1052–1063Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Rapini R, Marrazza G (2015) DNA technology for small molecules sensing: a new approach for Acetamiprid detection, AISEM Annual Conference, 2015 XVIII. IEEE:1–4Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Zhou W, Huang P-JJ, Ding J, Liu J (2014) Aptamer-based biosensors for biomedical diagnostics. Analyst 139:2627–2640PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Norouzi P, Larijani B, Ganjali M, Faridbod F (2012) Admittometric electrochemical determination of atrazine by nano-composite immune-biosensor using FFT-square wave voltammetry. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:10414–10426Google Scholar
  183. 183.
    Švorc Ľ, Rievaj M, Bustin D (2013) Green electrochemical sensor for environmental monitoring of pesticides: Determination of atrazine in river waters using a boron-doped diamond electrode. Sens Actuators B 181:294–300Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Liu X, Li W-J, Li L, Yang Y, Mao L-G, Peng Z (2014) A label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on gold nanoparticles for direct detection of atrazine. Sens Actuators B 191:408–414Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Hayes TB, Khoury V, Narayan A, Nazir M, Park A, Brown T, Adame L, Chan E, Buchholz D, Stueve T (2010) Atrazine induces complete feminization and chemical castration in male African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:4612–4617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Jiwan S (2011) Effects of heavy metals on soil, plants, human health and aquatic life. IJRCE 1:15–21Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    Singh R, Gautam N, Mishra A, Gupta R (2011) Heavy metals and living systems: an overview. Indian J Pharm 43:246Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    Dong Y, Zhou Y, Ding Y, Chu X, Wang C (2014) Sensitive detection of Pb (II) at gold nanoparticle/polyaniline/graphene modified electrode using differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Methods 6:9367–9374Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Kumar SaA (2008) Recent advances in DNA biosensor. Sensors & Transducers 92:122–133Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nahid Shoaie
    • 1
  • Maryam Daneshpour
    • 2
  • Mostafa Azimzadeh
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Sara Mahshid
    • 6
  • Seyyed Mehdi Khoshfetrat
    • 7
    • 8
  • Fatemeh Jahanpeyma
    • 1
  • Alieh Gholaminejad
    • 1
  • Kobra Omidfar
    • 7
    • 8
    Email author
  • Mehdi Foruzandeh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyTarbiat Modares University of Medical ScienceTehranIran
  2. 2.Biotechnology Department, School of Advanced Technologies in MedicineShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Medical Nanotechnology & Tissue Engineering Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences InstituteShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesYazdIran
  4. 4.Stem Cell Biology Research Center, Yazd Reproductive Sciences InstituteShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesYazdIran
  5. 5.Department of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, School of ParamedicineShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesYazdIran
  6. 6.Department of BioengineeringMcGill UniversityQuebecCanada
  7. 7.Biosensor Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences InstituteTehran University of Medical ScienceTehranIran
  8. 8.Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations