Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:415 | Cite as

Voltammetric determination of the antimalarial drug chloroquine using a glassy carbon electrode modified with reduced graphene oxide on WS2 quantum dots

  • Monika SrivastavaEmail author
  • Preeti Tiwari
  • Vineet Kumar Mall
  • S. K. Srivastava
  • Rajiv PrakashEmail author
Original Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

A voltammetric method is described for the determination of chloroquine (CQ) and validated simultaneously by two techniques and in three different conditions. The WS2 quantum dots (WS2 QDs) were synthesized by a hydrothermal method and then placed on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets. The resulting composite material was then deposited on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) where it showed excellent electroactivity. The modified GCE responds to chloroquine at a typical potential maximum of 1.2 V (vs. AgCl/Ag). Techniques including cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry were tested. Features of merit include (a) a wide linear response (in the 0.5 μM to 82 μM CQ concentration range), (b) an electrochemical sensitivity of 0.143–0.90 μA·μM−1·cm−2), and a 40–120 nM limit of detection (at S/N = 3). The sensor has excellent selectivity even in the presence of potentially interfering biological compounds. Responses were tested in phosphate buffer, human serum and pharmaceutical formulations, and no cross reactivity or matrix effects were found. In all the three cases, quite satisfactory recoveries were obtained.

Graphical abstract

Schematic representation of the mechanism for electro-oxidation of chloroquine on a glassy carbon electrode modified with an rGO@WS2 quantum dot composite. The sensor displays enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards chloroquine. The method was validated in biological samples and pharmaceutical formulations.

Keywords

Chloroquine phosphate Anti-malarial drug Reduced graphene oxide WS2 quantum dots Synergistic effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author (MS) is grateful to DST, New Delhi (SR/WOS-A/CS-52/2018) for fellowship. The authors are also thankful to Prof. D. Dash, Institute of Medical Science, BHU,Varanasi, for the help extended towards availing blood serum and CIF, IIT (BHU) Varanasi for providing various characterization facilities.

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. Monika Srivastava and Preeti Tiwari with Vineet have carried out experiments and are responsible for raw data if required. Human blood serum was collected from blood donors of the institute using our institute hospital (Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi) facility following the methods in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the Biochemistry lab of the Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi and further, it is sanctioned by institutional committee (Institute Ethical Committee) and consent was obtained from all subjects.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3525_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1 mb)
ESM 1 It includes FT-IR Spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, Energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy of WS2 QDs, rGO and rGO@WS2 QDs. It further covers CV responses of rGO@WS2 QDs modified GCE towards electro-oxidation of CQ in buffer, blood serum and in pharmaceutical formulation. (DOC 1030 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tracy JW, Webster LT, Brunton L, Parker K, Lazo J, Buxton I (1996) Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, D. Blumenthal (Eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, , pp. 965Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weingarten HL, Cherry EJA (1981) A chloroquine fatality. Clin Toxicol 18:959–963.  https://doi.org/10.3109/15563658108990324 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thapliyal N, Chiwunze TE, Karpoormath R, Goyal RN, Patel H, Cherukupalli S (2016) Reasearch progress in electroanalytical techniques for detremination of antimalarial drugs in pharmaceutical and biological samples. RSC Adv 6:57580–57680.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra05025e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saad B, Zin ZM, Jab MS, Rehman IA, Saleh MI, Mahsufi S (2005)Flow-through chloroquine sensor and its applications in pharmaceutical analysis. Anal Sci 21:521–524.  https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.21.521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Savarino A, Trani LD, Donatelli I, Cauda R, Cassone A (2006) New insights into the antiviral effects of chloroquine. Lancet Infect Dis 6:67–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70361-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sotelo J, Brice˜no E, L’opez-Gonz’alez MA (2006) Adding chloroquine to conventional treatment for Glibostoma Multiforme: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 144:337–343.  https://doi.org/10.7326/003-4819-144-5-200603070-00008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muhm M, Stimpfl T, Malzer R, Mortinger H, Binder R, Vycudilik W, Berzlanovich A, Bauer G, Laggner AN (1996) Suicidal chloroquine poisoning: clinical course, autopsy findings, and chemical analysis. J Forensic Sci 41:1077–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14054J CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qarah AS N, Basavaiah K, Swamy N (2017) Sensitive and selective extraction-free spectrophotometric assay of chloroquine phosphate in pharmaceuticals based on ion-pair reaction with Bromocresol green and Bromocresol purple. Pharm Anal Acta 8(3):539–566.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-2435.1000539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ducharme J, Farinotti R (1997) Rapid and simple method to determine chloroquine and its desethylated metabolites in human microsomes by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B 698:243–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00273-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Croes K, McCarthy PT, Flanagan RJ (1994) Simple and rapid HPLC of quinine, Hydrochloroquine, chloroquine, and Desethylchloroquine in serum, whole blood, and filter paper-adsorbed dry blood. J Anal Toxicol 18:255–260.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/18.5.255 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papadopoulos K, Triantis T, Dimotikali D, Nikokavouras J (2000)Radiostorage- and photostoragechemiluminescence: analytical prospects. Anal Chim Acta 423:239–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01118-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Radi A (2005) Accumulation and trace measurement of chloroquine drug at DNA-modified carbon paste electrode. Talanta 65:271–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.05.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiao L, Zhang L, Wang X, Diankov G, Dai H (2009) Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature 458:877–880.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07919 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park S, Ruoff RS (2009) Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechnol 4:217–224.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.581 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ding J, Sun W, Wei G, Su Z (2015) Cuprous oxide microspheres on graphene nanosheets: an enhanced material for non- enzymatic electrochemical detection of H2O2 and glucose. RSC Adv 5:35338–35345.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA04164C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang P, Lu X, Huang Y, Deng J, Zhang L, Ding F, Su Z, Wei G, Schmidt OG (2015) MoS2 nanosheets decorated with gold nanoparticles for rechargeable LiO2 batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:14562–14566.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA02945G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu S, Wang J, Fan W (2015)Graphene-based catalysis for biomass conversion. Catal Sci Technol 5:3845–3858.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY00339C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee SY, Kim JM, Kim KS, Ahn J-H, Kim P, Choi J-Y, Hong H (2009) Large scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457:706–710.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07719 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neto AHC, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81:109–162.  https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu Z, Liu Q, Huang Y, Ma Y, Yin S, Zhang X, Sun W, Chen Y (2008) Organic photovoltaic devices based on a novel acceptor material: graphene. Adv Mater 20:3924–3930.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xiong D, Li X, Shan H, Zhao Y, Dong L, Xu H, Zhang X, Li D, Sun X (2015) Oxygencontaining functional groups enhancing electrochemical performance of porous reduced graphene oxide cathode in lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 174:762–769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Becerril HA, Mao J, Liu Z, Stoltenberg RM, Bao Z, Chen Y (2008) Evaluation of solution processed reduced graphene oxide films as transparent conductors. ACS Nano 2:463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn700375n CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shin H-J, Kim KK, Benayad A, Yoon S-M, Park HK, Jung I-S, Jin MH, Jeong H-K, Kim JM, Choi J-Y, Lee YH (2009) Efficient reduction of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its effect on electrical conductance. Adv Funct Mater 19:1987–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200900167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yin S, Men X, Sun H, She P, Zhang W, Wu C, Qin W, Chen X (2015) Enhanced photocurrent generation of bio-inspiredgrapheme/ZnO comppsite films. J Mater Chem A 3:12016–12022.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA02297E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Du Y, Zhao Y, Qu Y, Chen CH, Chen CM, Chuang CH, Zhu Y (2014) Enhanced light-matter interaction of grapheme-glod nanoparticle hybrid films for high performance SERS detection. J Mater Chem C 2:4683–4691.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TC00353E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao X, Zhang P, Chen Y, Su Z, Wei G (2015) Recent advances in the fabrication and structure-specific applications of grapheme-based inorganic hybrid membranes. Nanoscale 7:5080–5093.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00084J CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumar A, Prakash R (2014) Graphene sheets modified with Polyindole for electrochemical detection of dopamine. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:2501–2506.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.8549 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Salavagione HJ, Díez-Pascual AM, Lázaro E, Vera S, Gómez-Fatou MA (2014) Chemical sensors based on polymer composites with carbon nanotubes and grapheme: the role of the polymer. J Mater Chem A 2:14289–14328.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA02159B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu Y, Wang R, Zhu Y, Li R, Zhang J (2015) Photochemical sensing of catechol based on CdS-DNA-pristine grapheme nanocomposite film. Sensors Actuators B Chem 210:355–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Srivastava M, Nirala NR, Srivastava SK, Prakash R (2018) A comparative study of Aptasensor vs Immunosensor for label-free PSA Cancer detection on GQDs-AuNRs modified screen-printed electrodes. Sci Rep 8:1923–1933.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19733-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen M, Su H, Mao L, Guo M, Tang J (2018) Highly sensitive electrochemical DNA sensor based on the use of three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene. Microchim Acta 185:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2588-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xing L, Ma Z (2016) A glassy carbon electrode modified with nanocomposite consisiting of MoS2 and reduced graphene oxide for electrochemical simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid. Microchim Acta 183:257–263.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-015-1648-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dadkhah S, Ziaei E, Mehdinia A, Kayyal TB, Jabbari A (2016) A glassy carbon electrode modified with amino-functionalized grahene oxide and molecularly imprinted polymer for electrochemical sensing of bisphenol a. Microchim Acta 183:1933–1941.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-1824-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yan X, Dai Y, Chen M, Wang J, Ren J, Wang Q, Wu Y, Ye N, Wang Y, Cheng X (2017) WS2 nanosheets decorated by ag nanoparticles with different content and uniform distribution for enhanced electrochemical properties. J Nanopart Res 19(5):165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3865-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang XH, Tan H, Fan Z, Ge MZ, Ye X, Xue MQ (2017) Synthesis and electrochemical performance of ultrathin WS2 nanosheets. Chalcogenide Lett 14(10):419–423Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhou Y, Sui C, Yin H, Wang Y, Wang M, Ai S (2018) Tungsten disulfide (WS2) nanosheet-based photoelectrochemical aptasensing of chloramphenicol. Microchim Acta 185(10):453–460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-2970-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gopalakrishnan D, Damien D, Shaijumon MM (2014) MoS2 Quatum dot-interspersed exfoliated MoS2 Nanosheets. ACS Nano 8:5297–5303.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn501479e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang Z-C, Wang M, Yong AM, Wong SY, Zhang X-H, Tan H, Chang AY, Li X, Wang J (2011) Intrinsically fluorescent carbon dots with tunable emission derived from hydrothermal treatment of glucose in the presence of monopotassium phosphate. Chem Commun 47:11615–11617.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC14860E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yang Y, Cui J, Zheng M, Hu C, Tan S, Xiao Y, Yang Q, Liu Y (2012)One-step synthesis of amino-functionalized fluorescent carbon nanoparticles by hydrothermal carbonization of chitosan. Chem Commun 48:380–382.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC15678K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tiwari P, Nirala NR, Prakash R (2018) Determination of the anti-HIV drug Nevirapine using electroactive 2D material Pd@rGO decorated with MoS2 quantum dots. Chemistry Select 3:5341–5347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201702250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao X, He D, Wang Y, Fu C (2018) Facile fabrication of tungsten disulfide quantum dots (WS2 QDs) as effective probes for fluorescence detection of dopamine (DA). Mater Chem Phys 207:130–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Singh MK, Pandey RK, Prakash R (2017)High-performance photo detector based on hydrothermally grown SnO2nanowire/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) hybrid material. Org Electron 50:359–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yan Y, Zhang C, Gu W, Ding C, Li X, Xian Y (2016) Facile synthesis of water-soluble WS2 quantum dots for turn-on fluorescent measurement of lipoic acid. J Phys Chem C 120:12170–12177.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rafati AA, Afraz A (2014) Amperometric sensing of anti-HIV drug zidovudine on ag nanofilm-multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater Sci Eng C 39:105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mathur NC, Goyal RN, Malik WU (1990) Oxidation of 2-aminoquinoline at a stationary pyrolytic graphite electrode. Anal Chim Acta 230:91–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)82765-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lama K, Stephen J, Van W, William EG (2017)One-electron oxidation of chloroquine, cymanquine, and related aminoquinolines in nonaqueous media. J Electroanal Chem 799:531–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.06.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mashhadizadeh MH, Akbarian M (2009) Voltammetric determination of some anti-malarial drugs using a carbon paste electrode modified with Cu(OH)2 nano-wire. Talanta. 78:1440–1445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2009.02.040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and Technology, Indian Institute of TechnologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Institute of ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations