Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 186:474 | Cite as

Magnetite nanoparticles with aminomethylenephosphonic groups: synthesis, characterization and uptake of europium(III) ions from aqueous media

  • Liudmyla Kostenko
  • Natalia KobylinskaEmail author
  • Sergey Khainakov
  • Santiago Garcia Granda
Original Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Two adsorbents with covalently bound aminomethylenephosphonic acid functions (and referred to as MNPs/AMPA and MNPs/SiO2-AMPA) were synthesized from two types of amino-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) via Moedritzer-Irani reaction. The sorbents with anchored dopamine ligand (MNPs/dopa) or aminopropyl groups (MNPs/SiO2-NH2), and the MNPs/AMPA were characterized by X-ray diffraction, FTIR, transmission electron microscopy and vibrating sample magnetometry. Surface modification does not adversely impact the physical properties of the starting magnetite. Compared to the size of the unmodified Fe3O4 (magnetite) nanoparticles (7–12 nm), the average size of functionalized nanoparticles is increased to 10–16 nm. Similarly, the magnetic saturation decreased from 67.5 emu g-1 to 42.0 emu g−1, and the surface area is increased up to 205 m2 g−1 for MNPs/SiO2-AMPA. The kinetics of the adsorption of Eu(III) on the sorbent is ultra-fast, and equilibria are attained within 5–10 min at room temperature. The adsorption kinetics can be described by a pseudo-second-order model. Adsorption and desorption conditions were tested with respect to the removal of Eu(III) ions from water solution. The adsorption capacities for Eu(III) at pH 7.0 are 77 mg g−1 and 69 mg g−1 for MNPs/AMPA and MNPs/SiO2-AMPA nanoparticles, respectively. Eu(III) was quantified by ICP-MS. The limit of detection (LOD) for Eu(III) is 0.05 ng L−1 (based on the 3σ criterion), with an enrichment factor of 150. The selectivity over ions such as Tb(III), Fe(III), Zn(II), Cu(II), and Ca(II) ions was studied. Under optimal condition the distribution coefficient for Eu(III) relative to these ions is near 105 mL g−1. The sorbents can be easily retrieved from even large volumes of aqueous solutions by magnetic separations. The method was tested for spiked water samples (with recoveries from 96.6–102.5%) and for rock minerals.

Graphical abstract

A schematic showing the regeneration of magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs), core-shell (MNPs/SiO2), and the structures with covalently bonded aminomethylenephosphonic acid (AMPA) after preconcentration of Eu(III) from largewater sample volumes onto a small specimen.

Keywords

Core-shell salinization ICP-MS Selectivity adsorption Magnetic solid phase extraction Preconcentration Rare earth elements Environmental water Rock samples 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO, Spain) MAT2016-78155-C2-1-R and EU (FP-7-PEOPLE-2009-IRSES grant No. 247603). The authors thank research members of the Department of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (Oviedo, Spain) for the collaboration.

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2019_3520_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1.03 MB)

References

  1. 1.
    Binnemans K (2009) Lanthanide-based luminescent hybrid materials. Chem Rev 109:4283–4374.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr8003983 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tan X, Fang M, Wang X (2010) Sorption speciation of lanthanides/actinides on minerals by TRLFS, EXAFS and DFT studies: a review. Molecules 15:8431–8468.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15118431 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houk RS (1990) Chapter 91 Elemental analysis by atomic emission and mass spectrometry with inductively coupled plasmas. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anastopoulos I, Bhatnagar A, Lima EC (2016) Adsorption of rare earth metals : a review of recent literature Adsorption of rare earth metals: A review of recent literature. J Mol Liq 221:954–962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nishihama S, Harano T, Yoshizuka K (2018) Silica-based solvent impregnated adsorbents for separation of rare earth metals. Sep Sci Technol 53:1027–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2017.1310895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu M (2017) Graphene oxide @ mg 3 Si 4 O 9 ( OH ) 10 : a hierarchical layered silicate nanocomposite with superior adsorption capacity for enriching Eu ( III ). Chem Eng J 9:628–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Queffélec C, Petit M, Janvier P, Knight DA, Bujoli B (2012) Surface modification using Phosphonic acids and esters. Chem Rev 112:3777–3807.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2004212 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ang KL, Li D, Nikoloski AN (2018) The effectiveness of ion exchange resins in separating uranium and thorium from rare earth elements in acidic aqueous sulfate media. Part 2. Chelating resins. Miner Eng 123:8–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Page MJ, Soldenhoff K, Ogden MD (2017) Comparative study of the application of chelating resins for rare earth recovery. Hydrometallurgy 169:275–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao Q, Xie J-F, Shao Y-T, Chen C, Han B, Xia KS, Zhou CG (2017) Ultrafast and high-capacity adsorption of Gd(III) onto inorganic phosphorous acid modified mesoporous SBA-15. Chem Eng J 313:197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2016.12.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ravi S, Lee Y, Yu K et al (2017) Benzene triamido-tetraphosphonic acid immobilized on mesoporous silica for adsorption of Nd 3 + ions in aqueous solution microporous and mesoporous materials benzene triamido-tetraphosphonic acid immobilized on mesoporous silica for adsorption of Nd 3 þ i. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 258:62–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dupont D, Luyten J, Bloemen M, Verbiest T, Binnemans K (2014) Acid-stable magnetic core-shell nanoparticles for the separation of rare earths. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:15222–15229.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502546c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dupont D, Brullot W, Bloemen M, Verbiest T, Binnemans K (2014) Selective uptake of rare earths from aqueous solutions by EDTA-functionalized magnetic and nonmagnetic nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:4980–4988.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am406027y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee Y-R, Yu K, Ravi S, Ahn W-S (2018) Selective adsorption of rare earth elements over functionalized Cr-MIL-101. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:23918–23927.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b07130 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pylypchuk IV, Kołodyńska D, Gorbyk PP (2018) Gd(III) adsorption on the DTPA-functionalized chitosan/magnetite nanocomposites. Sep Sci Technol 53:1006–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2017.1330830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quinn JE, Soldenhoff KH, Stevens GW (2017) Solvent extraction of rare earth elements using a bifunctional ionic liquid. Part 2: separation of rare earth elements. Hydrometallurgy 169:621–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao Q, Zhang Z, Li Y, bian X, Liao W (2018) Solvent extraction and separation of rare earths from chloride media using α-aminophosphonic acid extractant HEHAMP. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 36:136–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2018.1431079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Janicki R, Galezowska J, Mondry A (2017) Stoichiometry of lanthanide(iii) complexes with tripodal aminophosphonic ligands - a new solution to an old problem. Inorg Chem Front 4:1200–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7QI00191F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Galezowska J, Gumienna-kontecka E (2012) Phosphonates , their complexes and bio-applications : a spectrum of surprising diversity. Coord Chem Rev 256:105–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Namdeo M (2018) Magnetite nanoparticles as effective adsorbent for water purification-a review. Adv Recycl Waste Manag 2:135.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2475-7675.1000135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohammed L, Gomaa HG, Ragab D, Zhu J (2017) Magnetic nanoparticles for environmental and biomedical applications: a review. Particuology 30:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2016.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bagheri S, Julkapli NM (2016) Modified iron oxide nanomaterials: functionalization and application. J Magn Magn Mater 416:117–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warner CL, Addleman RS, Cinson AD et al (2010) High-performance, superparamagnetic, nanoparticle-based heavy metal sorbents for removal of contaminants from natural waters. ChemSusChem 3:749–757.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201000027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Massart R (1981) Preparation of aqueous magnetic liquids in alkaline and acidic media. IEEE Trans Magn 17:1247–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1981.1061188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rudzinski W, Plazinski W (2008) Kinetics of solute adsorption at solid/solution interfaces: on the special features of the initial adsorption kinetics. Langmuir 24:6738–6744.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la800743a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moedritzer K, Irani RR (1966) The direct synthesis of α-Aminomethylphosphonic acids. Mannich-type reactions with Orthophosphorous acid. J Org Chem 31:1603–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01343a067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kyeong S, Jeong C, Kang H, Cho HJ, Park SJ, Yang JK, Kim S, Kim HM, Jun BH, Lee YS (2015) Double-layer magnetic nanoparticle-embedded silica particles for efficient bio-separation. PLoS One 10:e0143727.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143727 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stober W, Fink A (1968) Controlled growth of monodispersed silica spheres in the Micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26:62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sato-Berrú R, Saniger JM, Flores-Flores J, Sanchez-Espíndola M (2013) Simple method for the controlled growth of SiO 2 spheres. J Mater Sci Eng A 3:237–242.  https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6213/2013.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yee C, Kataby G, Ulman A, Prozorov T, White H, King A, Rafailovich M, Sokolov J, Gedanken A (1999) Self-assembled monolayers of Alkanesulfonic and -phosphonic acids on amorphous Iron oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 15:7111–7115.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la990663y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Particles NO, Liang X, Shi H, et al (2011) Dispersibility Shape and Magnetic Properties of 2011:1644–1653.  https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2011.211219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li P, Fan QH, Pan DQ, Liu SP, Wu WS (2011) Effects of pH, ionic strength, temperature, and humic acid on Eu(III) sorption onto iron oxides. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289:757–764.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1153-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ramasamy DL, Repo E, Srivastava V, Sillanpää M (2017) Chemically immobilized and physically adsorbed PAN/acetylacetone modified mesoporous silica for the recovery of rare earth elements from the waste water-comparative and optimization study. Water Res 114:e3–e27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kosmulski M (2009) pH-dependent surface charging and points of zero charge. IV. Update and new approach. J Colloid Interface Sci 337:439–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.04.072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vermaak V, Krieg HM, De Beer L, Van der Westhuizen D (2018) Mechanistic study of hafnium and zirconium extraction with organophosphorus extractants. Solvent Extr Ion Exch 36:150–161.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2018.1431078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Abreu RD, Morais CA (2014) Study on separation of heavy rare earth elements by solvent extraction with organophosphorus acids and amine reagents. Miner Eng 61:82–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2014.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carvalho RS, Daniel-da-Silva AL, Trindade T (2016) Uptake of europium(III) from water using magnetite nanoparticles. Part Part Syst Charact 33:150–157.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201500170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang S, Zong P, Ren X, Wang Q, Wang X (2012) Rapid and highly efficient Preconcentration of Eu(III) by Core–Shell structured Fe3O4@humic acid magnetic nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:6891–6900.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am3020372 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shariati S, Yamini Y, Faraji M, Saleh A (2009) On-line solid phase extraction coupled to ICP-OES for simultaneous preconcentration and determination of some transition elements. Microchim Acta 165:65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-008-0099-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liang P, Liu Y, Guo L (2005) Determination of trace rare earth elements by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry after preconcentration with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc 60:125–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2004.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liang P, Fa W (2005) Determination of La, Eu and Yb in water samples by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry after solid phase extraction of their 1-Phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoylpyrazol-5-one complexes on silica gel column. Microchim Acta 150:15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-005-0340-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Momen A, Dietz ML (2019) Author’s accepted manuscript aqueous solution. Talanta 197:612–621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.01.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pasinli T, Eroǧlu AE, Shahwan T (2005) Preconcentration and atomic spectrometric determination of rare earth elements (REEs) in natural water samples by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 547:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.04.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rahmi D, Zhu Y, Fujimori E et al (2007) Multielement determination of trace metals in seawater by ICP-MS with aid of down-sized chelating resin-packed minicolumn for preconcentration. Talanta 72:600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.11.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hennebrüder K, Wennrich R, Mattusch J, Stärk HJ, Engewald W (2004) Determination of gadolinium in river water by SPE preconcentration and ICP-MS. Talanta 63:309–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2003.10.053 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kayasth S, Swain K (2004) Determination of rare-earth elements in Periyar River water (Kerala, India) and seawater (Mumbai, India) using neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 262:191–194.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JRNC.0000040873.09178.3e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Waqar F, Jan S, Mohammad B, Hakim M, Alam S, Yawar W (2009) Preconcentration of rare earth elements in seawater with chelating resin having fluorinated β-diketone immobilized on styrene divinyl benzene for their determination by ICP-OES. J Chin Chem Soc 56:335–340.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.200900049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Minowa H, Takeda M, Ebihara M (2007) Sequential determination of ultra-trace highly siderophile elements and rare earth elements by radiochemical neutron activation analysis: application to pallasite meteorites. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 272:321–325.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-007-0523-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rajendran J, Balasubramanian G, Thampi PK (2008) Determination of rare earth elements in Indian coastal monazite by ICP-AES and ICP-MS analysis and their geochemical significance. Curr Sci 94:1296–1302Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bulletin GS Reference Samples in Geology And GeochemistryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liudmyla Kostenko
    • 1
  • Natalia Kobylinska
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sergey Khainakov
    • 2
  • Santiago Garcia Granda
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Analytical ChemistryTaras Shevchenko National University of KyivKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Department of Physical and Analytical ChemistryUniversity of OviedoOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations